150°

Is Call of Duty's Perk System Broken?

Keith @ gamingvice.net writes:

"I am not sure how I can effectively say the point I am trying to get across with this question. I have played my fair share of the past two Call of Duty games and both are done quite well. The biggest addition in COD4 as we all know was the ability to create custom classes, but I feel the "Perk System" is a bit unbalanced, and at times I wonder why the system is even in place."

Read Full Story >>
gamingvice.net
Whiskers5441d ago

Call Of Duty is broken,correct.

ape0075441d ago

cod is broken?

if cod is broken what else is not?

poopface15440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

it isnt broken. I have migrated from using perks that help me kill durring death like martyrdom and stuff like taht to ones that help you kill because I dont die much anymore. To me, anyone who complains about unbalance is most likely piss poor at the game. I play alot of CS source so cod 4 is like a joke to me. It is really easy to win a match all by yourself in cod4, you dont need to even have a decent team if your good enough.

Ive never had any problem with the perk system because everyone has the same choices and I believe thing like martyrdom and laststand are totaly a waste of a perk when you are fighting me, cause that crap wont work 99% of the time.

I dont see how it can be unbalanced if we all get the same options, unless you are bad at the game. I dont even have the game anymore and I can still go 25-5 easily when I play it at my friends, so I really wouuldnt notice anyways.

3 perks Ive used since DEC 2007:
1) stopping power
2) bandoleer(xtra ammo)
3) steady aim

EDIT__ BELOW --- hell yeah GRUNTY. I like your style. Except I always use the m4 with a red dot scope. Those are the best 3 perks in the game tho for someone who doesnt die alot.

XxSpiiKeZxX5440d ago

I have to say Juggernaut is HORRIBLE and only PU$$YZ use it
the perk system is grea but at times it feels like somene is overpowering u and other times u feel like the king

ugly15441d ago

Uncharcrack 2 is better than COD

You Already Know5441d ago

the two games can't be compared with one another...

1st person shooter vs action/adventure

Tachyon_Nova5441d ago

You Already Know, you are correct in saying that Uncharted 2 and COD can't be compared, but not because they are different genres. The reason they can't be compared is because Uncharted 2 isn't out yet. There is no reason that you can't compare games from different genres in terms of quality. For example, Killzone 2 is unquestionably a better game than Cricket 2006. inFamous is undoubtedly a better game than Far Cry 2.

outlawlife5441d ago

this guys logic is extremely failed

the only weapon power/health mods available are available at the beginning of the game, anything else that may give you an advantage is later available but replaces one of these

the perks system is perfectly balanced, cod4 couldn't be anymore noob friendly, this guys is just talking out his backside

he says nobody uses anything but stopping power and juggernaut, maybe he doesn't but a whole lot of people have come up with different combinations and have been extremely successful

in my opinion this guy just isnt good at call of duty so he is blaming the perks

Tachyon_Nova5441d ago

I'd say you are right there, but I do agree with him. I found, especially in COD 5 that three things lessened the fun i had playing the game.

1: Dogs - on HC, it takes 1 bullet to kill a human, and at least 2 to kill a dog. wtf? And no, I'm not a noob who gets constantly owned by them, but i just think that it lowered the hardcoreness of hardcore.

2: Perks - didn't really overpower or give an unfair balance, realistically its not too hard to get to level 65 in under two days. However, they just took too much away from the shooting aspect of the game, which really should be what the game, being a shooter should be about afterall.

3: A small problem, but still pretty dumb. They may have fixed this since I played it, but I'm not sure. Why, when you get to level 65, and choose to go back to level 1 do you loose your awards, and only get an extra place for a kit.
Other than these things, pretty good game, although I shall be considering not purchasing Modern Warfare 2 given the quality of the other games coming out this year.

Boody-Bandit5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

Needs a lot of work from their site structure to their articles. This is the 3rd article I have read from their site and so far I am unimpressed.

I agree with outlawlife.
This sounds more like whining from someone that probably struggles with the game online then a legitimate gripe. The only disadvantage I found is when you are just starting out or right after you prestige. COD4 and WAW might not be perfectly balanced but the perks, when used correctly, do balance out nicely for the most part.

The only perk I'm not crazy about is the grenade perk but they are only a problem on congested maps like the wetworks in COD4. Common sense and a little strategy (map knowledge) goes a long way with these two titles.

Personally I can't wait for Modern Warfare 2 and I hope the perk system stays intact. Some tweaks are always welcome but I hope they don't change it too drastically, if at all.

primordialmeme5441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

If it's just new maps and a couple new perks thrown in I won't be impressed with MW2. But that's what I'm expecting, from the publisher that gave us the Tony Hawk and Guitar Hero franchises.

IdleLeeSiuLung5441d ago

This is Infinity Ward we are talking about. They had 2 years to create this game so I'm almost certain it is going to be good and include a host of new things.

LukaX235441d ago (Edited 5441d ago )

If the system were broken, then COD4 it wouldn't have been as popular as it had been when it was originally released in 07.

Show all comments (22)
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies18d ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken18d ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing6919d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker19d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing6918d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt18d ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken18d ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.

50°

Why MW 2019 is still the best looking Call of Duty to date

MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
EazyC25d ago

MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.

That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.

I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.

70°
3.0

Call of Duty Modern Warfare III (2023) Review - Jump Dash Roll

Call Of Duty is back with its yearly instalment, but is Modern Warfare 3 breaking new ground, or just a lazy cash grab? The answer may not surprise you in today's review from JDR.

Read Full Story >>
jumpdashroll.com