Red Faction: Guerrilla - Ps3 Vs 360 demo screenshots

Eurogamer Portugal published some exclusive screenshots comparing the two versions from the Red Faction: Guerrilla demo. Check them out.

[Mandaspt]

Xbox 360 version more darker.

[PirateThom]

Yep, that's about as far as it goes.

Adjust the contrast to suit.

[N4Sony]

With that said, first two comments are best. Darkness about the only MAJOR issue here, just adjust. PS3 demo functioned perfectly. Loved it.

[SullyDrake]

It isn't grotesquely dark, and is crisper; the 360 version appears to have a blur filter on it.

[squidyj]

The only difference i saw was that the shadows on the 360 version have some fuzz on them and the ps3 again struggles with transparency effects forcing downrendering(a lot more detail in the explosion on the 360 because the PS3 is rendering that part of the scene at a lower resolution than normal then blowing it up because transparency effects require a lot of bandwidth that the PS3 is weak on).

[LinuxGuru]

There is a full-rez option...make sure to look at those instead of the half-size popup.

[InfectedDK]

Seriously there is no difference at all.
Adjust the lighting/contrast in-game or on your TV.
That's all folks!

[RememberThe357]

But it's barely noticeable.

[Marcelles25]

you can see the screen shots were taken at different times of day causing the 360 to be darker. the PS3 surprisingly has better textures. i think the fire screen was taken right when the thing blew up on the ps3 so it looks blurry and the 360 one was taken a little bit after. the 360 does do shadows better, the shadows are kinda like rubbed smooth on edges as where ps3 just has very fine kinda crappy lines
overall same ps2 style quality

[Hellsvacancy]

It shouldnt b Ps3 vs 360 screenshots it should b Ps2 vs Xbox the graphics r really really poor i expected alot better

I loved the 1st 2 games aswell

[Andras84]

There are no jeggies. What are you talking about??? Ever tried stop being a fanboy???

Only differences is that the PS3 version is lighter and the 360 version is darker.

[LONEWOLF231]

Yep that pretty much settles it, the 360 version is darker.
Played it on the PS3 and its a pretty good game would of been better if it was a FPS though.

[PrimordialSoupBase]

"more darker" is redundant.

[morganfell]

Hellsvacancy is on the right track. The game doesn't even rate on the rental list. 'Horrible' would be putting it kindly.

[Brock Danger]

Pics look quite similar, in that they both look like an uninteresting third-person shooter. Haven't played the demo yet, but the videos looked...boring.

Pulling off third-person games has changed so much in the past few years, this whole set-up seems archaic and dated. This feels like it will play like Mercs 2, which was not exactly awesome.

It seems like the dev team had, "hooray explosions!" posted all around their office, along with some smaller posters that said, "hammers are cool too, kinda"

[littletad]

I actually had to edit my reply, right before I posted it. I actually agreed with you BASED on your pics. But when I saw them for myself on their site, there were no jaggies? Did you do something to it? Pretty idiotic if you ask me.

Anyhow, the only difference is the lighting. 360 is darker.

[360 man]

wow who are these sony fans tryna kid

ps3
http://images.eurogamer.net...

360
http://images.eurogamer.net...

[slayorofgods]

I am not getting your point?? What is the point of reshowing us the two comparison scans? It seems pretty obvious to me all the "sony fans" are dead on with the comparisons. All they said was that the 360 is darker, which it is. Other than that there are no big differences.

What did I miss?

[y0haN]

The 360 version's lighting looks more natural and has less aliasing, but the PS3 version seems to have more detailed textures and will probably have better physics (I haven't got the PS3 demo).

[Gue1]

I swear for my penis that I didn't do anything to those pics.

Look at the jaggies of the PS3 version:

http://images.eurogamer.net...

Now look at the X360 version and you'll see that it doesn't have any jaggies:

http://images.eurogamer.net...

-And now look at the same pics that I posted before, even the map on the left in the X360 version looks kinda blurry so, this is not something about the hour of day in the game.

X360: http://images.eurogamer.net...

PS3: http://images.eurogamer.net...

All of them are direct from the site....

Now talking about my new record of disagrees, seriously, how can anybody disagree with facts again?

