790°

Xbox 360 Could Save PS3 From Decimating Game Developers

Cinemablend.com writes. "You're probably already misconstrued regarding the aim of this article. But let me key you in on a very obvious fact: The video game industry would've died real fast, if the PlayStation 3 pocketed the majority of third-party developers, exclusively. That's why the Xbox 360 is the perfect savior for what could have been a disastrous "next-generation".

Marks of the video game industry know flat-out that third-party exclusivity is a surefire way to differentiate one platform from the next. Said exclusivity really reached a peak during the Xbox/Gamecube/PS2 era with games and series like The Chronicles of Riddick: Escape From Butcher Bay, Square's RPG library for the PS2, or THQ's Smackdown Vs. Raw series. But that's back when games – on a financial average – weren't reaching the $10 million mark, with the exception of Halo 2's movie-like budget of $20 million buckaroonies."

Hit for more....

Read Full Story >>
cinemablend.com
THAMMER16240d ago

This confirms some points I have been trying to make. Dev. need to make the CASH back. We need to buy the consoles to make their plan to make money back make since. If your user base is too small to support the budget of the game they are almost forced into going multi platform.

The article says Sony needs to sell 5 million consoles in the U.S. buy Nov. for publishers and developers to see a market that support the budget for the titles they are putting together. Sounds strait up to me.

AuburnTiger6240d ago

"This confirms some points I have been trying to make. Dev. need to make the CASH back."

2 words,

No Sh!t

GaMr-6240d ago

Nice Article.... Its about as obvious as saying The Xbox360 having a 1 year headstart and a lower price tag has managed to sell more consoles than the late and expensive PS3 console. This being said game developers will make more money from 13 million combined owners of both consoles or even 10 million (xbox360 alone) rather than 3 million PS3 owners. BRAVO ...BRAVO....

Who's the author of this.. Captain Obvious I suppose. By a show of votes... Who didnt know Xbox's 1 year jump and being launched in all countries first would give it a larger install base. Also that next-gen games cost way more to dev than last gen games.

I guess the obvious is not so obvious to some people. I think im going to write an article. Title it.

"When you drive your car it burns Gasoline"

weekapaugh6240d ago

At the end of the article he also talks about President Lincoln being shot and men landing on the moon.

TR0N6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

You dont realize the real truth,the real truth is that if microsoft would have never created a next-gen console neither would have sony because sony was doing super well with the ps2 so why would they want to kill their cashcow. As a matter of fact the only real reason why new generation consoles are created in the first place is because some threat like competition arises. If monopolies were legal we'd probably still have the atari 2600. Dont forget that at the end of the day video games are just a business like everything else except love and war and i could be wrong about war.

It pays to be cynical sometimes, it makes you smart.

THAMMER16240d ago

What are you talking about? I'm lost dude.

TR0N6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

My point is that this article is pointless. just goes to show that im no fanboy even though i preffer the 360

techie6240d ago

I think that what he's trying to say that if the xbox hadn't come out last generation and there weren't plans for an xbox360, Sony would have brought out the ps3 in 2010...as was planned. But they were forced to move a little quicker.

TR0N6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

Im even more cynical than that , im saying that if monopolies were legalized after the ps2 and this industry would belong to sony we would have maybe even never seen the ps3. And the same thing if it was nintendo or microsoft that "owned" the industry. ever heard? "if it aint broke dont fix it" If they are making money with this generation and everybody is happy with the games why should they make a new console unless there is competition? Get it? What do you actually think that any of the companies make new consoles because they care about us?

techie6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

How about pressure from gamers to have bigger and better. Gamers get bored pretty easily...I know the ps2 would have lasted another two years...but beyond that it would die a death as gamers would not see any progress. PC graphics also move the lead for console graphics. And not forgetting the developers. If an upmarket console can be made, and developers can make better graphics...they'll want to be creative and do that...they saw the end of the ps2 really.

Gamers, Developers creativity, I think it all counts. Of course competition makes the market move a lot faster...

