130°

Crysis 2: Why PC Gamers and Console Gamers Win

Crysis 2 could represent a revolutionary change in how multiplatform development is conducted...

ShabzS5464d ago (Edited 5464d ago )

seriously... i am super duper happy to get a chance to play their game ... thank you crytek ... this was really one of the best announcement of the week ... it was the first big one ... and it was awesome

M337ING5464d ago

And the great thing is: they're committed to making an awesome game on all 3 platforms. :)

MAR-TYR-DOM5464d ago

"The goal is to be the best looking game on PS3 [and] the best looking game on 360 in the entire market."

Making it look like the best 360 isnt hard, making it look like the best PS3 game is going to be, HOWEVER, IF**** they are developing the game bottom up for EACH INDIVIDUAL console, then it is not Impossible.

Szarky5464d ago

Don't know why you got a disagree MAR-TYR-DOM, but you're right IMO.

TheRealSpy025464d ago (Edited 5464d ago )

he has disagrees because he's a ps3 fanboy. and that statement is completely untrue in the sense that he believes ps3 games look better...which they don't.

i have every high profile game on ps3 and none of them are more impressive than the high end games on 360.

and neither look anywhere near as good as PC.

i fully expect to get disagrees but i really don't care anymore. the ppl on this site are completely biased fanboys and have no sense of reality.

calling Killzone 2 the best looking game ever made was the joke of the year.

as for the game... it would be impossible to match crysis on pc on this generation of consoles. i just hope they don't dumb down the quality on the next game for those of us who prefer FPS on PC.

Szarky5464d ago

TheRealSpy02, what about calling Uncharted the best looking game on the year? (I'm talking about consoles here)

Pandamobile5464d ago

TheRealSpy02 speaks the truth. It's been two years and the only game to have better visuals than Crysis has been it's expansion and now Crysis 2.

When my friend brought over his PS3, it was like comparing penis sizes. He was convinced that Killzone 2 had the best graphics around, so I went around and demonstrated (by looking up-close at textures, models and examining the shaders and physics) that KZ2 had nothing on Crysis' 1024 x 1024 pixel grass textures :)

This may sound fanboyish, but it's the truth. And don't complain and say "Oh, that's just a ground texture and no one looks up close at things like that in real games", because that's not true. That's what graphics are. Finite details that many people don't notice and just assume that theirs are better.

SaberEdge5464d ago

It is the truth. I have both consoles as well and I own most of the best looking games on both consoles. Most of the PS3 exclusives people talk about (like Resistance, Ratchet & Clank, LittleBigPlanet,etc.) look completely average and there are literally dozens of games on the 360 that look equally as good. Then there are games like Uncharted and Killzone 2 that really are doing some fantastic things with the PS3 hardware. But they aren't any better looking than the better-looking 360 games.

Alan Wake and Mass Effect 2 are just as technically impressive as Uncharted 2 and God of War 3. Those games all look fantastic and they all excel in their particular ways.

xwabbit5464d ago

How is he a fan boy? didnt u see all those articles about developers saying the ps3 was hard to developed for ? the 360 is like a computer, WAY Easier than the PS3

SaberEdge5464d ago

How about reading some more specific explanations by actual developers, instead of vague comments by publishing execs about maxing out a particular console.
Read this, for example: http://www.gamedaily.com/ar...

And here is what John Carmack says about the two platforms: http://www.destructoid.com/...

After all, we have heard this nonsense before about maxing out one or the other of the consoles, and it never turns out to be true. I tend to trust developers that actually go into a little more specifics about the strengths and weaknesses of each console.

caladbolg7775463d ago

I guess I'm just not all that jazzed about Crysis 2 on PC nor consoles. IMO, Crysis 1 was fairly lackluster, and because of that I just can't get interested in C2.

evrfighter5463d ago

crysis had potential. Major potential. Their track record for post launch support can be considered in no better term...Crappy

They need to work on their online modes quite a bit before they can be considered a major fps developer.

TheRealSpy025463d ago

why are 'gamers' so quick to point out a game's flawed, secondary, multiplayer whenever it actually attempts to have one. but then shower praise on games that don't even attempt it? i never understood that.

the multiplayer in crysis is very ambitious. and the lack of PCs that can handle it, combined with the heavy, already established competition made it very difficult for them to compete. but not many games go for the scope they went for. and in a lot of ways, when the lag was good, the multiplayer was a blast.

also, you're short changing the best looking game ever made cuz you had issues with the online element? seems a little shallow.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5463d ago
WildArmed5464d ago

because Crysis is an awesome franchise n every1 should be happy to be able to play it.
now only if they port Crysis warhead n Crysis over too :/

Pandamobile5464d ago

Fantastic article!

