350°

X-Men Games Will Be Sony Exclusives For More Than A Decade, Leak Reveals

Kotaku writes: "From the looks of it, Insomniac and Sony have secured exclusive rights to the X-Men heroes in starring roles as far as video games go, and the deal includes some stipulations that keep Marvel from using those characters in a way that could undermine them."

maniacmayhem145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

Oh boy! Sony is a monopoly and also taking the games out of the hands of gamers and narrowing the market/competition.

C'mon, we know the standard drill when something like this happens.

On a serious note, this could be cool that Sony and Insomniac are creating their own Marvel Universe. The same way the Arkham series did. I'm curious to see how their take on X-Men will be.

-Foxtrot145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

"Oh boy! Sony is a monopoly and also taking the games out of the hands of gamers and narrowing the market/competition"

Marvel went to Xbox for a deal before Spiderman, they weren't interested in licenced games so they went to Sony next.

https://www.videogameschron...

Microsoft had a chance, they didn't take it

maniacmayhem145d ago

Okay, so Sony is still taking the games out of the hands of gamers with these deals as I said before.

What changed?

-Foxtrot145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

You can't take something from someone which was never a thing to begin with, it's a new line of X-Men games, not continuing an old line of established games.

I love the spin though

Microsoft: Buys 2 massive publishers making games like Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, The Evil Within, Doom, Wolfenstein, Quake, Dishonored, Prey, The Elder Scrolls, Fallout etc exclusives.

You: Nothing but silence

Sony: Has some exclusive deals going of franchises that nobody was giving any love to, especially when those franchises last games were years ago and pretty terrible. Basically Sony doing things as a reaction to Microsoft buying up stuff in the industry.

You: COME ON SONY. JEEEEEEZ. WHAT THE HELL.

What do you want them to do? Lie down and die.

maniacmayhem145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

Lmao, there's always an excuse and made up rules as to why it's okay that Sony does it and not MS.

Sony is keeping X-Men and Spider Man games on their own platform. Doesn't matter if there wasn't any before or they weren't getting "the love" they were supposed to.

You can't change a narrative all of a sudden just so you can excuse your favorite company.

Sony: makes exclusive deals with IPs they don't own and keeps them on their system.

You: It's okay, they weren't going to be anywhere anyways! The developers were close with Sony and Sony has a special relationship blah blah blah

MS: Actually buys a developer, keeps their doors open, puts their games on GP that is basically playable on everything and a toaster.

You: OMG MS IS A MONOPOLY AND BUYING EVERY DEVELOPER AND TAKING THE GAMES OUT BLAH BLAH BLAH

**What do you want them to do? Lie down and die.**

Pretty sure that was the same exact sentiment that Xbox fans were saying when YOU ALL were yelling that Xbox has no games or first party developers, but then once again changed the rules saying MS has to grow their developers from scratch because it's unfair any other way.

CrashMania145d ago

Anyone with half a brain and a tiny bit of logical thinking knows a licensing deal to fund and develop marvel games as a first party is not in any way the same as spending 80 billion on publishers to sweep up a dozen or more IPs that have been on playstation for decades in some cases, but this falls on deaf ears of the most brainless fanbase on the internet.

Neonridr145d ago

@Foxtrot - I believe his remarks were tongue in cheek.. If you are outraged at what MS did but not what Sony did, then what type of hypocrite are you?

shinoff2183144d ago

Still isn't on the level of buying two major publishers. If you can't see that , sorry for ya. I'd rather ms had made a couple bethesada games exclusive rather then buying the whole fking company. Sony ain't buying marvel(couldn't afford anyway) they just got some exclusives lined up. Mind you games being developed by Sony studios.

Cacabunga144d ago

Sony knows what it takes to stay on top of the game.. xbox bought finished games from studios and publishers during 360 era but Sony secured licenses and makes the best games out of them themselves!! I talked about 360 era because it’s the best one xbox has and will ever get.

RNTody144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Maniacmayhem, you're just embarassing yourself with your thoughtless comments.

There is nothing wrong with an exclusive if you invest in the studio, allocate your game engines, resources and tech to the game and have an actual involvement in the development. You know, how actual good games are made. Look how far Insomniac has come since Sony invested in them. Why the hell should Sony invest in a game and studio, take on publishing costs and provide the resources of PlayStation studios and then publish it on Xbox, or Vice Versa?

