960°

New Details on the Black Ops 4 CWL Season and League Play

Treyarch:

After wrapping up the recent CWL Pro League Qualifiers in Columbus and taking in additional Call of Duty World League feedback regarding the upcoming launch of League Play, we’re updating our game plan to make the Black Ops 4 competitive experience even better. Our goal has always been to help make the CWL as exciting as possible, and we’re adapting some core gameplay mechanics to set the stage for an incredible 2019 season for players and fans alike.

Read Full Story >>
treyarch.com
Kribwalker1935d ago

paying to keep content off other platforms for a short period of time is for the players now? It’s funny, people have been complaining about MS buying studios because games will become exclusive now that weren’t before, But sony payingfor content first is for the players?

LOL the hypocrisy in your statement is crazy

salmonade1935d ago

* for the Playstation players

Unspoken1935d ago

He might be sarcastic.

Not sure how any platform can WIN when related to CoD.

UltraNova1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

Krib,

Come back when you learn the difference between making a piece of content on a multiplaform game exclusive for a couple of weeks and whole multplaform games being exclusive for one whole year.

Both companies do shit like this. One is usually far worse though. Get used to it.

Remember, context...

kayoss1935d ago Show
Marioraider181935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

Remember, Microsoft did it first but I completely understand why you are crying

KickSpinFilter1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

No different than last gen when MS was doing it for a whole month, but now it's just seven days. LOL breath...It's what PS3 players had to do last gen. Before ya know it the content will be out for XB1. And I do belive @sampsonon was using sarcasm btw.

gangsta_red1935d ago

@kayoss

That's exactly what Kribwalker didn't say.

@Utlranova

There's no difference, especially when people complained about it regardless. Shouldn't matter if it's a year, months or a couple of weeks.

Rude-ro1935d ago

Lone introduced it... the other is just playing said game better this gen.
Everything “new” to Xbox this gen has been from outside sources... so nobody is changing directions anytime soon.

S2Killinit1935d ago

@krib
Totally understand why you are upset, but lets not forget this is MS’s own medicine.

capjacksparrow1935d ago

This is actually why I hated when Microsoft was in the lead last gen. It was all about paying for timed-exclusive content. I thought it was stupid and still think it's stupid. I don't like that Sony has been doing that this gen and I wish Microsoft never started it. It's one thing to help publish a game's initial launch and another to straight up pay for the content to come to your platform first. I haven't supported CoD much this gen.

As to buying studios, I think it's cool to build them from the ground up or buying the studio after having a very close business relationship, but Microsoft was really hurting in the exclusives department, so I understand. I just hope they don't allow the teams they acquired creative freedom for one game and then make them grind out the same game repeatedly if it's a success (like they do with their other studios).

Kribwalker1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

It’s quite funny how everyone keeps saying “Well MS introduced this last gen” or “MS with rise of the tomb raider or dead rising being one year exclusive”

First, I’m questioning why when you guys complain about MS and business practices, it’s suddenly ok when sony does it. I’m not saying MS was right or wrong with this. I’m asking why suddenly these practices are for the players when before they were a source of anger

Second, do we need a refresher on gaming history and the story of Tomb Raider 2? That game was multiplatform for the first one, and for the second game, exclusivity was bought by sony to keep it off of the Sega Saturn Platform. This was all long before MS was even in the console game. Then there was the Grand Theft Auto timed exclusivity bought by sony to prevent San Andreas from launching on the OG xbox. All before the launch of the 360 where MS started to look at buying timed exclusivity, following in Sony’s footsteps.

Then there was the purchase of previous multiplatform games like Street Fighter 5 this gen to be exclusive on PS Platforms. Destiny 1 year timed exclusivity for content that was free with the game and DLC, Crash bandicoot 1 year timed exclusivity, Nier Automata one year timed exclusivity after the original was on both PS3 and xbox 360, countless indie timed exclusive deals that are all ok when sony does it.

