190°

CDPR is looking for acquisitions but the company itself is not for sale

The president of CD Projekt, Adam Kiciński, in a new interview with the Polish economic newspaper Rzeczpospolita talks about next-gen version of Witcher 3 and Cyberpunk 2077 as well as the future of CD Projekt.

Read Full Story >>
www-rp-pl.translate.goog
StarkR3ality895d ago

Can see Microsoft adding them to their portfolio.

Stocks never been lower so makes sense just to own the Cyberpunk and Witcher IP.

Nacho_Z895d ago

I mean it says right in the title there that they aren't for sale.

Killer73nova895d ago

Everything is for sale given the right price. I’m sure Sony would love to make cyberpunk a great open world game.

895d ago
MadLad895d ago (Edited 895d ago )

CDPR are one of the last companies I'd expect to see sell themselves to any of the big three. They also don't even own those IP. They have license agreements for both, but can't do anything with them without consent.

They're far too self-established. You may be looking at the stocks being lower than they were prior to the release of Cyberpunk, but the game, itself, sold over 10 million in just a couple months. They have a lot of capitol.
They also have a successful PC storefront.

They have no reason to let themselves be bought out.

Sashamaz894d ago

Whar big three? CDPR does not even make top 10.

MadLad894d ago

@sas

You really need to reread my post if that's what you took of that.

The big 3 are MS, Sony, and Nintendo. I literally spelled out my entire post fairly clearly.

I never said CDPR are one of the big 3. I said they have no reason to sell themselves to one of them.

luckytrouble895d ago

Yes, I'm sure developers are racing to be managed by the company notorious for Cyberpunk 2077, one of the best examples of a horribly mismanaged game ever seen.

MadLad895d ago

The guys behind CDP have a whole lot to show for themselves, outside of just being the people who released 2077.

It's not to be discounted, but it's pretty sad when you can do almost two decades of great work, in different sectors of the industry, and then everyone holds you to a failure, and that's all they attribute you to.

luckytrouble895d ago

Because what a company was doing 20 years ago isn't nearly as relevant as their largest project to date that they released a year ago. Would you give a company that has had the worst year ever the benefit of the doubt from a business standpoint, or run the other way until they prove they can bounce back?

MadLad895d ago

No.

It's what they've been doing consistently for the better part of two decades now.

And yes, I would. If you had a track record of both success, as well consumer good will, that would mean a hell of a lot more to my investing in your company, rather than a singular blunder that just happened to be more recent; albeit a lucrative one, being the game still sold well over 10 million copies.

If that doesn't make sense to you, well, all I can say is don't try your hand in the market.

Knightofelemia895d ago (Edited 895d ago )

From what I am reading they are down playing the mess Cyberjunk left, down playing the lawsuits focusing on Cyberjunk for next gen consoles. They are making themselves look good promoting the Witcher and buying up a studio and saying oh Cyberpunk taught us a lesson. Maybe CDPR might have learned a lesson and maybe they haven't I bought one of their games was not happy and I traded it off. It will take a lot for me to buy another game from them. As for acquisitions of other smaller studios. Focus on your mess first and yourselves first before you drag another studio into the fire. You had employees telling you Cyberpunk was not ready and should have been held back but you ignored the employees and launched a broken game. Wy do I have a feeling the Chinese company Tencent might buy CDPR in the future?

MadLad895d ago

Trust me, Tencent isn't going to be doing too much for a good while. The Chinese government hasn't taken a liking to their engagements over the years, and are cracking down on them as I write this.

KillBill895d ago

So basically they are looking for a sugar daddy?

50°

Activision Blizzard Faces $23.4M Fine for Patent Infringement

Activision Blizzard ordered to pay $23.4M for patent infringement involving popular games.

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
70°

Game Developers Have Begun Confirming Nintendo Switch 2 Support

Game developers have already started to confirm that they will support the Nintendo Switch 2 with their future titles.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
370°

Microsoft Is Finally Ending Its Focus On Big Budget Gaming Nonsense

Back when the Xbox 360 launched, Microsoft pushed the big budget game as a differentiator. Following all the recent layoffs, it’s clear this strategy has run its course.

Einhander197220h ago(Edited 20h ago)

The Microsoft shill take on the Microsoft causing the death of big budget gaming...