[littletad]

I went ahead and put the images to their original size, and yes, the jaggies did come up on the ps3 version. It's hard to notice these little things when they are re-imaged to a smaller size. You are correct in your observations. But your post didn't have to call the first two posters "blind". Not only that but it's a tiresome subject, which console has the best graphics for said game. But you used proof and stuck with it, I respect that.

Yohan? I'm confused, has physics ever been in an issue in multiplatform games. Despite jaggies, anti-aliasing, textures, and lighting; when has physics ever been noticeably different in a game?

[DaTruth]

Ps3 and 360 fans united in their utter disgust of the graphics... er... everything in this game. Comparison on which looks the most bad. I'll probably pay tribute to the awesomeness of the first game when I buy this used after the price goes down.

[phosphor112]

Are they retarded!?!? Don't use f*cking jpeg compression! It looks butt ugly!

[somerandomdude]

After printing out each picture and carefully analyzing each one under a microscope and counting the number of colors and counting every pixel in each slide and carefully blowing up each image to see the crevices of each item in every scenery I can now conclude that [insert your preferred console] has very slightly better graphics.

[insert the console you don't own]'s fanboys need to wake up and realize these very slight and unnoticeable differences.

[GUNS N SWORDS]

"You two sure are blind or something...

The PS3 version has a lot of jaggies but it looks clearer and has better lighting.

The X360 version has a lot less jaggies but it looks blurrier and darker.

edit: Good job at disagreeing with facts moron. =)"

"PS3 version has the edge
It isn't grotesquely dark, and is crisper; the 360 version appears to have a blur filter on it."

omg, that's antialiasing, (2x from the looks of it, maybe more i don't know) ,the 360 doesn't use blur filters..........wtf?
http://images.eurogamer.net...
http://images.eurogamer.net...

(look at the top of that small stone blockade)

edit, 360 has a slight "AA" advantage of sorts, well to know what 2xAA looks like will use "mirror's edge" as simple comparison.
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...
that's 2xaa.

[Ozzyb]

This game is far from impressive.

[GUNS N SWORDS]

oh i forgot this one
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...

it comes before this
http://forum.beyond3d.com/s...

[I did not murder him]

I agree with you the 360 version has better contrast making it not as washed out looking. The PS3 version is also missing detail. Sony needs to get some exclusives out fast I'm sick of not having anything to play on my PS3 because of this. Time after time the 360 comes out on top.

[Ozzyb]

I hope you're being sarcastic.

[I did not murder him]

Get real.

Strange. From these pics the PS3 version's main character seems more crisp but the 360 version has more detail and better contrast. To me it looks like they got more from the 360 overall.

I'm willing to bet the PS3 version is not doing something the 360 version is doing while the game is playing. The PS3 version is probably not pulling off some visual effects the 360 version is but they had a little to work with although not enough to match the 360 version they made the character crisp with the little they had.

[SL1M DADDY]

1) I was a silly fanboy

2) I thought this game was any good to begin with

3) Unicorns flew out of my butt

In any case, the game is not even on my radar. It just looks generic. Maybe a bargain bin game?

[manwich25]

360 may be darker but the explosions look miles better than the PS3

[raztad]

I dont get why you guys bother comparing the graphics of a crappy looking game. It's like to say yours looks worse than mine. This is beyond me.

Obviously visuals are not the selling point of this game, lets hope the gameplay make up for it.

[Raoh]

sigh.......................... .....

[Flipgeneral]

Sigh...
What was the game (worth mentioning) which had huge discrepancies between the two?

Can't we all just get along!?

[slayorofgods]

Just wait until ff13. People will be zooming into the scans just to point out slight jagged edges that are otherwise imposable to identify. It really is a funny process worthy of a sigh!

edit - my mistake people are already doing that.

[Ozzyb]

that there's a pixel in the 8th boss's ass, in FF 13, that is 1/4 of a shade darker on 360 than PS3. I think it's clear which version I'll be getting now.

[diefor]

For me Xbox360 better look.

[Dimitri]

How about ...

You own an XBOX 360 so it looks better even tough the PS3 looks more detailed.

[TheIneffableBob]

They're more or less the same. The PS3 version is slightly more detailed with better filtering in some areas while the 360 version has better shadows and anti-aliasing.

[cayal]

How about you both shut up.

[Malacath]

I played both demos.
I actually preferred the look of the ps3 version which is unusal for multi-format games.
The 360 version didn't look as crisp and was darker.

