280°
6.0

Hogwarts Legacy review – wizarding wish-fulfilment whose magic wears off - The Guardian

Given how merciless modern pop culture is in its exploitation of childhood nostalgia, it’s remarkable there’s been no credible attempt at a big-budget Harry Potter video game before now. Hogwarts Legacy has so much to work with: it is the product of millions of childhood dreams. Donning the Sorting Hat and setting foot inside the Gryffindor common room, manipulating the world effortlessly with a wand and fighting dark wizards are all fantasies that it can easily fulfil.

Read Full Story >>
theguardian.com
NecrumOddBoy461d ago ShowReplies(2)
ModsDoBetter461d ago

I’m not one who, when hyped for a game will excuse negative to average reviews as bias but it’s clear that this review has a bias given the author.

Lexreborn2461d ago

Wouldn’t every review that gives immediate claim to their Harry Potter fandom be bias as well? Or is it only when it’s a review that you aren’t happy with that there’s an issue? Because you speak as if a 6 is a bad score.

ModsDoBetter461d ago

I didn’t say anywhere that I was unhappy?
I simply stated a fact.
Try harder next time.

Imalwaysright461d ago

Weren't you the same guy crying about Forspoken reviews in several articles? Talk about being a hypocrite.

andy85461d ago

Forspoken got absolutely slated for being a 7 to be fair

Adrian_v01461d ago

@imalwaysright

Bias goes more than one way.

roadkillers461d ago

6 is a bad score. Has anyone ever congratulated you for getting a 60% on anything?

Lexreborn2461d ago

@roadkiller 60% isn’t universal, even Microsoft has a 70% success quota on patches and OS deployments in order to roll out to the masses. Context means everything, and for some reason y’all lose context quickly on game reviews.

You cannot apply your school report card logic to the rest of the world.

zeuanimals460d ago (Edited 460d ago )

3 isn't a 6. 1 through 5 is more like A through F grades. Once you look at scores in that way, it all makes sense. So 3 is actually closer to 7. I mean, why give two whole numbers for a 2/10 and a 4/10? They're both bad enough to just be 1s. I feel like I'm in Community right now.

gerbintosh460d ago (Edited 460d ago )

2 paragraphs of the review are dedicated JK Rowling and not the game itself. Based on that alone it is not surprising that the reviewer rated it low. Also, even the paragraphs about the game aren't that deep into what the issues are.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 460d ago
Lexreborn2461d ago

If you are considering this review a negative biased review. That means you clearly aren’t happy with the opinion piece which is why you would call it biased.

You aren’t using that same metrics in the positive articles that clearly have a bias so why apply it here? It’s because you don’t care that the positives have clear bias because you want to agree with them. But you call this review negative when a 6 in gaming is a good score and then call it bias.

That IS your bias talking.

Stanjara461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

Scoring 6 in gaming is not good.
It gets worse if the investment gets higher.

Would You buy a 6/10 Tv? Phone? A Car? A House?

VenomUK461d ago

@Lexreborn2 a person can be a fan of a franchise (such as Batman) but this doesn’t mean they will love every game about it (such as Gotham Knights) - that’s not the same as a person who is supposedly a professional journalist condemning J.K. Rowling and after complaining about her saying of Hogwart’s Legacy ‘It is a shame that the game can’t escape this context.’ This means she will be making the game down for it.

PureBlood461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

It's plainly a biased review with an agenda. It was only ever going to be that from The Guardian. This particular journalist is known for doing the 'wokey cokey', which just further ensured that would be the case. Some people can't review games, films or books without preaching their preferred ideologies and that's exactly what we've got here.

It's clear as day and not tied to people being upset that a game they wanted to like got a score lower than they would have preferred. Open your eyes.

MaximusTKG461d ago

This isn’t supposed to be an opinion piece. It’s a review, which theoretically should be unbiased. They never are.

CrimsonWing69461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

I think when you have a situation where 9/10 people are glowing about a game and 1 person isn’t, there’s a strong chance that 1 person is off base. Sure, it can be interesting seeing what their points are for context, but it’s pretty safe to say their experience won’t be the majority’s.

Also, let’s be real… there’s an agenda based off this review.

ModsDoBetter461d ago

You mention “You aren’t using that same metrics in the positive articles”

I’m sorry, but can you please explain where there has been a rally to buy Hogwarts Legacy due to political agenda?