You guys trying to paint this as something MS started, yet ignore the fact that Sony was doing this long before MS even entered the console space.

https://www.thefreelibrary....

here’s the press release for some monday morning reading

1935d ago
sampsonon1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

4 their players. they like to treat us well.
so i like to buy their consoles.
hey? maybe that's part of the reason they've sold almost 100 million consoles in 5 years.
it's a business first, don't forget that.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

trooper_1935d ago

Microsoft did it for years.
You were perfectly fine with it.

Quit crying.

Necr0philiac1935d ago

Nintendo was the first one to do it. Nintendo licensing policies required platform exclusivity on the NES. Sony was the second to do it. But everyone wants to blame Microsoft. People talk out there ass all the time on n4g. It don't matter what console were talking about, fanboys are blind sheep

darthv721935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

@nova... "Come back when you learn the difference between making a piece of content on a multiplatform game exclusive for a couple of weeks and whole multplatform games being exclusive for one whole year."

so what's your view on street fighter V? i mean when MS usually pays for exclusivity it is for a short period of time. What Sony did with this game... yeah I'd say they paid to keep it off other systems for the entire 8th gen.

So in that regard do you still think it's right or do you think it's wrong?

DaDrunkenJester1935d ago

Essentially all your replies are "well MS did it first!". Which I find funny, because Sony has been in the game business for longer and is equally guilty of buying 3rd party games and content for exclusivity.

The same people who are pissed that MS did it are now the people saying "well it's okay because it's a taste of their own medicine". No. It was wrong when MS did it and it's wrong when Sony does it.

OR Both sides needs to get over it and realize it's a business decision and a practice that is used to make their platform more attractive.

Kribwalker1935d ago

@dadrunkenjester

my point exactly.

AmUnRa1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

You forget Microsoft did the same with the 3 party games on the Xbox360 they where te one with all the deals what Sony now has. But then is was oke for you right? You where not complaning then right? And this gen Tombraider was a year excl. . For the Xbox One, right?
Thats called being a hypocryte....

DaDrunkenJester1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

I just love that people think buying up 3rd party exclusives/content started with MS with the 360. Must be the young generation who thinks that.

Or a certain fanboy hive mind...

shinoff21831935d ago

Ms has done this type of stuff in the past. Really what's it matter nowadays, if you don't play on playstation your missing so much literally

neutralgamer19921934d ago

Krib

According to people over at epic games store exclusives matter so whether it's exclusive games or content they matter

Phil Spencer has spoken about this yet he still keep doing similar deals so instead of the blame game how about we accept the fact and realize practices like these will only become bigger as competion becomes bigger

Ms started an evil chain of events with grand theft auto 4 dlc being exclusive to Xbox 360

All ms executives were boasting about it last Gen and that created a monster. Here is the scary thing

Ms doesn't depend on Xbox for success but Sony has realized for them to succeed playstation is their bread and butter moving forward so they will in my opinion be more focused on every advantage for their success

Did you not read the article aboit psn generating so much more and high attach rate on ps4. Sony realizes they want every to buy ps4 and than they will automatically buy games

This strategy will become even more aggressive moving forward

I am not saying for right or wrong all I am saying is that's the way the market is trending and ms have no one but themselves to blame

Kribwalker1934d ago

LOL

all these people talking, telling me to stop crying. Well MS did it firsts BS. First, MS wasn’t the first ones to do it, so you can quit repeating that garbage. I provided you with a news release of sony doing it in the Late 90s before MS was even in the console game.

2nd, I’m not complaining about it. I could not care less about 1 week exclusivity here. I’m just talking about how hypocritical you guys are being. Talking about MS being the devils of the industry for doing these things, and applauding Sony doing the exact same thing.

These are business’ of course they are gonna do what they can to make more money, and if it’s buying marketing/timed exclusive rights to games/content, then so be it. But don’t belittle one corporation for doing it then cheer another for doing the same thing.

