460°

Nintendo is gearing up to offer its own streaming service using Microsoft Azure

David Gibson said on Twitter that Nintendo will also be following in the footsteps of Sony. Nintendo is set to use Microsoft Azure for their streaming service.

XiNatsuDragnel1827d ago

Okay interesting but streaming.....

1827d ago Replies(8)
Razzer1826d ago

Okay interesting but who the hell is Dave Gibson and why should anyone listen to him? Serious question.

Kiwi661826d ago (Edited 1826d ago )

He's an industry analyst apparently

Razzer1826d ago

Could be an industry analyst wannabe for all we know.

gangsta_red1826d ago

He's the founder and maker of Gibson guitars. Have you not heard his music?

Razzer1826d ago (Edited 1826d ago )

@gangsta_red

lol.....insider confirmed!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1826d ago
gangsta_red1827d ago

This streaming is definitely gaining a lot of traction.

I can definitely see Nintendo wanting to do this for Switch, especially with it being portable and all. It would definitely benefit.

uth111827d ago

It's basically companies hedging their bets, they don't want to be left behind in case it does take off. We saw the same thing happen 10 years ago, it didn't pan out then. I don't exactly think it's going to take off now.

gangsta_red1827d ago

10 years ago with what?

There's way too many companies jumping aboard for it not to be viable. Streaming movies and music is already a norm, it won't be long for interactive media like video games to do the same.

uth111826d ago

There was big push for streaming 10 years ago. Maybe companies want it, but players are apathetic or hostile to it

Nyxus1827d ago

A portable being dependent on an internet connection is very impractical.

King_Noctis1826d ago

There are wifi almost everywhere right now, so that isn’t as big of an issue as it once was.

UltraNova1826d ago

King,

You say that like every wifi in the world (and its connection speed, lag, number of people using it at the same time, distance from router etc etc) is game steaming ready and optimal...you are so sorely mistaken!

bluefox7551826d ago

@King Public wifi is almost always horrible.

1826d ago
rainslacker1826d ago (Edited 1826d ago )

With mobile data it's more practical. But mobile providers in the US are very expensive for unlimited plans with reliable data throughput. Even with unlimited data, they will throttle it if you use it to much. And a lot of times, lag isn't their primary concern.

But, no mobile platform should ever require an internet connection. Have these services available for those with access, but keep it available offline for when they aren't.

@King

In major cities, yeah, it's not that bad. Get more than 20 miles outside the city, or less populated areas, and coverage can be very spotty. Even if there is coverage, it may not be the best. When I moved only 30 minutes outside the city, I could get T-Mobile with my phone, but it was so sh*t, that I couldn't even use the phone in my house. I switched to ATT on the same service(I use consumer cellular), and it works fine.

So, no, it isn't almost everywhere.

SLiSH831826d ago

I have a mobile hotspot

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1826d ago
IamTylerDurden11827d ago (Edited 1827d ago )

Gangster

It's garnering attention, but not traction per se. Companies are simply hedging their bets and preparing for the future, but the infrastructure is still several years away from mass consumer adoption. It's very similar to VR a couple of years ago. Companies see a viable, emergent technology and they want to get in on the ground floor. It's a great sign that companies are investing in the technology, but we are still years away until streaming really hits stride. Just like we talked about VR in 2016, this is merely the beginning. But i recall you not believing in VR yet you think streaming is the future? Interesting. I wonder if your attitude towards VR has to do with a certain company's lack of support in the technology, and likewise, if your enthusiasm for streaming has anything to do with a certain company's Azure infrastructure? Food for thought. Also, with such enthusiasm for streaming i imagine you were over the moon when Sony announced PSNow all those years ago. They were the first of the big 3 and the only major company i recall to support game streaming in that capacity. I can't remember, but you must've been so positive and supportive of Sony's efforts to promote game streaming seeing as how much you believe in the technology. Considering how new the tech was and that neither MS nor Nintendo supported it (so u had no comparison to say it's bad) i doubt you would've criticised PSNow because obviously such a new and innovative idea would need time to work out the kinks and supporting the service would really be supporting game streaming as a whole.

gangsta_red1826d ago

Not really sure what your points are or what you're even trying to say but mine remain the same.

I have always said that VR at it's current state isn't appealing or ready but it could be sometime in the future.

The same with streaming, it's definitely not fully ready but we can see every company prepping for it for the future.

I've always praised PSnow I think it's a great idea even when others kept slamming it for it's lag and gameplay in 720p. I have always said Sony should offer it's whole catalog of games through that service since BC wasn't an option.

So yes, streaming is still in it's infancy more so than VR and just like the two maybe they'll grow to be a concrete staple in gaming.

Hopefully that clears the air with whatever stance you thought I had with what you were mentioning.

