From Nothing But Shooters: "In regards to subsequent titles after MW2, it appears that Treyarch's next stab at the franchise may center on the Vietnam War with possible espionage missions based on The Cold War era, and I have previously suggested that Future Warfare would be received well, should it be the decided direction when the series inevitably shifts gears again.
But what about the Civil War? Would this be a viable course for the franchise at some point in the future?"
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.
Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.
Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?
I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.
Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.
MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.
MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.
That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.
I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.
cause god knows everyone wants to play a game where every gun, rifles and pistols, only fires one shot and then a 3 minute reload...
Why not?
CoD is one of the best war franchises out there and so heading to the Civil War would be cool.
On a sarcastic side note, once they're done with that one, they should out to the gladiator era :D Where I may throw you a rock and you hit me with a stick, along with some spears fighting with the addition of swords and the galloping horses...
and mean huge tigers!
Oh! Oh! Cavemen versus beasts like sabertooths! Build a raft and sail into the ocean, and get swallowed up by the Meg!!
Ok, I'll shut up now :)
Well the standard Union army rifle fired 4 shots per minute so that would not work out too well.
Spanish American war could work but the most efficient gun would be something along the lines of CODWAW's Springfield rifle.
WWI would be the best choice since there were guns like the Thompson and Arisaka around back then so WWI is possible. Not to mention the trench warfare from WWI is badass.
The Korean war could work becuase the tech is almost the same as WWII and it wouldnt be a hard change for Treyarch
i knew they would be thinking of doing a civil war game i think its stupid what reloading a musket takes 1 min or more to reload not cool thumbs down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The best possible solution would be COD: Vietnamese Warfare