100°

Capcom: Resident Evil 5 can still "loosely be considered a survival horror game"

VG247: Chris Kramer, Capcom's senior director for communications and community, has said that Resident Evil 5 is a continuation of the series and is no longer a traditional survival horror game.

"Resident Evil 5 can still loosely be considered a survival horror game," he offered. However, compared with Resident Evil 4 it will be "more exciting, more action with more tension."

Read Full Story >>
videogaming247.com
morriss5616d ago

Real shame that. I wanted it to go back to the classic survival horror.

Cwalat5616d ago

without any lies...
i dont like it... although im buying it first day. i dont like all the action thingy...

chaosatom5616d ago

So i am going to pick this anyway.

But I just want the game to be really good.

IzKyD13315616d ago

Not many survival horror games that take place in broad daylight

Blademask5616d ago

But, for horror fans:

1. Siren (PSN) Get this game now. - Play in the dark. I dare you. Now its not the most polished game, but it has a great atmosphere. Get over the controls, and enjoy.
2. Fear2 (PS3,Xbox360)
Give it a shot.
3. Deadspace
slides into more, shooter.. but it has great atmosphere.

ThanatosDMC5616d ago

Dead Space 2 will fix that... i just hope for co-op though... im scared... HOLD ME!!!

Deios5615d ago

I miss the classic survival horror style. Resident Evil,0,RE,2,3,CV.... Silent Hill 1,2....Haunting Grounds, etc.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5615d ago
patlike5616d ago

Guess they must have needed an "American" action game as opposed to a Japanese horror.

morriss5616d ago

Yeah. Spot on.

Well annoying.

bbelly9320_5616d ago

Sigh, makes you wonder what else M$ paid them for.

Caxtus7505616d ago

@2.3

How is it the Xbox? It may be down to the American and western market but directing it at an American console is very ignorant.

iNcRiMiNaTi5616d ago (Edited 5616d ago )

what? re5 is pretty much a new/improved version of re4, which came out on gamecube, ps2, and pc

re5 was developed for the ps3 first and was first announced to be a ps3 exclusive.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5616d ago
Vahn165616d ago

I really love Resident Evil's new play style, so I can't complain, but Capcom's bid for the hearts of Western fans is certainly interesting. As much as some may dislike it, this is the direction in which larger Japanese companies must move if they wish for their blockbusters to remain relevant; the Japanese market simply can't support them anymore.

name5616d ago

I've been saying this for a VERY long time and I kept getting massive disagrees for it. FAIL.

fossilfern5616d ago

ROFL well going by RE4 which WAS NOT scarry at all and this game pretty much playing the same i dont think it will be scarry which is a shame becuase the classic RE games where scarry

Show all comments (41)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ98d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia98d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73098d ago (Edited 98d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6998d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y98d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot97d ago (Edited 97d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex97d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y96d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody72d ago (Edited 72d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07257d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde256d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude257d ago (Edited 257d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992257d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme257d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992257d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313257d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69257d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor257d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69257d ago (Edited 257d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack257d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface256d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)