550°

Sony Game division posts 400 mill yen profit Q3

Sony has posted a small Q3 profit and its game division has also followed that trend from the latest figures released by Sony today. Of note, the PS3 shipped 4.46 million units in Q3, bringing the total of calendar year 2008 to 10.7 million.

ultimolu5584d ago

B-But Sony doomsooorz! o(o-o)0

ActionBastard5584d ago

Of course they are! Just look at heir 9 lineup ;)

rucky5584d ago

T-T-They were suppose to bow out...

fishd5584d ago

PS3 outsold xbox 360 in 2008

10.7>10.3(28-17.7)

now which one is the titanic?

ultimolu5584d ago

Yesh! o-0

But in all seriousness, good job for them.

L Ronald Hubbard5584d ago

Hurry! Fetch those 'PS3 is doomed' articles!

sonarus5584d ago

So whats the total sales for PS3 now?

sonarus5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

PS3 21.3 sold
360 28.5 sold

They are DEAD. DEEEAAAADDDD

sorry for double post

lokiroo4205584d ago

WHat no box boy attacks on this article, chicken sh1ts!

The Lazy One5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

according to both companies financial reports, they sold negligibly similar

Calendar 2008 reported:

360

Q3 07 : 1.3
Q4 07 : 1.3
Q1 08 : 2.2
Q1 08 : 6.1

Total : 10.9

PS3

Q4 07 : 2.33
Q1 08 : 1.56
Q2 08 : 2.43
Q3 08 : 4.46

Total : 10.78

edit: before people jump on the quarters not aligning, M$ has a 1 quarter shift from Sony. M$ Q1 ends in September, Sony Q1 ends in June.

edit: whoever disagreed is retarded. Go find the numbers and add em yourself.

INehalemEXI5584d ago

that kept saying I can't wait for these #'s? You know who you are. Read em and weep.

GWAVE5584d ago

Hah. Wow. Sony beat the 360 two years in a row....which console is "teh doomed" now? I'm amazed that they beat the 360 in 2008 despite TWO price drops on behalf of the 360. Haters officially have no excuses now.

- "PS3 haz no gamez!" Dismissed
- "PS3 online sux!" Dismissed
- "Blu Ray will fail!" Dismissed
- "PS3 graphics are worse than 360!" Dismissed
- "PS3 exclusives are lower-rated than 360 exclusives!" Dismissed

And now, the final one:

- "Bu...bu...but the 360 outsells the PS3!"

Dismissed, ladies and gentlemen. Dismissed.

PoSTedUP5584d ago

sh*t wheres all the haters? its kinda quiet in here ya feel me lol.

Danja5584d ago

umm where is the 8 million lead again the 360 has..?

M$ would never lie about there figures now ..hmm

well you read here folks the PS3 is officially dead ..it managed to outsell the 360 again.....it's doomed for the rest of the generation Sony should just drop the PS3.....there games division is obviously not making profits because they haven't done desperate price cuts yet.....lol

5584d ago
soxfan20055584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

"Microsoft likes to dump a mass of extra consoles on retailers during the holidays and then put out press releases claiming their amazing 'sales'."
You, of course, have proof of that, right? And these "retailers", who are barely staying afloat during the recession, allow tons of extra stock to clog up their stores? Exactly which retailers are you referring to?
Please post a link to a reputable source that can verify your statement, because it seems pretty unbelievable to me.
@below
You still didn't answer my question. What retailers do you know of that MS supposedly "dumped" product on? You brought it up.

5584d ago
Rampant5584d ago

Thought sonyboys were smarter than this.

4 million dollar profit in the most profitable quarter of the year is NOT ok. And, oh, Sony as a whole lost 3.5 billon dollars.

BU-BU-BUT SUCCESS

GWAVE5584d ago

@ Rampant

Oh Lord. 3 billion? What does that say about Microsoft's 8+ BILLION loss on the Xbox division alone?

BU-BU-BUT TEH PRICE CUT!

Rampant5584d ago

I didn't support the xbox which lost most of that money. Microsoft is making money on the xbox360, I own an xbox360, why should I care how much the xbox lost them?

I just think it's a little ignorant to claim that Sony did a good job of virtually breaking even in the biggest quarter for electronic devices.

