330°

Insomniac's Ted Price: Games studios must break the habit of brute-forcing through problems

Insomniac Games CEO Ted Price wants to see more developers being "creative within constraints" in order to end the cycle of crunch.

The pressures of games development, and the impact this has on staff, was one of many topics covered during his keynote interview at last week's Develop:Brighton conference.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
Rimeskeem937d ago

There is significant evidence showing that human brains are actually better at adapting to problems when taking periodic breaks. This occurs especially when someone is stuck on a problem.

EvertonFC937d ago

Totally agree, it's kinda like when you can't beat a boss after 20 tries and you just decide to sleep on it and then beat the boss first time the nxt day 😂🤣

Ninver937d ago

It never fails. Crazy how that works ay

Rimeskeem937d ago

The is actual science to show that taking 30 minute breaks after a long time focusing on a singular task results in better processing. So if you get stuck on something and you aren't making progress. Take a break and do something else, come back and you will likely make improvements.

Flewid638937d ago

So true. It's like all that practice soaks up in your mind overnight. Next day...bam. Boss beaten.

SyntheticForm937d ago

So true.

When you're flustered and frustrated you lose your judiciousness and make bad inputs to your controller or keyboard.

When you take a break, your brain puts things back into focus; focus that you lose as the deaths mount up.

Outlawzz937d ago

Never thought I would receive such great life advice off of a video game analogy.

Video games really are life lol

XbladeTeddy937d ago

So true, it's because the brain can process a problem without outside stress when you sleep. Humans have incredible brains and even sleeping you learn.

DogJosha937d ago

I can do 2 weeks worth of programming in 8 hrs when I'm focused, but if I take a break during that time, I'm back to 2 weeks. Research always treats us as if we are all the same which can't be further from the truth.

FreeFallFrenzy936d ago

I certainly wish that was the case fighting Sigrun!

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 936d ago
Popsicle937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

This is very true. I own a small business and anytime we are working on a big project and I get stuck after many hours, the answer to the problem will often smack me in the face while in shower the next morning. If I rush through a project due to time constraints, I often identify the very next morning the things that I could have done better. The human brain is extremely complex and the way it functions is very interesting.

Rimeskeem936d ago

Precisely why I got a BA in Psychology. I wanted to learn what I could and apply it to help people, I am trying to get a PhD/PsyD in clinical psychology!

NeoGamer232937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

I have a rule, if I spend more then an hour on a problem I park it for the next day. A large amount of the times I do that, I come back to it and have it solved in minutes the next day.

Einstein's definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. That's what people do when they work on a problem too long.

Popsicle936d ago (Edited 936d ago )

@Rimeskeem psychology is my favorite field of study and the classes I enjoyed the most while taking my pre-reqs. I find human behavior to be so intriguing. I often wish I would have studied psychology instead of business. Good for you and good luck on your PHD/Psyd.

NeoGamer232936d ago

@Popsicle
By no stretch of the imagination am I pysch expert at all. My job as architect and development manager is solving problems. Almost all day and every day. I am more that I learned it by doing it it 10,000 times and failing probably 9,000 of them. LOL.

RaidenBlack937d ago

So the final boss fight was downsized from its original design to avoid crunch.

blackblades937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

Is that all you have to say from that whole speach. Just to spin negative thought

RaidenBlack937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

Its not a spin, my god! Stop being this insensitive!
https://wccftech.com/insomn...
Insomniac CEO Ted Price: "Originally, we were going to have a boss battle that took you all over New York City, and it was way out of scope. The temptation is to just brute force it, put our heads down and run through the brick wall. But the team took a step back and thought about what was important to the players.
They rethought the fight and realised they didn't need to destroy half of New York to pay off the relationship. In fact, it would have worked against what we were going for.
This permission to be creative within restraints needs to come from the leaders, who set the tone for the project.
In the stress of hectic production, we often feel we can't take our foot off the gas pedal, but that's often what it takes. The team needs to have permission to pause and come up with a better way, instead of bulldozing through the problems and causing potential health problems."

GhostofHorizon937d ago

Just assume that everyone who doesn't agree with you is a fanboy?

