320°

OPM March Issue Scores

The Official PlayStation Magazine(March 2009 Issue) is out, here's a list of scores from their magazine.

Panthers5570d ago

Nice score for RE5!

Cant wait for that one.

Chris3995570d ago (Edited 5570d ago )

Still a miss for me, sorry.

The 360 demo wasn't terribly impressive either and I don't get the fuss about how "gorgeous" the game is, when it's really just the character models - and they have fairly poor facial animations. The environments are bland, low-textured and completely unable to be interacted with.

It feels like another next-gen/last-gen in HD game.

I'll play the PSN demo when it comes out, just to give it another go, but still skeptical that there will be any earthshaking differences to sway my opinion.

Congrats to whoever fancies the game though. Just seems like more of the same to me. Only worse, as nothing has really been improved except for the graphics, and even then, only marginally. Not everything has to be utterly innovative, but I really wish gamers would stop giving a free pass to games with mediocre improvements.

To give an example from each system. Gears of War, could not have been done on an original Xbox. Killzone 2, could not have been done on a PS2.

Resident Evil 4, can and was done on all last-gen systems. And from everything that I've read and played so far, this game is just RE: 4 in HD.

I'll buy it after a month or two, once they hype wears off and all the trade-ins hit the bargain bin.

SCThor5570d ago

Resident Evil 5 - 5/5

Project Origin- 4/5.

Loco Roco 2- 4.5/5

Sonic Unleashed- 2/5,

Skate 2- 4.5/5

King_many_layers5570d ago

@ Chris339

what on earth were you expecting ??

Why are so many people expecting it to be bloody run and gun, this is frustrating me to no end that people want it to completely change it's genre.
The game has taken a drastic change of direction allready (from the demo) as it's lost it's horror aspect. To me that's my major dissapointment, the game itself is ok, it's not as good as RE4 because it feels a little weird to control now (my opinion)

I would have prefered it if turning your camera was constantly on the right analog.

But seriously, it's supposed to be a survival horror, it would be so much easier if it was run and gun. It just wouldn't be resident evil in any way shape or form except the story. It's allready lost most of what it once was, why go and get rid of all of it.

/rant over/

Chris3995570d ago (Edited 5570d ago )

This is supposed to be "next-gen" after all.

I'm not some Halofan4life, FPS RULEZ sorta person. But with the advances in technology, I thought that games were supposed to become more realistic.

Dead Space was quite well executed and had a run and gun mechanic. A run and gun mechanic does not necessarily make a game "easier": ammo can be scarce, the atmosphere can be oppressive, the enemies can be smarter/ more agile/ more plentiful. Design choices are what affect the challenge of a survival horror game, and I don't agree with the ones the RE has made.

As well, the control scheme for Resident Evil has remained relatively the same for over a decade. Enough is enough. How many times do you plan on purchasing the same piece of software with updated graphics and a new number stamped on it?

The fact that a seasoned marine (cop/ whatever he is), isn't trained well enough to run let alone WALK backwards while using a fire-arm is ludicrous.

Oh, and I stand by my point that the game is graphically unimpressive aside from the character models.

There just isn't enough here for ME to warrant a $70 Canadian + tax purchase.

More power to you if you see greater value in the game then I do. I sincerely hope that you enjoy it.

Peace,
- C

P.S. And I second your point that the game has lost it's survival horror edge, the atmosphere is much more action oriented. Sort of like a crippled Devil May Cry w/ zombies.

Sevir045570d ago

expected things to improve over what was perfect for last gen, it's much the same why i left feeling ripped off after play DMC4. a total last gen experience on a new gen console with HD resolutions. Though

The only break through i see with this game is that it added better graphics, co-op and a limited online play. apart from that nothing's changed.

So I agree with you. These games had higher potential, but just go a graphics update. Dead space to me was the turning point of why i fell away from RE5, everything about Dead space was well executed. I'll be passing on Re5 for sure.

Nothing else.

Panipal20055570d ago

Your SOLE complaint is the whole 'no shooting without stopping' thing?

You know there are all kinds of games with very different gameplay mechanics. Re4/5 is only one of them, and you'll never guess, it's perfectly possible to be fun to play.

You're missing out.

Chris3995570d ago

- No run and gun mechanic.
- After playing Dead Space, it just doesn't seem "scary". And Dead Space wasn't terrifying by any means, but it had all the key survival horror components: limited ammo, tough enemies, claustrophobic/ eerie environments, great atmosphere.
- Character models are nice, facial animations are off - a long cry from the "Uncanny Valley" and more akin to early Godzilla flicks.
- Environments are bland.
- Aside from some of the graphics and the online component, nothing feels very "next-gen".

I'm not saying that this will be a bad game, I just don't understand how every review/ preview has the same complaints listed and yet this game gets a free pass.

I'm not excited about it. That's great if you - and a lot of other people - are. Hope that you all like the game. Who knows, maybe it'll be your copy I pick up in the bargain bin :)

Panipal20055570d ago

- No run and gun mechanic.

