Sony has moved to quash various speculation and internet rumour about co-operative play for Killzone 2 being patched in at a later date.
The PlayStation 3 may not have been the strongest generation for Sony, but there were still some diamonds in the rough that deserve a revisit as PS5 remasters.
Even if they could just remaster and put on PSVR2, some would still look great as VR titles and could do a whole lot to bolster the headset w these exclusives! I'd imagine the investment of reworking these titles into VR would be way less than building new games from the ground up, and they could be amazing experiences, and VR often makes flat games feel fresh again. The Resistance and Killzone games are particularly what I want to see!!
The time is perfect for a resistance fall of man game campaign coop multiplayer
Resistance was ok but Warhawk and Starhawk was better and kept me coming back for almost a decade of fun and petty revenge on the loud mouth unskilled players 🤣
Edit I loved capture the flag dropping the pot on the flag carrier was extremely satisfying as well as transforming your plane in bot form and stumping them to death 😱
The Amsterdam-based studio reflects on its humble beginnings, beloved franchises, and growth through the years.
Up there with the top tier in the industry. Love Guerrilla Games - Horizon Burning Shores is simply STUNNING.
32.7M sales in the Horizon franchise! With 8.4M coming from Forbidden West alone! Truly a hugely successful game and franchise as a whole. Looking forward to Horizon III
Yooo, when I first saw that Killzone 1 footage at E3, my friends my brothers and I were like, Holy shit! When it came out, it didn't look exactly like it, but we sunk so many hours into 1 & 2.
I even liked Killzone: SF, it was a spectacle to look at, and even today it looks good. I hope they make a new one. Can you imagine how that will look, and they can get some modern FPS pointers from Bungie.
Such a wonderful studio. They deserve all their success.
The Decima Engine is absolute 🔥 I'm just mad they have abandoned Killzone.
Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."
Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).
Quick google search
No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.
I can care less if theres no COOP, doesnt make the game better, really, its just little more fun but thats it. Man, ill be on Multiplayer all the time, how cares about coop?
I don't mind co-op (online, NOT splitscreen!) in itself, but if it was slapped on to KZ2 to the detriment of the overall (apparently brilliant) single & multiplayer package then I'd prefer it wasn't there.
I don't want to play co-op.
But if I did, I could go and play Resistance 2. Or another co-op game. It doesn't need to be a part of KZ2. 99% of games DON'T have single-player, co-op and multiplayer all at once, and very few have those all 3 of those modes awesome.
Co-op has always been debunked. There's not going to be any co-op. Think about it from their perspective - what would they gain from adding co-op? They've made the game, lots of the reviews have come in, and they're planning a big marketing push and they'll sell loads of copies of the game. By investing another load of money into a co-op mode, they won't make any money out of it, unless they charge, in which case there would be uproar.
It's all very well everybody shouting for co-op - but what if they just bodged co-op in as a patch very quickly and it was buggy, basic and not fun? It wouldn't even be played, and people would soon forget about it. They'd have to have had a seperate team working on it, just like the MP and SP, which would have multiplied their production costs by 1.5. It wouldn't have been worth it.
Who cares its got 32 player co-op, COD 4 didnt have it and I've never even bothered with COD W@W co-op.
Imo its better to have it a few months earlier than waiting till summer so they can tag on co-op that no one really cares about.
Is it me or are journalists trying really hard to find everything BAD with KZ2 despite the insignificance, its like they want it to fail?
KZ2 is helping push the boundarys for gaming especially on consoles, this is only ever a good thing!
It's the reason i'm not getting KZ2. I'm 30 and only got into consoles at 27-28 and co-op is the most important factor when it comes to games for me unless its a RPG like Mass Effect (yes i have both Xbox and PS3).