I don't get a sense of downsizing from that article, just a more efficent way to tackle the problem they had which was literally the whole point of the article.

Perhaps you're not communicating clearly but downsizing is a wrong term here, that's all.

ColtPSSX937d ago ShowReplies(1)
Christopher937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

Things you missed from your quote "They rethought the fight and realised they didn't need to destroy half of New York to pay off the relationship. In fact, it would have worked against what we were going for."

That last part is critically important and a sign that it's a redesign that also benefited other elements.

Things you put in that weren't at all mentioned: "avoid crunch." Causing health problems is them trying too hard to make it work, not necessarily a crunch element, but a major stress element. Especially considering how many departments would have to work on it and any changes to it throughout the whole process since it would encompass the whole game world.

HardeepTheGuru937d ago

Ted Price: Game developers are human beings first then they are game developers

Christopher937d ago

While they haven't received any awards lately, they have won many awards for the best place to work in the industry. I'm going to assume it's because of how they treat their employees.

monkey602937d ago

This coming from a studio that consistently raises the quality of its output and has for numerous years been voted as one of the best businesses to work for. More people should listen to Ted Price! He is clearly doing something right.

Eonjay937d ago

Fav comment:

He also revealed that the studio is eliminating higher education as a requirement for "almost all of [its] roles," adding: "This means if someone can't afford to obtain a university degree, experience is a valid substitute."

Love this mentality. I also must admit that kids coming out of school with a degree are often completely useless. Degree are for people with no experience. I would rather take someone with experience although they may actually be more expensive.

Tacoboto937d ago

Mmm, don't pin this on unexperienced kids. General software developer here as a degree-only guy when I graduated. A decade in now. We have a fool that commits his code and it won't even build. And yet he's kept on the team... . My favorite coworker would've proven your point though - he stormed out and quit when the boss told him he wasn't supposed to use some new technique he learned in school that week.

But the others, degree or degree-less it doesn't matter. Some people don't care about the quality of experience as long as it ticks some arbitrary X number of years. And the problem therefore lies within management. How are inexperienced grads going to get effective experience when the people hiring them invest minimal effort in training, or don't even try, or don't even care? Useless broken-build committer has been a dev for nearly 20 years. I'd take a Women's Studies grad over that pain to deal with.

(I do agree though - *quality* experience > arbitrary metrics. But when only the arbitrary metrics exist, employers need to be prepared to handle that. Instill bad patterns early on, that's what they'll be trained to expect, and the very nature of game development seems to promote bad patterns of employment and employee investment)

Eamon937d ago (Edited 937d ago )

To be honest, this has been employer mentality for the last 10-20 years.

In the 20th century, degrees were a rarity. But towards the end of that century, more and more people attended university. Simple supply/demand means the as more degrees are awarded, their value decreases because degree-required jobs aren't increasing as fast. Of course, this differs per industry. But generally speaking this is true.

That's why a lot of employers these days require not just a Master's Degree but also some form of experience - even for entry-level jobs.

One thing for sure, creativity and cognition is not measured by your university degree. All it proves is you were able to follow a programme and were disciplined and intelligent enough to finish it through.

Valve has had a culture of hiring modders since the 90s. Random people who used to make MP maps for Doom and Quake were hired by id Software.

Saaleh936d ago (Edited 936d ago )

In general, High degree only represents that the person is dedicated enough to finish the course. Usually most of the material learned in that course are forgotten.

Having a degree only represents a unique adaptive spirit toward that unique education system. Nothing more. Every person in that course have different [goals / skills/ weaknesses/ strengths/ approach / memory strength / different level of processing logic / life issues ] but what they share is the adaptive spirit. A great leadership will harnesses this attribute even if the graduate is lazy or slow as hell. All he/she have to do is follow a clear work flow. A wise leader will deliver that flow to encourage adapting and growing.

- Stop reading if what I’m saying doesn’t relate to your situation in your country, -

That’s why I hate interviews in my country when they are directed toward graduates or graduates with very little experience, companies expectations and job requirements are usually unrealistic and deliberately stupid. So they literally destroy the opportunities of many dedicated and smart people just so that they can hire cheaper workers outside my country. So both smart and slow graduates are having hard time finding a living..

If the graduate have a good spirit and with ambitions and willing to fulfill the job and learn it. Than all you have to do is bring great leaders to guide these types of workers and you will grow gems in your team, sadly companies in my country usually lack these qualities [ a reasonable HR and lack of a productive and reasonable leadership and zero reward when you exceed in the job ] . Usually their priority in Hiring and leading is mainly saving money and throwing responsibilities and deadlines without guidance or wisdom. They don’t care if you are smart or not. So even if you were hired as a Graduate you are stuck with the same low salary for 7 years if you don’t leave the company. They keep throwing unrealistic pressure/ deadlines, they throw their responsibilities on you. The more you do the more they expect from you.they always assume you are wasting time as a graduate. So all you get is drama instead of wisdom and reward. If you take a break after great progress or tough issue or if they see you helping someone, the boss calls you his office and act tough instead of understanding what is going on.

If graduates are suffering like this, imagine people with no degree. That’s why insomniac sound awesome.

Show all comments (37)
170°

Resident Evil Zero and Code Veronica Remakes are reportedly in the works, not Resident Evil 1

Industry insider Dusk Golem reveals that there is no Resident Evil 1 Remake in the works. Instead, Capcom are reportedly in active development of Resident Evil Zero and Code Veronica.

-Foxtrot1d 6h ago

RE Zero would be better to do first over RE1 because they can tie the story into RE1 more.

The original RE Remake was weird because Rebecca never mentioned anything about what happened in Zero and it felt so disjointed because Zero was developed during the Remake and they clearly didn't share any notes with one another.

Cacabunga4h ago

Wise decision. 2 of my favorites!

Knightofelemia1d 3h ago

Give me Dino Crisis dammit Capcom

TGG_overlord9h ago

And all it took was +24 years + a phone call from me lol.

GotGame8181h ago

LOL! A phone call from you? ROFL! They have been remaking RE games for YEARS! It was a matter of time!

Show all comments (15)
30°

Frostpunk 2 Director Łukasz Juszczyk Discusses Game Balance, Politics, and Beta Feedback

TechRaptor writes, "After getting our hands on the Frostpunk 2 story, we got to sit down with Łukasz Juszczyk to talk about how the game evolved from the original."

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
270°

Metal: Hellsinger dev says he is against Game Pass after seeing how it affects sales

Founder of Metal: Hellsinger studio says he wasn't against Game Pass until their game launched on Microsoft's service, which affected game sales.

TheProfessional14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Why did PS copy gamepass if it's so terrible and unprofitable? PS Now was before gamepass but it was streaming trash that no one had any interest in.

And honestly the way the industry releases overpriced and broken games with day one season passes and dlc who wouldn't want to just pay for a subscription instead of $70 per game?

Only biased PS fans would defend paying more to a corporation rather than an option that's cheaper for the consumer overall. If it's from an indie studio that needs the sales that's different but games published by larger companies are fine on a subscription model. Also any of these devs who complain did decide to put their games on gamepass in thr first place.

ocelot0712h ago

Ahhh yes the typical but but but Sony in a Microsoft article.

When did Sony copy Microsoft? I havent seen Sony's big day one titles such as God of war Ragnarok or GT7? Do you want to know why they are not on the service? Because people are still willing to PAY for the games. Sony has already admitted they lost millions putting Horizon Forbidden West and Ratchet & Clank on PS+ Extra.

"larger companies are fine on a subscription model" Oh really? So why is all the cod games yet to be on it? Where is elden ring? Resident Evil 4 Remake? Street Fighter 6? Boulders Gate 3? Alan Wake 2? Where are they of gamepass is great and big publishers are fine putting newer games on it?

I'll tell you where they are. They are currently still selling for their respected publisher's. You know actually making them money. That money they can use to fund the next project.

who wouldn't want to just pay for a subscription instead of $70 per game?

I'm one of the millions who much rather pay $70 so fully support the publisher. Why do we do this? Well for starters I rather just pay for it rather than keep renting it each month. If we all just kept renting years ago blockbuster would still be around. Secondly, I rather we have AAA titles in 10 years time to enjoy. Rather than play mobile quality crap from a subscription.

Tell me how this is a good thing for gaming going forward. The last time I subbed to Gamepass was October 2023. During that one month subscription I played the newly released Starfield, Forza and a few other titles. All for the cost of about $7. Since then Microsoft have not released anything I want to try out or put anything on GP I want to try. So they last made $7 from me 8 months ago.

In the last 3 months. I have bought Sea of Thieves on PS5 (earning MS more money on that than my 1 month subscription to gamepass). Resident Evil 4 for £20 and Diablo 4 for £25 (again earning MS more buying this than buying a sub). Tell me how it's best for gaming I pay $7 and play the latest and greatest for a month. Rather than just buying what I want even if it means waiting a few months and getting it cheaper than full price yet earning the publisher more than renting said games of a monthly sub.

darthv725h ago

...but didn't this game leave GP and then join PS+?

If a sub service is so bad, why get into another one right away?

Cacabunga4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

Finally devs waking up! More will follow .. reminds me of capcom during PS3,360 era almost going bankrupt they released extremely poor games because Xbox gave them paychecks not to release them on PS3 for as period. Sales were terrible and they went away from that.

Hofstaderman12h ago

Sony has never released new titles day one. They experimented with Forbidden West which was fairly new and quickly discovered that it cannabalized sales. XBOX gamepass was always an act of desperation to remain relevant and in their desperation they effectively dug their grave where today everybody is biding their time for their formerly exclusive titles. In a nutshell GamePass made XBOX not relevant.

Plague-Doctor275h ago

It wasn't desperation. Subscription Models had a very different outlook in 2017 and then with the gaming surge during COVID reaching critical mass seemed more and more possible.

Phil convinced Satya to chase a trend and it hasn't worked out

shinoff218327m ago(Edited 26m ago)

Pretty much. People can say what they want but Ms said it themselves with the court papers. It was definitely desperation. Xbox was getting it handed to them. They were desperate.

lellkay11h ago

Literally dev who put game on gamepass:
It's not good

TheProfessional: but but sony but sony

S2Killinit10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

Sony didnt copy MS. MS copied Sony, then MS went on to make xbox a subscription device. Remember that part? Yeah.

MrNinosan10h ago

You're not too bright, right?

First of all, Sony didn't copy Microsoft regarding PS+ and GamePass, which you admit to early in your comment, but with some faults. PSNow was not only streaming.
The mentality at Xbox gamers, is to NOT buy games, because they are used to get it on GamePass, preferbly day 1 like with all Xbox Studios games.

This is not a thing at PS+ and never was.
Sure there was plenty day 1 games on PS+ like, Rocket League, Stray, Sea of Stars, Tchia, Operation Tango etc, but those didn't take away from gamers that it was more like a "bonus" than a "thing".

Playstation gamers buy games, a lot of games and PS+ has been proving to be way better for business than GamePass, both by actually having more subscribers but also no eating up sales.

dveio10h ago(Edited 10h ago)

"Only biased PS fans would defend paying more to a corporation rather than an option that's cheaper for the consumer overall.“

How can you possibly come to this conclusion?

First, you pay for a subscription.

Then download games. But games will eventually leave the service. You will again need to buy them if you want to play them ever again. Or if you cancel your subscription. Right?

Eventhough this may NOT have an effect on every subscriber, this IS in fact the economical motiviation behind the service like GP.

If you are not already paying "double" this way, you pay at a 1.2 or maybe even at a 1.5 ratio eventually than opposed to simply buying the game in the first place.

As I said, this maybe doesn't apply to every subscriber. But this doesn't erase the fact of this business model existing. And possibly keep growing.

It's driving me nuts at times that especially the die hard Xboxers seem not to understand what they are actually cheering for foolishly.

The Wood9h ago

xbots always tryna group...

..they'll never understand or refuse to acknowledge why these two console brands are miles apart. Gamespass isn't the golden egg some would have you believe. Its hit its peak and is nowhere near the demanded target of subs by the purse holders

The Wood8h ago(Edited 8h ago)

xbots always tryna group...

