320°

Xbox’s Activision deal reportedly set for in-depth probes in the UK and Europe

Microsoft is reportedly facing prolonged investigations into its proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard in both the UK and Europe.

Last week, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said its inquiry into the $68.7 billion merger may be expanded to a second phase due to a number of antitrust concerns.

Notably, it said it was worried about the impact the deal could have on PlayStation’s ability to compete, given that the deal would see Microsoft gain ownership of the Call of Duty series.

According to the Financial Times, the CMA is expected to officially expand its antitrust probe this week after Microsoft chose not to offer any remedies to its concerns at this stage.

Phase two of the CMA’s investigation would see it appoint an independent panel to scrutinise the deal in further detail and evaluate if it’s more likely than not to result in a substantial lessening of competition.

According to the FT, regulators and others involved in the deal are also expecting a lengthy EU probe once Microsoft officially files its case in Brussels soon.

“It is a big deal, a difficult deal,” a Brussels source said to be familiar with the transaction told the publication. “It needs an extensive investigation.”

Read Full Story >>
videogameschronicle.com
Orchard606d ago

Everyone expected this acquisition to be scrutinized, even Microsoft - that's why they tempered expectations that it won't close until 2023. The internet will explode on the day that this deal closes.

Looking forward to this closing though, this year will be the last year I sink money into Call of Duty.

SullysCigar606d ago

Are you not approving this one?

Tbf, it's only right it should be looked at independently. Make sure all the 'I's are dotted and 'T's are crossed. It's a big deal, after all.

Orchard605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

There was a valid report on it from Christopher at the time I commented. I have now approved it.

And yes, a deal of this size (within and outside of gaming) should always be reviewed.

EDIT: Scrap that, noticed an issue with the article.

Gamingsince1981605d ago

Look forward to it but it has a chance it won't be legally allowed, I guess we will see, but so far it's not looking that good considering MS aren't giving any concessions or leeway.

Orchard605d ago

If you read the source article (which unfortunately is behind one of those randomized paywalls), it says companies rarely offer any concessions in phase 1 because they are very rarely accepted in phase 1 - so you end up double dipping and offering extra concessions in phase 2.

Elda605d ago

If you're paying or paid for a GP subscription you will still put money into COD just not at retail price.

Father__Merrin605d ago

If you play cod it's likely your gonna grab a lot of playtime few months at least. £11.99 a month for a few months. I can't believe they still believe it's free

Orchard605d ago

No one is saying GP is free. But I already subscribe to gamepass, so assuming they don't increase the price or add extra tiers when COD arrives in it, it's just a value add for me, and yes, lets me stop sinking money into COD.

generic-user-name605d ago

The Internet already exploded when it was announced. It'll only explode over this again if the deal 'doesn't' go through.

Elda605d ago

Anytime your spending money every month on GP you're still paying to play is all I'm saying.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 605d ago
Jin_Sakai606d ago

“Microsoft lawyers respond to CMA by offering no remedies/commitments“

It’s pretty clear they’re confident the deal will close then.

Destiny1080605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

they offered ''no'' remedies to the concerns of the regulators and you interpret that as a done deal

Gamingsince1981605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

Him and orchard are a bit too confident, these looks into the deal could stop it dead in its tracks if they think it will be bad for competition. The laws in Europe are much more harsh compared to the US where monopolies are seen as a good thing.

Jin_Sakai605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

I’ll come back to these comments when then deal is complete next year.

crazyCoconuts605d ago

MS is no stranger to these proceedings. I'd bet there's a well rehearsed dance that goes on in these negotiations, and playing hard ball might be part of it. How many times have we heard about the EU doing a "probe" on US businesses only for it to go away after a substantial "fine" has been paid...

Gamingsince1981605d ago ShowReplies(2)
Profchaos605d ago

They offered no remedies as stated in other articles because there is almost nothing they can offer to satisfy concerns at this stage. They will not hold agreements and offers to serve a game up for x years as a remedy.

Just reiterating what I read ms will have a chance to rebutted at an appropriate time now is not it

blacktiger605d ago

No it means that they won't hold anything exclusive or disrupt the service such as say since Playstation is call of duty's biggest customer, they will shut it down or change things around because they own it.

That's what it means. If they won't offer to hold it for few years then regulators will look into it Whether it's fair or not against monopoly fps game.

