340°

The Physics Revolution That Never Happened

OXCGN:

"Cast your mind back to 2003. Remember seeing those amazing E3 videos of Half-Life 2 with a Combine gunship shooting a car the player was hiding behind?

You know, where the doors would swing and the whole car would lurch on its suspension under the impact.

It was at that time that the buzz was officially started for the so-called physics revolution.

Yet here we are 6 years later, with fancy schmancy new hardware (360/PS3) and what is there to show for 6 years of tech exponentially improving in game physics?

For the most part, just a few more boxes that can fall off shelves. Yay."

gaminoz5388d ago (Edited 5388d ago )

Physics in a game really contributes to immersion...nothing worse than shooting 3D objects that act like painted pictures.

I get really excited with destructibility and when things act realistically when hit, falling down, catching fire or whatever.

It's like realistic lighting too...all these elements add to the atmosphere of exploring more 'real' environments.

REALgamer5388d ago

I love it when physics is used to make the game environments more like a real world and less like cardboard movie sets.

New stuff like Euphoria and DMM should help with this (providing the hardware they're on is up to the task, Force Unleashed felt very conservative in its use of DMM in particular). So glad we're over the initial age ragdoll physics where every enemy you shot went flying backwards flopping around like your bullets dissolved their bones or something (still remember if you died in Spiderman 2 it would bounce around like your arms and legs were dislocated).

I'm interested to find a copy of 'Trespasser' to see the physics in it. It may have been massively flawed but a first is a first after all. Can't always win the first time around.

mal_tez925388d ago

Half Life 2 did very well, but games like Crysis are suberb.

The best physics I have ever seen is when you shoot a gas canister in Killzone 2. Gas shoots out of the bullethole sending the canister flying around the room in a very realistic way.

socomnick5388d ago

I'm very saddened that physics have taken a backseat to graphics. Games like killzone 2 look pretty but have crappy physics, cod4 plays and looks really good but has 0 physics not even ragdolls it has death animations. The most impressive console game this gen is hands down Red Faction guerilla the destruction system in that game is completely physics based, metal bends from weight , concrete caves in everything reacts how you would expect it to.

FamilyGuy5388d ago

I don't think there is anything wrong with the physics is recent games. They don't seem to be trailing to me.

Ravage275388d ago (Edited 5388d ago )

heh that's exactly what i thought. My jaw literally dropped when i 1st saw it.

Over time, I actually mastered the art of manipulating the canisters. It never fails to bring a smile to my face everytime i see a canister fly towards an enemy and explode in his face :)

imo,RE5 is the classic example of a game with horrible physics that really destroys immersion.

crillyconlig5388d ago

killzone has some fantastic physics, like if you set a genade off the particles blow about in the wind, drop ships engines suck in particles/grande smoke and eject it, wind affects the direct of your grenades, death animations reacting with the environments and the gas canister explosions are pure joy

pixelsword5388d ago

Killzone has some of the best physics out today; he would know that if he actually played the game.

ape0075388d ago

engine is really something amazing,it's just a blast seeing body falling,slammed,bailing out of car in gta4,act different each time,look amazing,euphoria has really stepped up the physics in gaming creating some amazing\unique game moments

take a look again if you forgot or sold the game,enjoy :)

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

socomnick5387d ago

You guys just described graphical effects not physics. Killzone 2 feature for the most part static enviroments that did not react at all to gunfire or explosions you might have 1 or 2 beams in a level that broke apart but that was it. The Death animations were not physics powered they just reacted to gunfire. The grenades are a good indicator of how good the physics were, you throw a grenade and it travels the same distance and did not react tot he surface it hit. I'm sorry guys but kz 2 had horrible physics as do most games this gen, its sad but it did. Hell even battlefield bad company has bad physics that entire destruction is smoke and mirrors nothing is physics based that destruction is all scripted , segments of the buildings are scripted to blow up.

rockleex5387d ago (Edited 5387d ago )

Bullshiat.

Your Killzone 2 grenade comment proves your ignorance. Anyone who has played Killzone 2 knows how realistic your grenade reacts to the environment when it is thrown. Don't even get me started on the other physics aspects of Killzone 2. Hell, there are tons of GIFs and videos that display its physics. Its right there for everyone to see.

Killzone 2's physics are miles ahead of Halo 3 or COD. Stop assuming its the same as other FPS simply because you have not played it.

You're just making an even bigger fool of yourself with every BS comment you spit out.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5387d ago
Immortal Kaim5388d ago

Great article. I think we have reached a point where strictly graphical improvements will become less and less apparent, but physics are still trailing behind.

Perhaps next gen we will see a huge leap in physics calculations?

JL5388d ago

I agree with that to an extent. There are a few games here and there that show off some great physics. However, you're right that seemingly everything has taken a backseat to graphics these days. And I'm not sure how much of a leap graphics can take anymore, at least anytime soon. Sure it can get better, but any huge increase just won't happen anytime soon. Instead, they do need to take this time to start improving on other elements like physics, and start concentrating and making games be centered around gameplay as well.

DarkArcani5388d ago

Is an example of a good physics based game in this gen.

Godem5388d ago

Can't really read the article as the internet is too slow to load on my phone.... but, I really like that Nvidia added PhysX into their drivers etc to make the PC market a bit happier.

Pandamobile5388d ago

PhysX is pretty cool to play around with. In Mirror's Edge for example, you get nice, realistic cloth physics, a lot of glass particles when windows shatter and some other realistic elements like rubber and debris in the wind. I think it was a pretty cool step in the right direction.