The whole driving force for growth in gaming both technologically, creatively and financially was all nonsense, and it was definitely not because Microsoft ran the industry into the ground with obviously bad decisions and creating an unprofitable business model that massively disrupted consumer spending habits. /s

RpgSama19h ago

First, F**** Forbes and their shill take, I hope the money cleared by now.

Second, Which big budget games I might ask? Microsoft has been in a rut for like a decade now, with no big publisher and developers puechases they would have not released anything in the last 5 years but the new Halo and Forza.

Eonjay16h ago

Fortunately for us, since we know this message is basically coming from Microsoft, we can read into their motives. Why are they trying to turn people against big budget games and who would it help.... hmmm.

neutralgamer199215h ago

GP is like any content service it needs new content. AAA games take 100 plus million (low end estimates since most AAA games take double that) and it 4-5 years to develop. That’s why there were 2 god of war games instead of 3 because Cory felt like it would take too long

I am not defending MS. That’s just the reality when you put all your eggs in one basket (gamepass) and now they need content. Sadly that’s what we all said would happen and is happening. GP will be a service for AA games with 1-2 AAA games on yearly basis. And I am all for AA games because to me that’s where developers can take chances on smaller budgets but MS has mismanaged this whole situation from the beginning. Their messaging needs to be clear and it’s not

They own so many studios and IP’s they just need to get everyone on schedule so that there are games releasing every few months on GP. But I don’t even think Phil knows what he wants. It seems his goals change constantly

Game pass is not a sustainable and take two ceo was right when he said that it doesn’t make any business sense to release huge AAA games day one on GP. Just like call of duty shouldn’t be on GP because why give up on 15-20 million sales

Einhander197212h ago

"And I am all for AA games because to me that’s where developers can take chances on smaller budgets"

How'd that work out for Tango?

Do you think less AAA games will increase game pass revenue or decrease it when it has less value? What if they also have to increase the costs?

S2Killinit14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Right on.

Hahaha MS has ended “focus” on games? Lol when? 3 generations ago maybe?

Skuletor6h ago

I noticed it near the end of the 360 era.

notachance9h ago

Man I don’t know what the writer is smoking, anyone with a braincell can see what will happen is the exact opposite, they’re gonna double down on big name IPs and turn them into GaaS and milk them to the extreme with multiple studios focusing on specific IPs instead of creating their own games.

It was so clear with the way they keep 343 despite multiple failures and shutting down Tango even after winning awards, MS is a service provider and not a product creator, they will buy the product from others and turn it into a service.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6h ago
Hofstaderman19h ago

Ah Forbes. One of the prominent MS mouthpieces....

Luc2019h ago

Microsoft is finally... ahhh I've never heard this one before!

Petebloodyonion19h ago

LOL, this article is a big pile of dog crap...
Spencer has been constantly telling ppl that NO they would not go the route of having games like TLOU, Uncharted, etc because Playstation exists and prefers to focus on a diverse portfolio.

How many years have we seen Xbox as no game and we don't want small games like ORI, Pentiment, Grounded, etc.?

That's the real tragedy and why lots of gamers are mad at MS right now
because they have been championing smaller titles and yet fired the ppl delivering exactly what they were proning about.

So no the only nonsense is that MS seems now to be going BACK to AAA popular titles..sorry, I meant refocusing effort on core established IP where broken GAAS might be rewarded versus praised and rewarded work.

Einhander197219h ago(Edited 19h ago)

https://media1.tenor.com/m/...

You read an article cheerleading the end of big budget games and all the other articles about problems and this is what you have to say? That's what you think "the real tragedy" is?

I thought that xbox fans might finally "get it", but no, it seems they don't even understand what is happening and what is at stake.

Petebloodyonion16h ago

Please tell me what's happening and what is at stake

Since it's not big companies closing small studios, killing innovation while refocusing assets on big ongoing projects and core IP?

Let's See MS Close Tango Studio mentions that they are too thin on key project
Sony Close London Studio and make massive cuts in Firespite will reallocate resources to core project
EA will focus on Core project
Square will focus on big established IP
.....
.....

crazyCoconuts19h ago

Hurray! No more big gam.... wait... what??

Show all comments (49)