350°

São Paulo court in Brazil orders Sony to unlock banned PlayStation 5

The São Paulo court ordered, in an injunction, the unlocking of a locked unit of the PlayStation 5 .

The lawsuit, discovered in a Metrópoles investigation and to which The Enemy had access, determined that the console unit would be unlocked within 72 hours from December 17, under a daily fine of R $ 200 limited to the value of the product. There is still appeal by Sony.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
1232d ago Replies(1)
justsomeoffdude1232d ago

I don't understand, why not permanently ban the accounts or permanently lock the games on the ps5 instead of locking the console itself??? This is seriously a shitty move by sony

Silly gameAr1232d ago (Edited 1232d ago )

Something tells me anything Sony did would be a shitty move to you. Somebody dug this article from the bottom of the barrel.

MadLad1232d ago

Something tells me you come to Sony's defense almost 100% of the time.

nirwanda1232d ago

So you had your brand new ps5 banned because you have given away/sold the psplus collection would you be ok with that?
Also Sony's digital rights policy technically isn't legal in many countries as it goes against consumer rights and this court case highlights this.

Sunny_D1231d ago (Edited 1231d ago )

Yeah, I understand banning a person from being able to play online and being able to purchase future content, but banning them from purchases they already made with their own money shouldn't be a thing. They should be able to still use their product even if it's for single player only. I think Steam does this.

Also I'm not referring to anything like reselling digital copies or anything like that btw. Just if you get banned from PSN for being a troll.

Shikoku1232d ago

Because the console cod be hardware modded to allow game copying or other things.

justsomeoffdude1232d ago

So how do you know that the console can't be unlocked via some hardware/software modding as well? Anyway you look at it, permanently locking the console for sharing ps+ collection is wrong.. ban the accounts and/or ban the games from the console.

Shikoku1231d ago (Edited 1231d ago )

😂😂

Shikoku1231d ago

Hahaha no it isn't you broke the rules you pay for it and yeah I'm pretty sure it can't be idiot if it could be this guy wouldnt have filed a lawsuit to try and force sony to unlock it pretty common sense stuff idiot. People will cry about anything it's called TOS and EU agreements if you don't like them DONT SIGN THEM!! It's pretty damn simple.

MadLad1231d ago

Way to get on your knees for big business.

RememberThe3571231d ago

What? So Sony can't ban cheaters and thieves?

Dude broke the TOS, if you or I did it we'd get banned too. Why should this ahole get off because he whined to a court?

Orbilator1231d ago

Banning the console is the only way, as these bottom feeders would just create a new account and start again. Banning the console is the only way.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1231d ago
Kaii1232d ago ShowReplies(1)
Ryushaa1231d ago

I just say that it is Sony responsibility to ensure the PS Plus collection is activated only on One account per console. If they didn't manage to prevent multiples accounts being redeem for PS Plus on one console it is on them.

RememberThe3571231d ago

Now this is an actual argument!

Amplitude1231d ago (Edited 1231d ago )

yeah honestly. There's not even a notice on any of the games saying "Only valid for one account" or anything of the sort.

I let a couple of my friends and my brother claim the games on day 1 cause i just didnt think anything of it. Super dumb that they're banning consoles for that.

And yeah - selling the games to a ton of people is different than giving them to a few friends, which is different than buying a ps5 redeeming the games and selling the PS5, which is different from letting only people in your house have the games, which is etc etc etc.

My point here is that it's extremely unclear where they draw the line - and when you have a market of millions of people there are bound to be a TON of people that dont even know there is a line at all. Ridiculous they didnt think of this when they created the instant game collection

This is a super crappy move on Sony's part. Shoulda made it a redeemable code if it wasnt supposed to be redeemed on multiple accounts. Anybody saying Sony is in the right here is either a blind fanboy or just doesnt know what theyre talking about

northpaws1231d ago

@Ryushaa

If someone break in to your house, it is your responsibility, you should have hired a body guard. /S

70°

Boycott EA trends on X as community savages FC 24

EA has come under fire for making unexpected changes to its FC 24 Team of the Season unlocks.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
50°

MLB The Show 24 brings more of what made the series so good - Entertainium

With more reasons than ever to get back onto the field, MLB The Show 24 hits a home run!

Read Full Story >>
entertainium.co
110°

Helldivers 2 Dev Wants It To Be Available Worldwide, Restrictions Are From PlayStation & Not Steam

The lack of worldwide availability of Arrowhead Studios' Helldivers 2 on Steam is due to restrictions from PlayStation, not Valve.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
thorstein1d ago

To be clear though, Steam does not restrict use of their platform in any country. So, to say that Sony delisted games in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and other similar regions is disingenuous. The taliban doesn't allow video games in Afghanistan.

There are many restrictions in many countries. Painting this as a false dichotomy of Sony or Valve ignores all other layers of what is going on.

Just be honest in your journalism about what countries are left out. Those countries should a) have internet access b) allow the game.

18h ago
H91h ago

There's literally almost 170 countries and mentioned 3, and Taliban banned PUBG only, do you seriously think that these countries that had games all this time, suddenly decided to ban games when Sony wanted to put PSN as a restriction

anast1h ago

Sony would be stupid to let valve run the show. They would be bad at business if they did that.