Chris3995584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

And they LOVE their MS:

http://kotaku.com/gaming/mi...

MS has been "channel stuffing" for years. They also increase revenues by forcing retailers to take Windows software are engages in numerous anti-trust lawsuits and are pretty much one of the most unscrupulous companies in the world.

We'll know this to be the case if this year is almost exactly like 2007; where consoles sales in the first few quarters will be minimal, due to all the excess stock that retailers have.

Sure they are a decent competitor and made a nice system (when it works). But let's not glorify them or their practices.

GWAVE5584d ago

@ Rampant

I think it's equally ignorant not to congratulate the PS3 for outselling the 360 in 2008, even at a higher price point.

I think it's equally ignorant not to mention that Microsoft has been closing 1st-party studios and cutting loose 2nd-party studios while Sony continues to strengthen their 1st and 2nd-party lineup.

I think it's ignorant to turn to profit percentages and year-over-year increases to evaluate the success of a console. Don't tell me that 360 owners are going to change their tune AGAIN now that "the 360 sells more" isn't valid anymore. Will it be "the 360 has a higher profit margin percentage"? :^D

Rampant5584d ago

even though ps3 had a pricecut and a new model launch nov07 which helped them for the first 8 quarters until microsoft slashed the price of the 360 in the last 4 quarters.

The difference is that 360 sells for a gain and ps3 sells for a loss. Hence the ps3 is higher value than the 360, and it amazes me that it sells less when you can not only use it for playing games, but also for watching bluray movies. Remember when ps3boys said "Wait 'til christmas, first holiday where blu ray is the only next gen video storage solution". Well, that is true, and alot of ps3s are probably being used as a bluray player primarily.

How do I come to this conclusion? The PS3 doubled its installed base in '08, and had more high profile games than '07, yet software sales only increased by 50-60%??? If the ps3 had twice as many units in the busiest time of the year, shouldn't software sales increase at least 100% also, probably more because there were a lot of high profile games released for the year (LBP, Res 2, MGS4 etc).

Conclusion: PS3 might have kept up with 360 in '08, but many of the ps3s sold are being used as bluray players, and for sony that is bad because selling a system at a big loss means they have to make up for the loss in software sales. And the software sales just aren't keeping up.

Rampant5584d ago

So that is why every store here in sweden has a sale for ps3s and loads of ps3s stacked up in the storefronts, whereas you have to wait for new deliveries to get a 360 pro or Wii. Yeah, I'm not buying it :D

mint royale5584d ago

there is no humility on this site from EITHER side!

I will stay out of the needless scwabbles and just respond to the article. Well done sony, the figures aren't as bad as the leaked ones last week and the sales for the ps3 weren't disasterous at all considering the economy. However it is bad news that their most profitable console (the ps2) has had a 53% drop in sales, it must be on its way out. As for sales compared to the 360 it was ever so slightly behind but close enough to claim a draw for 2008, just like MS can for 2007.

And for those dumping on MS cos they were so much cheaper; when was the price cut? They weren't at this price throughout the year.

And for those that claim MS channel stuff - they did it once to meet a sales target in 2007 and consequently the first quarter of the following year they only shipped 0.6 million consoles as retailers already had enough of them. However this isn't a MS specific thing and Sony, nintendo, apple or whoever would do the same thing if they really need to.

So well done MS, Sony and especially nintendo for their christmas seasons.

JaggedSac5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

"Oh Lord. 3 billion? What does that say about Microsoft's 8+ BILLION loss on the Xbox division alone?

BU-BU-BUT TEH PRICE CUT! "

Yeah, but it took more than 1 friggen quarter to go down 8 billion. It has taken Sony 1 to lose 3.5 billion. That is insane. M$ made 4 billion in profit previous quarter on revenue of 16.2 billion.

And since when is PS2+PSP+PS3 = $4 million dollars profit a good thing? Something is dragging those numbers down, I will give you two guesses.

Also, perhaps we should take a look at the quarter before lasts results and compare.

mint royale5584d ago

neither side can brag about losses. MS have lost 6 billion since the entered the market and have only just turned profitable in the last 2 years - 6-7 years after entering the market!

