340°
8.2

IGN: Resistance 2 UK Review

Though it's certainly a competent package, the overall feeling engendered by Resistance 2 is underwhelming. For every breathless set-piece that powers the single-player campaign, there's another moment not far behind that peddles mediocrity, and every glorious vista is offset by sometimes derivative play. Ultimately the myriad multiplayer options atone for the patchy single player to ensure it's a worthy purchase, but one that's not quite essential.

jamesrocks31475646d ago

when the US reveiw is 9.6!!!! such a f*ckin differance i call bullsh*t.

N4PS3G5646d ago (Edited 5646d ago )

Its not 9.6 ..its a 9.5

and its not BS..its an opinion

and its not the first score near the 8 mark

The diff. could be because IGN uk and IGN us editors and reviewers etc. are not the same

PimpHandHappy5646d ago

ppl have read about how "run of the mill" the single player is

they really dont understand why they are wrong

i have never seen so much going on on screen at once in any game! Im about done on my 2nd run and while the game is repetative it does do some things really well

its kinda like GTA4
the game itselfs inst that great but the world you inhabit is crazy in size and thought

if you like FPS its a must play thats 4sure

and if you dont buy it a week wont even touch what the game has to offer

JaPo5646d ago

Technological complexity doesn't equate to a good game. + There is no obligation to enjoy a game simply because it has 'a lot on screen'.

I own Resistance and enjoyed my single player run, but it was extremely overrated by the PS3 fans. Multiplayer was also fun but nowhere near as deep and intelligent as its main comparison, Gears of War 2.

I know I'm going to get hounded here, but Gears 2 is clearly a more polished title which has established a winning formula. Resistance 2 has a wealth of features but lacks that polish which a shooter (because there is so many) demands.

I don't understand why people overrated Resistance so much. The adoration seemed to grow further into the PS3's life which is when, I presume, fanboys needed a game to use in their arguments.

Danja5646d ago

um so if you played R2 and found it okay , why are you comparing it to Gears 2..? did you just come in here to troll..?

R2 is the best shooter of the year, I dont even see how ppl can compare it Gears when Gameplay wise they are both different games...

The SP campaign isn't the best but it's way better and longer than even most SP player games without online these days and the online is way better than Gears 2...I experienced some serious Lag when I was playing it with a friend..and other than Horde mode what is there to brag about..for Gears 2 online..?

JaPo5646d ago

You're just biased. I, on the other hand, am not.

Gears of War 2 is constantly compared to R2. Perhaps it wasn't wise to incorporate it into such a fanboy ridden article, but it's useful considering there was a decent level of buzz about them both getting 9.5's from US IGN.

Gears 2 online is a tight, polished, and intelligent package. There is a demand for tactics and you won't have some n00b using a rocket launcher to win the game. On the other hand R2 multiplayer is technically impressive, boasting 60 players, but is far less polished than Gears, and on most servers is simply a mindless affair of running and gunning. In retrospect, I played the beta everyday and thoroughly enjoyed it, so don't go thinking I despise ANYTHING about the game.

I can see from your post that you're the kind of guy who sees stats and says: Longer = better, More enemies = better. In other words you do not have the intelligence necessary to form your own opinions and therefore let media buzz determine them.

Before others start pooping about SP, let me lay my cards on the table.

I've completed Resistance:FOM and thought it was decent. It certainly wasn't exceptional, and I think most people should be able to admit that. Perhaps not you, though. It was the perfect length.

I have played Gears of War single player and never really got into it (didn't have the time to). People say it was a thrilling, if short, ride.

I have not played Resistance 2 single player therefore cannot input ANY opinion, and don't plan to allow a website do it for me.

I have briefly played Gears 2 single player and, from what I played, I thought it was superb. Friends have told me the same.

We should ask John Carmack which he thinks he's better, considering he's the God of gaming. Or the people who made the original HL (the greatest FPS of the past 10 years). They'll be a voice of reason. But I suppose they're biased...

I think it's quite clear now I am not a fanboy, simply an asshole with an honest and informed opinion. If you disagree, fair enough, but don't accuse me of being a troll because I wasn't being one. I have a PS3, not a 360.

slinkey1235645d ago

japo.

Resistance is a better game IMO, im no PS3 fanboy either. My ps3 is actually collecting dust right now. I have gears 1 and 2 and they are both great games, but the multiplayer is complete bullsh*t. The shotgun is useless unless your the host. For example i shot someone in the head from 1 meter away 4 times with a shotgun and they didnt even get downed. Where as if im the host i cud shoot them in the leg and they would blow up. The lancer is also pointless because it takes WAYY to many bullets to kill people. AND GEARS OF WAR IS NOT POLISHED AT ALL!!!! one of the most glitchy games ever!

Remember thats my opinion

I think resistance 1 and 2 are a lot better, both the single player and multiplayer and especially no bullsh*t connections...

kewlkat0075645d ago

if you say anything negative about Ps3 related games, whether is a personal opinion, like most reviews are. Some are sensitive and are hurt very easily.

Though my cousin has this game and likes it, I'll probably borrow it and see for myself. I did play resistance 1 and didn't think it was anything special but I won't make comparisons.

heroicjanitor5645d ago

If you don't have a 360 then don't gives us some bullshit opinions that gears is better... Gears is glitchy as hell online so don't dare say it is polished, and both games depend on what you want from a game. Better online is resistance and better story is gears.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5645d ago
jamesrocks31475646d ago

why did the US reveiw get 9.5!!!! and the UK get 8.2 bullsh*t

heres the link to prove it

http://uk.ps3.ign.com/artic...

N4PS3G5646d ago

That doesn't prove anything

Fable II - IGN US=8.8

Fable II - IGN UK=9.5

same site,diff people,diff opinions

Omega45646d ago

Yep its pretty strange, seems like US IGN have been giving PS3 exclusives abnormally high scores especially compared to other sites

I guess the US 'incentives' from Sony didnt reach the UK

GlibGamer5646d ago (Edited 5646d ago )

And the flip side of that argument can't be said about the UK IGN being biased towards the 360?

Please people, you're smarter than this.

EDIT: Let me clarify, I'm not calling IGN UK biased. I'm saying that his baseless accusation can be applied to his detriment as well. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Kill Crow5646d ago

you need to turn up your sarcasm detector ...

Brixxer6005646d ago

The other thing that it proves is that games reviews are extremely flawed, one man's Resistance 2 is another man's Haze, never go with what other review sites say, if you like the look of a game then get it, the guy could've been having a bad day when he reviewed it, maybe he wanted to review Fable 2 but "Dave" got it before him, he then put his sulky face on and decided he wasn't going to like the game he had to review ?

With a game the size of Resistance 2 how are they going to review it properly ?, they simply do not have enough time to play every game mode, both online multiplayer and single player campaign.

die_fiend5645d ago

British people have different tastes unsurprisingly. I don't know why you're getting all flustered just because they didn't think it was great. I'm English and I thought the first was about 7/10 and if it hasn't improved greatly then 8.2 doesn't seem that absurb. Look how many other reviewers gave it 8 before you break down mate...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5645d ago
jamesrocks31475646d ago

but it wont update the comment...

mesh15646d ago

rfom 2 is nothing but garbage rfom 1 was better.

whoelse5646d ago

Anyone here got the game? What would you give it?

Surfman5646d ago

solo: 8,5 / 10
coop: 10 / 10
multi: 9,5 / 10

Serjikal_Strike5646d ago

And I'd give it a 9...best 1st person shooter i played this year!

Raptura5646d ago

9 / 10

More if you like futuristic type shooters, but that's not that much for me. I got kinda bored of it.

edwardcrisel5646d ago

sp 7 mp 5 mp co-op 8.5 seriously this game is crap it is just like halo but without vehicles the co-op is really fun though i bought the game beat it and sold it not somethin that would keep me playing if u like this game u should get a 360 and buy halo 3 it is a better game.

dukadork5646d ago

solo: 8,5 / 10
coop: 10 / 10
multi: 9,5 / 10

overall: 9 at least

dukadork5646d ago

solo: 8,5 / 10
coop: 10 / 10
multi: 9,5 / 10

overall: 9 at least

BulletToothtony5646d ago

then the single campaign it's easily a freaking 9.2 yes it could have been done better.. i followed the project abraham and the story on this game is deeper than MOST people think, it's very complex, but to the people who might've not finished rfom or not understand the story i can see how the story is nothing better than an 8..

it would be like watching lotR the return of the king without watching the first 2, it just wouldn't be as good.

the co-op is easily a 10 it's quite lots of fun.. and competitive i find it that some guns are not as well balanced as they should be resulting in sometimes a frustrating game.. i would give it an 8.9

Single player 9.3
Graphics 9.0
Sound 9.0
Co-op 10
Competitive 8.9

Overall 9.4 BUY IT!!!

callahan095646d ago (Edited 5646d ago )

Solo 9
Co-Op 9.1
Competitive 9.9
Overall 9.5

rexor07175646d ago

Solo: 8.9 It is very fun and well put together. The boss fights are great, even though they are heavily scripted. But the main reason for not having a 9 is that there are to many cheap kill moments. Its a bit annoying in certain parts.
Multi: 9.9 It is fun that no other console shooter offers. The number of players makes it very uniques, but it is the weapons that really set it appart. Each weapon has so much stategic potential. Some are not easy to use at first(not a bad thing) but when you get used to them, you can own people. The only reason its not a perfect ten is because skirmish on Bryce Canyon sucks.
CoOp: 10 There is so much to do here. If you like playing with your friends then this is for you. If you love upgrading characters, then this is for you. If you love the Resistance story, this is for you.
Graphics:9 There are some beautiful areas in the game, but some textures are ass and some areas are pretty bland while others are gorgeous.
Overall:9.5

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5646d ago
xxsnowmanxx5646d ago

9

edit- whoops meant to reply

Show all comments (75)
170°

Ranking the Resistance Games From Worst To Best

While it's been on ice for as long as it was around, the Resistance franchise has no shortage of quality.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knushwood Butt742d ago

My take:

Single player
3, 2, 1

Multiplayer
3, 1, 2

Overall
3, 2, 1

I beat the lengthy single player in 1 multiple times and spent hours in the online too. Plus 1 featured my home town! Special mention to the audio design in 1: playing that with surround headphones blew me away.

Note: I have the platinum for Resistance 2.

Eidolon741d ago

Resistance 1 MP will always be my favorite. Call it nostalgia or whatever, but that was my jam, felt more balance, natural.

Miraak82 741d ago

i have the platinium too , 10k kills in online ranked matches was no joke . Took me 3-4 months straight grinding but it was fun . To put it in perspective you only got like 25 kills per match if you were 1st place every match that's at Least 400 matches in 1st

Sciurus_vulgaris742d ago

I only played the 3 main Resistance titles. My ranking would be;
1. Resistance 3
2. Resistance: Fall of Man
3. Resistance 2

GoodGuy09742d ago

Man I loved 3's campaign. Another gem stuck on the ps3 and who knows if insomniac will go back to the franchise.

fr0sty741d ago

Resistance, Warhawk, MAG, Motorstorm, there's so many first party gems on PS3 that Sony has just left to die...

P_Bomb742d ago

Never played Burning Skies but I still have Retribution.

monkey602742d ago

Burning Skies was about 3 hours long and rather inconsequential. You haven't missed anything

porkChop741d ago

Honestly, Burning Skies was shit. There's no two ways about it. At first I thought it looked terrible, then I second guessed myself. Big mistake.

darthv72740d ago

Retribution has this really cool feature where you could use a PS3 to link a controller to it and play. So if you had a 2000 or 3000 hooked to a tv, you can use a real controller. All of this predates the PSP Go's ability to sync a sixaxis to it via bluetooth.

Yui_Suzumiya741d ago

Resistance 3 was shocking and brilliant. Loved it.

Show all comments (40)
200°

Why Resistance Was So Incredible

While the studio is best known for Spyro the Dragon, Ratchet, and Clank, and Spider-Man back on the PS3 the studio broke from creating platformers and made one of the highest regarded science-fiction first-person shooters of all time. This was Resistance and it remains one of Sony's most acclaimed and dormant franchises.

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
Jin_Sakai1098d ago

Really wish Insomniac would bring back Resistance!

darthv721097d ago

Agreed. Until they do a new entry, I'd love to get the two portable games remade into console versions. Maybe in a nice compilation with the mainline titles.

monkey6021097d ago

Burning Skies wasn't a great game.
It was only a couple of hours long and there was nothing memorable about it.

I'd love a new entry

darthv721097d ago

^monkey, hence why it should be remade into a better version.

SullysCigar1098d ago

Resistance 3's campaign was gorgeous for the time - and an awesome game to boot.

monkey6021097d ago

I remember being put off by it because McHale wasn't the MC but it turned out to be my favourite campaign

CBaoth1097d ago

by and large though the Resistance IP featured many protagonists (4 altogether I think if you include the portables). One of the reasons I enjoyed it was not being shackled to individual story arcs. Very rare for a major franchise.

Army_of_Darkness1096d ago

My favorite resistance game as well! It seriously had creepy, scary a$$ moments bro! It made me want an action horror game from insomniac!

Mr_cheese1097d ago

Remember playing this through online co op with the move controller and gun attachment! What a game!

BlackIceJoe1098d ago

I've said in the past I'd like to see this series return and have it take place years later, like in the present.

I'll give you an example if I'm not mistaken the last game ended in the 50s, so if it was to take place some time in the 2020s you'd have an opportunity to see how the world changed after the fall of Chimera and all the new technology that came out of that war.

Just like in our universe we all know WW2 happened, but we never experienced it, so if the next Resistance game takes place years later so too would people in that universe know a war look place against the Chimera, they just wouldn't know what it really was like.

So getting to see how that universe would respond to the Chimera reemerging would be interesting.

Imagine a little kid talking with his grandfather about the war and the kid just thinks it was just a made up bed time horror story and what was said was worse than what really took place, but now that the Chimera come back the kid will find out why years later the old timer adults were still waiting for the Chimera to return.

I think there is great potential for this series still and I really believe the best way forward for Resistance is make it have a time jump too.

So hopefully this series will return.

Dragonopolis1097d ago

Great Idea. I'd play that version.

Resistance was a great game and of all the remasters.... I would play a great remastered version of resistance series as well

waverider1097d ago

I was blown away when i played for the first time Resistance on the PS3. Great Game. Also liked very much an played for hundred of hours the Co-op of R2. The SP campaign of R3 is also excelent. I really hope that Sony and Insomniac annouced the Remaster of the Series and a new chapter. They got story to do that.

Jambola121097d ago

Resistance 2 was one of the first few games i played on ps3 and I loved it, would definitely finish that again :D

Chevalier1097d ago

I loved all the Resistance games. But part 2 online was amazing. The Marksmen for the Spec Ops type class when it was fully upgraded was such an amazing weapon. Oh man I wish they release all the games again and let us play part 2 online again.

Show all comments (24)
340°

Insomniac should bring back Resistance now that it's part of Sony Worldwide Studios

With Insomniac Games now under the Sony Worldwide Studios umbrella, the studio could bring a new Resistance game to life.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
PhoenixUp1727d ago

Insomniac didn’t feel all enthusiastic at continuing the series after the third installment

I don’t see how them getting bought out would encourage them to make a fourth game when they could work on another new IP or a sequel to Ratchet & Clank or Spider-Man.

Plus the third game ended on a deserved bittersweet note with a sense of finality against the Chimera. It’d be soul crushing even for this series to make all those sacrifices go to waste

purple1011727d ago

Nah. Just a new killzone from guerilla games please.

Let insomniac do a platform game..

Gaming1011726d ago

Thing is, there can be multiple teams doing multiple projects. One Insomniac team can do Spiderman, another can do Ratchet and Clank, another can do Resistance. It just depends on whether Sony is willing to grow the team enough and pay for more offices to do more work.

Fluttershy771726d ago

@Gaming101 multiple teams like Bioware doing multiple projects

NiteX1726d ago

The last Killzone game was lame. And there's no doubt Horizon 2 is there next game.

Gaming1011726d ago

Fluttershy, Insomniac isn't Bioware, dummy.
There are plenty of publishers with multiple teams running multiple projects. Sony has several studios with numerous ongoing projects and teams. I don't know why this is such a difficult concept for plebs to grasp but the disagrees keep coming in lol

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1726d ago
PhoenixUp1727d ago

I prefer another Killzone over another Resistance

Brave_Losers_Unite1726d ago

I dont. I love killing Chimera

UltraNova1726d ago

I want a semi-open world(think GoW) greedy, violent and super heavy atmosphere Killzone with KZ2's controls/feel with the best weapon audio possible and full on stealth elements for additional choice of approach.

As for Resistance (boy do I love this IP) I think Insomniac could do this game justice if they rebooted or continued the story with a different character. I just crave for Insomniac's weapon design ingenuity! As for multiplayer, they can go all out on a BR mode with some asymmetric PvPvE elements thrown in there like huge Chimera beasts dropping into the map at some random point and the team who kills it gets legendary loot.
Man just thinking about a modern Resistance game with a proper AAA BR made by Insomniac makes me salivate.

PhoenixUp1726d ago

I love doing so too, but there has to be context behind it.

Killing the Helghast for example is entertaining gameplay wise as much as it is narrative wise because of all the lore behind it all.

The Chimera were said to have been defeated for good after killing of converting 90% of humanity’s population as well dramatically changing earth’s climate. If after all that the Chimera came back even stronger than ever, then would be far too bleak for there to ever be any reasonable chance of defeating them for good.

Movefasta19931726d ago

Killzone has one game that's very good(2), resistance has three.

PhoenixUp1726d ago

Dafuq? Killzone 3 was received just as well as Resistance 3 was.

And Killzone: Shadow Fall sold more than the last mainline Resistance game, showing that there’s more interest in the former series than the latter

CanadianTurtle1726d ago

KillZone Shadowfall was a borefest. GG has wrote themselves into a hole with the story for that game. I don't know how they're going to fix that.

Resistance has much better gameplay, world building, story, enemy designs, weapon variety, campaigns, etc. In terms of campaigns, Resistance is leagues better. But in terms of online multiplayer, I'd give that trophy to KZ.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1726d ago
-Foxtrot1727d ago

I'd like to see them reboot it and go back to what Fall of Man was like

They could always do a reboot retelling like they've already done with Ratchet and Clank then do something completely new with a sequel

I'd love if they could restructure Nathan Hale and make him a better all rounded, developed character spanning the entire trilogy. At the end of the second one he could be transported to their world or something

Resistance 3 had a nice ending that closed the book on everything so I wouldn't want them to spoilt that, too many games come back and do the whole "Oh that great evil you got rid of? Yeah it's back"

Yobo51726d ago (Edited 1726d ago )

I'm still amazed at how little recognition is given to the first resistance from "fans" esp the narration of RFOM during custscenes. Cornelia Hayes did an excellent job as Rachel Parker she gave the world an authentic sense of atmospheric urgency and dread that I haven't seen matched since Halo, It was even more engrossing at times then gears. The multiplater on Resitance 2 though just looked like saints row 3 version of gears...
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Knushwood Butt1726d ago

The sound design in RFOM blew me away. Playing that with surround sound headphones was and probably still is awesome.

1726d ago
janus2251726d ago

Ah RFOM! The multiplayer was SO smooth at the time. Even with a 350 mo- 500 mo connection. That was my first online experience back then!

Knushwood Butt1726d ago

Agree. I think the series has run its course. I'd rather see a great new IP.

badz1491726d ago (Edited 1726d ago )

they can start with an easy one. Resistance Trilogy Remaster for PS4 and includes trophy patch for RFoM. there is so much win in THAT. BUT...ONLY if they let us have back Resistance 2 MP...THE WHOLE THING!

that would be one hell of a housewarming gift for the fans!

Inzo1726d ago

"It’d be soul crushing even for this series to make all those sacrifices go to waste"

I have always felt that there is room for more. For instance the Chimera could have sent out a distress signal just before the tower/ship blew up to the real threat to humanity or what if thanks to the virus Nathan Hale somehow survived?

darthv721726d ago

There are five games in the Resistance series. I think they could at least take the two portable ones and give them a proper big screen remake, like the GoW portables on the PS3 got.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 1726d ago
ABizzel11726d ago

No. let them work on what they want. I loved Resistance, but Insomniac proved they can work on New Ip and are hitting their Prime with the release of Spiderman, so let them work on what they want, and have a smaller 3rd party remake or remaster Resistance, and see if there's an audience for it.

Fist4achin1726d ago

Agreed. A new IP would be welcome. They've proven they can make a solid FPS, so let's make a new one!

xX-oldboy-Xx1726d ago (Edited 1726d ago )

Insomniac should do whatever they want, they deserve every freedom to deliver the game they want.

SyntheticForm1726d ago

This.

When developers do what they want their products turn out better and we all benefit. When they're ready to do Resistance they'll do Resistance.

TheUndertaker851726d ago

That's why they were independent and claimed to want that independence. If they wanted that freedom they should've stuck to their guns. Not took a payoff.

SyntheticForm1726d ago (Edited 1726d ago )

You're making it sound nefarious when this is hardly the case. There's a mutual trust here.

They know they'll be free to do what they want under Sony. Total autonomy - of course not, but Sony will likely approve and back anything they do.

This isn't to say Sony won't have any say - they'll likely encourage the immediate continuation of Spider-Man, but I doubt they'll mind and the fans sure won't.

Overall Insomniac is happy and trust Sony, or they wouldn't have taken the deal.

xX-oldboy-Xx1726d ago

TheUndertaker85 - Haha, c'mon mate - Sony will let them do what they want. This acquisition makes sense on every level.

There needs to be mutual respect between publisher and developer.

They'll find that respect at WWS, this is good for Insomniac. WWS has a huge talent pool and they share knowledge and resources amongst each other.

Very excited to see what Insomniac can achieve under WWS.

TheUndertaker851726d ago

https://www.polygon.com/201...

“ "It's hard for people in any industry to accept change, especially when you've been focused on doing things one way for so long," said Ted Price, Insomniac's president and CEO, in a recent interview with Polygon. "But as an industry, we're being forced to become comfortable [with], or at least accept, that change will be a constant for us."”

“ According to Price, Insomniac's independence is crucial to its ability to continually adapt to changing circumstances and try new things in all areas of game development. "We've always loved the opportunity to experiment with ... early on, game design models; now, delivery mechanisms and new platforms," he explained. And Insomniac's corporate culture ensures its employees are always challenged to "think creatively about not just game design, but how [they're] delivering [their] games and what audiences [they're] addressing with [their] games."”

“ Insomniac attempted to combine its history of creating hardcore games with a new platform, Facebook, when it began developing Outernauts in 2010. Price explained that the studio wanted to try a new business model but still deliver an experience that core gamers would appreciate. The company turned to Electronic Arts for help with the first half of that equation, and it didn't work out because, as Price put it, "the monetization and viral features that we had put in turned off a lot of the audience that we were hoping to attract."”

“ "I'm very proud of what we did with both those games because we took creative risks," he said. "And I think as a developer, taking creative risks is something you have to continue to do, even if people are telling you that all they want is the same recycled stuff over and over again."”

Movefasta19931726d ago

I think he means that sony shouldn't be too involved when they are making a game, just trust them to deliver if they want to make a new ip

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1726d ago
Imalwaysright1726d ago

Fingers crossed for a RFoM remaster.

xX-oldboy-Xx1726d ago

Fair chance any remaster would be done by BluePoint. They've done amazing work this gen.

Show all comments (81)