TR0N6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

the ps2 was created because competition existed in the form of nintendo and sega(edited)~~~> and also pc.

somebody hit the plus sign next to my bubbles please.

in reply to the comment from kewlkat007 VVVVVdown there: sony too stuck its nose in this industry when sega "owned" it and so did sega when nintendo did and so did nintendo when whoever was before them did, thats competition for ya.

to 3.7
conserning the existance of possible threats from newcomers to the industry, that may be so but i doesnt change the fact that new consoles are created because of that threat and not because these companies actually care about us. they care about our cash not us thats why they have to make sure they make good products like xbox360 and ps3. More comments added to comment #4

techie6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

Also you have to realise (as I'm sure you do anyway) that if a market becomes stale then another company sees a possibility to enter and take control. This is the case with the ps1 that introduced 3d graphics on a console. The console market had become increasingly repetitive and wasn't moving very far and so Sony saw the possibilities of taking a market share.

Since this is the case the leading console maker has to stay ahead and move with the times. If they just lie on their laurels and their console generally doesn't move beyond 10 years of innovation, where technology is increasingly more powerful on a year by year basis...then a competitor will arise as if by default in order to take control. Therefore, a company will inevitably create a more powerful console in order to keep control of the market.

The ps3 would have been made even without competitors, as the prospect of competitors taking advantage is ever present. Of course the cycle would not be as swift as it is now, especially with eager beavers like Microsoft...

(ps. clicked on your bubbles...though to reply just edit your post again...I shall read it :)

theagony6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

ps1 and ps2 was created to compete with pc gaming, those machines were always meant to target home computer game business, nintendo or sega was never a competitor to sony.
Even there was no x360 brand out, ps3 would still come out arround this time of the ps2 life cycle, because of the developing pc gaming tech.

Blasphemy6240d ago

You guys don't know what your talking about. PS3 starting development right after PS2 had been finalized.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6240d ago
TR0N6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

To GaMr

And trust me i'm not g@y as a matter of fact im asking you this cause im so un-g@y ,change your avatar, when i want to see porn i go to nude chicks sites (i do it plenty), your avatar is distracting every time i see it , it makes me want to go back to the those sites. (smiles)

reply to 3.7
the genesis already had 3d graphics, very crappy ones but 3d non the less, so sony made them look better with the ps1 big deal, thats what next-gens are supposed to do, make graphics better.

reply to 4.1
gamers getting bored because they see technology improving elsewhere IS competition. So we are in agreement. oh by the way thanks for hitting the plus button although i just realized that i know a way to increase my bubbles myself but i wont reveal it out of respect for the admins of this place.

techie6240d ago (Edited 6240d ago )

Well indeed. But remember the reason a market goes stale is because Gamers ge bored of it and see technology improving elsewhere and not on consoles. This means the consoles no longer sell...and so the company needs to rethink and reproduce.

Consumers buy consoles...there's no competition in a market without consumers. So it's a mix of everything. But still the market would keep on moving even without competition, but just the prospect of competition.

lol not because of competition...just because of the moving rate of technology. Ok competition from the PC market would still make a console improve, but that's not console competition.

InMyOpinion6239d ago

<--- I've got the antidote if you get hypnotized.

Funky Town_TX6239d ago

competition keeps it going. Deep is right also. 4 years are it for me. I change to a new console every 4 years or less. I also change console makers. Got a 360 in 05 so in 2010 I will be looking for something new. Sorry guys but I like to move foward.

Ban Me6240d ago

I thought it was a decent article.

It didnt seem biased towards one or the other, which to be honest is something of a rarity these days!

Show all comments (74)
120°

Rocksmith+ Comes To PS And Steam In June

This looks like a great way to play.
Rocksmith+, the award winning music-learning app that teaches you guitar and piano with thousands of hit songs, is coming to PlayStation and Steam on June 6, and is available to wishlist now on both platforms.

420°

Report Claims Xbox Is Planning More Cuts Following Studio Closures

"The sudden closure of several video-game studios at Microsoft Corp.’s Xbox division was the result of a widespread cost-cutting initiative that still isn’t finished.

This week, Xbox began offering voluntary severance agreements to producers, quality assurance testers and other staff at ZeniMax, which it purchased in 2020 for $7.5 billion, according to people familiar with the company’s plans. Others across the Xbox organization have been told that more cuts are on the way.

Speaking about the closures more broadly, Booty said that the company’s studios had been spread too thin — like “peanut butter on bread” — and that leaders across the division had felt understaffed. They decided to close these studios to free up resources elsewhere, he said.

Game Pass has not seen the massive growth that Xbox boss Phil Spencer may have been hoping for."