And sony have lost all the ps2 profits since the ps3 was released. If you don't believe me check the past game division results. Since 1998 when the ps1 was in its pomp and sony started to separate its game division for financial figures, SOny has made a loss.

Quite spectacular when you consider Nintendo has made 12 billion+ profit since 2000. God knows what the other 2 are playing at.

Chris3995584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

Didn't think so. Perhaps in YOUR region, what you stated may be the case. You represent what lies at the core of fanboy logic: an inability to see beyond your own perspective.

Fact: According to both MS and Sony's official figures, globally, they shipped/ sold relatively the same amount year over year - give or take 100K or so (and I really don't care who that small surplus belonged too). Re-read their press statements if you need further clarification.

Fact: MS has been channel stuffing for years, they do it with all their products. You asked for a link, and I provided you with one. I have both a 360 and a PS3. Aside from being on my second 360 and having disc-read errors (which I can sort of work around by installing games), I'm happy enough with both systems. I am not a shareholder in either MS or SNE.

I'm not going to continue this discussion, because you clearly live in a fantasy land. A magical place where logic and facts have no sway and global economics are governed by Sweden and Sweden alone.

P.S. Europe has all sorts of importing/ shipping restrictions. Perhaps SCEE is simply more adept at shipping within their region. There are a number of causes for the supply issue with the other systems that you mentioned. The reasonable thing would be to examine these shipping issues in detail (assuming they exist and are not fabrications of a hyper-active mind), find evidence to support your case and then present it in the form of an argument. "I don't buy it," really isn't a statement weighted with any thought or merit.

mint royale5584d ago

yes MS do channel stuff. But so do sony. They did it in last years Q3 and I think the same will occur this year. However sony do already have enough shipped to meet their targets for teh fiscal year with a poor next quarter (they need around 1.5 million shipped.)

prowiew5584d ago

Well. Today is sonys conference. Lets hear out what they have to say. I expect big job cuts. What do u think?

The Lazy One5584d ago

M$ can't channel stuff without demand for the channel stuffing. They can't just make people buy more consoles at their stores. They can give them better incentives, but regardless of the stuffing, someone bought the consoles. They can't just ship another 1 million consoles to people and send them a bill without them ordering it.

Demand for the 360 was overestimated that year by retailers just as much as microsoft, just like it was underestimated the next year with a shortage falling in january. And what Nintendo is doing by keeping their supply of wii's low to artificially inflate demand is just as bad if not worse, because they aren't allowing the retailers and consumers to make the decision to buy what they want right now.

Saigon5584d ago

good numbers...and the sad thing is that the fiscal year is not over yet...so that means they will be well passed their numbers by March...

NickIni5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

I love it when fanboys pretend to understand business and profits, and defend it like rabid animals.

Pure comedy. Please don't stop.

king dong5584d ago

i did'nt realise there was so many sony investors on here...what's the share of the profits for you lot then?? it must be quite abit seeing how this thread has gone.

eagle215584d ago

How many times should I remind aaron green-turd to keep quiet?

Sony has the swagger! :)

soxfan20055584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

Your comment about "not seeing the global marketplace" is interesting. What you are saying is that we should look at the big picture, not just a small sliver. In that regard, why are PS3 fanboys trumpeting just 2008 sales, while ignoring "lifetime" sales of PS3 vs. 360? Lifetime, 360 still leads by 6-8 million, depending on who you believe. (Don't give me the "6 million RROD double sales" line either. Software sales of AAA multi platform games are much higher on 360, which proves there are more 360's in homes than PS3's.)I know 360 released a year sooner, but it's not MS's fault that Sony didn't launch at the same time. Those sales still count. US PS3 fanboys who love to talk "worldwide" sales can't just suddenly narrow their views when it suits their views.

I know, I know, "the price cut" is coming. But, even if PS3 outsells 360 by 2 million a year, which is extremely optimistic, it will still take 3-4 years just to pull even. Plus, MS will cut prices again during that period as well, which will only increase 360 sales even more.

xwabbit5584d ago

OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM GOMGOMGOMGOOMGOMGOMGOM
MGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGO
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM GOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMG
OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM OMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGO
GOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGO MGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOMGOM

WTF! SONY was a sinking ship. I MEAN JUST BECAUSE BLU RAY IS GAINING MORE THAN TWICE THE GROUND DVD DID WHEN IT WAS INTRODUCED TO THE MARKET DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHING! AND THEY DON'T HAVE ANY GAMES! MGS4,MS2,LBP,RS2,HS WHERE ALL FLOPS CUS THEY DIDN'T SELL 5MILL THE FIRST WEEK! HOW CAN THEY MAKE $!!