..they'll never understand or refuse to acknowledge why these two console brands are miles apart. Gamespass isn't the golden egg some would have you believe. Its hit its peak and is nowhere near the demanded target of subs by the purse holders. on top of that it seems more devs on top of the devs that have shunned the service are not seeing the value of subs vs actual sales. Sell first, sub later works better than sub off the bat. MSGaming has a major sea change decision to make regarding COD. Do they release it dod and lose a high portion of up front revenue or either up the price of gp on the whole or create an even higher sub tier to cushion the blow or don't release it on gp at all and potentially damage the good will gesture reiterated not too long ago. The acquisition money wasn't free money....they'll have to pick their poison

anast7h ago

"Why did PS copy gamepass if it's so terrible and unprofitable?"

They didn't copy GP. They aren't dumb enough to put their exclusives day 1.

"Who wouldn't want to just pay for a subscription instead of $70 per game?"

People who don't like to rent things.

outsider16245h ago

It's funny when he says who wouldn't pay for a subscription instead of paying 70$. Well no shit...if MS keeps releasing average titles who wouldnt..🤣

Cockney3h ago(Edited 3h ago)

The reason is playstation didn't copy anybody and they don't release broken games, their games are still not day 1 and Ps players still buy games so ps+ is just an option for those that want a subscription service, the fact playstation doesn’t push it front and centre should tell you a lot.
On xbox gamepass IS front and centre with an option to buy games on the side, look how that is panning out for them!
Xbox fans are the only ones trumpeting this from the rooftops

shinoff21832h ago

Weren't we able to download ps3 on ps3 and ps4 on ps4 systems back then I really don't remember.

Truth is Ms still copied Sony and made a couple adjustments. One adjustment being day one games which clearly has been xboxs issue hence the ps5 releases, and they groomed the base to not buy games.

romulus231h ago

To be fair it takes it's own level of bias to not see the harm day one game pass is doing to xbox and the industry as a whole. Harm that xbox themselves have admitted to.

ChasterMies1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

“Why did PS copy gamepass”

This is a long story that spans decades. Sony subscription services for games (PS+ and PS Now) before Microsoft. Sony and Microsoft weren’t the only ones. We’ve seen OnLive die, Google’s Stadia die, and disc rental services die. What made Game Pass successful is the amount of money Microsoft is able to lose. Everyone expected Sony to offer a one-to-one Game Pass competitor and they did. To actually make money, Somy sells its own games for at least a year before relegating them to PS+. Sony also has scale. More PS5s sold means more users which means more money. Will these subscription services last? Probably not. Few things do.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 27m ago
Skuletor13h ago

I feel no sympathy for the guy, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that putting your game on gamepass would affect sales.

JEECE7h ago

Seriously, how is it that devs need one of their games to bomb in sales due to Gamepass for them to realize what so many people could easily predict? Like people joke about "armchair CEOs" on here, but at least with respect to the effect of Gamepass, we keep seeing that the armchair CEOs are actually smarter than the real heads of these indie studios.

Skuletor47m ago

Probably short-sightedness when he saw that initial Microsoft check, temporarily made all reason jump out the window 🤑

shinoff218319m ago

In some of the devs defense they know the game won't sell. So why not take the gamepass check. Hopefully yaluza/like a dragon sell decent on Xbox. I'd like to keep this series around.

dveio11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

The 'day-one' feature is the breaker or maker with GP, business-wise.

GP is no Netflix.

Because, from all the Marvel's Avengers to Sicarios, illustratively speaking, they all had their box office money. Before they had entered Netflix.

This concept shows you what Microsoft have actually put themselves into.

And what situation studios put themselves into if they go day-one into GP.

solideagle7h ago

GP/PS Extra day one is best suited for GAAS or free to play games

truthBombs11h ago

Why not sell your game the traditional way first? Then after about 6 months to a year put it on a sub service.

Day one on gamepass is a gamble. It works for some (Pal world) and not for others.

anast7h ago

It's the old psych. experiment. Set out some candy and tell the person they can have it all now, or if they wait, they can have double the amount. Most choose the first option, then complain when it doesn't work out for them.

Show all comments (47)