1020°

Bethesda Bans Fallout 76 Player With More Than 900 Hrs Playtime For Having Too Much Ammo

Bethesda apparently has banned a legitimate Fallout 76 player who spent more than 900 hours in the game to farm rare materials, ammo, and other in-game loot. They banned the account for having too much ammo according to the ban report shared by the player.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
MisterLou1913d ago

7.8/10 Too Much Ammo - Bethesda

fiveby91913d ago

I think the ban was for knowingly exploiting a bug in the game not specifically for acquiring ammo through normal gameplay. But still, Bethesda should not be banning someone for an exploit their programmers and QA group let be released. A bit heavy-handed if you ask me.

bouzebbal1912d ago

Lol 900hours??? Don't think I played third of that all PS4 games combined.
Di** move from Bethesda.. Players should really stand up against this.

Gaming1011912d ago

Yep, 900 hours of the craptastic Fallout 76.
And guess what ladies, he's single!

Gamingsince19811913d ago

Banning him from the game was more of a mercy really, how any one can spend 9 hours on that game let alone 900 is beyond my understanding.

RizBiz1912d ago

I imagine 90% of that time was spent idling. Or maybe it's like UPlay on Steam, where even if you exit a game it keeps logging hours. I tried to refund a Ubisoft game once and they denied my claim because UPlay logged 10 hours of play, even though I was only actually in the game for around 30 minutes.

dumahim1913d ago

They did this man a favor.

Redrex70001912d ago

lmao
so true
who the fuk
play this game for that long

Evolve1913d ago

They spent less than this time developing the game

rainslacker1912d ago

Wonder who the other guy is going to play against now.:(

Daeloki1912d ago

Yeah they're banning the few people who are actually playing, all games have exploits at one point or another. They should just focus on fixing the exploit instead of shooting themselves in whatever remains of their legs

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1912d ago
ElementX1913d ago

They should be banned for putting in so much time into that game

Psychotica1913d ago

or any game for that matter. 900 hours is ridiculous.

JackBNimble1913d ago

I have put more time then that into Ark

AdmGenAladeen1913d ago

I got 820 in Bloodborne. It's pretty sad lol.

notachance1913d ago

it's normal for longterm games though, like cs:go, lol, dota2, minecraft

I myself have 5000+ hours on dota2, probably 10k+ if you count warcraft 3 mod dota

NarooN1913d ago

I have almost 4,000 hours in Audiosurf. Sure, that's over a period of like 10 years, but still. If you enjoy a game you aren't obligated to cut yourself off for some silly arbitrary reason lol.

That being said, 900 hours in Fallout 76 is a red flag I'd say lol

Michiel19891913d ago

Id put way more hours than that into Guild Wars 1 and old school wow, would happily do it again.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH1912d ago

I’ve put way more than that into Final Fantasy 11. Like 8 -10 years worth

Segata1912d ago

I have 800 in Xenoblade X

dragon_rocks1912d ago

*Slowly backs out of the room avoiding any eye contact with 997 hours in Monster Hunter World*

KwietStorm_BLM1912d ago (Edited 1912d ago )

Its completely normal for games that are consistently supported and updated over a number of years. I have 3000 hours in Warframe.

Necr0philiac1912d ago

900 hours is ridiculous for how long the game has been out. Ive put 900+ hours into a lot of games. I just seen that i have over 1000 on Rocket League but that is over years not months

kevinsheeks1912d ago

smh i have 900+ in rainbow six siege . . i did shock myself with that but i do enjoy playing it . . . i like to think im active though lol >.> just enjoy muh games is all

RizBiz1912d ago

@JackBNimble You're really generous! Not only did you pay for an ALPHA test instead of getting paid like you should be, but you gave the devs over 900 hours of bug testing.

MrVux0001912d ago (Edited 1912d ago )

"900 hours is ridiculous."

If you think 900 h is ridiculous...lol

I remember reaching well over 1500 hours in WoW (while the game was still good)... the most recent games i have invested quite some time into are RDR 2 (474 hours) and GOW (233 hours).

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 1912d ago
EazyC1913d ago

I know, I guess 'one man's trash' etc

lelo2play1913d ago

Sad to say, but I have a lot of hours in Football Manager.
Don't know if it's 900.... but it's a lot.

nommers1912d ago

Pfft, y’all have some really short times. I put in 350,000 hours into that real life simulator that was all the rage 50 years ago.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1912d ago
2pacalypsenow1913d ago

To be fair, he was banned for exploiting a glitch.