Consoldtobots5584d ago

Id like to make a point to all my fellow PS3 owners out there. Don't be too harsh on the younger 360 fans. They are children and don't know any better. After children tend to get attaced to their first big toy. In time they will see that the PS3 is indeed the better console and make the switch with NO HESITATION. I know I have already seen it happen in some circles. Now here is the distinction, people like "The mart" "POG"
and the rest of the usual suspects are the ones that GET NO MERCY. They are clearly not children and have orchestrated a very relentless and ongoing smear campaign against sony and more specifically a product many of us have to come to love. Flame these turdnuggets all day I say.

Sarick5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

The whole issue isn't about just the PS3. Sony is earning from PS2, PSP and PS3 hardware and the online experience.

The 360 doesn't only earn revenue from console sales or game royalties. They also charge for Xbox live which forces people to pay for online gaming as a service.

Their next step is the new pay-as-you-go silver membership where if you choose to play online you'll be charged an hourly rate if you exceed the cost of a gold membership you'll be temperately upgraded to gold for that month. This way casual players can get online without a monthly subscription and it can lead to a full subscription fee.

This is also why 360 is surviving the heavy losses from RROD and the $199 price. The $199 isn't really a loss it's more that they aren't charging what they would if there was no competition. People who pay for the cheap 360 aren't finished paying because the $199 simply an outlet to gaming. To get the most out of that outlet you need a subscription and multiple hardware upgrades.

PSN, has a different approach where online is free but people have a choice to pay for extra personal content. You want to pimp yourself it cost money otherwise it's still accessible.

The PS3 & Blu-ray is also an outlet for online gaming but to the extent that it sales itself. Each helped get more consoles into the homes.

More then just the console sales make up for the profits and losses a simple how many units shipped doesn't mean everything. Look at the Atari E.T. game. So many of those where made that they ended up in dumps. The same go's for consoles. Stuffing the markets with units or manufacturing replacement units for defects doesn't mean profits. It's simple, just because unit ship doesn't mean they turn a profit.

uie4rhig5584d ago

sony must be lying!! coz microsoft says the lead was 8mil!! OMG!! sony are lying!! sony, i never knew you wud scoop to MS's level!!

/sarcasm

seriously tho.. who said Sony was a Sinking ship? FAIL EPICLY TO WHOEVER WROTE THE ARTICLE!!!

callahan095584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

@ Rampant: Let me start by quoting you,
"hehe
Thought sonyboys were smarter than this.
4 million dollar profit in the most profitable quarter of the year is NOT ok. And, oh, Sony as a whole lost 3.5 billon dollars."

Yeah, being one of the only profitable departments in a company that lost money overall is a terrible thing, isn't it? Surely Sony is going to want to leave the Videogame industry because of it!

/sarcasm

callahan095584d ago

@ JaggedSac, starting with a quote from you:
"Yeah, but it took more than 1 friggen quarter to go down 8 billion. It has taken Sony 1 to lose 3.5 billion. That is insane. M$ made 4 billion in profit previous quarter on revenue of 16.2 billion."

Simple response: none of those figures have anything to do with either company's gaming divisions. Sony lost money this quarter, but Sony Computer Entertainment MADE money. Therefore, the gaming industry is good for Sony, so all these gaming-related Doom & Gloom arguments about Sony can just go to hell, they have no merit.

DaTruth5584d ago

Which company in the entire world didn't lose money last quarter? Answer no.1 Sony Computer Entertainment. It's practically a depression.

socomnick5562d ago

correct me if im wrong but, isn't 400 million yen only like 3 million us dollars. Isnt that like chump change for a corporation. :/ if 400 million yen is all that sony could profit then they are in deep trouble.