AmUnRa605d ago

Wrong, after fase one they asked MS if hey will make concession concerning the deal.
MS refused, so the investigation in now going in fase 2. Its not pretty clear for MS that the deal will be closed, infact its realy insure for now and the near feature...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 605d ago
Ryuk_2007605d ago ShowReplies(8)
shadowT605d ago

This acquisition is not healthy for the gaming industry.

MrVux000605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

Consolidation of any industry is never good.

(Yes, the same would apply if Sony makes similar purchases of certain publishers.)

ChiefofLoliPolice605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

True but since MS got the ball moving Sony has to make moves like that now. This is why I said I have no respect for what MS is doing.

They have deep pockets but they can't even build their own studios or buy some to bring in some fresh talent to create new 1st party experiences (which is where MS has been SORELY lacking in these past two generations of consoles) they are trying to outright buyout ENTIRE publishers with well known established IP's that will surely not be on other platforms.

Buying devs is one thing, paying for exclusive content to a game is one thing but outright buying up whole established publishers? And considering these publishers has some of the the most popular game franchises on earth?...cmon.

porkChop605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

I think for the most part it's fine. Blizzard makes most of their money on PC, and King is all mobile. The main issue is COD going exclusive. Personally I'd prefer COD stay multiplatform like Minecraft, and hopefully that's what ends up happening. But I do hope this is the kick in the ass that Sony needs to start making shooters again.

They're complaining about competing with COD but they don't even try. They had Socom, Resistance, and Killzone. All great franchises, all very successful. They stopped making all of them because they realized they could just pay for exclusive content in COD every year and call it a day.

Then they complain that Xbox shouldn't be allowed to have exclusive content in COD after the deal closes. You can't reap the benefits of exclusive content for 2 generations and then cry if your competitor does the same. Honestly, Sony are making themselves look like spoiled children.

Workshyskiver605d ago

I wouldn't say they are acting like spoil children, completely hypocritical yes but at the end of the day this is business and Sony wouldn't be doing their jobs if they weren't trying to wring every little bit of concession they can from this deal going through.

Gamingsince1981605d ago

It's not Sony, these are independent governments doing what they are supposed to do, what crack are you on ?

porkChop605d ago

@Gamingsince1981

Did you read the article? Have you not read all the other articles every day about Sony's comments to regulators all over the world? Obviously the regulators are doing their job, that's not what I'm talking about.

Jin_Sakai605d ago

Paying to keep Hogwarts Legacy content off Xbox for one year isn’t healthy either. Same for Ghostwire Tokyo and Deathloop.

tay8701605d ago

thats funny you mention deathloop and tokyo ghostwire. yes they had a.1 yr exclusive, but what is worse sony paying for 1yr exclusivity or MS just buying the publisher outright and making all games going forward xbox exclusive. dont care for bethesda games personally,but im sure there are quite a few playstation only owners who are pissed. MS can keep bethesda and activision. if capcom, square and fromsoftware were all somehow available, id rather sony scoop them up than spend money on the likes of activision and bethesda. very curious what sonys next move is. they clearly are interested in square tokyo and fromsoftware.

CR7JUVE1897605d ago

And that is the same as buying an entire publisher that has always been multiplatform?

Oh wait. Correction.

TWO publishers that have always been multiplatform.

Please name 1 single multi platform title that Sony has taken away permanently. Go ahead. Name one.

You can't.

SoulWarrior605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

You guys keep parroting the same thing as if one is equal to another, MS do timed exclusives content and deals all the time and have been doing for years, how is this in any way equal to spending 70 billion to take games away from the competition?

Christopher605d ago

Ah, the whataboutism where you compare timed exclusivity, let alone of a minor content item, to owning and controlling a slew of IP, including the best-selling IP every year.

I think we can agree that timed stuff sucks. But, in comparison to controlling what has been third-party titles of great note and utilization by the gaming community as a whole to suddenly fall under one hardware, not software, umbrella entirely? Yeah, not an argument. It's like you're arguing the value of punishment between a person who stole an apple to survive versus Bernie Madoff.

shinoff2183605d ago (Edited 605d ago )

not the whole game though from multiple publishers. Ms went for the killshot to try and ruin sony. MS is looking to monopolize. Your comparing a few hours worth of DLC to buying whole publishers wtf dude.

