880°

Starfield At 30FPS Is A Creative Decision, Says Xbox's Phil Spencer

"At some point, not to get all geeky about it, but there's render time per-frame and teams can either want to go horizontal or go kind of deep on a frame, and it's a creative choice.

We obviously have games that are running at 4K/60 on the platform. It’s not a platform issue, it’s a creative decision.

I trust the decisions Bethesda Game Studios makes, and I trust what I'm playing.

I don't ever want us to turn playing games into a math exercise... I'm not saying that 60[FPS] or resolution don't impact what you play, but I don't think we want that to turn into an Excel thing.

I think you want to give the creatives the tools to make the best decisions, and the game will be what it is.

I think Starfield's going to be a great game and I love the reception today, and I don't want to kind of force specs on every game before they start."

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
Knushwood Butt336d ago

'and I trust what I'm playing.'.

He played Redfall.

chrisx336d ago

Yeah. Just another PR talk nothing more. There's no excuse as to why this game doesn't have an option to play at 60fps, I mean Xbox is the most powerful console ever, or so they were using as the bragging rights.

RpgSama336d ago

This is not a Math exercise, you should not bring up the fact that it's a 12 teraflops machine, those are just numbers in an excel sheet, the option to play in 60fps are just numbers in an excel spreadsheet, they do not make a difference, LOL.

The mental gymnastics of "Good Guy Phil" are amazing.

EvertonFC336d ago

Agreed, I find it funny how lots of the Xbox YouTube influencers have said there playing Starfield on PC yet they've been saying Xbox is back baby on there respective channels yet there playing it in on PC 😂🤣

darthv72336d ago

40fps would be a nice trade off... if it supported 120hz output.

dumahim335d ago

Has there been any Xbox 40fps games yet? I mean, meant to run that, on purpose.

Army_of_Darkness335d ago

Everyone stfu. Xbox finally has an exclusive. Let them enjoy the moment.

Profchaos335d ago

It's sad to not see more of a push to a 40 fps minimum it's barely any sacrifice to fidelity but it's infinitely more playable and provides vrr owners current and future a way to further boost the performance of the game.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 335d ago
Lightning77336d ago ShowReplies(1)
Sonic1881335d ago (Edited 335d ago )

Didn't the Xbox fans shit on Zelda for being locked in 30fps? Now they're cool with Starfield being locked in 30fps. Let that sync in for a second 😂 when Zelda tears of the kingdom wins GOTY hopefully they won't complain that a game in 30fps wins the award

Jin_Sakai335d ago (Edited 335d ago )

Zelda is on an outdated relic while Starfield is on a powerful 12TF console. There simply no excuse for not having a 60fps performance mode option.

And 60fps would just make GOTY contender TotK an even better experience.

Sonic1881335d ago

Bethesda game engine is also an outdated Relic. They been using that engine since Skyrim

Rdeal335d ago

Redfall was in production before they bought them and they are not going to scrap it when they can just stick it on gamepass

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 335d ago
-Foxtrot336d ago (Edited 336d ago )

No one would really give a shit if he wasn’t going over the top with PR about the worlds most powerful console and how it can easily handle 60fps back when the console launched

Once again Phil’s PR bullshit comes back and bites him on the arse, if he shut his mouth more then this wouldn’t be a huge deal

IMissJimRyan336d ago

If you write your logic in a way that it needs more than 16,6ms there's no room for 60fps even if you made it 240p. Those games made with Gamebryo are the most interactive ow games out there. I think there's no other engine that tracks every object you move.

Maybe they just keep adding to the logic side of the engine and reached the limit of what Xbox Series is capable of doing in terms of CPU in 16,6ms.

darthv72336d ago (Edited 336d ago )

for the type of game it is (space exploration), 30 sounds like it will be offering the ideal experience as it relates to the various weight and gravity differences each world may hold.

back here on earth, 60 is more for racing, fighting and competitive shooters... this isnt any of those.

IMissJimRyan336d ago

It's not ideal, but it's what the cpu of these consoles are capable of. In a good pc I can't see any problem for this game running at 60fps or more.

Consoles have their limitations and CPU is always an issue.

P_Bomb335d ago (Edited 335d ago )

30 is ideal for Space exploration? The Mass Effect Legendary Edition @ 60/120 begs to differ.

“back here on earth, 60 is more for racing, fighting and competitive shooters... this isnt any of those.”

I’m on earth lol, and greatly appreciate 60 for all my action, adventure, platforming, rpg needs. TLOU Remake, Spider-man Remastered, DCUO, FF14. Hell, Sly Cooper. They all had one thing in common. 60 > 30.

Redgrave335d ago

I have seen some real reaches in my time for people to put their preference at the forefront, but "30fps more accurately represents the alien planets, whereas 60fps is more of an earth exclusive frame rate" is by long and far at the top.

We might have to preserve this comment by darthv72 for the Museum of Desperate Fanboyism because they have put out something truly special here.

LonDonE335d ago (Edited 335d ago )

@darthv72 dude stop accepting this crap, phil can go suck a ...... go replay fallout 4 or skyrim at 60fps on your series x and tell me it dont make a massive difference even on the gambryo engine or whatever hell its called.. playing oblivion and skyrim and fallout 4 at 60+fps is an incredible experience... and is how starfield should be... no reason at all to force us to play it at 4k whilst sacrificing framerate when we all know what skyrim used to play like on 360/ps3... was a terrible experience and constantly below a stable 30fps.

we deserve better, i love tod howard games but if i didnt have gaming pc i would of just not bought the game and would of played it on next gen when they eventually re-released it at 60fps...
We need to stop cutting bethesda and ms so much slack, phill and team xbox are a laughing stock at the moment and they give no shizzle for the loyal xbox gamers who spend £500 on a so called premium console
They need to give us the option to turn off the real time global illumination and other settings, i would prefer baked in lighting if it gives me 60fps.

FinalFantasyFanatic335d ago

I don't even have words for this, you can have a nice smooth jump around in space at 60fps or a choppy jump in space at 30fps, this game does have shooting too, doesn't it? Big reach.

anast335d ago

This isn't a real comment. Or is it?

sinspirit335d ago

@Darth

Wait.. 30 sounds ideal because it relates to various weight and gravity differences. How does this make any sense at all?

In no way in any game ever does 30 make more sense in a technical or realistic sense over 60. Reality is not 30fps. Physics don't make as much sense in 30fps. 30fps is a tradeoff either because of hardware limitation or developer limitation. It's not a design choice for the sake of design.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 335d ago
SullysCigar336d ago

Phil: "I don't ever want us to turn playing games into a math exercise..."
Also Phil: "12 TERAFLOPS BABY!!"

RpgSama336d ago (Edited 336d ago )

Numbers do not matter, they are just stuff that's in an excel sheet, stuff like if it's 4K, or frame rate, how much it reviews for, metacritic average, those are things that just go on an excel sheet, LOL.

You cannot make this up.

EvertonFC336d ago (Edited 336d ago )

I bet Phil's really regretting the series S, unfortunately they can't go back on that without a massive unrecoverable backlash from series S fans which lets face it are about 65% if sales.
They've well and truly messed up this gen with the introduction of the series S.
I wonder if they heard about the PS5 digital and thought playstation were going to have a playstation S but it's backfired ?

MWeaver589335d ago

I think it's far simpler.

For years they've tried to make Xbox the affordable/accessible option. This is why last generation they released a digital only console, there is Xbox All Access, and it has been a talking point for a while. It makes sense that a $300 console with Game Pass would be appealing to a lot of people, especially those who can't drop $500 on a Series X (that's a difference equal to two years of Game Pass at MSRP!).

The problem is, while it makes sense in terms of marketing, it doesn't translate particularly well for things like performance. It's one of those things where someone notices a potential market, doesn't calculate all the negatives of going there, and then discovers why said market exists.

TiredGamer335d ago

Agree that the Series S was a short-sighted decision to try to get a "leg-up" on early console sales. Even today, we don't know the breakout of X vs S console sales, which does and will play a role in decisions being made. While the chip shortages of 2021 ravaged sales for the Series X and PS5, MS was able to ride along with continuous availability of Series S. But in the end, we now have a technically fragmented generational pool right from the start.

Rdeal335d ago

They are regretting so much they made another one. You do realise it probably their best selling console

Lightning77336d ago

Tell me why it's only been Bethesda games that are 30 frames and the rest of the studios hit 60 fps then?

maniacmayhem335d ago

You guys seriously deal with strawman arguments, a developer making a creative decision doesn't take away the specs on the Xbox Series still being more powerful than the competition.

-Foxtrot335d ago

You're missing the point

This is not a big deal, who cares, the game looks promising

The issue is Phil's over the top 24/7 PR from the past is now biting him on the ass because it now LOOKS like a big deal based on his past comments about the Xbox Series X hardware and stance on 60fps.

maniacmayhem335d ago

"The issue is Phil's over the top 24/7 PR"

So Phil marketed the Xbox Series X which in truth and on paper is still the most powerful console on the market, but because Bethesda decided to make a game that is 30 fps this some how invalidates what Phil said?

You have to realize how ridiculous that sounds.

You guys over sensationalize everything Phil says and turn into an unnecessary debacle.

-Foxtrot335d ago

...Yeah you really aren't getting my point here are you

Never mind

EvertonFC335d ago

It's because Phil is full of sh*t

Profchaos335d ago (Edited 335d ago )

That's Microsoft when the one s dropped they touted it as the most powerful and only 4k console on the market as the pro hadn't launched yet despite fully knowing that the 4k functionality was never going to work with games just video playback on Netflix.

