570°

There is no Zelda timeline, stop trying

Destructoid: "For years people have been trying to piece together a time line for The Legend of Zelda. With stories this epic there has to be an overarching time line, right? They can't just be plopping us down in a random world, with a random Link every time. A few months ago YouTube user ocarinahero10 tried to piece together a theory on the time line of Zelda. He used the (evidently) widely accepted "split time line" theory in which there are two Zelda time lines that are created in Ocarina of Time. One of these time lines leads to the Wind Waker games and the other leads to the NES games."

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
Smacktard5420d ago

I smell delicious Nintentears. People who actually believed in a timeline were morans anyways.

RememberThe3575420d ago (Edited 5420d ago )

People thought a shadow was Micheal Jackson's ghost. People will believe anything.

At least he tied though.

tmt3455419d ago

If you look under that "shadow" it also has a shadow, why would a shadow have a shadow? He's obviously got unfinished business! OOOOOooooOO

FamilyGuy5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

Who's been trying to form a time-line?
Personally, I've always seen new Zelda titles as re-imaginings
They're all basically the same game.

LMAO@ "morans" and the calling of anyone a moran.
I can't stop laughing!!111!1!

Mahr5419d ago

""morans"

Indeed."

Maybe he was saying that all the people who believed in the timeline were from the city in Kansas?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

ChickeyCantor5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

Even then, while the story doesn't really add up its still strange how
Minish cap explains why link is wearing the hat, it explains why there are so many stuff in pots and between grass fields.
OOT explains the origin of the 7 sages.
How Windwaker indicates to be the events after OOT(where the hero never returned, they even refer to him as the hero of time)

So i wonder if the one who responded just said that because its what he thought. Cause Miyamoto even stated that TP is about 100 years after OOT.

This guy is lying or miyamoto isn't telling the truth xD.

edit:
There is also a contradiction in the letter though...
He states that every game represents a new link, and thats not true.
OOT>MM
OA>OS
WW>PH
LTTP>LA

Montreafart5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

Thats why every Zelda feels like a remake of the old.

They twist a little bit here, a little bit in the fighting there. But overall, the picture is the same.

The story is pretty bland for an RPG (but then the Zelda fans are like "but but but ZELDA IS NOT AN RPG, YOU morAn".

Funny how Zelda is not an RPG when it comes to the storyline but it always get nominated and wins the RPG award. And conveniently, Zelda is an RPG then.

Anyway, every Zelda is the same. Thats why trying to piece the Zelda's together, doesnt work. And no matter how hard people try, the end results feels FORCED and artificial but not natural. Because the games twisted together, simply dont make any sense. They are the same.

The changes are miniscule, like Maddens, Forzas, NFLs and FIFAs. Every Zelda features the same, village boy grows up into hero and saves Zelda and Hyrule from evil boss Ganon. And somewhere in between, there is the mastersword, the ice/ water dungeon, the grappling hook and the Tri force.

lol

People should just accept the fact that Nintendo isnt good at telling stories. And thats why they never try. Not even in a game like Zelda. Even the most generic and average Square Enix RPG has a more complicated and better story then this.

The fact is that if you grew up with "A Link to the past" then you played the best and most complete Zelda ever. That game was the first of the line up that followed after it with all the elements mentioned above. Every other Zelda since that game, is a copy/ remake of it.

Every Zelda is the same. Thats why I stopped playing it after I realised this many many years ago.

EDIT: to the people who are still in disbelief and are claiming that certain games have connections:

You are wrong. Let me explain you how the corporate world works. 15 Nintendo folks gather together on a Monday morning after weekend and they are like: "hey guys, last Zelda was a success. Lets make a new one. Anyone got any ideas?"

And they just start brainstorming for several weeks and come up with different weird things. And then one day:

Nintendo dude A: "hey, it just strikes me as odd that Link always wears that hat. Why dont we change his outfit?"

Nintendo dude B: "Are you nuts? Thats his trademark clothing"
Nintendo dude A: "Oh... but why though?"
Nintendo dude B: "It just is! Dont question my authority!"
Headboss: "hmmm, interesting. Why dont we make the next game about Links cap and explain why Link wears that cap. Sounds like a good DS game to me!"

Everyone: "yea!"

And that is how these connections are formed. There is no timeline, just Nintendo employees coming up with funny shiat. But meanwhile you folks are wasting your youth and time, trying to "uncover" the hidden timeline hidden inside Nintendos top secret "fault".

lol! Yea righhhttt *rolls eyes*

N4g_null5419d ago

I really hate when group up fans impose their own ideas on creators of their favorite things. This is getting out of hand this gen. Zelda doesn't have a time line in the same manner that mario bro does have a time line. These are merely game design devices.

Zelda and link are basically a metaphor at best. In a similar way they are like Final fantasy which is always a new fantasy maybe linked in some odd manner yet new.

If the "story" needs to be there then it would make sense for each game to be a parallel universe that is only separated slightly. Which means there are similarities and some random continuance.

Go back a tell me the frist zelda was about the story... seriously.