You can't cry about losing a game that Microsoft had NOTHING to do with. Sony actively made Marvel's Spider-Man happen. You're just deliberately being stupid to maintain your false opinion.

You know what happened when Insomniac teamed up with Xbox once upon a time? They made a game that made $500 profit apparently. Now they're making multi million dollar franchises that are universally acclaimed and moving consoles.

Investing in new games and growing studios is good for the Industry. Buying up publishers is not.

If you can't see that, then you're not worth responding to further.

ravens52144d ago

I don't think xbots are stupid. But boy do they play the part sometimes. Like 🤯

TheKingKratos144d ago

@Maniac

Such a nice name for you indeed

I have seen such a stupid takes on this hell hole but you take the prize for the most dumb one

144d ago
darthv72144d ago

......and people were worried about the CoD 10y deal.

SMH

Tacoboto144d ago

Microsoft took the Spider-Man games out of the hands of Xbox-exclusive gamers by declining the deal. Their reasoning was a slap to their players' faces, too - "We don't want others' IP" but then spent $77bn buying exactly that.

Sony, like MS too for the IP they have, isn't stopping anyone from buying the hardware necessary to play the games they make.

So... Blame the owner of the IP for making deals that you don't like, maniac.

badz149144d ago

@maniacmayhem

Nothing changes. So what games are Eony taking away from non-PS gamers? Care to make a list?

GamerRN144d ago

The goal posts changed....

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 144d ago
Christopher145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

If I make a lot of ridiculous claims, maybe someone will believe one of them!

maniacmayhem145d ago

You definitely let a lot of them slide on this site already, why start commenting against them now?

Christopher145d ago

Yeah, I get downvotes from everyone because I don't tell people when they're being hypocritical on any side of the spectrum!

Nice attempt at that gaslight.

maniacmayhem145d ago

No, you seem to actually target certain people on one side with your remarks than you do the other.

But cool attempt at being the victim.

Lexreborn2144d ago

@maniac if you see him attacking one side over the other more. Maybe that’s because you’ve positioned yourself on that side so firmly it’s rare for you to see the other?

144d ago
Christopher144d ago

***No, you seem to actually target certain people on one side with your remarks than you do the other. ***

The gall to follow this up with....

*** But cool attempt at being the victim. ***

I've never gotten downvotes for criticizing 'the other side' for a complete lack of news, wasting time on MP elements that went nowhere, keeping the generation on PS4, trying to compete with GaaS companies, etc. Never.

But am I a victim? No. I'm a person who realizes people, like yourself, like to put up walls on arguments rather than actually discuss them openly and honestly.

InUrFoxHole144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

I agree with that. He does tend to target. I r think he's a cop in the real world... lol

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 144d ago
isarai145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

Can't take games out of people's hands if they were never in people's hands. Like what existing X-Men games are they talking away from you? Is there some multiplatform X-Men series no one knows about ?. Having exclusive rights to make new games based on a license is not the same as Buying an existing franchise/series everyone is currently consuming and making it exclusive. Big difference between license and ownership, Also not what "Monopoly" means at all, maybe learn what the word means before throwing it around.

Markusb33144d ago

xb gamers wont play these games anyway, just take a look at how many got to level 10 in starfield

Outside_ofthe_Box145d ago

"Oh boy! Sony is a monopoly and also taking the games out of the hands of gamers and narrowing the market/competition."

When Sony buys the equivalent of Zenimax and Activision in the span of a few years then you can sarcastically makes this this statement. Until then continue to make obvious false equivalencies!

maniacmayhem145d ago

Why, Sony is still keeping games off of other platforms?

Why does it have to be on some type of equivalence scale?

It's always fun to see how lopsided views are here and then the spin when a favorite company is now doing exactly what was these people accused another of.

Shane Kim144d ago

maniac

Besides, in 10 years you can play them on the xbox. We wont be playing any ActiBlizz or Zeni games on PS again.

derek144d ago

@maniac lol, the difference is these future xmen games are being made for an audience who buys games so marvel knows the deal with contribute to the overall growth of the ip. New games that both parties will benefit from, look at Spiderman. Microsoft/xbox is the place ip goes to die so everyone should be concerned when Microsoft tries to buy their way to relevance. We've seen it already with Bethesda and we'll see it with abk. $100 billion spent while xbox continues to fade away into irrelevance. Lol

BeHunted145d ago (Edited 145d ago )

From the recent leaks, I think it's because Disney demands 20% in Royalties from Sony for each copy sold. That's why Microsoft refused the Offer.

ziggyzinfirion144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

No. It was already revealed in previous articles that Microsoft refused the offer because they would rather want to focus instead on their first party titles (Halo, Gears of War, Forza etc.). It has nothing to do with royalties. Disney actually made a better choice in opting to Sony after being declined by Microsoft because their studios more than capable to handle Marvel franchises. Just look at Insomniacs Spider-man compared to when it was developed by Activision.