So it’s not just for “Having too much ammo”.

UltraNova1913d ago

A glitch is the devs fault, so instead of banning him they should have stripped that player from all assets gained through that exploit and a last strike warning. But Bethesda is not one to make ahem...the right choices these days.

ziggurcat1913d ago

while that may be, the onus is still on the user to not exploit those bugs to gain an unfair advantage in an online title. there would also be no way to determine how much ammo he would have attained through the exploit. he's also being disingenuous by saying he was banned for simply having too much ammo.

UltraNova1913d ago

Agreed. But if its just a cut and dry case of a glitch exploit then banning that guy was too harsh.

DJStotty1913d ago

No Ultra, knowingly exploiting or glitching any game, you get whatever the developers seem justifiable.

I knowingly exploited another game, and rightly got banned for 2 weeks.

UltraNova1913d ago

@DJ

What? Why does it have to be the "death penalty", why so harsh? The glitch exploit is the dev's fault! So with that in mind they should have punished the guy proportionally.

Palitera1913d ago

The devs made the player abuse the glitch? Wow, some powerful devs out there.

2pacalypsenow1913d ago

If it's in the TOS, he violated that agreement.

They also banned him until that glitch it patched, its not a permaban.

Cobra9511913d ago

Anything a game lets you do is fair. If the devs don't like how their game behaves, they need to change it, not blame the user for what they did.

DuckOnQuack351913d ago

I've quit many games because people were using exploits like crazy and it ended up ruining the game economy and game play because people suck and can't play the game how it's meant to be played. I mean think about it do you think that devs have all the time in the world to check every single little thing to make sure there are no bugs? It's hard and plus most devs have so much pressure from publishers. I think a ban will make it so more people won't do it.

Razuel1913d ago

Not even that, just take the ammo. If the devs cannot support their game then that is on them not the players looking for !@#$ to do. This sounds alot like division 1 baloney.

rainslacker1912d ago

Personally, if a glitch exists, and people use it, then that's on the devs, not the player. Fix the glitch, and call it a day. Reset people's ammo if you need to, or some other relevant action, but don't ban them because you didn't do proper QA, or fix something quick enough. That's just punishing the customer.

It's the nature of online games, especially big ones, that when you have lots of people playing, they're going to find ways to exploit those things. But it's just wrong to ban people because of it.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 1912d ago
Baza1913d ago

So what, Bethesda should fix their crappy broken game

2pacalypsenow1913d ago

Yeah go luck with that.

That's like robbing a bank and saying, well maybe if they fixed their security, I wouldn't have robbed them.

rainslacker1912d ago

Skyrim is still a glitch fest after a decade and multiple re-releases, not sure if Bethesda even understands what optimization of fixing is.

yellowgerbil1913d ago

"Go anywhere, do anything" another Todd Howard lie

NSANiTY1913d ago

What I'm wondering is if he did actually use an exploit. Doesn't appear that they did. The letter seems to say that they think he did, but Only because of the amount of items he aquired in 30 days. But the article says that the reason they got that much ammo in 30 days is because he traded over 100,000 ammo with a secondary account.

The person being banned never said they exploited the game, just that they played so many hours they aquired piles of ammo. Might be Bethesda in the wrong here.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1912d ago
froy4021913d ago

The ban was a blessing on his soul.

INMATEofARKHAM1913d ago (Edited 1913d ago )

While I agree with the thought, it was honestly my first, this guy obviously found fun in the game and he shouldn't have lost his account if everything was on the up and up. That said he exploited a glitch so he's at their mercy.

notachance1913d ago

it's an act of mercy on bethesda's side

Show all comments (113)
70°

Fallout 76: Skyline Valley Developers Preview

Players looking forward to exploring the new content can now enjoy a preview of what to expect.

50°

Fallout 76 Spring Cleaning event guide – all challenges and rewards

Spring has arrived in Appalachia and that means that it is time to go on a cleaning spring in Fallout 76 during the Spring Cleaning event.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
90°

Fallout 76 Players Have Nuked Phil Spencer in Response to Studio Closures

Fallout 76 players have dropped the big one on Phil Spencer in response to Xbox's closures of Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks this week.