30°

HowStuffWorks: How Video Game Systems Work

HSW: "Video games have been around since the early 1970s. The first commercial arcade video game, Computer Space by Nutting Associates, was introduced in 1971. In 1972, Atari introduced Pong to the arcades. An interesting item to note is that Atari was formed by Nolan Bushnell, the man who developed Computer Space. He left Nutting Associates to found Atari, which then produced Pong, the first truly successful commercial arcade video game. "

Read Full Story >>
electronics.howstuffworks.com
riddlesticks5385d ago

I love howstuffworks!

For the forward thinkers among us, get the "Stuff You Should Know" podcast from howstuffworks.com

:D

Pandamobile5385d ago (Edited 5385d ago )

According to HowStuffWorks, the PS3's CPU is nearly identical to the ones found in the G5 Mac computers from 2005.

:|

They also compare its transistor count to the Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 (which is terrible by today's standards).

Pandamobile5385d ago

Nothing. Just pointing that out.

LostDjinn5385d ago (Edited 5385d ago )

What you're saying is pretty one-sided. Why are you leaving out the rest of what the piece says?
http://electronics.howstuff...

Oh, and what are current computer CPU's based on?

I'll just leave you with the last line of the article on the Cell.
"All of this amounts to unprecedented power for a piece of consumer electronics."

Pandamobile5385d ago

What hate?

"All of this amounts to unprecedented power for a piece of consumer electronics."

Unprecedented for 2005 hardware. The cell's not that great by today's standards.

LostDjinn5385d ago

I'll answer it for you.
Let's take, say, the i7.
It's based on the Conroe architecture first released in 2006. The same year the Cell released. Care to guess which is the better CPU for gaming, video or audio? Which has more cache memory? Which has more power?
Now you're correct in that today’s CPU's are ahead of the Cell in most tasks. You do however seem to be overlooking the fact that a G5 is what the Cell is based on. Not what the Cell is.

As for your "what hate?" question, "According to HowStuffWorks, the PS3's CPU is nearly identical to the ones found in the G5 Mac computers from 2005.

:|

They also compare its transistor count to the Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 965 (which is terrible by today's standards)." tell me that's not a backhand.

Pandamobile5385d ago (Edited 5385d ago )

No, the i7 is Nehalem. The Core 2 series was Conroe. Nehalem was made in 2008.

The i7 has more L2 cache too.

The only thing the Cell will beat a modern CPU at is video encoding. That's about it.

LostDjinn5384d ago

My comparison was between Cell and Conroe.
Look Panda. The Cell is being beaten now by current chips but not by as much as you let on. It's bound to happen. It's taken a long time in tech terms to get there though.
If I were to say my PS3 beats my work station (not the little Pentium D I use for surfing or my 360 for that matter, as it does) I'd be lying. I've got an i7 (that's the work station) and it blows the Cell away in almost all areas. After three years of the Cell being released, how by the grace of God could it be any other way? For what it is, the Cell is still a very nice piece of equipment. To state otherwise seems to be an attempt on you part to downplay that fact.

Pandamobile5384d ago

I know it's still pretty good.

But it's no where near as good as the PS3 fanboys play it out to be. I'm not really badmouthing it.

LostDjinn5384d ago

I'm glad we had this little back and forth.
It shows me you're no fanboy yourself.
;)
Good to have met you.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5384d ago
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel5d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow4d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1823d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie3d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
Notellin3d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

3d ago
Hereandthere3d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere3d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX4d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney2d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno4d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno3d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

3d ago
fsfsxii3d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno3d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)