[lociefer]

ps3 have more rocks / 360 have more sand , ps3 have better lightning / 360 has rrod after 3rd screenshot

[GayStation3]

The PS3 screenshots have framerate issues.

[Cajun Chicken]

lol. All logic just left the Open Zone.

[PR3DAT0R]

Man i have heard a lot of retarded stuff in my time but screenshots having framerate issues absolutely tops the list, do you even know what framerate is? its the number of frames to a unit of time like FPS frames per second, now how you managed to think you can capture bad framerate on a picture is beyond me, the ONLY way you can see bad frame is through video, ingame or slow motion. Your utter attempt of trying to insult the playstation is just pitiful you just make up a load of bullsh*t to fulfill your satifaction, to you it doesn't matter if it makes sense it just the simple fact you think your being smart, well let me break it to you...your not!

[360 man]

who are these sony fans tryna kid

ps3
http://images.eurogamer.net...

360
http://images.eurogamer.net...

oh man its unbelievable

[Gue1]

Those screens are too tiny 360man.

The same screens you're posting but bigger:

PS3: http://images.eurogamer.net...

X360: http://images.eurogamer.net...

BTW these are the only pics were both versions look similar, nice way of spinning this. But now look at this flat textures on the X360. lol

PS3: http://images.eurogamer.net...

X360: http://images.eurogamer.net...

Look at the terrain were the woman's walking on the PS3 version... Now look at the same place on the X360 to see flat textures! YAY!

This is what's called nitpicking? Lol But that doesn't change that the X360 has some flat textures here and there combined with blurrynes while the PS3 version has come jaggies here and there. =)

[ambientFLIER]

Predator, have you ever heard of sarcasm?

Btw, yes, the ps3 screenshots do have frame rate drops. It's awful!

[somerandomdude]

screenshots having framerate issues? I guess that is why he calls himself gaystation; his arguments are packed with (that stuff you pull out your a$$)

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

Gaystation was kidding.

How can you take that seriously?

He's just a guy on here who likes having fun.

Take a joke!

[Traveler]

I thought the 360 version looked better in some shots and the PS3 looked better in others. All it really comes down to is contrast differences. For all intents and purposes they look exactly the same.

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

5gb of this game will need to be installed to the PS3 just to have it play in 15fps and only 6 people will buy it.

[Zeus Lee]

For me comparison useless.

[Cajun Chicken]

PS3 has better lighting.

Of course we all know the difference; one system apparently wasn't maxed thanks to this game.

[freeman29]

The game looks the same on the 2 machines.

[GayStation3]

Nope. I counted more hair cells on the X360 version.

EDIT @ solidjun5 :
If people can count pixels then I can count hair cells.

[solidjun5]

you can't count.
Even if you can, that comment was ridiculous.

[NegativeCreep427]

Oh yeah well...well...In The xbox 360 version the guys hair is shinier and more full of body!!!

[ToastyMcNibbles]

wheres jason360 and themart/pog? they usually like to comment on these...it helps them sleep at night

[SmokingMonkey]

one game makes you pay $50 to play on line and the other version doesn't.

one version let's you "cross-chat" while online, the other doesn't.

Free online > "cross-chat"

or

one version may get scratched (in your system) and the other one is on bluRay (which can take scratches) (not talking about capacity on this one).....

or

one version may over heat your system, the other may require some "annoying" install.

[Firstkn1ghT]

one game doesn't make you pay $50 online.

[RememberThe357]

If it's the only game you want to take online for the system, then yeah it would. Otherwise, that complete BS.

[BobbySaget]

Most of us purposely bought a 360 because we want to pay for the better online experience. Either way though, its now 40$ a year which = 11 cents a day.

We always reserve the option to buy a PS3 and play online for free if we would prefer.

Thus the ability to Chat, using voice, in real-time, with everyone else in the game is one of the benefits we get for paying for Xbox Live.

As for scratching, the original version of the Xbox360... scratches disks, if you move it while the disk is spinning. If your moving your console around while its on, you deserve to get your disk scratched. However this issue is irrelevant now.