144d ago
Redgrave144d ago

Bro, it is well documented that MS said no to a Marvel offer. It's not taking games away when one guy says no, and the other yes.

It is also not the same as buying out developers, saying games will be available everywhere until the deal closes, then making the games exclusive that were said to be "made available for more gamers on more platforms".

It's a dirty business and nobody plays cleanly at the end of the day, but in this instance it's only because Sony said yes where Microsoft said no.

Asplundh144d ago

People with this "Microsoft doesnt want a Marvel deal" argument know that they literally just revealed one at the Game Awards right?

144d ago
1Victor144d ago

@maniac comments

I’m sorry but I think we all missed the news where Sony purchased Disney and lied about keeping their content on Xbox.
Till then your fake rage and equalization of everything Sony get as a (timed) exclusive to Microsoft purchasing a legacy 3rd party publisher is just offensive read without 🤦🏿🤣

OptimusDK144d ago

SONY had a chance of buying ABK but didn't not so different at all

itsmebryan144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Have you read the leak? Insomniac is now only making Marvel's games til at least 2031/32.
And did you see the schedule? It's like a game every other year and how much for development. They are going to run insomniac into the ground.

I bet they didn't know this would happen before they sold themselves to Sony. They can't be happy being forced to make Marvel games instead of their own games.

Sony made an awful deal with marvel.

RedDevils144d ago

The more you talk, the more fools you make of yourself.

MrBeatdown144d ago

Ironically, Microsoft now owns Activision and their trash Spider-Man and X-Men games.

So I guess if you really want your Marvel fix on Xbox, you can bug Microsoft to remaster Spider-Man 3 or X-Men Destiny.

Crows90143d ago (Edited 143d ago )

I'm sorry...what? You do know insomniac is a PlayStation 1st party right? They're not taking any games away. Insomniac games wouldn't come to Xbox.

Blade isn't being taken away from PlayStation for instance. The devs who are now making the game who traditionally made multiplatform games were taken away but not the game itself. L

Starfield was taken away because as we've heard...Xbox came in and said no more playstation versions. And we all know they were originally planning a PlayStation release ... It's their biggest console base.

Geez ..just read more of your comments...your name suits you. You make no sense

recoctimocassirnff143d ago

To everyone trying to explain to xbox fanboys very easy to grasp differences between what ms is doing and what sony is doing, you're wasting your time.

Their "sOnY dOEs iT tOooOO huUUuUrRR" has been debunked 100s of times, but they just want to remain deliberately stupid.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 143d ago
VivaChe145d ago

is there not an ethical issue with reporting information obtained illegally through a ransomware hack??

purple101145d ago

I’m going out on a limb and say yes

However
Freedom of internet act blah blah

Once it’s in the public domain its free game for anyone to use

Christopher145d ago

Gaming sites aren't based on ethics. Haven't been for 20 years or so.

Christopher143d ago

@InUrFoxHole: We're an aggregate. It's hard to call us ethical when we are what people put out there. I mean, look, the leaked Insomniac stuff is all over here because it's out there and the community wants it. So, really, the question is "is the community ethical?"

derek144d ago

Nah there is no ethical issue unless a reporting outfit choses to make a stand against these losers who do these things, the information is out there. The problem with gaming "journalists" is their persistent lies and half truths along with a distortion of facts for clicks.

gold_drake144d ago

yes

but the internet is gonna internet does it make it right tho.

Mr Logic144d ago

No. It's unethical to withhold the information from the public.
If someone from the Pentagon illegally leaks information to a journalist and they publish it, then the journalist has done nothing wrong.

ChasterMies144d ago

You mean public information? Usually no issue but there are various data privacy protections depending upon the type of data, jurisdiction, and victim of the data breach. There is also an ethical and legal issue of using data, even public data, to harass someone. Remember that one website that was sued for harassing Hulk Hogan? I don’t.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 143d ago
Felix_Argyle_Catbro145d ago

Coming simultaneously to PC according to the leak though.

