Overall, Call of Duty: World at War will keep you occupied if you're looking for some multiplayer WWII fun, but the single player campaign's many frustrating points, including clichéd set pieces and juxtaposed Rambo/serious subject matter, is extremely disappointing, if not unsurprising. Bring on the next Infinity Ward developed Call of Duty.
Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."
Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.
2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.
A very devoted fan of Call of Duty: World at War racks up incredible in-game stats while playing regularly for the past 15 years.
Of course you will hit a ridiculous stat after 15 of anything.
My main character for Everquest had over 500 days played in the first 6 years of the game. I was young then and had a lot of time on my hands. I don’t think I could duplicate that again until I retire and not sure I could match it if I tried.
Gamespot : Call of Duty: Vanguard launches with 20 multiplayer maps, three of which are actually remakes from 2008's Call of Duty: World at War. Let's take a look at how the maps have changed with this side-by-side comparison.
multi play equals fun ,single campaign equals frustration i think this game only deserves an 7/10 score.single play is border useless theres to many guys on your own team getting in the way.i think the next call of duty should be online only 32 player dedicated servers.some peoples bandwidth is useless in these peer to peer match ups,love the online when you take your own party knowing you have solid host connection outside that it can be a bit of a pain.