Play-mag writes: "Shellshock 2 tries to distance itself from the likes of Wolfenstein by claiming to be a survival-horror game in first-person, rather than a first-person shooter with horror bits. But we've seen no evidence of that in the few sections we've had the chance to play through. Yes, there are zombies, yes there is gore, and yes ammo is more restricted than in most shooters, but it still feels like a pretty standard FPS, and less of a true horror game than, say, F.E.A.R., which managed to blend horror and shooting extremely well."
Allan Muir looks at the question "Have we run zombies into the ground in terms of effectiveness?" and uses examples of 4 zombie games. Two that get them right, and two that gets them wrong.
Have a look at GamingXL's list of top Zombie games to get if you own an Xbox 360 console!
ZeroTolerance writes: It is that time of year again where the nice games get the entire spotlight and the naughty games are forgotten. That is why we bring you the naughtiest games of the year each and every holiday, and even though it may not be the kind of naughty you are thinking of, it still doesn't change the fact that every game on this list needs to be avoided at all costs. Without further ado we bring you 2009's most heinous list of gaming.
I downloaded the demo to Darkest Days and it was terrible. Everything about that game felt awkward and sloppy.
Shellshock 2: Blood Trails was surely one of the worst games released not only this year but this decade. A total masterclass in how you shouldn't make an fps or any game for that matter.
Once you touch it you can never go back, it has stained your soul.