360°

The U.S.' Potential Loot Box Ban Could be the End of FIFA as We Know It

Luke explores just how much EA will have to change Ultimate Team's model if the bill passes, and why it should change even if it doesn't.

Read Full Story >>
doublejump.co
Brave_Losers_Unite1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

And hopefully Fifa can go to a legitimate developer. EA is a cancer. They havent done anything good for gaming the last few years.

georeo1750d ago

God you are right. I'm really missing the old need for speed.

simoboyu1750d ago

I m making $320 to $380 every hour online artworks and that I got $19894 and additional in multi month web based performing from home. i'm an ordinary full time understudy and I work unquestionably to my spair of hours in my extra time.anybody can attempt this activity and makes mogul and demonstrated yourlife design by methods for truly open this hyperlink......excellent luck★

https://bit.ly/2QCOGd9

Kostche1750d ago

to be honest its not just EA, its the people that buy it, they are worse that EA in my books

quent1749d ago

Decade actually, go back and look at what was added, improved or removed with every itiration of annual EA releases in the quests to sell you more fragmented content for more of you're money

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1749d ago
SheenuTheLegend1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

this looks like a dream article that i am reading. hope it becomes a reality soon.
MT's almost fu**ed gaming.
and i also do hope a ban on multiplayer behind a paywall. that price of multiplayer is already included in the price you pay for the game.
If it is that costly, how are f2p games handling that lol.

quent1749d ago

It's in a word a dream unfortunately, there's just too much money involed

NeoGamer2321749d ago

Even if a loot box ban became law, it is unlikely that it could hold up in courts very long.

There is no difference between loot boxes and sport or card games like (Magic The Gathering). If you ban loot boxes you would have to ban them as well to succeed in court.

frostypants1749d ago (Edited 1749d ago )

That analogy only works if there is an easy means of trading/selling the loot items on a fully open marketplace. "Walled gardens" don't count either.

Tross1749d ago (Edited 1749d ago )

Except physical Magic cards have resale value (mostly minute but it’s still there), and you don’t have to pay to play the game. You just need the cards. Even with the digital game, you aren’t paying $60 just to be able to play it. Also, genre wise, selling physical or digital cards makes way more sense than that kind of transaction in a FPS or in this case, a soccer game.

People are opposed to loot boxes because they’re already paying to play EA games and they’re shoved into games where it doesn’t make sense. Paying to play a game should entitle someone to all its contents unless legit DLC is added later, and then paying for that should mean access to all that content.

Imalwaysright1749d ago (Edited 1749d ago )

I'm not familiar with magic the gathering but does it use monetization practices similar to the ones described in this video? https://www.youtube.com/wat...

quent1749d ago (Edited 1749d ago )

are there any age restrictions on trading cards ? , also do the cards I buy vanish into thin air on a yearly basis ?

Dragonopolis1749d ago

Magic the gathering the card game is more like comic books and graphic art sales than loot boxes. Magic the gathering the Company does not make any money of card trades and resale only in the initial sale.

There is no favoritism like in lootboxes esp ones who pay money. In magic gathering the card game you are buying an unknown deck but everyone has that disadvantage. If you buy resale cards knowing what they are you are gaining an advantage but the company isn't directly making a profit and is not in control of resales cards

The whole purpose of lootboxes is to steer players to the games store front. I doubt EA would continue with lootboxes if they weren't going to make money

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1749d ago
Nu1749d ago

I'd like for the football association to stop giving these predatory companies license for these type of games. Disney could end EAs hold of the Star Wars licence

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1749d ago
XiNatsuDragnel1751d ago

Please ban lootboxes because game companies aren't self-banning the practice

harmny1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

Don't worry. Nobody plays FIFA in the US. They won't care

KyRo1750d ago

And that's the problem. Now if Europe and the UK banned them, that would put a massive spanner in the works for EA but hopefully if the US ban them, it might make other places sit up and wake up. At least that's what I hope for lol.

I don't even play FUT but that is easily thr biggest scam in gaming but casuals lap it up, just for it to be irrelevant a year later.

AnubisG1750d ago

You know that the UK is part of Europe right?

It's like saying, Canada and North America banned them....

indysurfn1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

I get your point about it not being popular in the US but as the article points out it is not just FIFA.

QUOTE:" it’s also available in the MADDEN NFL and NHL series"
But even in 2012 (as the article pointed out it had 2.6 million people play it) Plus it has grown since then.