FallenAngel19841827d ago

I wish Nintendo would just improve their online period

It’s hard to get excited for any of Nintendo’s future online ventures when they’re still missing basic features and make you pay for an underwhelming service

1826d ago
FallenAngel19841826d ago (Edited 1826d ago )

No this isn’t their first time, Nintendo has been doing online gaming since 2005 and they’ve been flubbing it up ever since. There’s no excuse for their efforts to continously poor every system

Vasto1827d ago (Edited 1827d ago )

Project X Cloud must be getting some really high praise behind the scenes. E3 cant come fast enough.

IamTylerDurden11827d ago (Edited 1827d ago )

It's just the easiest server infrastructure for tendo n Sony to jump in on. Makes the most sense and Google is scaring everyone. Sometimes certain rivals have resources you need. MS needed blu ray. I know there are multiple partners in blu ray, it's not solely owned by Sony, but it's about playing ball in order to advance.

E3 has lost its luster and will continue to lose partners. It's sad, but reality. Look back at 2015 and 2016 and compare this year to E3 back then.

1826d ago
bluefox7551826d ago

I think the only ones scared by Google are investors, and as we see with EA, investors are rather out of touch with gamers.

rainslacker1826d ago

All Cloud services can adapt to whatever software you can put in them. There is no easier or harder. You write your software to a base platform within a few different paradigms of programming, upload them, and they work.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1826d ago
jaycptza1827d ago

For businesses money talks

rob-GP1826d ago

Nothing to do with X cloud. If the service is like we saw in the trial, there’s at least a second of lag and the servers are based on S hardware, so not visually that impressive. The infrastructure of Azure is the impressive side, as they’ve been upgrading their servers constantly. Although, they’re nothing compared to Google’s tbh...

However, X cloud all relies on its software and the S hardwear it’s running off. An example of this is you may have an armature website on the same hosting as a professional one. The pro one looks and runs great yet the amateur one runs really slow. That’s because of the users created content/site, not the servers or systems.

Lennoxb631826d ago

"Although, they’re nothing compared to Google’s tbh..."

Azure surpassed Google's and Amazon's cloud infrastructure a few years ago.

HighPlayer281826d ago (Edited 1826d ago )

Me either cant wait it must be a game changer for competition to want it lol.

meka26111826d ago

Well Microsoft azure services has been around for awhile and it does work great. I work in IT so we do a lot of work for it. Right now for business' it makes it so they don't have to have their own server as azure takes care of that. Plus it is completely integrated for office which makes life way easier for us. Not sure how they will apply this to gaming but in terms of business azure is very nice.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1826d ago
1827d ago
Show all comments (87)
60°

Crossplay Will Be In College Football 25 But Not In Online Dynasty Mode

EA Sports dropped their first gameplay trailer for College Football 25 today and the game looks truly amazing. Buried in the details of the game hype, however, is a significant letdown for those who play online dynasty (a significant portion of the userbase).

Read Full Story >>
collegefootball.gg
410°

Resident Evil 1 Remake To Have Slower Pace; Will Further Expand On The Game's Lore

Many details for the upcoming rumored Resident Evil 1 remake have already leaked online. Capcom appears to have huge ambitions for it.

XiNatsuDragnel17h ago

Sounds interesting I'll be interested in the second remake of re1

Cacabunga17h ago

They game cube remake was mind blowing.. another remake would be nice but i was really hoping for Code Veronica first

-Foxtrot16h ago

If it's true they are probably leading up to RE5 with the Chris vs Wesker story

RE1, CV and then RE5

Terry_B15h ago

Their REmake is still one of the best 3 video game remakes ever made.

Cacabunga14h ago

Terry

Zero was not a remake but an amazing game as well. I hope they remake that one one day with some coop play.. great great game

maelstromb10h ago

The whole Lisa Trevor side-story was an incredible addition and really fleshed out more of the lore. It could have easily felt tacked on to artificially extend the length of the game, but it felt 'right' like it should have been in there from the beginning. I'm hoping they include that in the Re-remake.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10h ago
fsfsxii17h ago

Cant wait until they cut the basement section and replace it with something worse.

Becuzisaid17h ago

While I want another modern remake of 1, I think code Veronica should be first. The first re1 remake holds up amazingly well. Give CV it's due.

Scissorman17h ago

As long as the Crimson Heads are back.

Nerdmaster4h ago(Edited 4h ago)

I hope they don't. They were created mainly to justify Wesker not really dying, and they do create more tension, but they don't make much sense.
Re-reviving things that were twice dead? Why would the virus stop there and not keep reviving them forever (until the head gets destroyed)?
And also the characters knowing that destroying their heads keep them from becoming crimson heads, while having a combat knife and lots of heavy objects around to do it while they're down, but having to rely on lucky shots or burning them with oil?
They can create other stuff that serves the same purpose of creating tension but that makes more sense.

Levii_9216h ago

Come on State of Play already!!!

Show all comments (34)
70°

Nintendo’s new job opening hints at innovative packaging for future products

Nintendo of America has posted a fascinating new job opening that could signal significant changes for the company’s future products.

Read Full Story >>
mynintendonews.com