460°

Windows 7 SKUs announced: your worst nightmare has come to pass

The following will be the actual new SKUs for the OS:

* Windows 7 Starter (limited to three apps concurrently)
* Windows 7 Home Basic (for emerging markets)
* Windows 7 Home Premium (adds Aero, Touch, Media Center)
* Windows 7 Professional (Remote Desktop host, Mobility Center, Presentation mode)
* Windows 7 Enterprise (volume license only, boot from virtual drive, BitLocker)
* Windows 7 Ultimate (limited availability, includes everything)

At least most consumers will only see Home Premium and Professional options at retail, which is more akin to the XP options of yore, and means Windows Media Center will be "baseline" for most PCs.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
killzone2flop5565d ago

I like that idea gives consumers a CHOICE.

Beg For Mercy5565d ago

pp my son this is terrible, this is called nickel and diming

meatnormous5565d ago

Most people shouldn't buy a OS without consulting someone that knows whats going on. But people still do buy products they have no idea what they do.

meatnormous5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

My xbox controller, I can buy alot of AA batteries or get the play and charge kit. (should have been included)

Choice of Xbox console with or without a hard drive (better get the pro at least cause it will cost alot more if you want a HDD later on)

Gears of War on PC It chooses that its time to quit playing it and doesn't work at the moment( I have this game, check my gammertag. I guess I have a choice to make, turn back my clock or wait for a patch)

vmanj5565d ago

and wut does SKU mean???

Panthers5565d ago

Each SKU is a separate version for release.

Like 360 arcade, 360 Elite, ect are all separate SKUs.

5565d ago
TheSadTruth5565d ago

Cool, lots of versions, I think I'll be downloading the Ultimate package.

callahan095565d ago

"Windows 7 Starter (limited to three apps concurrently) "

Didn't read the article (can't be bothered, but at least I admit it!), but if that isn't free, they've got another thing coming!

Anybody else get the impression that Microsoft is really verging on jumping the shark with their OS's? I mean, I'll always love them for Visual Studio and the fact that I can do most of what I want/need to do with Express edition, completely for free, and I own the license to anything that I create with Visual Studio, never owing Microsoft a penny in royalties... that's great! But their OS's are just really not living up to my expectations (well, I guess I just mean Vista), and the way they're marketing W7 with all these SKU's is a bit outrageous in my opinion. Oh, and how they went from IE being the best browser on the market to essentially the worst I'll never understand.

Tempist5565d ago

am going to Unbuntu. No more of this different OS does something completely different. This is petty of them and I'd rather go free than stupid. Have they learned nothing from Apple? (the single OS update / version is way simple and effective on getting the OS to everyone, however I still hate OS X.)

Multi-sku is why piracy of Windows happens, if they had a unified version, less problems would happen. Way less.

HolyOrangeCows5565d ago

I'm sticking to Vista, I just switched to it a few years ago!

Kushan5565d ago

@callahan09

It's designed for extremely poor markets that couldn't even afford the £50 or whatever the "basic" version costs.

Sarick5565d ago

"Windows 7 Starter (limited to three apps concurrently) "

"Didn't read the article (can't be bothered, but at least I admit it!), but if that isn't free, they've got another thing coming!"

It's probably so PC makers can pre-install windows 7 on PC's to save big money for licensing. This way when the user loads up the PC and finds this limitation the user has two options.

1. UPGRADE for $$$
2. Get a new FREE open source OS.
3. Suffer with starters limitations.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5565d ago
Sarick5565d ago (Edited 5565d ago )

It seems silly that your forced to install packages. Didn't they ever see Al la cart packages.

There should be a max of 3 versions.

Windows Starter <-- FREE OS with ability to upgrade.
Windows Custom <-- Only install the features you want!
Windows Ultimate <-- Everything.

The only thing they're doing with packages is like a PC maker installing 3rd party programs on the system. These SKU's are just another way to exploit the OS monopoly.

They wouldn't make windows custom for one reason.

#1. It'd hurt windows ultimate sales. why buy everything when you know you can pay only for the features you want.

Says you5565d ago

When it comes to Microsoft why is that??.

