480°

Lens of Truth: Resident Evil 5 Comparison (720)

Resident Evil 5 just shipped out so now it's our turn to compare this action-packed survival horror side by side and find out which version will send shivers down your spine or simply send you back to the store. This time around we decide to depart from our traditional Head2Head and introduce the first ever Head2Head LIVE! Keep on reading to find out which version we and our viewers have chosen to infect your console of choice.

Read Full Story >>
lensoftruth.com
5529d ago Replies(10)
evildeli5529d ago

I honestly think the textures are the same. It looks like PS3's graphics engine dulled some of the textures.

frayer5529d ago

Dude, you're a 360 fanboy instigating your own articles to drive hits to your website.

Ghoul5529d ago

"PS3's graphics engine"

there is no such thing. and the 360 does have slightly sharper textures but in the end they both look amazing. no need to defend one side.

evildeli5529d ago

Name calling cause your console lost won't get you far.

thewhoopimen5529d ago

Theoretically the difference could just be between 2x MSAA and Quicunix (on the ps3). That would explain the blur differences in the stills.

Eddie201015529d ago

The textures are the same on both, the difference in the way they look is because of the way they handle anti-aliasing, xbox 360 anti-aliasing looks a little sharper and makes the textures appear a little sharper. The fact that it is a little darker by default makes everything appear a little sharper too, you can adjust your tv brightness or in game brightness if you want it to look a little darker on the PS3. The PS3 version still looks just as good, just a little different because of the way the hardware handles things. I've played both versions and there is no frame rate difference between the two versions.

You will be just as pleased with either version, and unless you had the games running side by side you would not even notice the very, very small difference between the two.

evildeli5528d ago

I meant graphics card. Sorry to throw you off completely.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5528d ago
Marcello5529d ago

Yea this is becoming so yawn now, just get it for the system you have and enjoy it.

I really cant see that much difference, wat would be interesting is putting the PC version side by side if/when it comes :)

evildeli5529d ago

A microsoft xbox to microsoft PC sounds like a yawn comparison to me and no brainer. That should be simple port.

Ghoul5529d ago

They said the ps3 had no selfshadows but i could clearly see the microphone shadow on the ps3 version too @ 1:51

hmm weird

Ghoul5529d ago

dont disagree its a fact, watch the video ffs.

Sevir045529d ago

the 360 version looked darker.. if darker means better graphics then i guess. i think the lighting in the PS3 version was fantastic... They oth look amazing but plays like MEH!!!!!! skip this game, if all you want are pretty graphics then this game is the perfect choice. RE4 has the gameplay

Panthers5529d ago

Resident Evil is about STORY and RE5 moves the story forward a lot more than RE4. The gameplay is the same in both games. Plus, Co-Op is amazing. But if you dont have any friends to play with then yea, I understand.

Ghoul5529d ago

i also liked the less dark more global illuminated ps3 lighting better.
but i gotta disagree about it beeing a bad game, especially since you mentioned re4 couse re5 is the same gameplay basically.

blind-reaper5529d ago

I tought the same as you but after trying different layouts during 1 hour I finally get used to the controls and the game became fcuk!ng addicting in my opinion my learning curve time was really well spent.

Show all comments (111)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ68d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia68d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73068d ago (Edited 67d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6967d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y67d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot67d ago (Edited 67d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex67d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y66d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07227d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde226d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude227d ago (Edited 227d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992227d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme227d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992227d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313227d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69227d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor227d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69227d ago (Edited 227d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack227d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface226d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)