OXCGN Writes:
"When is an apple not an apple? Well apparently when Sony PR calls it an orange!
Every once and a while I have the pleasure of imagining a world where PR speak isn't taken as gospel by the pathetic "I got a hard on for hardware" types and used in their incoherent, blindingly illogical diatribes about why their "hard on for hardware" is bigger than the other guys."
From school politics to ping-pong, pistols to police procedurals, let’s dive into the best that Rockstar has to offer.
Even 10 years after release, Grand Theft Auto 5 and GTA Online's player engagement has risen drastically compared to last year.
The game looks too clean without it.
i dont. it hurts my eyes. but im fairly ssensitive when it comes to that sort of stuff.
LOL...classic. Let's face it: All companies want is YOUR money and they will do whatever they can and call it something else to get it. MS 'buys' exclusives and Sony 'gives incentives' for content.
Wow what a surprise. But I bet many will say it isn't the same thing.
That's a great article in these times!!!
Now that was a well written, insightful article. Hopefully it puts to rest the notion that Sony doesn't pay for exclusives.
They are giving a fantastic opportunity to indie devs,to those who can't afford making a game because of the financial risk,instead of spending their money to preventing a game that is suppos to be multiplat from being on competitor's platform,*cough*bioshock,and all those timed exclusive*cough*
Sony doesn't pay for exclusives- they make em
zing
oh come on if they're funding your game of course its gonna need to be exclusive, its basically requiring indie devs to become first party groups if they want their game made