Plus once they get it banned in sports it should be VERY easy to ban in all other games. Because all they have to do is set a presidence.

Imalwaysright1749d ago (Edited 1749d ago )

Fifa 19 didn't sell that badly in the USA but if this bill passes it will have an impact on every single EA game.

DaveZero1749d ago

are you daft.
Tons of Americans play fifa 19.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1749d ago
Sono4211750d ago

Honestly it's the consumer's fault more than it is the game companies, if these less than intelligent people would just stop buying them, they wouldn't keep trying to force them into every game, but nope these mindless people keep buying them, so why not lock some stuff behind a lootbox, all it takes is developing the box model and some super over the top flashy opening and chime when you get an EPIC item, and then make 10x the profit. To these companies it's a no brainer, and ironically they profit off of people with no brain.

1751d ago Replies(5)
ZeekQuattro1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

It will be a severe blow to EA if it passes. Most of the money they make comes from FIFA and its microtransactions.

AK911750d ago

Good Lootboxes and microtransactions need to go, FIFA was already a successful franchise before them.

badz1491750d ago

No thanks to FUT, FIFA is trash now

Show all comments (82)
140°

PlayStation Had The Chance To Steal FIFA From EA In The '90s, But Passed

"I think EA would have responded quite badly to that"

Read Full Story >>
timeextension.com
franwex213d ago

If there’s an organization that is more corrupt than EA, it’s for sure FIFA.

I also agree that EA has done more for FIFA on brand awareness too. I know of people that thought FIFA was an EA brand similar to Madden instead of their own independent organization.

Profchaos213d ago

Probably a good call on Sony's part given the relationship they needed to build with ea over time and given the era if EA didn't want something they found ways around it such as building their own unlicensed games and bypassing console copyright protection on 16 bit systems to avoid paying licensing

XiNatsuDragnel213d ago

Fifa with playstation I would've preferred that over EA now tbh.

Seraphim213d ago

guess you don't remember how bad those Sony sports titles were in the 90s. The only exception would be NBA Shootout '97 which was phenomenal.

shinoff2183212d ago

Idk what that means. Nfl GameDay was fun as fk.

FinalFantasyFanatic213d ago

I never liked sports games personally, except for ESPN Extreme Games, that was fun for me back in the day.

gold_drake213d ago

the Fifa people are some of the scummiest people there is, even outside of the gaming industry.

good on that sony ceo for actually talking to EA first and letting them know what happened.

anast213d ago

The career mode would have been way better.

Show all comments (10)
100°

10 Companies that can get the FIFA License

While EA confirmed that its football title will lose FIFA Licensing starting next year, there are ten companies that can acquire the license.

Read Full Story >>
gamingonphone.com
shinoff2183394d ago

First I don't think ms would get the nod, they wouldn't be able to get away with it being exclusives. Second it's to big of a game to just put on gamepass and call it a day. I think Konami , sega or 2k could do it justice.

Knightofelemia394d ago

Konami made or should I say farmed out a soccer game and it was a piece of broken shit.

XbladeTeddy394d ago

Konami making a football game? Just no. They dropped the ball on that one with their poor version.

EA have cemented a name for themselves with football games. Minus the crappy practises the core gameplay is unbeaten.

badboyz09394d ago

2K are the best option they also just purchased The Top Eleven Developer's in 2021.

TheColbertinator394d ago

Even if you get the license, what matters is getting the clubs and leagues that matter to fans. I'd pay good money to anyone who can get every team in the Top 5 Leagues and their stadiums to boot. EA has come close.

XbladeTeddy394d ago

"Even if you get the license, what matters is getting the clubs and leagues that matter to fans"

No, gameplay matters most. EA will do that without a license.

franwex394d ago

They could, but the price is obscene.

394d ago
120°

FIFA’s New Game Decisions Make EA Games Looks Better

Gamerterra writes: "FIFA recently announced its first four games after its long-term partnership with EA ended, and these new games make EA games look really consumer friendly. All four ‘games’ are blockchain projects built with Web 3.0 for the 2022 World Cup."

Read Full Story >>
gamerterra.com
ApocalypseShadow545d ago

That's like saying Mephistopheles is nicer than Satan.

anast544d ago

This is funny, even EA thought FIFIA's blockchain proposal was too much.