Lens of Truth writes; "We go in-depth and get to the bottom on which version of Bioshock you should be playing in this Head2Head. Wow, that was deep. A boat load of more puns inside."
Hey Poor Player's James Davie Takes Us On A Bio-Shocking Deep Dive Into Irrational Games' Nautical Nightmare.
Gareth, Justin, and Michael at Skewed and Reviewed look at timely and topical entertainment news on their latest show including the latest video game movie and news of another in the works.
The movie was absolutely garbage !!!
BH needs to do better - since Halloween Ends - Exorcist , Freddy is Shyte - STOP IT !!!!
Dead Space recently received a popular remake that was faithful yet constructive, and the original BioShock is also deserving of this treatment.
No it doesn't need it. It was remastered in 60 fps last gen and still looks and plays great. Would be a waste of time, money and resources imo. It's games from 3 or 4 gens back that could use the remake treatment.
The games that need remaking are.
Resistance fall of man.
Motorstorm.
PS5 would produce something special.
There's been such an advancement in tech since the PS3 days. It would be awesome. DAY 1 BUY for me.
I would love this
Expand on the lore
Incorporate Bioshock Infinite and Bioshock 2 plot lines
Add room rooms or maybe even an extra area
Maybe new plasmids
Give Jack a personality and add voice acting, it worked for Isaac. Jack did speak at the start of the game so adding onto that and giving him convos between Atlas or Ryan would be great
Man could you imagine what bioshock would look like in ue5 with full raytracing, phwaaarrrhh.
Stupid Article.
Pc Version trumps all. BTW it leaves out Extra content in the final analysis and the comparisons look shoddy to me. Maybe it's true or maybe it's pre patch screens. Either way it's a lame article.
Once upon a time, there was Killzone 2.
The End
Nuff said
Was the first time we went thru this so popular we need to do it again?
I think it's safe to say whatever version you get is going to be good. I played the demo on PS3 after many play thrus on the 360 and it looks so close to identical you won't notice a difference.
The days of the multiplatform games being completely crap on the PS3 were over the first year. Yes, there might be some games that look or perform better on the 360(or vice versa) the difference is so small it's not worth arguing over anymore. For multiconsole owners there are bigger things to consider when choosing which platform like online service or exclusive DLC. Why do you think MS is working hard on the exclusive DLC front.
Hmmm, I think I played this game...way back in 2007.
I don't see any problems with this article.
The 360 version does look slightly better and having played Bioshock on both consoles (yes I own both) I can say the 360 does seem to have a smoother framerate.
HOWEVER, this is to be expected, NOT because the 360 is more powerful or anything like that. Bioshock was originally created with the 360 as its primary platform and ported to PC. It was optimised for 360, and as a result looks and plays great.
The ps3 version is a port, and running on the Unreal Engine 3 which is known to have issues with the ps3 due to its focus on GPU rendering rather than the ps3's strength in its CPU.
This doesn't mean the ps3 has worse graphics than the 360, it just means this game running on this engine isn't quite as successful. Killzone 2 looks amazing on ps3 because it was developed for ps3, Bioshock looks amazing on 360 because it was developed for 360 and later ported to ps3 with an engine that was never optimised for ps3 use.
I appreciate these articles because I own both consoles and when great third-party games are released I like to get the version that looks the best or has a smoother framerate. For multiplatform games it has NOTHING to do with the overall power of either console, it's just a matter of which was used as the primary console during development and what engine is being used since some focus on CPU (best for ps3) and some focus on GPU (best for 360).
Either way, you get a great game.