I’ll quote the great Kratos
“Be Better”

specialguest1934d ago

The hypocrisy of the Sony fanboys on N4G is real and has been this way for a decade. I've been a member on N4G since '06. Seen it all... nothing new, business as usual here

+ Show (22) more repliesLast reply 1934d ago
Kumakai1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

suppressing the competition by money doesn't have the players best interests first. they have their bank accounts interests first. just like how everyone got pissed when MS paid to have tomb raider be a timed exclusive. If they really were for the players they'd have better policies for returns, services deals, crossplay etc. they want to isolate you to their platform for money and control.

kayoss1935d ago

Yes, i hate this exclusive stuff. But when you're competitor pulled the strings and started a trend. You fight fire with fire. SqaureEnix learned their lesson with Rise of the Tomb Raider. Making it exclusive to Xbox One for one year. During that time, they lost a lot of money from PS4 fans.

fiveby91935d ago

I do agree I don't care for such exclusivity. Sure this business practice was not started by Sony but clearly, it is effective from a marketing perspective. Perhaps the saying should be, "For Our Players". I guess MS get's to continue to face this tactic some more. MS has money though. Why did they not try to buy some exclusivity?

letsa_go1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

I'm sure you enjoyed it when MS bought exclusivity for PUBG, Cuphead, Ori, Ark, Super Lucky's Tale and more...right? Hell...Microsoft just recently said forget buying game exclusivity...let's just buy developer exclusivity instead!

Also, Sony isn't innocent either. Didn't they buy exclusivity for GTA3 on the PS2?

Kribwalker1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

@kayoss55m ago
“Yes, i hate this exclusive stuff. But when you're competitor pulled the strings and started a trend“

That trend was started by sony with Tomb raider 2 all the way back in the late 90s......

@letsa go
they bought studios just like sony has.

jznrpg1935d ago

If Sony wasn’t paying for it MS would just pay less for it. Sony is just outbidding them

rainslacker1935d ago

I just rather they spend money on making new games, rather than millions for these marketing deals. I know COD is big, and marketing is important, but at this stage in the game, this doesn't seem like something that will really make that much of a difference since ps already has most of the COD sales, and for the most part, people already picked up their console for the gen, and those that haven't aren't likely to have this influence them that much.

RosweeSon1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

Like Xbox life and gamepass and all their yearly subscriptions. You realise the only reason Microsoft were open to crossplay is because majority have flocked to PS4 it now even switch over Xbox this Gen they had to be open to crossplay they got no one left to play with/against ;)
Bit like BC being added because it’s great for the players 3 years into a Gen when they should be playing banging new games instead a feature that should have been day one not year 2-3 was added for the players to give them options?... no it was to make up for a lack of new or upcoming games by recycling old games which grest if you’ve been holding onto the discs still to everyone else you’d have to repay and re buy if you wanted to play so they basically selling old games again without massive expensives of actually making new games. Yay. 4K X on that please 🤪🤪😜

Cueil1934d ago

Microsoft funded a large amount of the game. That will never be a issue as long as it leads to a better product as it did with Tomb Raider. Maybe it is me getting older, but I just see things in a much more broader sense then when I was hard core Xbox in early 00

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1934d ago
2pacalypsenow1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

For the PlayStation Players.

Why should Sony care what gamers who play on other consoles do or cant do?

They should only focus on their fanbase.

Hardiman1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

Yeah I don't understand why this is such a hard concept to wrap ones head around. You don't go into business to try and prop up your competitors. You compete and while I'm not a fan of this practice per say, I'm also not a fan of COD but 7 days is nothing! Why you wouldn't own a PS4 is beyond me! There's literally something for everyone, hell multiple somethings for everyone.

I guess I'd have more of a problem with it if Sony didn't allow so much creative freedom and fund sooo many varieties of SP games. They are just fighting fire with Fire and COD is played by a lot of casuals so I see the thinking. Something is working because they are heading towards 100 million sold while the competition I see not!

