290°

Xbox 360 vs. PS3 Face-Off: Round 17

It's the first face-off of the New Year and with it, the opportunity to bring the cold, hard, iron first of order to the games cupboard by rounding up the games we really should have covered by now, but didn't for reasons too numerous and too tedious to get into. It's also the chance to take a look at how the first high profile release of 2009 - EA's Lord of the Rings: Conquest - measures up under Eurogamer's unyielding scrutiny.

As we've got a lot of software to get through, we've bumped up the interesting games to the front of the feature, then grouped together the rest in the form of smaller, round-up featurettes at the end. However, as per the norm, all games get the full screenshot gallery treatment - captures losslessly derived from the HDMI ports of both consoles at full range 24-bit RGB precision. Where PS3 outputs a 1080p signal on any given game, additional galleries are provided, along with their 360 counterparts.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
duplissi5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

you said it. yet the fanboys will be like flys on sh!t.

although i did notice something peculiar: laras boobs seemed a tad bigger in the xbox version. see here- jump to 1:15 and tell me if im wrong

Carbide75583d ago

Haha, yea. I just checked that out. They do seem to be a tad bigger

duplissi5583d ago

yeah just by a little. lol odd dont you think?

thereapersson5583d ago

That's because Eidos was utilizing the advanced polygon pushing power of the 360 to augment Lara's cup size where they simply could not on the PS3. ;)

Helghast5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

Nobody buys a particular console base on the minute differences between multiplatform games.

Although a KillZone 2 comparison isn't necessary to see the gap between PS3 and 360 since Uncharted: Drakes Fortune was compared to Gears 2 and Uncharted won by a landslide!

Seriously, these sites need to compare exclusives not multiplatforms.

Why dis5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

You keep saying KZ2 but I don't think folks will be able to boast KZ2 2 months after teh release once other 2009 titles are announced.

PixlSheX5583d ago

That's the point. There are so many exclusives that we don't know what to play.

Rampant5583d ago

Why should they compare exclusives? You already know that you're going to get Killzone 2 for the ps3. They do these comparisons to show which version of a multiplat game you should buy.

lordgodalming5583d ago

"Not this again..."

Agreed. There's no reason for this series of *ahem* articles to have gone on for so long. For example, Issue 17 (this one) can be summed up in a single sentence: "We don't like the anti-aliasing on the PS3." Fair enough. Now be quiet already.

tatotiburon5583d ago

1.7@ if you all have too many exclusives to play, why every single game of the 2008 lineup had terrible sales?

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 5583d ago
pansenbaer5583d ago

Ha. I know. These just make me laugh. And the discussion that stems from them is pretty interesting as well. :)

InMyOpinion5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

Give it up for The We Don't Cares feat The Bu-Bu-Buts with their smash hit single "They're biased"!

Graphics Whore5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

Do Sony Fanboy's really need to mention anything other than Killzone 2? No offense Jenzo, but as a Xbox Fanboy you should keep your mouth shut when you know your console of preference ain't doin' to hot in the technical department.

Anyway, happy gaming gamers.

InMyOpinion5583d ago

Multiplats show what the developer can achieve on both platforms, exclusives only show what they can achieve on one particular platform. I'd love to see what Guerilla Games with a $50+ million budget could achieve on the 360.

PixlSheX5583d ago

"I'd love to see what Guerilla Games with a $50+ million budget could achieve on the 360. "

Maybe a exclusive DLC.

Dark General5583d ago

*Laughs my ass off* Well played Pixelsex.

And oh yeah i don't think multiplatform shows what devs can do with both consoles. Multiplatforms maximize profits from sells. More times than not because of deadlines, fixes etc games aren't extremely optimized. There's a difference between peak performance and polishing.

dude_uk5583d ago

hahaha!!!!

OWNED

Nice one mate =D

Man_of_the_year5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

Bro the droids will never understand the concept of multiplats looking worse on the PS3. They believe that KZ2 is the only game that the PS3 needs. No other games for the console are needed - just KZ2 and that people will flock to buy a $400 console just to play 1 game for the next 8 years....(they seem to have already forgotten about MGS4 & LBP) as if those 2 exclusives never existed. And that KZ2 is enough to bring the PS3 from 3rd place up to 1st.

LOL delusional droids will never understand the concept of which ever console has the largest library will be the winner of this Gen (excluding the wii).

Can't wait to play Section 8.

@ PixlSheX

Nope i didn't forget the /sarcasm (its because there is none there) i am not a delusional droid - i see things as they are and yet i still love my PS3.

Graphics Whore5582d ago

Man of the year, I would take you up on your discussion however seeing as this topic is ABOUT GRAPHICS, Sony Fans have the upper hand.

/article.

Man_of_the_year5582d ago (Edited 5582d ago )

Gameplay > Graphics

Always has been, always will be. And since KZ2 is the ONLY game that i would say is a nice way to up the bar graphic wise - KZ2 has also been in deveopment for 5 years, cost $50 million to make.

The true test is comparing the same game on both systems - and i am sorry but the 360 continuously wins in multiplat game comparisons.

The conversation would be 1 sided here as you only have KZ2 to bring to the table. And going by recent reviews getting 8, 9, and 10's only solidifies the fact that KZ2 was an over HYPED game.

And since we are only talking about the article, then your comment "seeing as this topic is ABOUT GRAPHICS, Sony Fans have the upper hand." was already incorrect before you even thought it up.

Article is about multiplat games being compared to each other - not exclusives - maybe if you had read the article you would have realized this.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5582d ago
Fishy Fingers5583d ago (Edited 5583d ago )

Not many great multiplats over the last few months? Only played 2 of the games on that list (PoP, Saint Row) and didnt really enjoy either. Have fun arguing over got the higher polished poo ;)

edhe5583d ago

Last few months saw Dead Space, mirror's edge, skate 2, prince of persia, saints row 2, sf2hd, cod w@w, midnight club, fallout3 ..

No i don't think there's a problem with multiplat titles recently.

Show all comments (57)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader821d 3h ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1822d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere1d 22h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 22h ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere1d 22h ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 7h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere1d 22h ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 8h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX2d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 2h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno2d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno2d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)