According to Mitch Dyer, who previously worked for IGN and wrote the article in question, states he was forced by the site’s editors at the time (Steve Butts and Tal Blevins) to include “forced gossip” in the report.
Sony has launched the PSN Store "PlayStation Indies" sale this May 15, and this one is full of smaller titles at a discounted rate.
Insider Gaming sits down with ExoCross creative director Paul Coleman to talk about the game's development, features, gameplay, and more.
In an era dominated by digital downloads and streaming services, the importance of physical media in gaming remains a topic of discussion.
Of course, Nintendo has always preferred physical sales, especially since they skew to a younger audience, and kids want games for their birthdays and holidays. They go to the store and pick the game they want.
Since the Wii they have always been the last major publisher to support modern tech or concepts, and they will be the last to support physical if it ever goes away. Which I hope it doesn't.
OK, but you need better format where these games could actually fit instead of half of the game being in physical form and all I have being on a digital code or have to download
Yeah it artificially retains the high prices for their software. Hence Pirates will always have their day with them.
"They forced an unproven claim onto http://IGN.com with my name on it, against my will, to "protect their relationship with Sony."
When Sony justifiably condemned our story, Steve and Tal were SILENT. They never went to bat for me for a second.
Huh? They forced an unproven claim in the story to "protect their relationship with Sony" which Sony later condemned? How exactly was that "protecting" their relationship with Sony? Those editors sound like total dumbasses.
Steve Butts was later fired from IGN for misconduct:
https://www.polygon.com/201...
"These are the guys who would later publish a story on http://IGN.com stating THE LAST GUARDIAN IS CANCELED."
I remember that, lol
this was debunked in Schrier's book, but IGN is still not out of this. that original article should be updated, or excised...
This is a very dangerous statement if he what he says is true they purposely did things to remain in good standing with publishers/companies this makes them extremely untrustworthy.
How can we trust them to review anything with honesty if they want to be on good standings with a company hell their reviews become meaningless if they are afraid to step on toes.
Also shame on them for painting that narrative if not true.
As far as I know it was a creative difference not a hostile takeover. ND simply didn't want to go with Amy's vision and she was basically like yeah I'm done peace out