I don't know if I would call them morans LOL but some people are using their creative talents in the wrong manner. This is one case of it. Stop trying to build on top some one else's work! If that is not what you are trying to do then why would you try to impose a time line on to nintendo when that isn't really the reason why we play these games?

Some thing tells me the zelda fans on the internet are loosing or forgetting or wanting this game to be some thing is was never meant to be. This seems to be more prevalent now but maybe I'm wrong.

I hope the next link is a girl LOL. And zelda is her sister Oh I wasn't suppose to say that or was I!

evrfighter5419d ago

wow you guys are acting like a bunch of morans =\

edgeofblade5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

There are SEVERAL split timelines... and most of them are only one game deep. Only a handful of games can be considered to have a sequel. Ocarina and Majora. LOZ and Adventure. And those two Capcom GB versions are possibly concurrent.

Why does this have to fit? Can't a game just have great gameplay and infinite re-playability? This is the kind of f*ckery that I'm talking about when I say plot diminishes gameplay.

And Zelda is NOT an RPG... It's an adventure game. Just because there are people with pointy ears doesn't make it an RPG any more than it makes it Star Trek!

5419d ago
njr5419d ago

So this is what people do on their spare time away from console wars...

Mr.Mister5419d ago

well lets the one that finish zelda speak i finish zelda and there is a time line.
I will take consideration until miyamoto say so. until then sorry i dont take there word for.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 5419d ago
ahall88nhl5420d ago

lol
he sounds so offended
now that's a true nerd

is it so hard to believe that all the Zelda games are just individual stories? I thought it was pretty clear while I was playing them

Timesplitter145419d ago

yeah this guy sounds butthurt over nothing

qface645420d ago

well its obvious some are connected together so a time line does exist just not in the way most people think

only the certain games that are connected have a time line

TruthbeTold5420d ago

the same base story being told over and over. Is it that much of a disaster for fandom if it is all not "linked"? Just let it go and enjoy the series for what it is, a Legend, told over and over with details changing here and there each time it is retold. I mean wow... The guy who made that video was ANGRY. A petition? Just let it go...

CobraKai5419d ago (Edited 5419d ago )

The base story is exactly the same (although i never played the handheld versions) it's the approach and execution that changes. It's almost like each iteration is a remake or retelling in some way. You can always count on Ganon's search for the Triforce, zelda getting kidnapped, and Link following inadvertantly bringing the Triforce together. Big exception being Majora's Mask which is my favorite cuz it involved no triforce.

Quickstrike5419d ago

A few days ago a friend of mine asked me what's the most complex story in a game series. I said the MGS series and he said I was wrong and said it was the Legend of Zelda series. I said "what's complicated about it? You play as Link and you save Zelda." He then said "Try to place each game in its correct time line." I then said "There's no timeline, it's just random worlds each game." It went back and forth for a while.

Montreafart5419d ago

MGS was the correct answer. Your friend is just a sour Nintendoboy loser.

Zelda has no story. Actually, the potentional for story is great. Young village dork rises to become hero blah blah.

But the way the game ends up being, is always so bland lol.

It doesnt help when the games are always made using last gen technology.

- no voice acting on ANY character
- script and character lines resemble a C movie
- movie experience like MGS or Uncharted? Forget about it
- always the same like the previous games
- sound resembles MIDI sounds era. No soundtrack or composed music at all.

All this makes for a pretty bland RPG production. I swear if the name "Zelda" or "Nintendo" wasnt pasted on top of it, it wouldnt draw any attention at all. People would pass it off as a generic last gen RPG.

Show all comments (49)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

70°

A Matter Of Trust: What The Game Industry Should Do To Win Gamers Back

Skewed and Reviewed have written an Opinion Piece covering issues in the gaming industry, how current issues were issues years ago, and what can be done to help restore consumer trust.

anast4d ago

Nothing. It's up to the gamers to stop consuming content from companies that they don't agree with.

Garethvk3d ago

How do you know if you agree with it or not unless you play it? Which without conventions forces gamers to rely on trailers. Perhaps Demos should be made more frequently. But companies need to do better as well.

anast3d ago

Wait until release. Watch Gameplay. Exercise patience.

Garethvk3d ago

But is that not what they have now? Tons of gameplay or are you talking about watching actual gamers play it versus the trailers and streams? The big issue is that some companies pay streamers and influencers and they create content but for me; that is hardly a fair, unbiased, and factual look at a game.

1nsomniac3d ago

Get rid of the suits in the industry and job done!!

Garethvk3d ago

They usually are attached to the money sadly. It would be nice to have gamers in charge but you have so much money invested that business people are needed. Hence the issue; you need people who know business but are also gamers who know have an eye to the community. It sounds simple in theory that if you give gamers quality games that they want to play; money will be made. But that is not always so.

60°

From The Last of Us to Baldur's Gate 3: The success of the Game Music Festival

Marie Dealessandri speaks to Borislav Slavov and Gustavo Santaolalla about “the new golden age of games music”.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz