The Worst Xbox 360 Achievements.

From ones that require superhuman skill to those that require superhuman patience, this is a look at those achievements that are too difficult, too dull and just too stupid to forgive.

Not a definitive list but six of the worst anyway.

[poindat]

I feel sorry for the obsessive compulsive.

[lord_of_balrogs]

Gears 2

Party like its 1999- play 1999 online matches
Gears 2.0- get 100,000 kills any mode.

These require a lot of time.

[Covenant]

You can boost the 1999 achievement in local multiplayer, but it involves leaving your system on for loooong periods of time.

And 100,000 kills is doable...just replay the first part of the Brumak level over and over and over and over and over and over...*sudden headache*

[LeGenDx]

lmao!... i got 15 wins in a row in sf4

[Jubo1]

i would add mile high club on veteran soooooooooo frustrating

[Campy da Camper]

I totaly concur! I still have not obtained it!

I must admit I am an Achievement whore as well. It's not like I buy a game just for it but after beating a game I always go in and try to get the points. It feels sooooo good when after hours of game play you FINALY get that one elusive point. Plus, you have bragging rights with your friends, etc. It's a good thing.

[CharlesM]

I got atleast 10 games with online MP achievements that NO ONE plays. In other words getting 1000GS in those games are impossible and that's just plain annoying.

[Covenant]

Quake...f******...4

'Nuff said.

[Klopek]

I completely agree. There's either no-one playing or they're from too far away. I tried Condemned 2 online and the few people online were American (I'm English). The games were unplayable. There's an achievement for blocking an attack online. I didn't get it. That's how playable it was.

[Nihilism]

i know it's on pc too, i just don't like it, that's fine if you like it, i just think some of the awards are stupid, such as the getting an award for 5 headshots in a game etc....and theres always discussions/arguments about achievements/trophies (360/ps3) and i just don't see the point getting worked up about something as stupid as an achievement, people seem to be more concerned with the achievements than the actual gameplay...i just see it as another thing where people complain when a game doesn't have trophies, who cares, if it does- bonus, if it doesn't...it doesn't mean a game sucks...people who are obsessed with trophies seem to think that its crucial to a game, i think they're irrelivant and pointless, just an opinion

[thebudgetgamer]

if there is an achievement for buying that piece of crap.

:)

[2FootYard]

I wonder if theres an trophy for being Sonys top hooker?

[STONEY4]

There is. I got it right after buying Killzone 2 for some reason. At least it brought me up to level 6!

http://www.ps3-sense.nl/ind...

[likedamaster]

I'm glad to see they gave props to two of my favorite games this gen... GRAW and Crackdown.

[JOEdANGEL]

While some games have terrible achievement conditions, (like the ones in the article) I believe they are actually a pretty cool idea. In certain games getting points for something I would do anyways is cool, but achievements open up new possibilities for things I might not do. If a game has exceedingly bad achievements, I just ignore them.

[buckethead_911]

Some of the achivements in FEAR were fking annoying. Complete the game without dying, Complete the game without using slow mo, complete the game without using health packs etc.

WHAT
THE
****

[CRAIG667]

DEAD SPACE SHOOTING GALLERY

[Klopek]

I disagree because I found that rather easy... perhaps even fun. Sure, it took me a few tries on the last stage and I was always one or two measly points off but it was always doable.

My first play-through was on Medium, having to replay the game on Hard just to unlock <name of hardest difficulty setting> was a chore. Got platinum though! ;)

[peacesquid]

Some great (ie - horrible!) suggestions in there. I may well do a part two with some of them (I'll quote and credit as appropriate).

FEAR's achvs were indeed horrible!