460°

Eurogamer: Far Cry 2 - PS3 vs 360 Comparison video

Take a closer look at how the Dunia engine performs on PS3 and 360.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.pt
xhi45627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

I didn't realise how badly those graphics compare.

Those visuals look NOTHING like the Far Cry 2 graphics I've got on my XPS with DUAL Geforce GTX 280 SLI video cards, seriously that's shocking!

Play the PC version on maximum and then look at these graphics........the console version no offence look like trash on both versions compared with maximum on PC.

I had no idea....wow!

Equinoxe_75627d ago

Hmm, strange...

Even though I own a PS3, I think the graphic card in Xbox360 is a bit stronger.

shine13965627d ago

in some of the scenes I thought the x360 was mildly better, but in others I thought ps3 was better. when it was mid range normal, I thought the 360 had slightlly higher def, but in the close up, the ps3 one had less jags, looker a lot sharper without degrading the picture.

brodels5627d ago

i don't know what you guys are seeing but the ps3 looks better IMO. less jaggies and the explosion effect was better. not to mention the shading is weird on the 360 version, but someone said that's due to the video being in slowmo? in any case, that's just what i'm seeing. but i'm sure the pc version looks amazing if you got a good enough gaming rig

thor5627d ago

PC graphics >>>>>>> console graphics. Always.
Whilst a console version of a game might suffer from framerate problems or pop-in, on PC you can adjust settings/upgrade in order to alleviate these problems.
PC games often support more players online and get free added content, especially in the form of mods. Take COD4 for example; it supports over 50 players online and we got the map pack for free.

The main disadvantage of PC gaming is that it costs an awful lot.

The Killer5627d ago

yes but thats if u have the latest PC specs, and very few people upgrade their pc's every year, besides there is one or 2 things about pc gaming i dont like

1: the controls(its only good for shooting or strategy games)

2: the texture always have sharp edges while consoles have smoother edges than pc games and that a fact!

SeNiLe9115627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

I have it and it looks just the same as the video is showing. At first I thought it might have been the art direction they where going but later I found out it wasn't the case with the PS3 version.

The game is good either way and I won't say either is better since they both have their plus and minuses.

I am sure both have the same irritations when clearing a base of enemy's, leave, come back a minute later and the enemy's have re-spawned again. I can't stand that!!!

gameraxis5627d ago

please trust i'm not a fanboy, i don't know what version is better... but when i'm playing FC2 on my ps3 sandbags and cars (and everything else) DOES NOT look that motion blurred or blurry in general, i'm calling tom foolery right off the bat here!

thor5627d ago

No textures do not have "sharper edges" on PC games, unless by that you mean the textures are higher res and look better.

If the flaws in the game's textures are more apparent on PC then that's because you're viewing it at a higher resolution than the consoles (typical console resolution is 720p which PCs were doing over 10 years ago).

You can tweak (if you want) the PC version's settings to look almost identical to the console version. Lower the resolution, lower the texture resolution so they don't have "sharp edges" as you put it.

I agree with you about the controls - for many types of game the keyboard/mouse setup just doesn't work that well. It's the keyboard that lets it down though, and of course, you can always buy a controller for PC.

DaTruth5627d ago

Does anyone's PS3 version look like that; I know mine doesn't look that blurry. They must have changed the settings to force 480p.

theEnemy5627d ago

consoles doesn't require a good processor, ram, and videocard to get good - great framerates and graphics.

Most high rated games are very beautiful.

MGS4 looks astounding and in close textures it's kinda similar to Crysis on Max settings, but ofcourse Crysis is still the most beautiful and demanding game.

Not to mention it's on a $400 console with a video card a bit less powerful than the 360.

Oh well, as for Far Cry 2, I got a bit dizzy when using the sprint. The motion blur effect or whatever is a bad addition IMO. :D

buy a ps35627d ago

the graphics cards have nothing to do with this. devs that make games for both consoles still are having allot of trouble making games for the cell processor. if you just take a look at any MGS4 video or Killzone 2 video you will notice that devs that know how to use the cell can make the 360s graphics card look like trash.

Sergeant Osiris5627d ago

video comparisons from eurogaymer are no better than the trolls you find on n4g, full of distortions, agendas and fanboyism.

ind15627d ago

@The Killer,

PC controls are only good for shooting and stradegy games?

Well, for starters, the majority of the games that are played on these consoles are shooting games. Secondly, have you ever played an RPG with a mouse and keyboard? Take WoW for example, you may have 20-30 skills - How on earth are you going to do that with a controller?

But regardless, you can use an Xbox 360 controller or even a PS3 controller on a PC anyway.

And don't try and come here with some "facts" when in fact they're just made up garbage.

theEnemy5627d ago

Buubuhbuhbut teh Cell! :D

I wonder where are those idiots that said that lines now.

yesah5627d ago

obviously the best graphics would be on the Wii.