TheUndertaker851935d ago

““Given these changes to the League Play structure, we’re taking a few extra weeks to implement and test the new changes, and the launch of the World League Hub and League Play is now slated for our next major game update planned for mid-February, first on PS4,” reads a Treyarch blog post.”

First, not only. Plus PS4 exclusivity for Black Ops 4 is one week.

Teflon021935d ago

Anything for clickbait lol

aconnellan1935d ago

1 week exclusive = ‘big win’ apparently

crazyCoconuts1935d ago

Does anyone really care about a few weeks? Those little marketing gimmicks seem largely inconsequential to me...

TheColbertinator1935d ago

The gimmicks don't matter, it's just fuel for the fanboys

TheUndertaker851935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

It’s not even a few weeks anymore. Content for Black Ops 4 is timed exclusive for 7 days.

This piece was added to fuel the flames. Nothing more. This can be justified as the original source is the Treyarch blog as given credit in the story. That should actually be what’s directed to as it’s the original source with full information.

gangsta_red1935d ago

I suspect for next gen these types of "exclusives" deals will be even less or maybe none at all.

crazyCoconuts1935d ago

Why do you think things will change? These are marketing decisions and have nothing to do with technology or "gen".

gangsta_red1935d ago

They'll change because there's no point in spending money even if it's fromarketing for these types of deals.

And as we can already see these types of deals are becoming less and less, especially compared to the beginning of this gen and even more last gen.

crazyCoconuts1935d ago

The core business and what drives consumers isn't changing. As long as there are people influenced by "play it first on X" ads, this will continue...

1935d ago Replies(6)
2pacalypsenow1935d ago

If they didn't help, do you think Sony and MS would spend money doing it?

gangsta_red1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

I personally don't think they help, which is why we're seeing less of these.

If they do help, how come both MS and Sony aren't doing it as much as they were before and getting these deals for a longer period of time?

jznrpg1935d ago

I doubt it. Sony is playing the game with MS now so MS doesn’t get these things for their price . If MS wants exclusive deals they will need to pay more than Sony because they are the lesser brand and Sony is willing to pay this gen

rainslacker1935d ago

I doubt that. I don't think the marketing people have changed their mind on if these things are effective, and if there is money to be made, publishers will barter for it.

gangsta_red1935d ago

They dont seem to be as effective as they once were as we are seeing less of these over the years, especially this gen. Destiny and CoD are the only ones I can think of that come to mind right away.

Publishers don't seem to be allowing for exclusive timed content over a long period of time on one console like they have in the past and there hasn't been a whole lot of exclusive content being pushed for one console only this gen as we saw in the past.

I can definitely see this going away except on the rarest of occasions for next gen.

rainslacker1934d ago

I couldn't say if they're still effective. Sony had quite a few of these kinds of deals this gen, and it seems to be effective for them. But given that the value of paying for such things doesn't exist in a bubble, and there are many factors to consider, I'd say it'd be impossible to derive a conclusion without more data, both how it affects sales, how much it may have dropped off, and how much they're spending on it.

The reason we may have seen more drop off is because we're at a point in the gen where it may not make as much difference, and the disparity in console sales makes it more costly for MS to buy such things, and Sony doesn't need to buy as many things.

With COD, Sony still has the marketing deal with them for this gen, so it's possible this kind of thing was laid out way back at the beginning of the generation, or it may be it's own thing.

I guess it is possible it could become less of a factor going forward, but I think deals like these will still be seen as having some weight when next gen rolls around. I believe this kind of stuff is probably more effective at the start of a gen, rather than the tail end of it.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1934d ago
Kumakai1935d ago (Edited 1935d ago )

ha. stupid. so ps4 gets an update a few weeks before xbox. but if i personally just wait those few weeks then i too get the updates and still get better resolution etc on one x - seems patience nets the best results more than anything here.