The only reason we got a one X was they felt embarrassed because they didn't have the most powerful system happens pretty much every gen they like power but don't know how to design for it.

I seriously wonder where Xbox would be today if Microsoft didn't fund every failure from their windows and Azure profits

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 335d ago
GoodGuy09336d ago Show
seanpitt23336d ago

This is total BS If they could do 60fps they would.. believe me, if what they say is true then they would cap it on pc at 30fps but no they won't do that it's a total L

Rdeal335d ago

Any game can do 60fps but do you want to lose detail to do it, I suspect they didn't

meanmallard336d ago

One thing we can all be sure of it's that it's definitely not because the game is being rushed out before an optimization pass.. So, you can be sure this won't be like Redfall.

Sonic1881336d ago (Edited 336d ago )

Except for bugs 🙄

NoFanBoy335d ago

Bugthesda baby, it just doesn't work.

Show all comments (169)
180°

Xbox No Longer Has Its Head In The Game

Microsoft & Xbox have shut down Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks to lay off more workers, insinuating that they're not in the game anymore.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

They're headless for a long time because closing tango isn't exactly a good move

PapaBop1d 4h ago

Ever since that cringe Kinect reveal they've never been the same. They used to make some amazing games and do great deals with third parties Early on in the 360 era they had games like Chromehounds and Shadowrun, both well ahead of their time. Now instead of nurturing their studios, they'd rather gaslight gamers and throw billions on pre existing studios. Not sure how Spencer is still in a job, I wouldn't trust him to organise a piss-up in a brewery.

Father__Merrin1d 4h ago

We've said all along Spencer needs to go. I wish xbox went back to xbox only with new gears fable forza halo releases lots of third party releases

Those early rainbow 6 Vegas days and phantasy star universe are gone forever

S2Killinit1d 1h ago

MS has its head in the game but the game they are playing is something different from what console gamers expect from a platform. MS’s end game has always been to use the xbox as a trojan horse.

XiNatsuDragnel23h ago

Lol that's funny well this plan they have isn't working homie

343_Guilty_Spark1d 22h ago

Acquisitions always come with cuts

1Victor1d 21h ago

“Acquisitions always come with cuts”

343 trillion points shield activated
343 trillion percent damage negate activated
All damage reduced to 1 for 343 trillion turns.
MICROSOFT DEFENSE FORCE IS A GO

Tacoboto1d 21h ago

Especially for Microsoft, when Booty pretty much said they didn't know how to handle that many studios.

Why even make the acquisition then.

-Foxtrot1d 20h ago

Didn’t they make the swipe for Bethesda when Sony wanted like 6 months exclusiveness for Starfield

It’s like…chill, you got Rise of the Tomb Raider for a year.

romulus231d 20h ago

Do they always come with senseless cuts becasue that's exactly what cutting Tango was, senseless.

H91d 22h ago

Everyone's acting now that game companies care about games and Xbox is committing the Ultimate betrayal, they are all like this and you have just been quiet about it for far too long

Nuclearmoon1d 20h ago

I wonder if Microsoft do pull out of the console market that it might open the door for valve to relaunch the Steambox. Competition is good for the industry but Microsoft don't even seem to be trying anymore.

UltimateOwnage1d 17h ago

Steam / Valve are one of the few truly pro-consumer bright spots in gaming right now. Thankfully.

Jingsing5h ago

From all the money Valve make from Steam they reinvest almost 0 into creating new AAA titles for the PC platform, Absolutely no giving nothing back in that regard. Wake up.

jwillj2k41d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

“Your game has won some pretty significant awards and is a show piece for where we want to go in the future.”

1 hour later.

“We’re gonna have to let you go. You can’t cover our 100 billion dollar acquisition. Oh and take your awards too 👍🏾”

Show all comments (29)
100°

Former Dragon Age lead writer David Gaider pours scorn on EA's AI dreams.

"They want you to believe the devs under them are super stoked to work generative AI into their processes," continued Gaider, "but I assure you what they took as excitement was really a veiled wail of despair not unlike the time that team was informed of their new 'really cool' live service mandate.".

LordoftheCritics2d ago

Publishers see gaming as another stock market.

isarai2d ago

I think anyone with some common sense knew this, im glad i don't support their games anymore, what a sh!t company.

Psychonaut852d ago

Friends don’t let friends buy EA or Ubisoft.

Chocoburger2d ago

I said this yesterday. AI isn't what we want when it comes to crafting artistry. Alas, these soulless corporate morons don't care about their work, only about cutting corners as much as possible.

120°

Modder Uses Raspberry Pi To Create "Game Gear Classic Edition"

One modder produced an unofficial, modern-day take on the Game Gear.

Read Full Story >>
timeextension.com