190°

Metacritic's 12th Annual Game Publisher Rankings

We reveal the past year's best and worst videogame publishers (based on their 2021 releases) in the 12th edition of our Game Publisher Rankings.

Read Full Story >>
metacritic.com
Obscure_Observer798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

Congratulations Phil and the Team Xbox!

#1 Xbox Game Studios
#2 Sony Interactive Entertainment
#3 Humble Games
#4 Activision Blizzard
#5 Bethesda Softworks
#6 Capcom
#7 Bandai Namco
#8 Sega
#9 Electronic Arts
#10 505 Games

Hopefuly, future holds even more greatness.

sparky77798d ago

Crazy how 1, 4 and 5 are all Xbox or soon to be Xbox studios.

They absolutely dominated in 2021, they might not be number 1 in 2022 but 2023 onwards I can't see anyone coming close.

MadLad798d ago

That's why you see so much anger towards Microsoft in the short term.
The fanboys are scared of Microsoft in the long term.

They've done a great job making the Xbox brand strong again.

Last gen was an embarrassment.

neutralgamer1992798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

Ted

Why would people be mad about Xbox being good man? Finally it took them 2 decades but they finally understood what Sony and Nintendo have known since day one

Who knew a console needs games to be considered great 😜

I know this i got a series X which I wasn't planning on buying and waiting on PlayStation till I can get it for retail

LucasRuinedChildhood798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

It will be pretty much impossible for MS to be #1 this year because they published CrossfireX (40). https://www.metacritic.com/...

SquareEnix's average will be ruined by Babylon's Fall (42) this year and Elden Ring (96) will boost Bandai Namco's average a lot. Destruction AllStars (62) brought down Sony's average last year.

I think these awards are a good thing because it encourages companies to only publish high quality software.

It's crazy that Nintendo came in at No.14 and were No.9 in 2020 (MS at No.6, Sony at No.4). If BOTW2 and Bayonetta 3 come out this year, they're going to do way better.

peppeaccardo798d ago

#9 Electronic Arts <==== THIS MUST BE A JOKE, RIGHT ??

798d ago
ABizzel1797d ago

I think they took it down, because some game scores were lower than what they had in the article.

I still think Xbox is going to win, but its score is a bit lower.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 797d ago
Christopher798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

Sony: "11 scored products (10 distinct titles): 91% good, 0% bad"
Microsoft: "10 scored products (5 distinct titles): 100% good, 0% bad"
Nintendo: "18 scored products (18 distinct titles): 50% good, 0% bad"

***** The difference between Distinct Titles and Scored Products, if any, results from multi-platform releases; for example, if The Sims 4: Even More Tables and Chairs comes out on the Switch, PS5, and PC, that counts as 3 total products but just 1 distinct title.***

Seems notable. That's 5 unique titles across multiple platforms on MS. But, that's 10 unique titles (all but MLB The Show it seems) for Sony. Twice as many titles and still 91% good. Even more were "not bad" on Nintendo.

MS stole the show by having three games score great, which they award bonus points for on top of just being great games. But, that's half (or one-third) the number of games in comparison as well.

LucasRuinedChildhood798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

Destruction AllStars (62) brought down Sony's average, although I think MS's average might still be slightly higher without it.

Sony were right to take development of Twisted Metal away from Lucid Games and give it to an internal studio.

Christopher798d ago

That game seemed a bit weird, TBH. Less-than-Rocket-League-level customization concepts for cars only others ever see. And then the whole earning up to being in a car or something? Remove movement options by putting you on four wheels and then make it just kind of mayhem, people are looking for more. I'd blame people at Sony for greenlighting the idea as well, TBH. Perhaps it made it past that process just to fill out the release? Kind of like Knack, but that at least got a sequel.

coolbeans798d ago

I feel like I ought to clarify some things regarding Destruction AllStars.

The car players are earning up towards is their special vehicle. Regular ones, varying from light, medium, or heavy, continuously spawn throughout the match in designated spots. I'm not sure what you mean about the customization concepts when comparing to Rocket League. From what I remember, there were different styles for each Hero, their special car, and regular vehicles. I can't recall how basic the decals & other stuff was for regular vehicles though. The better stuff was pretty diverse, but it felt slow to save up enough credits.

It did feel like this "release filler" after it'd come out, but I can see genuine creativity Lucid Games was going for. It's kinda like retooling Titanfall's on-foot soldier/mech dynamic with Heroes fit for a destruction derby. Given what we now know, it seems like this was a tryout for the Twisted Metal franchise. Its release is made even weirder by the ginormous price difference within weeks of its release: initially PS+ exclusive since the $70 price tag never went up on the storefront and then dropped to $20 upon leaving + in April. I remember one reviewer cataloguing this around the time it happened too: https://www.vgchartz.com/ar...

