DigitalTrends: "While not outright broken like Sonic the Hedgehog (2006) or Sonic Boom, Sonic Frontiers is a heavily misguided game that muffles good ideas with questionable narrative, technical, and gameplay design decisions. Sonic Team continues to demonstrate that it's not quite sure what to do with the blue blur, taking a wild swing with a game that tries to rival open-world games rather than double down on the strengths of newer titles like Sonic Generations and Sonic Mania, or older successes like the Sonic Adventure series."
A new patch for Sonic Frontiers resolves the game's controversial difficulties and many other polarizing elements.
From GameWatcher: "Publisher Sega has lofty plans for its Sonic IP, aiming to develop it in such a way that it will "catch up and surpass Mario" in the future.
Sonic and Mario have always been competitors, but where Nintendo has managed to consistently stick the landing with its titles – even when stepping outside its comfort zone – Sega's output has often received a mixed reception from both fans and critics.
im a huge sonic fan, but that will never happen.
mario games have solid gameplay in every game he is in.
mario is also more child friendly and easier to play.
Mario is brimming with quality and Nintendo will take time with it. Other than Panasonic Era, usually quality games. So SEGA prepare to take your time and don't cheap out.
By selling it to Xbox so we can hear that 25 million players tried the game for 5 minutes? Then every sheep and journo can pretend that Phil is the King of Japan and Sega is nothing without him, the Nintendo should give in and sell to MS and that Sony only makes movie games not classic games.
Lol
Making games like Frontiers is not going to help them achieve that.
Also Superstars was average at best
They should have stuck on the Sonic Mania train, then work towards Sonic Adventure 3
the time for this passed, sega. back in the Nintendo vs. Genesis days when Sonic was the new mascot on the block maybe.
From GameWatcher: "The vast majority of Sonic IP sales, as much as 95 % come from overseas markets, Business Manager Osamu Ohashi has revealed in an interview on Sega's careers website.
Although Sonic's overseas popularity dwarfs that in Japan, the publisher will continue aiming to work towards making the IP a bigger name in its home country and other similar regions."
I am not sure if this is a mistake to have this review at 2/10 on meta. What do you guys think? I think it doesn't warrant a 2/10 rating
Oof. And here is the token outlier. Enjoy your attention, digitaltrends.
Here's hoping you don't find the nutter online that likes to make violent threats, as that will only succeed in generating more hits for your websi...WAITAMINUTE !?!
Clickbait rating. The state of vidyagame journalism these days…
much like the 6/10 god of war review, this review seems drastic based on the average of game scores coming in so far. most hover around a 7 for this game, so a 2 seems personal and lacking subjectivity. everyone is entitled to their opinion but reviewers need to keep it objective. It made no sense in the context that god of war deserved a 6 when literally every other review at the time was a 9 or a 10. same with this score of 2. maybe its not for you and you're free to score it lower, but to me a 2 is a horrible game that is unplayable - technically, creatively... all of it. i don't think thats this game. for the record i have zero interest in buying this game, i'm simply stating that the quality and trust of some reviewers in this current climate of general shitty-ness is questionable. too many people have agendas today.
It's a purposeful outliers trying to get attention by a low score to generate clicks