Lastly, The reason the PS3 requires installs is because blu-ray cannot stream textures and other components off the disk fast enough for them to render in real time. Thus making the PS3's use of blu-ray somewhat negligible. And who's system overheats? are you implying the 360 overheats? SINCE WHEN? I play my launch box plenty, i'v played Fallout 3 for SEVERAL HOURS STRAIGHT. I have accidentally left my 360 on for nearly a week straight and continued playing it without letting it cool down. I have never once had an issue with overheating.....

[Ozzyb]

If that's true, how come Killzone 2 didn't have an install? I don't remember one anyway. You could very well be right, but if I remember correctly, that wouldn't make any sense.

Lets not get into overheating please. Simply put, if I wanted to burn someone's house down, I'd buy them a 360. Grats to Microsoft though, you got people to buy a product so faulty, it pales in comparison to PCs carelessly slapped together by nerds in their basements (which don't overheat after months of Fallout 3). Seriously, I wasn't gonna take a stab until I read something about defending RROD.

[OmarJA]

Yep the PS3 version is better, anyway i didn't like the game...

[Firstkn1ghT]

Game looks like crap on both consoles.

[DarthTigra]

We have a winner

[whothedog]

exactly the game really isn't that great to look at to begin with so a minor difference really isn't sheet

not saying its a bad looking game though its all about the physics baby

[ZombieNinjaPanda]

Am I the only one that can't see a difference other then the brightness?

[Eddie20101]

The differences are so minor that they don't really need to be pointed out. You have to really be nitpicking, because they are virtually identical.

[redsquad]

My opinion: Both versions look equally rubbish.

[I did not murder him]

I hear that a lot when the PS3 version comes up short.

[redsquad]

IN MY OPINION, which is set in stone and won't be changed by the likes of you, both look as bad as each other.

Sorry you have to read something into my OPINION that was never there in the first place, but it speaks volumes about your outlook on life matey.

But, just for you (everyone else ignore this bit): 'The PS3 version looks waayyyy better'

Does that conform to one of your stereotypes too?

[Antan]

Don`t worry about "I Did Not Murder Him", its only POG`s/WHY DIS`s new account. Sticks out like a sore thumb. Lol, all 3 of "his" accounts signed in 1 hour ago. Must do better POG. 6 bubbles after only a handful of comments?.......4 ignores already?.......no-one tracking? ....good to see yourself bubbling up!

On topic-:

Both look equally poor.

[iistuii]

As with every multiformat, they will be near on identical apart from the ps3 will be more jaggie.Why is this with these multiformats ?? R5 was the latest.

[Bumpmapping]

Hair cells?!you have been hanging out with guys little too much....

[KingAlaBala]

i neverrrr listen to eurogamer....sometimes thier comparisons are extreme bullshit

[4cough]

As always the 360 wins,The overhyped & underachiving ps3 looks gay again.

The Score XBOX360 1002 Ps3 0003

Wooooooooooo haaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa woot woot.

[-x.Red.x-]

a 17" B/W computer monitor doesn't count

try getting a HDTV and you'll see what is truly HD

[OmarJA]

"Wooooooooooo haaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa woot woot."

Butt fu_cked ? again ?

[ps92117]

Less than 25% of those that comment here will buy the game so how about you all STFU.

[redsquad]

Yikes!!! That put me in my place...

[heyheyhey]

man... they weren't kidding when they said they maxed the 360 with this game, look at the lighting and pp-effects on the PS3 version!!

[II Necroplasm II]

fanboys know everything about technology!!

[PirateThom]

Oh yeah. I forgot about that.

Microsoft should sue for slander.

[heyheyhey]

yeah i know! it's great isn't it!?

[tudors]

all it shows is that both consoles do things a little differently, neither version looks better just different.

[solar]

god bless 720p....

[OmarJA]

B-b-b-b-but teh salez better on 360 :D

B-b-b-b-but teh 360 supportz Anti-Antilizing x16 :D

[Queers of War]

the ps3 version can end world hunger and cure cancer

[BasilMarceaux]

Once again, the only visible difference seems to be the brightness that the moron taking these shots has his console set on.

According to these stupid comparisons, the only difference between the ps3 and 360 is that the ps3 is a few shades lighter??

What a joke

[divideby0]

the MP demo I played was pretty bad.....this game wont get more than low 8s in ratings and even that the fun factor is no where like it was when the first RF game came out...based upon many hours playing the MP demo on live...