+ Show (44) more repliesLast reply 5562d ago
TheColbertinator5584d ago

They should cut the PS2 price to 100 dollars and bundle it with Gran Turismo 4 to give it one last huge push

ultimolu5584d ago

That's a pretty good idea.

fishd5584d ago

Or make a wii type controller for PS2...

Helghast Slayer5584d ago

NOOOOO!!! SONY IS TEH DOOMEDZ!!! lol people think the ps3 is the only thing Sony has in it's arsenal. Why do you thing their called Sony Computer Entertainment? Neither they or the ps3 are going anywhere for a long f@cking time so get used to it.

They are still the most successful video game makers in the history of computer games.

JasonPC360PS3Wii5584d ago

Nice to see that Sony still makes money on the PS2 even if they are losing in all other areas :D

cmrbe5584d ago

Sony should do an ultimate PS2 bundle with top games from their first parties say top 5 games. This would be a fitting end to the greatest console in history of gaming.

Snake Raiser5584d ago

200 million PS2 shipped MOTHA FCKA!!!

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5583d ago
HS835584d ago

Can we say Sony is making.........A COME BACK!

Bathyj5584d ago

No, because they've never actually been in trouble.

INehalemEXI5584d ago

exactly, all those doom articles where pure comedy. Some just took them seriously and made it even more comical

lokiroo4205584d ago

Dont call it a come back because the kid was never down!

TheTwelve5584d ago

Don't call it a comeback...Sony's been doing this for years. I didn't expect the raw numbers to prove the h8ers wrong so soon, but I knew that they would come eventually.

12

prowiew5584d ago

Do you know what is 400million yen in dollars? Thats 4.4 million USD. MMM. Thats good for a small company. Personally I thank ps2 and psp. Probably thats were they are making lots of money.

DaTruth5584d ago (Edited 5584d ago )

That's good for any company in one of the worst quarters in financial history.

Do you people not know what's going on out there?

prowiew5584d ago

I just want to clear that out. Some people saw the 400 million and thought that was great. But when you make the conversion, 4 million doesnt sound so great.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5584d ago
5584d ago Replies(5)
SupaPlaya5584d ago

not just from sales of PS3. Nonetheless, this is really good news for Sony as 2009 looks to be even better as far as games go.

Quick question for you guys: anyone seen any Killzone 2 advertisement yet? Isn't the game less than a month away?

HS835584d ago

I been seeing ads on gamepsot.com and gamefaqs but thats about it. I hear thou the TV ones dont start until closer to release.

SupaPlaya5584d ago

my friend, as it will be totally unfair to Guerilla if Sony screw up on the marketing for this gem.

HS835584d ago

I agree! Killzone 2 is the flagship PS3 game in my opinion. It is what the PS3 can do when developers take the time to know how to truly make games on it.

arika5584d ago

i heard they are going to start the mega-advertisement of killzone 2 on superbowl. i know one thing for sure that sony knows that they have a winner in their hands and it would be foolish of them not to market the hell out of this one.so guys don't worry about it.

SupaPlaya5584d ago

Sony's marketing team has finally passed Marketing 101...

Sarcasm5584d ago

"Sony's marketing team has finally passed Marketing 101... "

Not quite sure about that. They're still stuck in Marketing 105A. They'll finally get to Marketing 105B.

Not until I see a Helghast or Kratos mountain dew soda bottle, til they're marketing team passes 101.

shawnsl655584d ago

i wanna see Helghast n the other dudes playing football on Helghan during the superbowl commercial... then after that drinking "GATORADE" to end the commercial.

CBaoth5584d ago

Go ahead and google the XLIII commercial ads and Sony is NOT listed. Doesn't mean they can't or won't, but at this time no. At 3 million per 30 seconds, it's a steep price if they can't get a slot early before halftime. I always root for Cinderella but this year's game could get ugly quick.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5584d ago
Show all comments (193)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 9h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 6h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 5h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble8h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 5h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 5h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 5h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 4h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 4h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 4h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_23h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy8522h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty13h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 13h ago
thesoftware7301d 3h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 2h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 2h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier17h ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood9h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k48h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
WelkinCole22h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel198919h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware7307h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos13h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno8h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 7h ago
anast1d 6h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 5h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 5h ago (Edited 1d 5h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 4h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 4h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (46)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal