650°

Microsoft and UK regulators agree to pause their Activision battle to negotiate

Microsoft won its fight against the FTC, and now it’s trying to make its big Activision Blizzard acquisition work in the UK

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
maniacmayhem302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

Not suspicious at all...

They threw the white flag up quick when they saw the FTC lost...of course, they said the FTC had no influence on their first decision anyways, but now...

Sonyslave3302d ago

Yup like come on fight to the bitter end.

Christopher302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

What are you on about? Microsoft literally approached them with concessions to make the deal work. They want to see those concessions and see if they will take care of their issues with the merger. Why are you acting like the CMA approached Microsoft? It's the other way around. Microsoft is trying to get this to work with this negotiation.

"While we ultimately disagree with the CMA’s concerns, we are considering how the transaction might be modified in order to address those concerns in a way that is acceptable to the CMA..."

That's Microsoft looking to modify things to make it work. Not the CMA asking to renegotiate.

-Foxtrot302d ago

Yeah exactly if anything the CMA held it’s ground and Ms came running to then soooooo….

See you can stick up for yourself against a billion dollar company

maniacmayhem302d ago

I'm sorry, aren't you the one the said MS was paying US politicians in another article not long ago.

Doesn't matter who approached who, the CMA now wants to sit down and 're-negotiate' and put their ruling on pause to talk. This comes moments after the ruling against the FTC.

I can bet you the CMA will also drop their case now that every country has approved this and the FTC lost.

*Yeah exactly if anything the CMA held it’s ground*

It held it's ground thinking the FTC had a chance. Now they're 'negotiating' to save face.

Christopher302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

***Doesn't matter who approached who, the CMA now wants to sit down and 're-negotiate' and put their ruling on pause to talk. This comes moments after the ruling against the FTC.***

Literally does matter. Microsoft is saying they will give up power and control to meet the demands of the CMA. Why did it take this long for it to happen? Why didn't they do it before?

***It held it's ground thinking the FTC had a chance. Now they're 'negotiating' to save face.***

This! This right here is BS. This is you acting like the CMA did anything based on FTC. They didn't. They are doing their job and seeing if Microsoft will concede things that are of concern to the CMA. They aren't negotiating for any other reason that it is literally their job to listen to concession options.

This is not 'good for Microsoft' it literally means they are lessening their case to try and make it happen. How is that good?

maniacmayhem302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

*Why did it take this long for it to happen? Why didn't they do it before?*

What are you on about? MS was always willing to to negotiate or 'give up power". They will be offering the same deal that was on the table before with little changes and I can bet it will go through.

*They are doing their job and seeing if Microsoft will concede things that are of concern to the CMA.*

Their job? You mean the insane concerns about the cloud industry that aren't there at all? Hilarious, please just stop, you are fooling yourself if you think their decision wasn't influenced by the FTC and only now they are willing to sit down and discuss terms over 'the cloud'.

This is very good for MS because more than likely the CMA will pass this with little to no changes from what MS offered beforehand.

Kaze88301d ago

*What are you on about? MS was always willing to to negotiate or 'give up power".*

I bet they had ample time and many talks, but they went nowhere. Now after FTC case MS went to CMA just to get this thing through before the 18th. MS is making the compromises to get this through with CMA. How hard is this to understand?

*You mean the insane concerns about the cloud industry that aren't there at all?*

MS biggest push is on the Game pass and cloud services, currently it is definitely the biggest fish on the sea on that front. We all know that eventually everything will be on monthly subscriptions and cloud based services. It's not really that hard to see how this could affect the future of cloud services on the gaming front.

To me it's funny that somebody thinks of nothing about this deal. Just buying the one of the biggest 3rd party publisher with record price ever, yeah just let it go through since Disney did the same on movie bizz (though with less money). ABK also has some of the biggest IP's, well Sony can make their own COD. If it's just so easy to make, why did they not make it themselves? Nobody else hasn't been able to do it either, many tried but couldn't.

Also "ABK will be better under MS, they will change their policy and games will be better" oh, how then MS has the track record of letting devs do their own thing? Then what happened to MS biggest franchises like Halo and Fable, Even Gears have lost a lot of steam. What happened to Rare? instead of making bangers they made the kinect games and well sea of thieves is at least something. Still far from what were expected from them. Let's also not forget RedFall, MS knew it was a bomb but released it anyway.

Kaze88301d ago (Edited 301d ago )

Kotick had also demanded bigger cut from MS for COD and got it. Saying that it's just one game, then why did their demands go through for bigger cut if they cannot live without COD? How can we know if that cut wasn't already forced upon Sony as well.

I don't even own a PS, but even I can see that this is not just another normal transaction in gaming industry. Even though MS has had lot of good will with customers now due to their current policies and how they let them been seen publicly, their track record with devs is not very good, it's in the same league as EA. Even their PC launcher is the worst of all, even uplay works better lmao.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 301d ago
raWfodog302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

I'm not sure why you're seeing this as CMA throwing up the white flag. Their original stance was always that they were blocking the deal because they weren't satisfied with MS's proposed actions and they wouldn't accept the deal 'as-is'. MS is now ready to go back to the discussion table and discuss ways to alleviate the CMA's concerns. This is how proper deals and discussions are supposed to take place.

"..the CMA said its decision to block the deal "comes after Microsoft’s proposed solution failed to effectively address the concerns in the cloud gaming sector, outlined in the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) provisional findings published in February." https://www.gamesindustry.b...

"“After today’s court decision in the U.S., our focus now turns back to the UK. While we ultimately disagree with the CMA’s concerns, we are considering how the transaction might be modified in order to address those concerns in a way that is acceptable to the CMA,” says Microsoft president Brad Smith in a statement to The Verge."

I mean it's right there in print and quoted.

EvertonFC302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

I wonder why there negotiating with the UK @maniac, all 3 key markets ? You get it now pmsl.

darthv72302d ago

you should get your bladder checked... you do a lot of "PMSL" lately in your comments.

ChasterMies302d ago

Anti-trust actions usually end with a negotiated settlement. Not very cinematic but that’s the way it is.

richardmmorales302d ago

Looks like the FTC and CMA were working together to try and get this blocked. of course they both deny it. but it already came out before that the FTC and CMA met 26 times to discuss this acquisition.

blacktiger301d ago

government/judge always side corporate, everything is just a show. Microsoft will always win. The game is rigged.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 301d ago
302d ago Replies(1)
Workshyskiver302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

Wow, deals closing before the deadline then. What a monumental waste of my tax that was CMA.

Christopher302d ago

It's their literal job to listen to concessions and make sure the deal supports their consumers. If they didn't listen to Microsoft on this, they wouldn't be doing their job. It also doesn't mean that the CMA will change its mind..

302d ago
EasilyTheBest302d ago

Brilliant news for Microsoft. This deal is done.

Christopher302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

It's brilliant news that Microsoft will make concessions to the CMA to make the deal happen? I don't think people are actually reading the news around why this is happening.

Workshyskiver302d ago

Because prior the CMA wasnt willing to accept any concessions, now they clearly are.

Christopher302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

***Because prior the CMA wasnt willing to accept any concessions, now they clearly are.***

Ridiculous. They absolutely do hear concessions and Microsoft offered none. Until today.

StarkR3ality302d ago

They offered the same concessions they offered the EU.. so this is false.

Christopher302d ago

***They offered the same concessions they offered the EU.. so this is false.***

I don't think you understand 'when' concessions happen. They happen either in reply to a formal objection (which the CMA didn't provide) or a ruling (which happened) and Microsoft is now offering concessions to.

343_Guilty_Spark302d ago

***Ridiculous. They absolutely do hear concessions and Microsoft offered none.

Well you’re flat out wrong. They did offer concessions.

darthv72302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

Sorry Chris, MS was trying to negotiate prior to the FTC ruling but the CMA wasn't interested in what they had to offer. They did that thinking they had some sort of leverage against MS in the form of FTC support. Now that the FTC side has crumbled... CMA is 'open' to negotiations again. Kind of coincidental but as you say "its their job to listen" when they literally ignored MS open willingness to offer concessions before.

If anything, the CMA have tucked their tail and want to save face (as others have stated) because they know MS has the leverage now. I'd be surprised if MS offers anything more than what they initially offered in the first place.

Christopher302d ago

***Sorry Chris, MS was trying to negotiate prior to the FTC ruling but the CMA wasn't interested in what they had to offer. They did that thinking they had some sort of leverage against MS in the form of FTC support. ***

1. The CMA constantly expressed their concerns, Microsoft didn't listen, and now they are making concessions based on the ruling and likely a hope to get this done ASAP rather than wait the few months where the CMA would be overruled (most likely, IMHO).

2. Utter made-up story on that FTC stuff. That can be your opinion, but the CMA has never given any input to the status or goals or meaning of the FTC.

302d ago
thesoftware730302d ago (Edited 302d ago )

@ Christopher

"Ridiculous. They absolutely do hear concessions and Microsoft offered none. Until today."

That is not true at all, and concessions were made, the 10-year deals, putting CoD, A/B and MS games on every other cloud service. MS thought they were good concessions, but the CMA did not. So MS did indeed make concessions but failed to realize that the cloud was the CMA's main concern, so now they are meeting to address the failed original concession, with the sole purpose of addressing the cloud...most likely nothing else as that is what the whole CMA denial was based on.

If you think this sit-down is bad, then you are the one reading it wrong, the CMA could have said, no, see you in court in about 2 weeks, but they didn't, the CMA even admitted they were ill-prepared for another court hearing so soon and would need until OCT. to prepare which was denied. The CMA is scrambling just as much as MS, you really think it's a coincidence that this sit-down comes on the exact same day as the FTC ruling?

301d ago
+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 301d ago
IRetrouk301d ago

Cma are actually making an exception for ms after they have already given their final verdict... listening to new concessions after the fact isn't usually done, but it could also lead to a new investigation, ms should be careful of that when deciding what concessions to make, there are no white flags being waved by anyone, one wants it to go through, the other doesn't, both are willing to listen to the other.

https://twitter.com/Perlrul...

KicksnSnares302d ago

Friendship. Microsoft Wins. Flawless Victory. (MK11 voice)

KicksnSnares302d ago

Activision Blizzard games on Game Pass Day One. (Rubbing hands like Birdman)

ravens52302d ago

This exactly. Kind of unbelievable to me. Gotta respect the loyalty though, through good and bad, till death. Hive mind definitely lmao.

__SteakDeck__301d ago

@KicksnSnares That’s what is was always about with ya’ll Xbox zealots. Ya’ll wanted this to go through so you can rent Activision/Blizzard games.

Show all comments (87)
70°

EA to Spend Billions Boosting Share Prices After Mass Layoffs

EA has announced it will engage in a shareholder-pleasing share buyback program just a couple of months after mass layoffs at the studio.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Yi-Long1h ago

Well, anything to make those shareholders happy, I guess. They're all that matters in this industry nowadays.

310°

Report Claims Xbox Is Planning More Cuts Following Studio Closures

"The sudden closure of several video-game studios at Microsoft Corp.’s Xbox division was the result of a widespread cost-cutting initiative that still isn’t finished.

This week, Xbox began offering voluntary severance agreements to producers, quality assurance testers and other staff at ZeniMax, which it purchased in 2020 for $7.5 billion, according to people familiar with the company’s plans. Others across the Xbox organization have been told that more cuts are on the way.

Speaking about the closures more broadly, Booty said that the company’s studios had been spread too thin — like “peanut butter on bread” — and that leaders across the division had felt understaffed. They decided to close these studios to free up resources elsewhere, he said.

Game Pass has not seen the massive growth that Xbox boss Phil Spencer may have been hoping for."

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
just_looken3h ago

Sense it seems very few remember that human's were around before 2020 the next studio to close will be bethesda based no doubt on the history of.

Fallout 76
Elder scrolls online
elder scrolls blades mobile
fallout mobile
The vr versions of old games

Then you got starfield pissing out cash nothing to cover it.

I doubt tod's team or any sub team is making m$ cash they are no doubt on the chopping block for job cuts

If you can remember before 2020 even fallout 76 was made with over 4 studios.

-Foxtrot4h ago

"Speaking about the closures more broadly, Booty said that the company’s studios had been spread too thin — like “peanut butter on bread” — and that leaders across the division had felt understaffed. They decided to close these studios to free up resources elsewhere, he said"

So what you're saying is...you bought all these studios and you guys can't run them.

Jesus.

Inverno4h ago

Spread thin after firing over 2000 employees a few months prior. So basically they created the problem and their solution was to just fire more people. Absolute geniuses over at Xbox, of course can we even believe this to be the reason for the closures?

just_looken3h agoShowReplies(1)
Profchaos2h ago

Leaders can't run them hire more management create new roles don't shutter entire studios cause you can't figure out how to run them.

Unless the reality is this whole consolidation thing was really an excuse for IP harvesting

Eonjay4h ago

Reports are suggesting that Game Pass will be getting a price hike soon and that Call of Duty may not be added to the day one offering. I honestly have a hard time believing this but it does beg the question why exactly did GP fail? I think the answer is that it just didn't get the growth that it anticipated. Jim was right but I wish he wasn't because at the end of the day, its gamers, devs and other front-line workers who have to absorb the blow for Spencer and team's miscalculations.

3h ago
NotoriousWhiz3h ago

And out of the ashes something even better than Xbox will be born.

Eonjay3h ago

Honestly as long as is not a situation where the industry has to contract in order focus wealth on a few people who are already trillionaires..

Tacoboto2h ago

I think 2022 killed the Series X.

2021 was a good year for Xbox though and maybe the best in a long long time, hardware and software and as a publisher. Halo Infinite launched to popularity, Forza Horizon 5 blew everyone away, Psychonauts 2 was so well received, Flight Simulator on console, Deathloop even on PS5 & PC.

But they followed that up with next to nothing. Then 2023 with Redfall, a disappointing Forza, Starfield, and 2024 leads with closures and layoffs. And some tweets reminding us Hellblade is days away.

The only disappointment with the PS5 is not enough Sony games. Xbox followed up no games with disappointing ones.

Scissorman4h ago

For all the armchair executives who were calling for Sony to release its big-budget AAA games on PS+, the same exact thing would have happened at PlayStation. Game Pass has killed Xbox. Congrats.

shinoff21834h ago

There's not many of of us clamoring for Sony to do this because most of us understand it would kill Playstation. I'm sure there's a few but I've not seen alot of it myself.

3h ago
Show all comments (45)
290°

Xbox Has Had More Studio Closures Than First Party Game Releases So Far In 2024

Twisted Voxel writes: "We've almost reached the end of the 1st half of 2024, and Xbox has had more studio closures than first party game releases in the year so far."

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
23h ago
KicksnSnares19h ago(Edited 18h ago)

Hellblade 2, Indiana Jones, Avowed, Towerborne, and Call of Duty are still to be released this year. Marcus Fenix collection to be added to the list with the Xbox showcase, hopefully.

anast16h ago

Those are all coming to PS5 too.

Tech511h ago

"Xbox Has Had More Studio Closures Than First Party Game Releases So Far In 2024"

they kept the IPs though. they'll be making them under the MS brand i'm guessing. like minecraft all those years ago.

solideagle15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

the keyword is so Far...

on topic: Ouch!

Hedstrom13h ago

Kinda missing the forest for all the trees statement!

shinoff218313h ago(Edited 13h ago)

Bet all those don't make it though this year

romulus2312h ago(Edited 12h ago)

If we're going to talk in "still to be's" there still could be more studio closures from Microsoft this year as well.

DOMination-9h ago

How much confidence do people have in these games being good though? I hope they will be (especially Avowed) but from what we know of them so far, it's hardly a guarantee, is it?

And even if they do turn out to be good, how much of that will be down to Xbox and its leadership? Most of these games were either sequels to games made before being acquired or started development before being acquired.

And just a note on Hellblade II - it is out in two weeks and unless I'm missing something, I don't see much in the way of previews or advertising from Microsoft. Not ideal for a niche game that looks like it probably cost a lot of money to make. It genuinely feels like another game being sent out to die and then have the studio shut down.

Elda8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

To me...Avowed graphics look cheap, the game looks generic as well as boring.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 8h ago
anast16h ago

Popcorn is good. Anyone want some?

anast11h ago

I wouldn't mind a caramel and cinnamon mix actually.

dumahim11h ago

That does sound good. I have trouble just finding caramel corn.

anast7h ago

I find it interesting that people have to resort to praising how they were randomly born in a certain location to say they're not weird. But, I'm not sure this kind of stupidity can be generalized over an entire group of people, at least, I'm being optimistic here.

Eonjay15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Sony doesn't have to bother fighting the next Microsoft acquisition. The massive layoff by themselves should be enough to get the next big buy blocked.

Hofstaderman14h ago

Vindicates Jim Ryan. Don't know who didnt see this coming except those frothing pro acquisition fanboys who are not commenting here for some reason....

Tacoboto12h ago

What did happen to Obscure?

Tody_ZA12h ago

Obscure is working on his thesis on how to spin this.

Elda12h ago

Exactly. Where is the mayor & spokesperson of XB?

badz14912h ago

Obsecure where are you? Don't tell us Phil fired you too

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 12h ago
MatrixxGT10h ago

Let’s not pretend Sony is setting the world on fire with its first party either….it’s been crickets from them as well. In fact they even said not to expect any at all this year.
MS is a dumpster fire and Sony isn’t fighting anymore and it shows. I fail to see how this is a good thing.

Skuletor6h ago

Wasn't it no new existing IP entries? That would still leave room for new IPs, maybe we'll see one or more of those this year.

Sonic188110h ago

I was actually thinking about that. You beat me to it

MrDead15h ago

So if MS hadn't spent $80 billion consolidating the industry just think of all the games and jobs that would have saved.

MS is a drain on gaming and have been nothing but a negative.

MrCrimson13h ago

not exactly like the studios were putting out good games anyway. Industry needs to restart from the ground up; if games like battlebit or manor lords can be made by teams with 10 people - then there's something fundamentally wrong with having 500 man teams put out glitchy overmonetized crap.

shinoff218313h ago

Interesting. Prey was a good game, evil within was dope, and hi fi was the best Xbox game that Xbox has had in so many years. That's according to the base.

romulus2312h ago

HiFi Rush was a really good game actually so that's hardly the reason for shutting down Tango.

Show all comments (53)