I'm glad my Crysis 2 experience on PC won't be hindered by the lack of power the current gen consoles have.

I'm sure a lot of people that follow Crytek's news could see a console version of the franchise coming after they acquired renowned console-dev company Free Radical.

Can't wait for Crysis 2 :D

Fishy Fingers5464d ago (Edited 5464d ago )

I'd say it was pretty obvious after they announced Warhead and stated that will be their last PC exclusive.

But regarding the PC, Crytek will always continue to push the platform to the limits. I just prey the new engine is optimized better.

Pandamobile5464d ago

If Crysis is boring, you're doing it wrong.

M337ING5464d ago

Yup, its all up to the player's imagination.

Crysis is only as fun as the player is creative. Of course its going to be boring if you play it like a standard, corridor-shooter.

Pandamobile5464d ago

For sure.

I loved every freaking minute of Crysis because it was so dynamic. It took me a full 24 hours of play time to beat it because I stealthed my way through the entire KPA parts.

I'd sneak out, assassinate a patrol, take his stuff, find cover, rinse and repeat and boy was it fun.

potenquatro5464d ago

They will get the most out of every platform. But I hate how pc game devs always call conslole versions "dumbed down" or "distilled" like they say in the article. For known hardware reasons, consoles won't have the same grfx. And they tend to slow down the game a little for analog stick use. But overall it's the same thing. Same missions, same everything. COD4 was literally the same on consoles and pc. W/e. I just feel like some in the pc crowd still don't give consoles their credit. I really wanted this game for console, but I guess it's going to have to be on pc with low res again for me. :(

free2game3655464d ago

The big debate is accessability and mass marketing vs focus and niche. Why can't anything seem to be made for specific markets now without people from other markets complaining about getting a watered down experience? Why should a racing simulation controls and physics be dumbed down so it plays better on a gamepad, why should a first person shooter slow down and makes the enemy movement/aggression slower so it plays better on a gamepad? When it comes down to it, there are already games that fit that gamepad niche. Today there are almost no PC centric, mouse and keyboard, and technologically innovative first person shooters because of the large outcry for everything to be on each platform. There's a place and a market for everything, if you want a dual analog 8-10 button FPS you have killzone 2, new halo games, resistance, gears of war, uncharted, ect. PC games don't have anything designed for their gameplay standard and hardware when it comes to shooters, that whole market somehow was completely abandoned in an almost instant period.

Tehdaza5464d ago (Edited 5464d ago )

Same with the aim-assist you get in a lot of console shooters.

Some of my friends don't understand how you can play an FPS with a mouse and keyboard.

I tell them the next time they're trying to aim at a 3px target that's a mile away and that little mini-aimbot kicks in and locks on to the body of that enemy to come back and tell me that needing AI assistance to kill an enemy is superior to my twitch reflexes and accuracy to within on freaking pixel.

Look at your monitor. Look at it REEEEEALLY closely. See that little square? We can hit that with a gun. Can you?

Show all comments (50)
80°

Can You Run Crysis In VR? You Can, Thanks To A New Mod

A Crysis VR mod is now available for download, allowing users to experience the first entry in the series in VR

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Rynxie410d ago (Edited 410d ago )

No one cares. The whole can it run Crysis is old, dead and stupid. It's also irrelevant, considering only less than one percent of pc owners, own a high-end PC. Second, I believe Crysis wasn't even optimized properly.

TheColbertinator410d ago

Crysis blew my mind back then and still kinda does.

bunt-custardly410d ago

Let's hope the modders can get the other Crysis games working in VR as they use the same Cryengine.

220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan482d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya482d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled482d ago (Edited 482d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney482d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled482d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist481d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin482d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled482d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE482d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi482d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE482d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
80°

Can It Run Crysis? The Only Steam Deck Question That Matters

Digital Foundry: "When Alex Battaglia got his hands on a Steam Deck, this was inevitable, right? So can the Steam Deck really run Crysis? And if so, what type of optimised settings produce the best performance? What's the best balance of features and battery life... and what about 60fps?"

Read Full Story >>
digitalfoundry.net