I also enjoy the PhysX mod for UT3 where maps are modded to add things like hail (probably one of the coolest things I've seen in a video game - to use the Shock Rifle only to have the thousands of hail pellets cyclone around the shock beam.

I imagine computing power will have advanced enough in the next 8 or so years so that we can have semi-realistic fluid dynamics.

REALgamer5388d ago

Nvidia owns PhysX so it currently is only available on their cards. It won't be able to reach mass-market until it is available for ATi cards as well, so developers aren't going to take it seriously until the vast majority of players have it available.

I'm hoping Havok will bridge the gap, as the article said they're coding their new engines in OpenCL which all current graphics cards can use (even the next Apple OSX: Snow Leopard supports it!).

PhysX needs to go OpenCL too or it will always be just a 'bonus feature' like in Mirror's Edge and UT3 for only Nvidia owners.

My PC has ATi cards that have OpenCL so I'm waiting on Havok to hurry up with their stuff so we can all benefit.

XboxOZ3605388d ago

Some great physics were in BLACk on the 1st-gen xbox just before the release of the 360.

ANyone that has played will understand the huge amount on environmental interaction and damage and the physics around that from the game.

Plus it was a great game to play.

REALgamer5388d ago

I think it came out right around the launch of the 360, so I missed it.

I may be mistaken, but I thought I heard last year there was a sequel in production. WOuld be great with total destruction in it.

gaminoz5388d ago

@ Realgamer

That sequel was hinted at but has since been canned I believe. A shame...

Syronicus5388d ago

BLACK has got to be one of my all time favorite games of last gen and even as it sits, it is currently better than some of these current gen games. It is not only a decent looking game but it is fun as heck to just blow crap up and see how your environment reacts to your devastation. Shooting a guy on a bridge only to see him tumble over side and grab on the ledge then slowly let go and fall to their death is incredible. The game is just amazing.

andron5388d ago

Can't remember where I read it, but I don't think it's canned. Or so I hope...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5388d ago
Show all comments (37)
130°

Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Video games are no longer just a simple past time. Today's games are evolving into true works of art. Offering intriguing narratives, cinematic setpieces, and profound messages, games can entertain us for hundreds of hours.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
Chard4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

I never got around to mass effect - I’m skeptical that it would hold up if I were to try it now

Furesis4d ago

I would say it does. The combat is a bit shit for todays standards but everything else is great.

anast4d ago

It's worth a play through today.

gold_drake4d ago

the first one is abit the odd one out but after u finished it, believe it it gets tremendously better and better

70°

Review: Passion and tragedy collide in Jordan Mechner’s book Replay - Entertainium

The mind behind Prince of Persia shares his family’s life story as well as his own as a videogame developer in an emotional and very personal book.

Read Full Story >>
entertainium.co
230°

All the Essential Video Games Everyone Needs To Play At Least Once

Given the medium's wild diversity, this primer of the essential video games everyone should try is a good place to start.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein47d ago

.... from the 2000s (mostly).

shinoff218347d ago

I can't fk with this list. They missed on alot of games probably before the writers times. Also I know people loved some portal but I was never a fan.

Cacabunga47d ago

Tomb Raider 1
Driver 1
Abe’s Odyssey
FF6
King of Fighters 94
Mortal Kombat OG
LINK 2 the past
Street Fighter 2
Resident Evil 1

Inverno47d ago

Infinite but not the first two games? Witcher 3 but not the first two games?? GTA V but not literally any of the games before it??? Portal 2 but not the first? Also if you're going to play Shadow of The Colossus play the remaster and not the remake. Can't say I disagree with the list but my man it's all over the place.

Name Last Name47d ago

I mean some sequels are objectively better and you don’t need to play the whole series.

Inverno47d ago

But most of these games have a story to follow, sure you can catch up with a YouTube vid but where's the fun in that?

LucasRuinedChildhood47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

A list like this isn't telling you not to play the previous games if you want to. It's just giving you legendary games to play.

But tbh, you don't always have to force yourself to play every entry in a franchise to get to the better ones.

- The vast majority of Witcher 3 players never played the first 2 and had a great time. The first 2 games aren't in the same league.
- The GTA games are self-contained with the odd fun reference. You can easily jump into any of them.
- The Shadow Of The Colossus remake looks and controls better than the original (plus it has a 60fps option while the remaster is just 30fps). New players will enjoy it more.
- Portal 2 is a lot better than Portal 1 and takes the concept much further gameplay-wise. Storywise, Portal 1 is fairly light too. Not that you shouldn't play it but realistically ... you'd love Portal 2 whether you play it or not (at lot of Portal 2 players have never played 1).

Bioshock 1 is the only one I agree with you on simply because it's one the best games of all time and arguably better than Infinite. No other setting like Rapture.

Looking at the list, I'd recommend playing Uncharted 1 before 2 but no doubt, 2 is the legendary one you have to play.

Inverno47d ago

I get it, but that's just my opinion on his opinion. I just think that before you play a sequel you should still play what came before it. Maybe it's just me but i find it fascinating playing through the first game in a series and seeing how it has evolved through its sequels. Like I said I don't disagree with the list, other than SoTC which I strongly believe the remaster of the original should be played above the remake.

AuraAbjure47d ago

Awesome list! Hot take on Fear (and it's hard af expansion Persaus Mandate!) Bioshock Infinite is stellar, so is the Witcher 3 and you nailed it by having Ocarina of Time. So many fantastic games! Gotta play 'em all! Next one on my list is Prey after I beat Dead Space 2 and Splinter Cell Conviction.

Show all comments (11)