One of Ubisoft's most-anticipated new titles is The Division 2, the sequel to the popular first game that launched back in 2016. The Division 2 is a third-person military shooter.
Pure PlayStation's Jeremy lists his top ten games of 2019.
Blood & Truth his number one game. Nice pick. One of the best VR games ever made. Basically Uncharted in VR with British gangster skin.
Blood &Truth was the truth. Well written story of London underground shady characters. Lots of action that made the game play out like a summer blockbuster movie. The shooting was memorable with only one hiccup on the elevator trying to target while behind cover was a bit troubling. Will play though it again on the new hard mode and also try to use the Aim controller for the shooting gallery. Such a great game and can understand why it was picked as the authors game of the year.
I have made $13594 last month by working online from my home. I am a full time college student and by just doing this in my free time for few hours per week by using my laptop, I payed off my student loans. Check this out and start making cash online in so incredibly simply way by just following instructions on this website...
══════HERE► https://bit.ly/2QCOGd9
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 had a strong start to the year, and while it wasn’t perfect, it still proved itself to be leagues better than the original game’s release back in 2016. Ubisoft has hopes to continue the upward trend with the latest release of free DLC, Episode 1 – D.C. Outskirts.
2 new dungeons (which look amazing), expeditions, and new loot / quality of life stuff (including making skill builds usable) for free, is mediocre?
Should companies start planning for a game's shutdown ahead of time? Would offline spin-offs or patches that let people play something unplugged be wise for the future?
Why just flat out no? I mean what would it hurt to have some kind of offline mode so you can still use the product you paid for if their server goes down or the internet goes down or you just want to play alone and relax?
Online only just means it has an expiration date.
What's the problem with offline mode ?
I don't see why this can't be an option.
By that meaning a game like Monster Hunter World or The Division which allow you to play by yourself but require you to be constantly online where you can't even pause the game?
Then yes...yes they do.
If you are playing by yourself, are in a private session with no other players and you aren't playing with friends or are in a party then there's no need to be constantly online.
I Didn't buy it but here's a perfect example: Starblood Arena
http://www.pushsquare.com/n...
Attempt to patch it for offline but failed
https://www.reddit.com/r/PS...
Goes offline tomorrow.
The developer should have had single player with optional multi player from day one. When you make a game online only, that cuts out a large group of buyers. When the servers go down or other online gamers move on to something new, you can no longer play. Also, single player games with online connection is also wrong. There's no need for DRM.
When you buy a game, you should be able to play it when you spent money on it. At least have Bots as an option.
I know the intent is to make an online game. Or, the developer doesn't have funds to do both. But when some developers who have less money can do both, it looks like a cash grab of micro transactions with no trade in value or something you can't lend to a friend.
I mostly play single player anyway. But I did buy Firewall Zero Hour used for $17.99 because it looks great and is awesome with the AIM controller after the free weekend demo. I refused to buy it new because of what it is. It's online only with barely no single player options except for training missions. And only **ONE** mode for online. ONE. No story, no hostage saving, no PvP free for all, no capture the flag,etc. And the developer seems fine with not adding any other modes but more micro transactions. Which is sad. So I only play the training missions which is like horde mode until the game goes offline. Then it's unplayable because it requires an online connection. Single player option with Bots not requiring online should be a must for any game you buy.
Yes.
Ghost Recon Breakpoint being online only is an absolute stupid decision.
Anthem could be rediscovered and preserved if it had offline single player support, but now it will most likely shutdown and die and be lost to history forever.
Etc etc
Media preservation is becoming more of an issue these days but the new age consumers are being told to treat services like goods and pay for them not to own but rent.
Common sense Xbox One X is stronger....
i dont understand journalists and gamers
games look identical on every platform (PC,PS4,XBOX)
one might have a higher res but its the same damn graphics why argue about it
every GEN the games look the damn same on every platform it will always be the way
performance is what matters
i’m interested to see what it looks like. For the first time today I played The Division on my X and even with its upgrades, it doesnt look great. Even worse is it gameplay. One big hit box. Targeting body parts means nothing in the game. It is also a very linear environment. Meaning the entire map is one big façade. You can only go in a handful of buildings, it’s just very boring and lacks any interaction. I hope the new game not only looks better, but plays better also. The videos look a little more promising, but it still doesn’t look like gameplay has changed a whole bunch from the first game. it’s truly why I cannot wait till next generation until we have more powerful CPUs that can pull off better physics and AI, not to mention better world simulation. I want more next generation than just prettier games. I want physics to become a integral part of gameplay. Something that was promised back when an Xbox 360 came out.
As always
Support for true crispness confirmed.