Zeke68144d ago

Jim Ryan is soon gone so that is probably going to change Playstation to less PC-focused.

DarXyde144d ago

Doubt it.

PC gamers are generally pretty warm on Playstation Studios titles (except the Last of Us, but that's just because it was a bad port).

Why would they leave them out to dry like that? I actually think this was one of Ryan's better strategies.

Zeke68144d ago

"Why would they leave them out to dry like that? I actually think this was one of Ryan's better strategies."

Well, maybe because they need to spend more time on their Playstation offerings now when their little GaaS experiment seems dead in the water and with all the trouble Insomniac is in after their hacker situation.
I assume Jim Ryan's bosses are eager to get Playstation games to be their main priority again after blowing alot of cash on PC and other nongame related things surrounding the PS brand.
But we'll see soon enough. Jim is gone in about 4 months so it will be clear with a new leadership how they are planning for the future. We just have to wait and see.
And ofc you think it's a great strategy, I guess you got to play these games for the first time now on your PC ?
Or am I wrong? ;)

144d ago
Shiore2u144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

Oh yea, they're just gonna decide to not want to make easy money anymore after purchasing a studio to port games, all because Jim is gone. Corporations are certainly known for their humility toward the sensitivities of brand worshipping troglodytes over money. Lmao.

Sarcasm aside, the whole reason Sony even got involved in porting games was because game spending is down, they're trying to maximize their profit as much as possible to make up for that, which makes exclusivity a hinderance. That's not going to change any time soon.

DarXyde143d ago

Zeke68,

"Well, maybe because they need to spend more time on their Playstation offerings now when their little GaaS experiment seems dead in the water."

You forget they have Nixxes? That is, quite literally, their only function.

"I assume Jim Ryan's bosses are eager to get Playstation games to be their main priority again after blowing alot of cash on PC and other nongame related things surrounding the PS brand."

Sony is clearly managing both just fine. They stagger releases, too and the ports are handle by other studios. It's not a bad deal at all.

"And ofc you think it's a great strategy, I guess you got to play these games for the first time now on your PC ?
Or am I wrong? ;)"

Very wrong. I have a MacBook Pro that can run Dark Souls I flawlessly and Dark Souls II with difficulty on a good day (both through virtualization, and done as a test). I'm not a PC gamer—I don't have a PC. Occasionally, I'll pick up native games to see how they fair (Lies of P, Resident Evil Village) and they run very well.

But PlayStation games? No. None.

Zeke68143d ago

@DarXyde,Shiore2u
It wasn't long ago Jim Ryan himself said they didn't make much on PC Ports, it was a disappointment for them.
And Nixxes doesn't mainly do PC Ports, that's just a media guess. They are supporting Sony/PS in PC related tech like PS Store, infranet structure and stuff like that too.... Backend stuff.
"You forget they have Nixxes? That is, quite literally, their only function." - No it's not!

DarXyde143d ago

Zeke68,

"It wasn't long ago Jim Ryan himself said they didn't make much on PC Ports, it was a disappointment for them."

They're expecting $450M in revenue from PC by end of fiscal year. That is nothing to scoff at. Horizon sold over 3M on PC too, so there's that.

"And Nixxes doesn't mainly do PC Ports, that's just a media guess. They are supporting Sony/PS in PC related tech like PS Store, infranet structure and stuff like that too.... Backend stuff."

Link?

"You forget they have Nixxes? That is, quite literally, their only function." - No it's not!"

Okay, can you share some insights on this?

Shiore2u143d ago (Edited 143d ago )

@Zeke68

The ransomware leak shows that porting costs Sony less than 30 million, and they're expected to make, as DarXyde pointed out, almost half a billion by the end of the year. Nixxes has been porting games since the dreamcast. Quite literally 99% of their existence over the last two decades. No experience of which has anything to do with what you broadly and tech-illiterately stated.

PC ports aren't going anywhere any time soon. You're just going to have to accept that. Economies have ups and downs. Sony is a business and needs money to stay afloat like any other. If you didn't want this to happen then you and others should have forgone eating and paying rent to warrant Sony financially maintaining exclusivity.