Ill add ms does the same thing with timed exclusive dlc. Remember ms paying out the wazoooo for gta4 dlc

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 605d ago
ApocalypseShadow605d ago

The biggest issue is the lie Microsoft told the industry that there was this outside threat. That if they didn't save.....buy these companies, others would have swooped in to buy them. They do need scrutiny. If those other companies did buy them, there's a clear chance they would have continued making multiplatform games. Because there's money there. Being that most 3rd parties made more money on PlayStation. And there's still Nintendo, Xbox, mobile and PC to make money from. Microsoft is making them exclusive to their platform and services.

Did Facebook, Apple, Amazon or Google buy any big console publishers BEFORE Microsoft did with Zenimax/Bethesda?

No. They had plenty of time.

Did any of the four show interest and buy any big console publishers AFTER Microsoft moved in to buy Zenimax/Bethesda?

No again. They had plenty of time.

Did the big four show interest in buying any big console publishers AFTER Microsoft moved in to buy Activision/Blizzard?

No. Still not seeing it yet?

We have not heard or seen any movement from these companies. A developer here. A developer there. No big console publishers. Yet, Microsoft felt it necessary to move in and buy two big ones. Supposedly to create their own metaverse. To gain a foothold on mobile. Besides saving Kotick's ass. Microsoft knows exactly what it does to PlayStation and other platforms.

Tencent was considered a threat from Kotick's words. But Tencent owns developers that make multiplatform games. Embracer Group owns multiple developers that make multiplatform games. No threat there. Those companies bought developers and continue to spread games around.

But what Microsoft is doing is creating an imbalance. Supposedly, to bring "joy and unity of gaming to everyone on the planet." That was Satya Nadella's words. That's what he told investors. Joy is fine. Unity sounds like control and a monopoly with them on top. I'm guessing Windows Internet explorer brought joy and unity as well Satya. And that's why Microsoft was sued with anti trust. Microsoft is now trying to leverage game pass in a similar fashion to Internet Explorer. Where some devices aren't compatible or willing to have it. Creating inoperability. Are wonder who devices aren't compatible with game pass? Hmmm...

The purchase will most likely go through. There's so many shady things that get allowed. So, I wouldn't be surprised. But it's obvious what Microsoft is doing. Embrace Extend Extinguish. It's still the same. Just done in a different industry. AT&T learned this years ago as well. Do I see "Baby Bells" in Microsoft future? We'll just have to see.

porkChop605d ago

The metaverse hasn't even taken off. That's why we haven't seen Amazon, FB, etc, start buying anyone up. The actual platform has to be there and it has to work. Logically most people knew we wouldn't be seeing any of those companies start swooping in yet. FBs metaverse project has been such a failure that their stock historically tanked. And yet you're surprised they didn't jump in dropping billions buying developers for a nonexistent platform? Come on man, I know you're smarter than that. Hopefully the metaverse never takes off at all though. That would be better for all of us.

"Microsoft is now trying to leverage game pass in a similar fashion to Internet Explorer. Where some devices aren't compatible or willing to have it. Creating inoperability. Are wonder who devices aren't compatible with game pass? Hmmm..."

Huh? What are you talking about? They want it on as many devices as possible because that widens their potential customer base. MS can't put GP on a device if the manufacturer doesn't let them though. Phil publicly stated he wanted to put GP on PS. It's not there because Sony refused. He wanted it on Switch but Nintendo refused. MS wanted GP on Apple's App Store. It's not there because Apple blocked it. So you have to stream the games through the browser. MS can't work miracles and they can't force any company to support their service.

Gamingsince1981605d ago

Yes because the competing companies should all be lining up to put xbox onto their consoles......what ever world you live in must be pretty weird compared to reality.

porkChop605d ago

What are you talking about? I'm not saying they *should* be. Dude, the quote I was responding to was literally in my comment.

Show all comments (74)
260°

Report: Sexual Misconduct Investigation Conducted at EA, Suspects Named and What They Did Revealed

EA senior staff has been investigated for sexual misconduct involving female coworkers, and these said people have been named publicly.

isarai17h ago

Aye just call Phil, i mean he somehow made Bobby Kotick's scandal disappear and gave him a few million dollar high five on the way out.

Cacabunga8h ago

I wonder if it will be censored with some in game ads.

XiNatsuDragnel14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

EA about to go down like Activision and then Phil saves the day saying.this is good for the industry and consolidation will help create competition. /s.

ravens5212h ago

What's up with all these horny creeps. You gon be horny, fine. Just not at work take care of that shit before you go in. Rub one out if you have to. Don't be a creep at all. ESPECIALLY at work. But don't be one AT ALL.