[Silly gameAr]

I don't see much to compare. They look the same to me.

[Whitey2k]

i think the ps3 one looks alot better then the 360 version the brightness the textures lighting and with the flames u can clearly see theres like alot of blur around the flame which u would see if ur not up close whree the 360 one u don so for me its ps3 > 360

[Claudinho69]

i think the ps3 represents HD better

[ironmonkey]

ill have to say ps3 this time has the better edge

[Whitey2k]

ps3 is the better muiltiplat lol finally!! but Guerilla games know to work with the ps3 and how to code for it which is an advantage if it was done by another team say like ea or ubisoft then the 360 eill end up looking better but not by far

[goflyakite]

Wow, nobody see's that gaystation is joking?

[SonySoldierEternaL]

gaystation is a joke in general

[spandexxking]

i can see it but people on this site are retarded.

[HDgamer]

screenshots are merely for fanboys

[bob saget remix]

But the game is going to be bad.

[doa766]

or at least a killzone 2 side by side

[squadass99]

and we all want a halo comparison! /sarcasm

[KingsofOmega]

neither. This game looks like something a four year old would make with glue, maccaroni and crayons.

[wanderofys]

I'm finding it hard to believe anyone is taking this seriously at all. This game is aesthetically retarded, and clearly looks absolutely atrocious on both systems.

I don't know anything about these games, so for all I know it's fun and might be a great game. However, these guys aren't going to win any awards for visuals.

[Spike47]

is beyond me.

[Rorkimaru]

The 360's one looks bluryer and has a shorter colour range. The PS3's shots range to the darkest colours on the 360 ones but there are more mid tones.

The effects look better on the 360 though but that could just be because they are two different shots of the fire

[JayX666]

They made this? didnt they make killzone?

[LinuxGuru]

lol....don't think any harder or your head will explode.

And no, Guerrilla is just Red Faction's subtitle...the game development house by the same name had nothing to do with this game.

[BasilMarceaux]

This game wishes it was made by Guerrilla Games, as far as I know this is made by the same guys as the other red faction games. The game is called "Red Faction: Guerrilla"

[THC CELL]

i have a question to some of you
i played rainbow six vegas 1 on xbox 360 for a solid year
and then moved to the ps3 version upon release
i note that all the levels on the ps3 version was wider and some missing rooms like the loo in vegas casino level online

Redfaction on ps3 looks wider then the xbox version
xbox in other words looks compressed

Developers need to start taking advantage of the ps3 now that killzone has pulled its guns out really

btw the shots are from a demo and they both almost look the same
i am still buying for ps3

along side flashpoint 2

[Jockamo]

..the Jaggies are pretty prominent...

[Jockamo]

nt

[mastiffchild]

Jeez! Average Multiplat game looks identical on both systems like evry single other one does.

People put away your nitpicking goggles cos devs will actively try to make the game the same for both and any differences will be tiny and only there cos of the dev not being amazing at all times while equalising performance.

If you want to sell on both consoles why would you alienate half your market? You wouldn't and we ALL know that Gears2 pushed the 360 harder than this and KZ2 pushed the PS3 harder-only exclusives can for the above reason and for financial ones.

Comparisons can suck my hairy appendage-waste of life. Criminal BS. End of the sermon. Amen.

[360Hater]

I think its fair to say multi platform games are equal at this point.

Is this demo even out yet? No its not so wtf, I hate when they do this... Dont talk about a demo until we all have it there is no point.

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

360 Demo - Out

PS3 Demo - Download Qore to get it. It will be available for free on the store this week though.

[TrueGamer71]

Oh my lord

am i seeing this right?!?!

The PS3 is actualy better.. what the hell

it appears to have a tad more detail than the 360.. then again who cares the game looks crap.

[bviperz]

with comparisons anymore. Both HD consoles produce great visuals in their own right. Just bring on the games. Good games, mind you.

[BobbySaget]

I will ADMIT that they are damn near identical, however when looking at the ground the 360 version has slightly higher texture-res. Which is expected due to the RSX's bandwith issues.

Besides that, the only REAL imagine i can find that is superior on the 360 is this one

http://www.eurogamer.pt/vie...

Look at the comparison on the page, its the eight image on the first page.

HOWEVER in all honesty, the game looks pretty poor in general. Both systems are capable of far better.