That’s right.
There hasn’t, same can’t be said about the other side though…

jwillj2k4461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

What's your point?? 6/10 is a failure anyway you slice it. Would you be happy purchasing anything other than a game where its rating is 6/10? Go ahead Ill wait.

In gaming people are even more critical. A 6/10 is bargain bin status. 8 (not 7) /10 is usually recognized as good game, sometimes it has to be even higher. This review is subjective, its only 1 persons opinion but dont sit here and defend a 6/10 rating. It's universally considered a failure.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 461d ago
mike32UK461d ago ShowReplies(3)
Nineball2112461d ago

Of course the author has a bias and that obviously affected their score. To say otherwise is to deny human nature.

GotGame818460d ago

Yeah, funny you can't comment, on her Twitter feed, unless you follow her! She doesn't want her feelz hurt! 🙄
Played through the opening and went to my first 2 classes @Hogwarts. Seems like it is going to be epic!

460d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 460d ago
Leeroyw461d ago ShowReplies(2)
GoodGuy09461d ago

Story seems kinda...mid-ish from streamers I've been watching. Not a HP fan but I'm quite interested in the exploration, visuals looks to be the best it has and gameplay seems fine.
Many games I have more interest in are also releasing soon so I'll have to wait and keep my eyes out for a sale. No way I can dive into this 30+ hr game atm. Good that it's getting mostly positive reviews so I'll be looking forward to it down the line.

ANIALATOR136461d ago

What do you expect from a rag like the Guardian

Show all comments (61)
170°

Was Hogwarts Legacy Only Successful Because Of Nostalgia?

Shahmeer from eXputer: "I've always wondered whether the success of Hogwarts Legacy had much to do with nostalgia. The RPG is great but certainly not free of issues."

Markdn12d ago

I totally agree, and no replay value for sure but enjoyed every minute I was playing it. Not a Harry Potter fan but still really enjoyed

Lexreborn212d ago

I still haven’t finished it, mostly due to it not holding my interest after 20 hours. Wouldn’t say it’s a bad game, wouldn’t say it’s amazing I really can’t judge it fully due to not completing it.

Lexreborn212d ago

lol are people upset because I said I put 20 hours into the game and that because I haven’t finished I won’t criticize it’s value or if nostalgia generates it’s success? That’s funny

CrimsonWing6912d ago

Harry Potter is one of the biggest IPs in the world. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out why it sold so much. It’s a great game on top of that, so the math kind of maths here.

Can’t wait for the article on if Zelda or Mario only sold well due to nostalgia.

Crows9011d ago

They're trying to find a fake reason for its success...the mainstream hate how successful it became because of the writer behind the series.

So now they want to say that people bought it not because they liked it but only because of nostalgia....as if harry potter is really that old or even a classic IP in the game industry.

thorstein11d ago

That doesn't even make any sense. The author made those statements before the game released. People knew ahead of time and wanted a boycott.

But most people knew any boycott would only punish the people who worked on the game and put their hearts into it (like most boycotts).

So many people bought it, enjoyed it immensely, and moved on.

VenomUK11d ago

@CrimsonWing69 A greatly in demand IP only takes you so far, if it was crap quality then the reviews and word of mouth would have stalled its sales. But it is a good game (judged by Metacritic and user reviews) and that has given the game legs.

Tzuno12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

ngl, it got me in the first half hour
after that, a big let down, mediocre at every step
only fans are praising it

Markdn12d ago

In what way was it mediocre, can't really find anything about it that was mediocre and I'm not a hp fan

Demetrius12d ago

It's still a good game almost time for a 2nd playthrough, the passion they put into it is🔥🔥 crazy how after a couple months or a year folks get to complaining about this n that about certain games smh childish mfs

Show all comments (19)
30°

Hogwarts Legacy might be hiding a grotto in here

A Hogwarts Legacy player came across a gigantic tree under Bakar's tower, which might be hiding a grotto in it.

Read Full Story >>
gamerstones.com
120°

A Hogwarts Legacy Player Crafts a Spectacular Vivarium

Beyond the routine of completing quests and hunting for mysterious places, there are tons of additional methods to enjoy Hogwarts Legacy. One such way is the creation of a stunning and content-rich Vivarium, as done by a Reddit user Zvak-Keh.

Read Full Story >>
gamerstones.com