Must it have one? Why? Because some people, such as you, can only handle one particular shooter mechanic? Not willing to, as it were, try different experiences?

- After playing Dead Space, it just doesn't seem "scary".

Never played RE1, 2, or 3, so I can't judge them for 'scariness'. I don't think RE4 was going for 'scary' (you say scary, I think Fatal Frame/Siren), it was going for 'panic inducing' in that you're constantly being surrounded. RE5 is going along the same path.

Also -

- The fact that a seasoned marine (cop/ whatever he is), isn't trained well enough to run let alone WALK backwards while using a fire-arm is ludicrous.

I take it you never played RE4 to completion, or if you did you must have found this an issue and hated it, after all Leon's a Secret Service agent with acrobatic skills who can't walk backwards while firing.

- Character models are nice, facial animations are off - a long cry from the "Uncanny Valley" and more akin to early Godzilla flicks.

I tell you what, I'll give you this one - if it isn't any different in the full game.

- Environments are bland.

What's bland about them? I'm not seeing 'bland'. This just seems like you're looking for things to complain about or make bullet-points about.

- Who knows, maybe it'll be your copy I pick up in the bargain bin :)

I doubt it, I don't sell or trade my games in. Although that's largely due to the insulting prices the shops offer :)

Chris3995570d ago (Edited 5570d ago )

Yes, I played RE: 4 till completion and didn't enjoy it either. I have played every iteration of the franchise except for the Wii version and including the Dreamcast version, so I think that my opinion has a good deal of experience behind it.

Should it have a run and gun mechanic? Yes. The mechanic exists because it WORKS AND IS REALISTIC. Almost every person who has played the game wishes that the feature was implemented. You are the exception.

As far as the mood of the game, it is survival HORROR. It should induce fright, that is it's purpose. If you had played the first few games in the series, you would know that they are sparsely-munitioned, cinematic, jump-fests. The emphasis is on survival, stealth and conservation (of life and ammo). It is not a zombie-mowing gun extravaganza. And if the latter is the choice the developers decided upon, would it not make sense to have complimented a better control scheme to compliment change in atmosphere? (Aka: Run and Gun)

If you have a copy of the demo, I suggest that you load it and take a discerning look at the environments - they are poorly textured and low-poly. Hence I refer to them as "bland".

Again, all of this is merely my opinion, you are more than entitled to your own.

It's clear that we disagree, and that's cool. You enjoy your purchase, and I will enjoy my purchase of something else (or a second-hand version).

Peace.

P.S. I'm not looking to make "bullet points" or for things to complain about. I am a consumer, and my money has value to me. I am critical in how I make my purchases. I also would like to see gaming evolve as an adult form of entertainment. And I personally (again, this is just my opinion and something we may disagree over) don't believe in supporting a franchise that doesn't seem - to me - to have done anything intriguing or creative over it's last iteration. Supporting titles in the industry that do not exhibit growth will not lead to artistic creativity in the future. It just tells a developer:
"That's alright, put another number and a new coat of paint on it and you can have my $70".

Panipal20055569d ago

You could have just said it should be the same as every game ever. There's no arguing with someone like you, you lack reasonable arguments.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5569d ago
Sir Ken_Kutaragi5570d ago

Cool;) I'm glad us PS3 owners get the better version!!! ;-D
(xBot Zombie Lemmings don't like me saying that!!!) ;-D

Ghyst5570d ago (Edited 5570d ago )

How do you possibly have the march issue? i can see having the feb issue, but march?

I call fake, no images from the mag? ....

LordDhampire5570d ago

magazines come out month ahead for subscribers

Stu19815570d ago

No. Subscription copies do not come out a whole month before the stores.

Ghyst5570d ago

I guess none of those games are important anyway, but they should still need scans, just because none of the games are big.

switch-it5570d ago

RE5, F.E.A.R. 2 and Skate 2 isnt big enough for you?

Meryl5570d ago

I can't still believe they gave it more than killzone 2, thats bad considering how the controls are awkward and the camera angle can be 2, they should have scored it lower if they can put down killzone 2 for no having co-op then they should put down re5 for having clunky controls and bad camera angles and for making the same thing but hd, oh well i will still buy it anyway coz i love the re franchise.
oh well i am happy killzone 2 scored what id did, and many other reviewers have given it a higher score of 10/10 anyway so i'm happy.

King_many_layers5570d ago

if I'm correct in believeing this is american OPM then I'm afraid you're mistaking. They scored it 5/5, it was uk and some others that gave a 9.

but if I'm wrong then I do thoroughly agree, judging by impressions of the beta testers in this place.

Show all comments (22)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ58d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia58d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73058d ago (Edited 58d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6958d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y58d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot58d ago (Edited 58d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex58d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y56d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07217d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde217d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude217d ago (Edited 217d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992217d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme217d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992217d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313217d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69217d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor217d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69217d ago (Edited 217d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack217d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface216d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)