280°

Sony: Blu-Ray Has Hit Price 'Sweet Point'

TVPredictions.com:David Bishop, president of Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, says that Blu-ray player prices have finally hit the "sweet point" which should generate significant momentum for the high-def disc format.

Studies have indicated that consumers have been reluctant to buy Blu-ray players largely because of their relatively high prices. Until recently, an entry-level Blu-ray player was priced at $399, triple the amount of a standard-def DVD player.

However, retailers have slashed the price of some Blu-ray players to under $200 and early holiday sales reports indicate that the move has paid off. The high-def disc player has been dubbed one of the holiday's hottest items.

"As is evidenced by the sell-off of Blu-ray players over Black Friday weekend, I would say we hit the sweet spot regarding price," Bishop told Home Media."Some stores were sold out by 9:30 a.m. (on Black Friday). Clearly, it is a top gift item. There will be more price-point-oriented promotions throughout December and that momentum will continue."

Bishop said the recent Blu-ray release of Hancock sold nearly 300,000 units in the first six days thanks to the Black Friday sales. He added that a strong holiday season for Blu-ray players should trigger an equally strong January for Blu-ray movies.

"The positive in all this is the momentum we are getting from Blu-ray. It is continuing to grow and 200% to 300% year-over-year, and the ratio of Blu-ray and DVD sales continues to rise," he said. "That calls for optimism. For anyone who said that people would just go to digital and skip Blu-ray that has certainly been proven not to be true. Even if you took Blu-ray separately as a revenue stream, it is probably 20 times larger than digital revenue."

Read Full Story >>
tvpredictions.com
pwnsause5635d ago

lets see how people spin this article.

mikeslemonade5634d ago

Blu-ray is atleast in the minds of the average non-tech savvy person. When I talk to people about games, movies, computers etc. eventually they will bring up the subject about blu-ray. And I also remember it was the samething happened with DVD when it was new. People talked about it but couldn't buy it. When the price drops more and more people will get it.

Mr_Bun5634d ago

I'm waiting for the DD spin...you know...where 360 fanboys claim that DD is the future even though the arcade/core don't even have a hard drive. Digital Downloads...you know, the DDs that you will have to delete in order to make room for new DDs since you only have 120gig HDD max!

Monchichi0255634d ago

Now if they can only do something about those movie prices!! LOL That's the major reason why I hardly ever use my Blu-Ray player.

Fallen_Angel5634d ago

No spin need the reason they are 199 is cause they will becoming out with 2.0 soon making all the blu ray player that are out now useless. Sony is screwing over there customers once again

SeNiLe9115634d ago

I just don't feel the need to spend more for Blu-Ray movies when upscale DVDs looks great on my HDTV. The difference of VHS to DVD was huge where upscale DVD to Blu-Ray is not as huge of a difference. That's not saying there is no difference just not as much of a difference compared to VHS to DVD.

The Lazy One5634d ago

blu-ray discs and movies, no.

I will not buy an HD player till I can get an HD movie for <$20

Hububla5634d ago

go watch planet earth on blue ray with a big a$$ hdtv its crazy

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5634d ago
pwnsause5635d ago

Since you bots think of yourselves as smart and stated that Blu-ray is Doomed, lets see you guys spin this article.

Blademask5635d ago (Edited 5635d ago )

Digital downloads and low quality no high bar having netflix Hd movies is the way to go... upgrading disc formats is STUPID.. well except for like.. floppy.. to cd.. to dvd.. but DVD is the perfect medium, and after DVD.. we shouldn't even need optical discs anymore, just keep manufacturing more dvds!!!!

uh,, (grasps at more straws) There is no point in having more space ona disc. Jst like theres no point in having a high capacity Mp3 player. Who needs 80+gigs when u can just keep using 128mb mp3 players .. and just keep deleting and refresh..

uhm..

I just plain hate the PS3.

PoSTedUP5635d ago

blu-ray (blu-ray high definition disc read with a state of the art blue laser) is proven to have higher quality highdeff than a highdeff FILE. and having more disc space on a blu-ray disc works good for two things, compression in games and compression in movies, both not needing to compress data make the quality of each formant top notch and at its peak performance. if you sir think that a highdeff file can match the quality of blu-ray then you sir are ignorant. stop hating and start WATCHING B3YOND.

ThatCanadianGuy5634d ago

Damn man! I could of sworn you were Bladestar there for a minute! :P

Then again..All you really have to do is drop your IQ by 25 points and you're pretty much an Xb*t..

Pennywise5634d ago

Sarcasm just flies over some peoples heads!

The Lazy One5634d ago

wat? where do u think the movie on blu-ray comes from? high definition juice spread evenly over it's surface?

Blu-rays play high definition files. idk why you think they wouldn't. Blu-ray is a physical storage medium. It plays MPEG 2/4 and VC1 files.

If you get those files, and play them on a computer; they will look just like the blu-ray. If you put them on any other non-blu-ray storage format that can be read fast enough, they will still look and sound the same.

PoSTedUP5634d ago (Edited 5634d ago )

blu-ray has its own special dics where it is read with a blue laser, thats the only way it is blu-ray. it is a file but it would have to be on a blu-ray disc read with a blue laser ok. anything else would be considered highdefinition, not blu-ray highdeffinition.

The Lazy One5634d ago

HD-DVD used blue lasers too...

PoSTedUP5634d ago (Edited 5634d ago )

ok but blu-ray utilizes it more buy having a 0.1mm depth and more storage compacity so you can have the most quality because you dont have to compress anything. blu-ray is better than HDDVD and a highdeff file, what are you trying to argue about?

The Lazy One5633d ago

they didn't have to compress anything on HD-DVD either... You don't have to compress anything on regular DVDs if you don't want, you just won't fit a whole movie on it.

PoSTedUP5633d ago

dvd is not high definition and between HDDVD and blu-ray, blu-ray has a a better and more noticeable picture due to the lower bit depth, blu-ray has better audio support also, its just the better format. i was wrong when i said it was because of compression but having a game or movie on one disc is more convenient.

The Lazy One5633d ago

DVDs are perfectly capable of storing mpeg4s

and HD-DVD had better audio standards than blu-ray.

read here: http://www.hometheatershack...

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5633d ago
kyleg5634d ago (Edited 5634d ago )

fu*k netflix its only in the U.S so fu*k netflix i say. and not every one has fast internet and i only can download 60GB every month and when i go over it cost me $1.50 per GB. until there is faster internet and no download limit for the whole world there will never be just Digital downloads. so blu-ray wins.

pp5634d ago

As long as the public are buying stand alone Blu-Ray players and not that piece of Sh*t PS3 i'm happy so far.In this console war ps3 will remain 3rd place i know its sad and i feel your pain droids but Hey cheer up i know ps3 put up a good fight.As for Microsoft (XBOX360)the world is its oyster.

Nitrowolf25634d ago

Yup and come next year the PS3 is going to brake that oyster

Show all comments (41)
100°

Former Dragon Age lead writer David Gaider pours scorn on EA's AI dreams.

"They want you to believe the devs under them are super stoked to work generative AI into their processes," continued Gaider, "but I assure you what they took as excitement was really a veiled wail of despair not unlike the time that team was informed of their new 'really cool' live service mandate.".

LordoftheCritics2d ago

Publishers see gaming as another stock market.

isarai2d ago

I think anyone with some common sense knew this, im glad i don't support their games anymore, what a sh!t company.

Psychonaut851d 22h ago

Friends don’t let friends buy EA or Ubisoft.

Chocoburger1d 22h ago

I said this yesterday. AI isn't what we want when it comes to crafting artistry. Alas, these soulless corporate morons don't care about their work, only about cutting corners as much as possible.

120°

Phil Spencer and the Battle for Xbox’s Soul

Has the rapid growth of Xbox made the ship too heavy? Following the closures of Tango Gameworks, Arkane Austin, and Roundhouse, we explore what the future of Xbox could look like.

LG_Fox_Brazil2d ago

This ship was never meant to sail, this ship was made from the get go to sink as fast as possible. It almost feels that they want to lower the standards of quality in the industry so that they can fit in

rlow12d ago

I disagree, Xbox from the get go innovated and changed the industry. They did a lot of firsts and standardized a lot of others. It wasn’t till the beginning of the Xbox1 era that things started to go south.

Stevonidas1d 21h ago

Yep, although I’d argue it started going to shit when they tried to hock Kinect on their audience instead of continuing to invest in their studios and IPs. 2001-2010 Xbox was peak gaming, though.

rlow11d 19h ago

@Stevonidas
I agree they never should have focused on it after the 360 era. But you do have to remember they were faked out by the huge volumes of Kinects sold. To quote info on Wikipedia, “Project Natal, It was first released on November 4, 2010, and would go on to sell eight million units in its first 60 days of availability.” So if your Xbox and see these huge sales on a peripheral where are you going to put some money? Criticism in hindsight is worthless…..if only we could all see our future. In other wards they had no way of knowing. Plus they had engagement numbers and a lot of signs pointed to people wanting it.

Their biggest mistake wasn’t the Kinect, but unlike Sony after the PS3 debacle. They didn’t double on down on exclusive good games. The other huge mistake was letting Call of Duty go to Sony.

Hedstrom2d ago

Phil wants Xbox to be as soulless as him!

Tacoboto2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox has no soul and Phil has no confidence, and it's impossible to say either do when they killed Tango and Arkane Austin.

Everything they've said since has only made them look worse to a point that they're actually less competent than Embracer.

Markdn2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Whe you release something like the series S and expect it not to hurt your business model, and developers have to have parity with games. Then you know Microsoft don't care. Series s is the final nail that broke developers,

Show all comments (12)
360°

Sarah Bond dodges questions on Xbox studio closures

While on stage with Dina Bass at The Bloomberg Technology Summit the President of Xbox, Sarah Bond, was asked about the Xbox studio closures of Arkane Austin, Tango Gameworks, Alpha Dog, and Roundhouse Studios

3d ago
ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Of course she did. She's part of the problem and will just tow the company line.

VenomUK3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Bloomberg’s Dina Bass could barely read her scripted question without looking at her notes, whilst Sarah Bond who WAS expecting the question spoke without saying anything of substance or answering the question in any meaningful way. Clearly she’s had the same expert PR training as Phil, but this avoidance was disrespectful. In time the short-sighted decision to shut down Tango Gameworks will be seen as of the most notorious examples why Phil Spencer messed up his tenure in charge of Xbox. That’s a fully built out talented team that could’ve been put to work on any project.

Additionally, Phil Spencer should not be using Sarah Bond as a patsy for his mistakes- he should be answering that question.

gleepot3d ago

I think you are all really overselling Tangos value. Hi-Fi rush was a lot of fun. Ghostwire was incredibly dull. Evil within 1 and 2 were just okay.

lucasnooker3d ago

Evil within 2 was incredibly under rated. I thought that game was surprisingly good

NotoriousWhiz3d ago

Someone else said it best. I don't think it was a Phil decision. It was most likely a Satya decision. I think Microsoft is done giving out free money to Xbox.

Cacabunga2d ago

people please boycott Activision Bethesda next release and support Hellblade.
these people mus understand that they cannot treat their fans and employees that way.
scumbags.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Yikes you don't help Sarah 😬 making a problem worse

Christopher3d ago

She's playing her role. There's absolutely nothing any of them can say other than the truth, this is about profit margins and not quality, so they just don't answer anything and wait for gamers to forget.

shinoff21832d ago

I think news is coming of more ps5 release but they gotta be careful cause Xbox is still sitting on store shelves. They can't get left holding all that stock

Lightning772d ago

Come next month they'll flash nice looking games in our faces and expecting us to forget.

The only thing that'll be going through my mind at their showcase is how many of those studios will get shut down after release.

I'm not joking around either. MS probably expects every game to be like COD and do COD numbers. What a way to destroy gaming for the entire industry because they're dumb af at being realistic in what success means for each game.

-Foxtrot2d ago

Always feels she was brought in / promoted for this. Happened just before things started to be out in motion.

Phil and co have someone to throw under the bus and share the blame with

zaanan2d ago

Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

darthv722d ago

....won't get fooled again

Hofstaderman3d ago

Like a deer caught in the headlights.....

notachance3d ago

I always wondered why xbox had multiple leaders with similar titles like Phil Spencer, Matt Booty, and Sarah Bond, like, how many heads do you actually need?

Seems to me it would be more cost efficient to cut 2 of them instead of all those studios.

DarXyde3d ago

Frankly, I suspect she is the most competent of them. I don't mean that I like her more, I mean that she's the best at articulating herself and giving the talking points MS wants to give. The others are starting to sound more like her than her sounding like any of them.

Are any of these people "responsible" for what's happening? No. This reeks of Nadella. But that being said, I don't see any of the Xbox heads stepping down in protest.

"Don't shoot the messenger", sure, but at the same time, the messengers don't seem to take umbrage with the message. Not enough to remove themselves from it, anyway.

CS72d ago

I disagree. Nadella is looking for profit as a CEO should in my opinion.

The problem is Dr. Phil & Co. had 10 years to bring Xbox back on track and have been failing woefully.

Phil needs to sell to Nadella that if we are to make a profit, we need to make great games. And to do that we need employees here for the long haul and the freedom to work on creative projects.

But as Phil said himself he doesn’t believe great games sell consoles.

RpgSama3d ago

Dude, 100%, forgot Major Nelson and Aaron Greenberg, like what is the point for all these suits? They have more C-level executives than games released in a generation.

This is just so they can all pass along the hot potato one at a time and in between all of them can say a lot without actually saying anything, misinformation at its finest.

Show all comments (46)