Anyways...

Christopher798d ago (Edited 798d ago )

***The car players are earning up towards is their special vehicle. Regular ones, varying from light, medium, or heavy, continuously spawn throughout the match in designated spots.****

I mean, the focus is on earning those vehicles, right? I feel that was my main point, you earn up to your "special" car?

***I'm not sure what you mean about the customization concepts when comparing to Rocket League.***

There was some customization stuff, but it fell well below what was already in Rocket League.

***I remember one reviewer cataloguing this around the time it happened too***

Ugh, not reading that clickbait material. I bet that "journalist" even made a sports car reference about the quality of the game.

coolbeans798d ago

-"I mean, the focus is on earning those vehicles, right? I feel that was my main point, you earn up to your "special" car?"

It's dependent on the mode, really. The pure TDM stuff treats them as a key towards damaging hits and body counts. Objective variants have a slightly different vibe.

-"There was some customization stuff, but it fell well below what was already in Rocket League."

Sure, but RL has been out for several years. Considering all the different heroes, Lucid did a decent job on the amount of options. It just sucked how most good stuff was behind microtransactions.

-"Ugh, not reading that clickbait material. I bet that "journalist" even made a sports car reference about the quality of the game."

I think most sports car references are based, especially his. Having read through it, I don't think "clickbait" is a fair assessment. The way it captures that moment in time when AllStars price drop happened is something hardly ever seen in other games writing.

ABizzel1797d ago

This was MS year regardless of how anyone feels.

It was a good close to the year for them, and the developers they bought produced solid content. As someone who plays Xbox too, I agree that several those games scored about 0.5 higher than they should have (Flight Sim 90 -> 85 on SX, Psychonaughts was 90 something and now an 87, and Halo and the same with Halo it dropped down to 87 when it was like 89 or something.)

And now they've taken it down.

Xbox still deserves to win, but overall this was an off year for most of the gaming industry. 2022 going forward is where the competition and winning something like this will be the real battle.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 797d ago
rlow1798d ago

Nice rankings and congrats to MS. What I was more shocked by was Nintendos ranking. Not even in the top ten. Next year it could be Sony in the top spot with two excellent releases so far. But the year is just warming up.

Rocosaurus798d ago

Well done Xbox. Surprised to see Nintendo as far down as nr 14.

Show all comments (22)
320°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Brazz9h ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate7h ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts2h ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16242h ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

gold_drake9h ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit6h ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS3h ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies1h ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT8h ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor6h ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff21836h ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot7h ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit6h ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal5h ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS3h ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box3h ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

7h agoReplies(7)
Show all comments (50)
90°

Epic Games Faces $1.2 Million Fine Over "Unfair Practices," Plans to Fight Back

Epic Games is facing a $1.2 million fine by the Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets over "unfair practices" in the Fortnite shop.

Sciurus_vulgaris1d ago

It might be cheaper to simply pay the fine. Fighting said fine could cost millions due to court and lawyer fees. Fortnite generates well over a 100 million in each month, so Epic has plenty of cash.

franwex16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

But if they did pay it, then they are basically admitting that they did something they weren’t supposed to be doing. If they fight it, they may win and continue to have a sense of urgency for their micro transactions thus making more money long term.

Goodguy018h ago(Edited 8h ago)

Meaning more suits to follow from others if they don't fight as well.

Not a fan of Epic nor fortnite and their micro transactions. But the game is heavily supported and is free to play, all store items are completely cosmetic.

14h ago
Furesis11h ago

I'd fight back too. These are kinda meaningless reasons to fine someone like really for THAT. It's like they just wanted to make money or something.

Sephiroushin1h ago

There is a law for something, but even if its stupid follow it because if you break it you pay for it; if they knew they cant place a “buy now” in NL then just dont do it!

80°

Dev Gets Windows 11 To Run On A Nintendo Switch, Don't Try This At Home

The OS works, but it barely crawls along on the Nintendo Switch's older ARM chipset.

Read Full Story >>
hothardware.com
OtterX16h ago

Yeaaa... no. It's cool to say that you got it running as a bragging right, but this is completely unusable. I like how he hits the screen while trying to type! X'D

Vits9h ago

I mean it always start like this. Ubuntu was the same, started with just being able to load the GUI, now people can play classic PC titles like Fable and Warcraft 3 as well as emulate GC, Wii, 3DS and PS2 on their Switch. With Windows things are definitely harder because Windows on Arm is pretty garbo, but who knows in a couple of years.