Zeke68143d ago

"Link ?"
Alright, we are done. I will never ever need to discuss with you guys again, are you 3 years old and never heard of Google??!!
It took me LESS than 7 minutes to find both articles through Google.
You guys ain't serious at all.
Sorry guys, I'm out. :)

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 143d ago
mkis007144d ago

Nah that is conjecture unless you can find those words.

TheKingKratos144d ago

No they would never do that ... You probably will never see it on pc after Jim leaving too as his strategy wasn't good enough.

144d ago
Ironmike144d ago

Isn't this the same as what everyone was saying Microsoft was doing but it's okay now I own a ps5 and xbox and think it's wrong of both companies

CrashMania144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

How is a licensing deal to use a 1st party studio to build games from scratch the same as spending 80 billion to remove decades old multiplatform IPs and cancel PS5 versions of already in development games the same? Please explain.

mkis007144d ago

It's not and it never will be, that is an grade school hot take.

144d ago
InUrFoxHole144d ago

It's exactly the same. These companies are takings games and compiling them so you have to use their product. Stop simping for these plastic boxes. But but they're only taking this and that... its all the same my man. These companies don't care about you. Only your $. They're all scum bags. The problem is gamers have taken the bait hook line and sinker. So now we're making excuses for them. What is better for the consumer? Play where you like or exclusives? Xbox is dead wrong and so are sony

CrashMania144d ago

@fox

'It's exactly the same'

No it's not. The rest of your post is just rambling while pretending to be nuetral, but you aren't fooling anyone.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 144d ago
ChasterMies144d ago

Paying for a license is not the same as buying up game publishers. Robber barons didn’t get rich by buying a license to put logos on their trains. They got rich buy buying up all the tracks.

aaronaton144d ago

Their roadmap looks pretty dull imo, no Resistance or new IP's for a decade then.

Zeke68144d ago

I would love a Resistance Reboot or something like that too, but dull, that roadmap is far from dull imho.

Show all comments (107)
120°

Would It Have Even Mattered If Redfall Were Good?

Even if Redfall were a good game, the closure of Hi-Fi Rush proves even that doesn't matter in the industry.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Profchaos4h ago

Yeah it would have mattered especially since their huge game that year wasn't all that it was cracked up to be remember redfail was almost heavily promoted and hyped not to the level of starfield but still more promoted than the average game.

There was still a decent marketing campaign behind the game I'm sure millions were spent advertising it on websites and I saw a few billboards and bus stop signs in real life

jwillj2k44h ago

No it wouldn’t matter it wouldn’t bring in enough profit to offset their 100 billion dollar acquisition. It would maybe delay the inevitable by some months.

CrimsonWing693h ago

I would f*cking think so. Good games are what draws people to your platform. It’s why I adored the 360 era with Gears of War being one of the highlights for me. You make sh*t games and it just makes your platform that much worse and you start gobbling up studios I like and then killing them off it also makes me hate your platform as well… just sayin’

franwex3h ago

Unless the game would’ve been War Zone, or Fortnite level. No. Maybe even Hell divers 2 I doubt would’ve been enough.

Exvalos3h ago

No it would not have, the ABK deal was great for Microsoft but horrible for Xbox. Over 100 billion dollars in acquisitions. That money has to be made back. That ABK deal essentially destroyed Xbox as we know it.

Show all comments (14)
270°

Report: Sexual Misconduct Investigation Conducted at EA, Suspects Named and What They Did Revealed

EA senior staff has been investigated for sexual misconduct involving female coworkers, and these said people have been named publicly.

isarai22h ago

Aye just call Phil, i mean he somehow made Bobby Kotick's scandal disappear and gave him a few million dollar high five on the way out.

Cacabunga13h ago

I wonder if it will be censored with some in game ads.

XiNatsuDragnel19h ago(Edited 19h ago)

EA about to go down like Activision and then Phil saves the day saying.this is good for the industry and consolidation will help create competition. /s.

ravens5217h ago

What's up with all these horny creeps. You gon be horny, fine. Just not at work take care of that shit before you go in. Rub one out if you have to. Don't be a creep at all. ESPECIALLY at work. But don't be one AT ALL.

Extermin8or3_12h ago

I mean part of the issue is that things transpired outside of work....

KwietStorm_BLM12h ago

You think deviants care where they are? Work sometimes makes it an even better situation for them because they can abuse their power.