[hiredhelp]

guys why there always battle of the bit*hing between whos got better console. i have owned 3 x 360's 1 x ps3 still witch works.
you talking about pixels detail ect. its daft. lighting well fact is 360 had nvidia chipset and ps3 has ati chipset. to me nvidia has always been my fav winner from pc. however recent times has prooven ati has more than matched gforce chipsets. so you trying to compare witch console is better on redfaction. my ansew same. maybe darker on 360 for some but thats down to the 720p. REZ BOYS not the game premium 360 and cores has 720p so does ps3 however ps3 is hdmi 1080i somert like that. witch makes the res look brighter cos the chipset being ati will be i reckon HD. look at all latest ati cards top end there all hd. not only that but graphics processor far more advance than 360 something that microsoft wasnt to know about or maybe they did.FOR THOES WHO HAVE A ELITE 360 MAY NOT SEE NO CHANGE cos be HD so thats why the normal 360's are 720 not true hd only the elite had HD. if they had made the game deadicated for ps3 it would been 1080p witch would made this game look soo much better but cos multi format most games look same on both consoles guys. thanks for reading. hope makes sense. my appologys for spelling and full stops commas not great speller.

[BobbySaget]

The game is rendered in 720p for both the 360 and PS3, And the game can be scaled up to 1080p on both the 360, and the PS3 using HDMI, even without the elite. The only people whom cannot use HDMI are those with original 360's, they use component cables which will create NO noticeable difference in image quality. Sometimes HDMI results in a brighter image, but this isn't on purpose.

[1ikedamaster]

The game looks HORRIBLE on both consoles.

[VMAN_01]

People who over analyse comparisons like this just don't deserve to be gamers.

[commodore64]

but the ps3 version strikes me as being a teensy bit sh1ttier.

In other news: the sky is blue.

*shrugs*

[PtRoLLFacE]

not much difference just the 360 version is darker thats all

[Jockamo]

...pretty dramatic in their differences.

[durran3]

lol.. Its funny ..because this game looks like crap.. and we know that both consoles are capable of producing FAR better graphics than this haha..

[meetajhu]

Both versions look identical but i think some places PS3 suffers framerate issues. Even after 3 years Ps3 is undergoing the same problem that sucks!

[LeonSKennedy4Life]

Both versions look so beautiful though! It's hard to decide!

Haha...

[CaptainKratos]

its just darker on the 360. looks the same to me.as for the jaggies or whatever maybe you should brighten up the 360 version to see them.lol

[Bordel_1900]

Why even compare? This game looks like a PS2 game in the screen shots.

[Jockamo]

...click "ver resolucao em tamanho original +"

And behold the PS3's magnificent jagginess.

[CaptainKratos]

second wasn't as great. and the fanboys are just messing this one up for me.lol.

[TheDeadMetalhead]

The PS3 version is SLIGHTLY sharper than the 360 version, but you can barely notice. And it might just be because the 360 version is darker, too. =O

[xXKingofStingXx]

Why are there people arguing about which version looks better? Both versions look like chewed up buffalo butt.

Anyway, thought i read somewhere on here how this game was supposed to look better than Killzone 2 or play way better? Cause if so, someone needs to tell these guys they missed the mark, HORRIBLY.

[jack_burt0n]

I had low expectations of this game but the support THQ needed wih the ps3 version obviously paid of cos it looks great and plays pretty good too!

By slowdown do u mean when you take the walker into the building and demolish everything setting of loads of explosions cos that was the only time the fps dipped for me and it was not really that noticable and no way an issue.

[jessehaysfl]

does this really matter? Really?

[GameGambits]

I must be the only one who doesn't think this game looks ugly seeing as I'm sure 90% of you didn't play the demo on your HDTV's. The game is a great looking 3rd person shooter. When you destroy something or blow something up in this game it is really astounding.

For anyone unsure about this game or completely written it off----TRY THE DEMO. If you can't get around to that then rent it when it releases.

It'd be pretty hard for this game to score less than 8's, because during the demo I didn't find anything wrong. The A.I wasn't dumb, they work together to try to kill you or run you over, they patrol until you are spotted, take cover, etc.

Cover system works smooth and easy. Gun play with the guns you could use was spot on and felt polished. Controls were easy to use on the PS3 version. Plus who could say no to a sledgehammer across the face in a game? I sure couldn't refuse.