Thundercat771935d ago

The thing is that most people doesn't care about the Xbox one x. Their number 1 preferred console is the Playstation.

Last Gen when MS created this tendency, it wasn't stupid right? 🤔

1935d ago
Show all comments (108)
290°

Cancelled Call of Duty Game "NX1" Gameplay Footage, Black Ops 4 "War" Mode" Surface

A cancelled Call of Duty game titled "NX1" had footage surface online, along with a Black Ops 4 unreleased mode called "War."

RaidenBlack116d ago

looks like the OG Infinite Warfare

Profchaos115d ago

Yeah it does look good wonder why it was canned

EvertonFC115d ago

Probably a proper game with no MT and they didn't see any profits 😂🤣

Name Last Name115d ago

That Neversoft logo took me back to Tony Hawk days. Sad to see this cancellation led to the studio closure.

Juancho51115d ago

It’s always sad to see great concepts destroyed so deep into development. They obviously had a lot of ideas and aren’t happy about it. Now withe layoffs even more videos like this will surface soon.

Show all comments (8)
70°

Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 - Cancelled Campaign Details Leak, Four Years Later

Details of the cancelled campaign from Call of Duty: Black Ops 4 – the only game in the franchise without a dedicated single-player mode – have been leaked after four years.

370°

Xbox Fans Call Out 'Activision's Greed' Over Call Of Duty Digital Prices

This week's Deals with Gold selection on Xbox has rubbed certain Xbox fans the wrong way, as several Call of Duty titles are still ludicrously priced - despite being discounted by up to 67% off over the next few days.

Read Full Story >>
purexbox.com
VersusDMC992d ago

How is 20 dollars for X360 call of duty games "ludicrously" overpriced?

And with Activision's lawer bills skyrocketing at the moment you are not going to be seeing deep discounts for a bit.

Chevalier992d ago

Pretty sure that's the sale off that's 60% off. After the sale ends that 360 game is still listed at $49.99, right not its $19.99 because the 60% off.

VersusDMC992d ago

I guess they can wait for the next sale then.

SullysCigar992d ago

It's nice to see the Xbox community stand up for themselves though. That's been needed for a long time.

InUrFoxHole992d ago

For a long time? Its the reason xbox is killing it this gen.

senorfartcushion992d ago

Lawsuits don’t cost billions, they’re ALWAYS going to be fine for money.

They could stack their bills on the ground and fill half the continent of Africa at this point.

RaiderNation992d ago

Because Xbox fans are so used to playing games on the Xbox EBT subscription service, the idea of paying anything for a game seems ludicrous to them.

MadLad992d ago (Edited 992d ago )

You pay for the service.

Do you have Amazon Video?
Hulu?
Netflix?

It's a subscription service. Not a charity. You're literally going at people over the idea of using a pro consumer service, and that's the real joke here.

thorstein992d ago

When records were sold, they were eventually replaced by tapes, which cost less to manufacture, but more to buy. Then CDs came along and were cheaper to manufacture, but cost more at retail. Digital, of course, is the cheapest yet, but billion dollar corporations want to charge the same.

And no, that money is not going to the person sitting in the chair actually making the game.

It is pure and utter greed from people who don't need any more money.

InUrFoxHole992d ago

Lol calm down Bobby. You crapped on thus franchise.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 992d ago
autobotdan992d ago (Edited 992d ago )

"Many have also noted how the multiplayer in several of these titles is either dead or filled with hackers, meaning players are paying a hefty sum for a short campaign and potentially some zombie modes."

With these clear truths the decades older COD games should be permanently 19.99 regular price and sale prices 7.99 minimum

autobotdan992d ago

Typo sale prices 2.99 minimum and 9.99 maximum. Older COD tiles seven years old or older should never be over 20 dollars regular price

senorfartcushion992d ago

I have paid less than 3 dollars for some AAA PS4 games, old 360 CoD games should not be $20

FanboysKiller992d ago

Any fps game runs by the quirk engine follows this logic
Eat
Sleep
Die instantly
Repeat
As if the main purpose of the game more of "repeat" than the actual gameplay experience , any noob in this game will tell you his mind stucked in repeating the sequence number of deaths than the gameplay itself , what a complete pile of #.