NotoriousWhiz17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

"it seems that according to EA, given the events transpired outside of work between two adults, and the fact that once investigation has started that the alleged perpetrators didn’t do it again, the investigation is considered closed. [...] The victim still has to work with the people that harassed her."

Yep, EA is disgusting.

Extermin8or3_12h ago

I mean the fact stuff happened outside of work puts EA in quite a difficult position legally. These women don't seem to have reported the matter to the police which kinda ties EA's hands on what they can do. If they don't file reports of the crimes then yeah from EA's perspective it is stuff that happened outside of work. The only exception is the guy that apparently referenced things in the slack channel for work, spending on what he said proving it may be very hard and he may well be able to get away with plausible deniability. I don't like EA and I think these people need to be dismissed but without any legal action being taken, EA can't really do much without risk of being sued themselves for unfair dismissal etc.

Show all comments (14)
340°

Former Deviation Games Devs Have Formed A New Studio At PlayStation To Work On A New IP

Former Deviation Games developers have formed a new studio at Sony Interactive Entertainment in order to work on a brand new PlayStation IP.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Tacoboto1d 9h ago

Well that's an awesome and very surprising turnaround. Cheers to the new studio and what they'll build!

RaidenBlack1d 6h ago

Likely to continue their FPS project

Cacabunga18h ago

It is not about money it is about talent.. get that talent in and they will take care of you and earn you that money

Eonjay18h ago

I had picked up on this before the Deviation shutdown was announced. It was pointed out that a senior manager of the team had joined PlayStation prior to the close. It was a little suspicious because from the outside in, it appeared had basically poached Deviation's talent.

Reading some of the other comments it seems this is understood to be the case.

In other news it would be wild if Sony winds up announcing a brand new internal studio.

isarai1d 4h ago

That's..... confusing, so shut down but just reformed and same employer 🤔 sounds like pretty much what happened to Japan Studio basically just being rebranded as Asobi

ocelot071d 4h ago

It is odd one I don't know how business deals work or the law of that kind of stuff. But is it possible Sony reached out and said hey we want you apart of Sony but don't want to purchase you for what ever reason. How about use disband and we will open a studio and hire you guys type of thing. Is that even possible?

isarai1d 3h ago

Maybe it's to void/bypass some contract? I have no clue

VersusDMC23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

I guess the deviation team fell apart and didn't deliver good progress on what they pitched (they overhyped themselves when the team was announced)so Sony shut them down. They regrouped with a new team and a new pitch so Sony is giving them another shot.

And this time they are keeping it quiet to keep pressure down on the team. So people aren't asking everyday what deviation(or whatever the new team is called) is doing.

Edit: Also Sony never owned them. They just ended their partnership with them. Deviation decided to close on their own.

outsider162423h ago

Good point. You know, i was thinking of Days Gone too. They pitch an idea to Sony for Days Gone 2 but Sony didnt like it do they scrapped the whole thing. Maybe if a good pitch came by...they'd reconsider it.

isarai22h ago

That makes a bit more sense

lodossrage21h ago

To be fair, Sony didn't shut them down. Devation was independent. Sony pulled funding on the project they were working on. As a result, they couldn't run so Devation decided to close on their own.

MrBaskerville18h ago

Maybe it's a good team but sony changed plans?

Plague-Doctor2711h ago

https://imgur.com/HhYbZDi

The management at Deviation was reportedly a problem. Sony cut their funding and when the studio layoffs began they bought the talent back up

Lightning7711h ago

It's probably cheaper to grab the talent than to anage a full studio as a second party.

Maybe we see the game at the PS showcase?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 11h ago
roboteye23h ago

If this was MS they'd be gone.

Goodguy0123h ago

Maybe make a smaller game this time?

Elda23h ago

Good for them that they were able to work it out. Hopefully they're developing something interesting.

Rainbowcookie22h ago

I think Sony is thinking long term as a replacement for Call of Duty M$ edition.

lodossrage14h ago

If they can pull off at least 2 more games similar to Helldivers 2 they won't have to worry about that COD deal anymore (my personal opinion, not fact)

-Foxtrot12h ago

The best thing they can do is make something old school based

The issue with COD is that it's so over the top and arcade like now where it feels more like you are relying on gimmicks and what you've unlocked rather than skill.

If they can create an old school like first person shooter where "less is more" and not a game that relies on a drip feed road map then they'll get some attention.

Show all comments (24)