Extermin8or3_7h ago

I mean part of the issue is that things transpired outside of work....

KwietStorm_BLM7h ago

You think deviants care where they are? Work sometimes makes it an even better situation for them because they can abuse their power.

NotoriousWhiz11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

"it seems that according to EA, given the events transpired outside of work between two adults, and the fact that once investigation has started that the alleged perpetrators didn’t do it again, the investigation is considered closed. [...] The victim still has to work with the people that harassed her."

Yep, EA is disgusting.

Extermin8or3_7h ago

I mean the fact stuff happened outside of work puts EA in quite a difficult position legally. These women don't seem to have reported the matter to the police which kinda ties EA's hands on what they can do. If they don't file reports of the crimes then yeah from EA's perspective it is stuff that happened outside of work. The only exception is the guy that apparently referenced things in the slack channel for work, spending on what he said proving it may be very hard and he may well be able to get away with plausible deniability. I don't like EA and I think these people need to be dismissed but without any legal action being taken, EA can't really do much without risk of being sued themselves for unfair dismissal etc.

Show all comments (14)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18811d ago (Edited 1d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo21h ago(Edited 21h ago)

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus2315h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos5h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb334h ago

i think you are really missing the point

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4h ago
SonyStyled20h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

18h agoReplies(2)
ChasterMies8h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear213h ago(Edited 3h ago)

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3h ago
jwillj2k41d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex23h ago(Edited 23h ago)

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot23h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

Jon615864h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

RNTody23h ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead13h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage6h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast23h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn197922h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel14h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19793h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage6h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (59)
180°

Xbox No Longer Has Its Head In The Game

Microsoft & Xbox have shut down Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks to lay off more workers, insinuating that they're not in the game anymore.

XiNatsuDragnel1d 8h ago

They're headless for a long time because closing tango isn't exactly a good move

PapaBop10h ago

Ever since that cringe Kinect reveal they've never been the same. They used to make some amazing games and do great deals with third parties Early on in the 360 era they had games like Chromehounds and Shadowrun, both well ahead of their time. Now instead of nurturing their studios, they'd rather gaslight gamers and throw billions on pre existing studios. Not sure how Spencer is still in a job, I wouldn't trust him to organise a piss-up in a brewery.

Father__Merrin10h ago

We've said all along Spencer needs to go. I wish xbox went back to xbox only with new gears fable forza halo releases lots of third party releases

Those early rainbow 6 Vegas days and phantasy star universe are gone forever

S2Killinit7h ago

MS has its head in the game but the game they are playing is something different from what console gamers expect from a platform. MS’s end game has always been to use the xbox as a trojan horse.

XiNatsuDragnel5h ago

Lol that's funny well this plan they have isn't working homie

343_Guilty_Spark1d 4h ago

Acquisitions always come with cuts

1Victor1d 4h ago

“Acquisitions always come with cuts”

343 trillion points shield activated
343 trillion percent damage negate activated
All damage reduced to 1 for 343 trillion turns.
MICROSOFT DEFENSE FORCE IS A GO

Tacoboto1d 3h ago

Especially for Microsoft, when Booty pretty much said they didn't know how to handle that many studios.

Why even make the acquisition then.

-Foxtrot1d 2h ago

Didn’t they make the swipe for Bethesda when Sony wanted like 6 months exclusiveness for Starfield

It’s like…chill, you got Rise of the Tomb Raider for a year.

romulus231d 2h ago

Do they always come with senseless cuts becasue that's exactly what cutting Tango was, senseless.

H91d 4h ago

Everyone's acting now that game companies care about games and Xbox is committing the Ultimate betrayal, they are all like this and you have just been quiet about it for far too long

Nuclearmoon1d 2h ago

I wonder if Microsoft do pull out of the console market that it might open the door for valve to relaunch the Steambox. Competition is good for the industry but Microsoft don't even seem to be trying anymore.

UltimateOwnage23h ago

Steam / Valve are one of the few truly pro-consumer bright spots in gaming right now. Thankfully.

jwillj2k41d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

“Your game has won some pretty significant awards and is a show piece for where we want to go in the future.”

1 hour later.

“We’re gonna have to let you go. You can’t cover our 100 billion dollar acquisition. Oh and take your awards too 👍🏾”

Show all comments (28)