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
just_looken13h ago

Sense it seems very few remember that human's were around before 2020 the next studio to close will be bethesda based no doubt on the history of.

Fallout 76
Elder scrolls online
elder scrolls blades mobile
fallout mobile
The vr versions of old games

Then you got starfield pissing out cash nothing to cover it.

I doubt tod's team or any sub team is making m$ cash they are no doubt on the chopping block for job cuts

If you can remember before 2020 even fallout 76 was made with over 4 studios.

purple10152m ago(Edited 49m ago)

pretty sure starfield coming to playstation 2024, nx gamer deep diving on the creation engine update in a recent blog, he seems to think, there is a lot of stuff developed to use on starfield for its Playstation release,

who will buy it though, ?? I think M$ has lost all good will now, after the Activision debacle, and now all these studios closing, people dont want to support them even if the game is half decent

Abear218m ago

Bethesda is the only studio to release anything noteworthy on Xbox. Take Bethesda out and they have nothing this Gen. Hifi Rush and Starfield are probably their two biggest hits.

-Foxtrot15h ago

"Speaking about the closures more broadly, Booty said that the company’s studios had been spread too thin — like “peanut butter on bread” — and that leaders across the division had felt understaffed. They decided to close these studios to free up resources elsewhere, he said"

So what you're saying is...you bought all these studios and you guys can't run them.

Jesus.

Inverno14h ago

Spread thin after firing over 2000 employees a few months prior. So basically they created the problem and their solution was to just fire more people. Absolute geniuses over at Xbox, of course can we even believe this to be the reason for the closures?

just_looken13h agoShowReplies(1)
Profchaos13h ago

Leaders can't run them hire more management create new roles don't shutter entire studios cause you can't figure out how to run them.

Unless the reality is this whole consolidation thing was really an excuse for IP harvesting

anast2h ago

He's lying. They are doing it for the shareholders.

Eonjay14h ago

Reports are suggesting that Game Pass will be getting a price hike soon and that Call of Duty may not be added to the day one offering. I honestly have a hard time believing this but it does beg the question why exactly did GP fail? I think the answer is that it just didn't get the growth that it anticipated. Jim was right but I wish he wasn't because at the end of the day, its gamers, devs and other front-line workers who have to absorb the blow for Spencer and team's miscalculations.

14h ago
NotoriousWhiz14h ago

And out of the ashes something even better than Xbox will be born.

Eonjay13h ago

Honestly as long as is not a situation where the industry has to contract in order focus wealth on a few people who are already trillionaires..

Barlos8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

It's already here and it was born before Xbox was even a thing. It's called PlayStation.

Tacoboto12h ago

I think 2022 killed the Series X.

2021 was a good year for Xbox though and maybe the best in a long long time, hardware and software and as a publisher. Halo Infinite launched to popularity, Forza Horizon 5 blew everyone away, Psychonauts 2 was so well received, Flight Simulator on console, Deathloop even on PS5 & PC.

But they followed that up with next to nothing. Then 2023 with Redfall, a disappointing Forza, Starfield, and 2024 leads with closures and layoffs. And some tweets reminding us Hellblade is days away.

The only disappointment with the PS5 is not enough Sony games. Xbox followed up no games with disappointing ones.

Scissorman14h ago

For all the armchair executives who were calling for Sony to release its big-budget AAA games on PS+, the same exact thing would have happened at PlayStation. Game Pass has killed Xbox. Congrats.

shinoff218314h ago

There's not many of of us clamoring for Sony to do this because most of us understand it would kill Playstation. I'm sure there's a few but I've not seen alot of it myself.

porkChop2h ago

"the same exact thing would have happened at PlayStation"

But the same thing *has* been happening at PS. They've closed, what, 3 or 4 studios so far this gen? Laid off plenty of staff, restructured studios, etc.

BehindTheRows1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

PlayStation isn’t struggling. Xbox is. That’s the difference.

Sony also didn’t buy out multiple publishers with LOTS of studios and leave them in a state of uncertainty.

So, he’s absolutely right that Sony not following Game Pass in its entirety was smart as this very thing could have happened. Name a team, like Tango, who wasn’t struggling (like Tango) that Sony closed. Every closure was because of a studio who wasn’t pulling their weight.

14h ago
Show all comments (74)
90°

The Rise of the Metro Series

A look back at 4A Games' admirably consistent post-apocalyptic shooter franchise.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
1d 4h ago