Skynetone5565d ago

what a load of b++++x that is

if you like long boot times go for the ultimate version, ill stick with the basic version from know on

Marcan215565d ago

I'm in the Beta and I REALLY think 7 should be offered free for everyone who got Vista. It is what Vista should have been. It never stopped working or crash once.

Show all comments (42)
60°

Bard's Tale IV is no longer compatible with Windows 7 apparently

Windows 7 official support ended recently and inXile Entertainment are now pushing Bard's Tale IV players to install Windows 10 apparently. Considering it was originally playable in Windows 7, players are not liking the minimum system requirements change.

90°

Microsoft has made it possible to port Nvidia’s DX12 ray tracing to Windows 7

Building on the success of porting WoW's DX12 version to Windows 7, Microsoft has published help for other DX12 devs, which includes a runtime that supports all the features of Windows 10 October Update... including DirectX Raytracing.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
160°

Microsoft Ports DirectX 12 to Windows 7 - Boosts World of Warcraft's Performance in Latest Update

That's right, DirectX 12 has come to Windows 7

Read Full Story >>
overclock3d.net
bmf73641875d ago

Strange they made this update with DX12 when Windows 7 is going to be EOL next year

rainslacker1875d ago

I guess when they said they needed the new kernel for DX12 that was just them spewing BS like they always do. I knew this to be true, because Win10's kernel is essentially Win7's kernel. Same BS they've spewed for so many DX updates locked behind new versions of windows, which held back PC gaming for so long, because devs wouldn't use the new API's, and even skipped generations of the API because MS didn't sell enough of the new OS's to make it worthwhile for the dev.

it is a surprise though, because I thought they were going to abandon older versions of windows because Win10 was their way forward, and Win7 doesn't have the native access to Live like they have now.

King_Noctis1875d ago

World of warcraft? Does this game need a boosting at this point?

Stanjara1875d ago

I still don't get it if dx12 is better for performance or not.

Sgt_Slaughter1875d ago

I guess it all depends on the developer and how they optimize it.

maybelovehate1875d ago

DX12 allows much better optimization. But that is of course up to the developer to take advantage of.

CaptainCook1875d ago

Since DirectX12 was built around Windows 10, it will always offer superior performance compared to Windows 7

rainslacker1875d ago (Edited 1875d ago )

If the dev takes advantage of it then yes. Even if you don't have a DX12 card, there are some things with the rendering pipeline which are better than previous versions. The low level stuff can be hit or miss with older cards, but luckily it can adapt when you do the actual application runtime.

@Captain

DX is not built around Win10. The graphics API, which is the most important, is not actually tied to the kernel, and Win10 uses essentially the same kernel as Win7. MS saying it's a kernel related issue was them just once again trying to get gamers to upgrade to new versions of windows, just like they have so many other times in the past. That lie that MS kept spewing has held back console gaming for years, because devs often wouldn't support new versions of DX because people weren't upgrading their OS's.

Win10 does have other advantages in terms of game performance, but it has nothing to do with how the API and kernel are connected.

Stanjara1875d ago

Bravo...this is absolutely the right answer!

maybelovehate1874d ago

Yeah, it would make more sense to say that Windows 10 was built around DX12.

rainslacker1874d ago (Edited 1874d ago )

@Maybe

No, it wouldn't.

The windows Kernel, and DirectX have no direct relationship to one another. One is a software API that runs in windows, and is not dependent on it outside the interpreter that handles the instructions that get carried out between the API and the hardware. Windows itself does not in any way need DirectX, nor does the base rendering process have any connection to how Windows renders the OS, or anything in it. Developers can enable that in their programs, but it isn't required. It is even possible to uninstall DirectX if one knows the process to do so. I have done so on many occasions in my work due to beta versions having issues which didn't allow me to do my work, so I had to reinstall other versions.

Win10 is a modified version of Win7. A few core commands have changed, but the meat of the kernel is still the same. There may be dependencies for DX built into Windows which are based on the kernel, but dependencies can be implemented in older versions to allow it to work. MS just chose not to do so, because they want to push new versions of windows.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1874d ago
maybelovehate1875d ago

Seems strange to port it to Windows 7 at the same time they started to notify customers it has reached its end of life lol

eddvdm1874d ago

Woah, that's great actually! I can finally throw my Win 10 in the trash and go back to an OS that doesn't f*** up my games performance at each update.