Try it out, because it's worth most of your time and I'm def going to rent it unless a review lets me in on some major problems for the retail.

[jessehaysfl]

i thought it was great as well my point is who the fu<k cares about graphics anymore they all look pretty damngood pc is best ps3 & xbox are so close its pointless to compare unless your looking for fanboy bait. this story along with most of these type are BS.

[Sickr]

The 360 version clearly looks the superior version as far as textures go. If you can't actually see that then I'd highly suggest visiting an optician. As far as which version to purchase I'll wait and see the final build.

[Jockamo]

It's totally strange that people think that the high resolution pictures look exactly the same.

The jaggies are as clear as night and day in the PS3 version.

Weird...

[crillyconlig]

we know both consals can do much better graphics than whats on show here, the only difference is the game does max out the 360's processing thats, but realy, this game isnt one to get argumentative about

[peeps]

only real difference is how dark the 360 version is which can be sorted by changing settings on your tv, i really doubt graphically you would notice a difference playing this game on either system, unless of course you enjoy dissecting each pixel rather than playing the game...

Only thing to worry about is if the game struggles with frame rates with all the explosions, physics etc going on so will wait for some reviews to see if either system has trouble with that. It's certainly not a game that i'll pick up on 1 console or the other because of it's graphics.

[Pug]

I'm confused this must surely be PS2 vs Xbox game comparison.

[jinjojuice]

they are both about the same when your playing it on your tv you wouldnt notice anyway.i will be getting it on xbox360 because i prefer the controller plus most of my mates have 360s.

[Microsoft Xbox 360]

PS3 version confirmed superior.

[XPC HARDonE]

but it sucks more on the PS3

fanboys are the future of gaming

[Jaces]

aaand your one of them. Congrats.

[Sir Ken_Kutaragi]

;)

[azmanmanz]

Ring red of red faction is on the way

[Mindsucker]

YEa Xbox Fanboys and girls unite Every Multiplatform game around is always going to be better on the Xbox 360. Come on bring down the PS3 we have to lie cheat and smear everything against the PS3 in order to win. Now what do you win in the end you bunch of Microslaves. you get a little fascist regime that's what you Win now go stomp around like a bunch of little freaks.

Any way back on subject there is very little difference between the two Xbox has the blur effect on to try to hide the "Jaggies" like always they are there just not HD.

[DARK WITNESS]

i need to get my eyes checked... i just can't see any difference. yep one is darker, what else is there...really?

[tonywood24]

As of today, PS3 and X360 multi-plats look similar. (Don't sweat the ridiculously small to the naked eye stuff) Superfans are better off focusing on the exclusive offerings from their favorite system.

The arguing points can be made better because these games are made by dedicated developers. Meaning, these specific games have special ingredients, in the form of Bungie, Epic, Insomniac, Naughty Dog, and Kojima Productions. Not only is it a much better argument, it a lot more fun to battle over Halo vs. Resistance, Gears vs. Killzone, and Grand Turismo vs. Forza. Also, I think Halo: ODST and God of War 3 will be in the "Video Games" SUPER BOWL, for 2009.

[Josh11]

TV and time in which pics are taken is the only difference I would say.

[hiredhelp]

there isnt much differnce. but when ever there is a multifirmat game out out come the fanboys

[specialguest]

Contrast level on the 360 version is too high by default. It voids the much finer colors and detail of the graphics. Other than that, both versions look identical.

[UltimatePS3]

PS3 version is superior. We don't need screenshots to prove this the 360 maxed out last year with gears 2, didin't you here the story about cliffy b almost lossing his life in a fire the bloody dev kits exploded and cliffy b was warning that this could happen months before but ms kept waving the cash. MS=Krooks!

[2Negativecool]

And neither of them impress me all that much. With recent advancements in current gen graphics, on both systems, I expected more graphically. Some of the textures, closer up, are pretty muddy and not very sharp IMO.

[JasonPC360PS3Wii]

Droids lost another one, damn your system is such a loser this gen.

[CobraKai]

They need to turn down the brightness on their tv for the PS3

[Keita101]

the only difference is the brightness issues.

aside from that only a fanboy will notice any more differences.

gettin this for my PC with high hopes for a decent port and a timely release date

*crosses fingers*