EvertonFC992d ago

It's why I don't play cod anymore, my 45yr old hands can't compete with these kids 😂 🤣
1 kill to every 10 deaths is not fun

John_McClane992d ago

Don't let that stop you if you enjoy the game, it's actually pretty good for hand/eye coordination.

lipton101992d ago

Try Escape from Tarkov. It forces you to slow down and think. I’m not a fan of the ADD speed of CoD

Father__Merrin992d ago

All the back compat titles are cheap listing when you scroll through them u till you come to black ops it's a complete rip off

Rhythmattic992d ago (Edited 992d ago )

Well... Don't buy it..... Is it really that hard to comprehend?
Everything else you choose to purchase with your hard earned cash , so should games be held to the same reasoning....
Just don't give em the cash....

Entitlement that's bizarre, from the publisher and from the consumer.... Thats pretty fkd up if you think about it...

GhostofHorizon992d ago

It's hilarious that some people don't see this as an option.

MadLad992d ago

Bananas now cost $30 a pound. There's no good reason for it, but if you want bananas, there you go.

You don't have to buy them.

It's about their constant greed when handling the franchise. Nobody has to buy anything, but when a company doesn't follow corporate norms when selling their product; overpricing their old wares just because they can, the consumer is allowed to call that out.

GhostofHorizon992d ago

Consumer can call them out, but I think they are going about it the wrong way.

The reason they get away with everything they do is simply because they can. They can charge $20 for a skin pack because people will gladly buy it. There is plenty of competition for FPS games, it's not like it's a niche market.

I know it's easier to blame and demand better from Activision than people that keep buying these overpriced items. If they weren't being bought, Activision would lower the price though. People like to pretend to take the high road but wouldn't you rather sell the banana for $30 than $3 if people are willing to buy it?

franwex992d ago

@therealtedcruz

I think there’s a virus destroying the banana and may even go extinct. So maybe that’s why.

I think it’s happen before too.

MadLad991d ago

A small subset buys those skins and whatnot. Most players don't. The "whale" mindset is pretty accurate across the board, where there's a small handful who buy a lot, and most who don't buy any. Either way, that means they're imposed on the majority either way.

That's different from overpricing your game though. Activision easily makes their money off every release, then milks it until the next release, then throws it away. They never put significant sales on even a release from several cycles ago. Whether it sells or not.

And I mean, yeah; if I were a business, I'd probably want to make as much money as possible.
But I'm not a business; I'm a consumer, thus I find many businesses to be complete assholes.

Rhythmattic986d ago

And people are still blaming the high prices but suggest they're still wiling to buy it... Not too smart are you peoples....

Its a non regulated pricing structure, sure , many play by the status-quo , but to actually complain by complaining, instead of standing your ground and not buying it, by buying it , you are the reason its happening....

Idiots, Idiots everywhere.... What? So those that are complaining don't want to pay the money, but cant do without it?

FFS. Entitlement level 5000...
Drink some cement and harden the Fk up!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 986d ago
Sitdown992d ago

The article and title isn't saying that people are buying it, its simply saying that they are calling them out for greed. I guess you had a problem with people calling out Microsoft for trying to increase the price of Live, and don't understand how voicing concern led to them backing away from the decision.

Teflon02992d ago

People need to put that energy into Nintendo's Pricing over Activisions tbh. They're focused on the wrong things

Rhythmattic986d ago (Edited 986d ago )

Greed? Ok... Dont buy it and prove that by being greedy , they got it wrong... Not that hard to understand is it?
To Add... I haven't bought Cod since MW2.... Because of these exact practices.... Fact.

Show all comments (54)