Bolts5626d ago

The console version looks like crap, what a shocker! Even more of a shocker, Farcry was designed to be a console game from the ground up. Now you see why there isn't a Crysis port for the console.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 5626d ago
THC CELL5627d ago

ps3 looks fine with no errors but if u look close at xbox u see missing pixels when showing on the computer focus on the xbox side
also if u look a more closer xbox looks like a cartoon in some parts

air15627d ago

omg, so i been playing a cartoon this whole time?!

i noticed clearer texture on the 360 side ps3 looked a little fuzzy.

The Killer5627d ago

who cares which one is a little bit better? u cant realize it if u dont have both versions running side by side, but it matter if one version is broken and full of bugs or not!!

normally ps3 version should be better since its more powerful but that also depends on the devs and which they choose as a lead console for their game!!

if the game is one disk then it sucks, this gen should be about 15GB and plus for any next gen game!! anything under us just a last gen game with improvements

pwnsause5627d ago

"omg, so i been playing a cartoon this whole time?!"

well you do seem to like Power Ranger Games

sak5005627d ago

@Killerdroid

"normally ps3 version should be better since its more powerful but that also depends on the devs and which they choose as a lead console for their game"

Ah you came up with it yourself or did ken told you when you were riding his bicycle? YOur fking ps3 is the weakest console this gen even wii beats it with innovation and availability of games. PS3rd will flop and remain third this gen. Keep jerking off thinking its Teh most powerful console but in reality it sucks donkey's a$$.

snakeater35627d ago

weakest console ? yeah right ....it it makes you sleep better at night kiddo
btw have a good long look at killzone 2 and repeat what u just said .
btw the 360 is also good, im not dissing any console like the fanboy you are.

Midnightshade695627d ago

Look at the shadows on the man and his shirt and background on 1:58, the ps3 version has silky smooth shadows, the 360 version has lines going across them and looks dirty and messed up, almost like texture artifacts. The 360 looks sharper in parts, but it has more Aliasing and the ps3 version has better anti-aliaising, which is strange as usually the 360 has better AA but not here. I am a ps3 owner but got the pc version, and will tell you the ps3 version's shadows look more like the pc versions shadows...

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5627d ago
THC CELL5627d ago

we are on about consoles u pc whore

Qdog5627d ago

On Topic, I think it's a very short hair of difference, which is good considering that the Dunia engine was originally optimized for the pc. Did anyone else notice the dithering effect, going on in the shadows on the 360 version? The draw is probably whichever controller you prefer.

thewhoopimen5627d ago

I found those mosiac lines on the 360 rather annoying. A cheesecloth effect instead of real shadows. I was wondering about that too. Ps3 wins on the shadowing for sure.

Qdog5627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

For anyone that is interested, I'll take some pics of Farcy 2 running on my PS3. Who prefers a 1080p picture to 720p pics, or vice versa? I'll post them on my photo bucket.

Sergeant Osiris5627d ago

of the machine gun in the 360 version, it has this really weird matrix effect, almost likes it's failing to fill those pixels in time with the framerate.

Statix5627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

Far Cry 2 is a PC lead-developed title, so obviously it would look and perform better on that particular platform. I don't think anyone would argue that the multiplatform FC2 is any indicator of the true capabilities and strengths of the PS3 in the same way that an exclusive, 1st-party title would be.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5627d ago
UziSuicide5627d ago

Are the 360's shadows on FC2 really cross hatched like that?

hoolesy5627d ago

Firstly, guys this video is in slo mo, hence the framerate, I've got Far Cry 2 on the 360 and the framerate seems great to me, even with massive bush fires and explosions.

Secondly, I've seen both versions and the colours and crispness on the 360 seems a lot better. BUT the cross hatching shadow DOES exist and oh my god what a bizarre awful distraction. It doesn't seem apparent on the PS3. So, 360, much crisper but the result is a cross hatching shadow ballsup. Don't get me wrong I love this game, you can end up on it for hours but equally go back to it now and then if you wish. Great on either platforms, dont me put off, but they DO need to patch this crazy shadow weirdness, it's "unnatural"!

thereapersson5627d ago

So it's not just me that noticed the bad shadowing effects. The 360 version is a technically adept port, so it doesn't make sense.

digger185627d ago (Edited 5627d ago )

hoolesy, I do agree on the crispness in the 360 version, but don't you find that the bright colours on most 360 versions of games always look unnatural, almost cartoon like.

This game should look and run better on the 360, because its basically a cut down PC.

Equinoxe_75627d ago

I will buy a new PC, when this one crash, it´s from 2005, an oldie, but stable, and that's what I like.

Show all comments (113)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox410d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever408d ago (Edited 408d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88408d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai409d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle408d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE408d ago (Edited 408d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy407d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE407d ago (Edited 407d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan455d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya455d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled455d ago (Edited 455d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney455d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled455d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist454d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin455d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled455d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE455d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi455d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE455d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10577d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17577d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10577d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop576d ago (Edited 576d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics577d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos577d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt577d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10576d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt576d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 576d ago
MajorLazer577d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran577d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz577d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof577d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)