TLoU Part 1 is for super fans of the series or those who missed the first two versions, especially for accessibility reasons. For everyone else, it's hard to recommend spending the 15 or so hours it takes to play through The Last of Us yet again.
"The Game Music Foundation are today very proud and pleased to announce an additional concert, circling back to the roots of Game Muisic Festival in Poland. On April 28th, 2024, the National Forum of Music in Wroclaw will once again become a place to celebrate the art of video game music, featuring scores from The Last of Us and The Last of Us Part II." - The Game Music Foundation.
Najam from eXputer writes "It's time fore a new installment in the series, not another pointless remaster."
They are working on something new. Not to be rude but it is impossibility stupid to think ND next major announcement is going to be a remaster or their next Last of Us entry is going to be another remaster.
The team is sad for losing out on such a great project but celebrates its growth because of spending time on it.
All they had to do was make a basic online mode like their previous games. Instead they wanted more money and choose to go live service which makes games worse in my opinion.
What a waste of time and money, what a shame.
Not sure why they didn’t just make Factions 2. There was no need to make it a live service.
TLoU Factions was a great addition such a shame they couldn’t be bothered to remaster that for PS5 considering the crazy high price tag of the remaster of a remaster…
This is something to be celebrated. This studio is smart and they get it, even factions 2 wouldn't've have been worth the time. I am surprised they didn't just remaster the first one though, but actually how popular was Factions?
These reviews are comical. So you give low scores to the same game, because it's been released again and you don't like the price tag?
Game is a solid 9.0 out of 10 imo.
I like how this review admits this is for super fans or people who never played it, but then reviews it as someone who has played it three times. Great review, way to strive for objectivity. So, it’s what, a 9 or 10 for newcomers and fans?
I’m still confused how a game that improves a lot over the original is somehow a worse game…
Game is a 5//10. Just milking this overrated so called masterpiece. They used flashy graphics to hide the fact it was such a terrble game when it first came out back then. I found the game so boring and slow, I couldn’t bring myself to even finish the original. Yet alone remake it again for the 3rd time. People cry, but the story. I don’t give a flying f@ck about some cgi story, I’m playing a video game, not a movie.
A lot of people got suckered into believing that this was supposed to be a masterpiece, and you are supposed to worship it, because paid reviewers and the like say so. I don’t think you could pay me to sit thru this boring game again. It would be too agonizing. There are loads of other games that are much more worthy than this overrated heap.
Well I believe you do also need to take into consideration the price tag and worth for game reviews also. Sadly Nintendo still does it and still gets praised lol.