270°

Dead or Alive 6 Director Clarifies Comments on Reduced Fanservice; Debunks PS4 Censorship Rumors

Dead or Alive 6 has sparked discussion among fans about the level of fanservice included in the game, and rumors have been running rampant due to a recent interviewì with Director and Producer Yohei Shimbori.

Twinfinite talked to Shimbori-san, who provided clarity and debunked rumors of censorship on PS4.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
Kashima1946d ago

"The best place to play" /s

Nyxus1946d ago

"Any rumors about censorship for Sony’s [platform] are not true."

But keep trolling.

Kashima1946d ago

They reduced clothes damage because of sony that count as censorship, mentioned in older article.

Nyxus1946d ago

Yes, and that was proven false as stressed multiple times by the man who actually was supposed to have said that. Try reading this article before posting.

Abriael1946d ago (Edited 1946d ago )

@Kashima:

"They reduced clothes damage because of sony"

That is absolutely not what Shimbori-san said. "Older article" was pretty literally fake news.

UCForce1946d ago

@Kasima I think you are way too naive. Lack of judgment and lack of self control.

rainslacker1945d ago

@Kashima

I might believe that it was due to Sony's policy, and KT is just trying to say this was their vision to avoid conflict with Sony, IF they had not come out and said long before these censorship policies were known that they were toning down the design of the female bodies as well. There is a definite shift in how these games are being designed compared to older ones, where the sexy depictions were almost celebrated. Now that kind of thing is taking a back seat. On a side note, I give the designers credit for still keeping the sexy feel of the game in tact, despite not making it overly gratuitous.

Anyhow, since the censorship policies are more recent, and really came out of nowhere for all devs, there's enough reasonable doubt to not blame Sony here. I also think the dev has been very transparent through all this, and has stated why and what they are doing with the game in relation to all this stuff, so I don't see any reason to think he's lying now. They stated their reason for doing this was to attract more customers, and wouldn't have mentioned the censorship policies if people weren't asking if this was the reason why.

I'm against Sony's censorship policies 100%, but I'm not going to blame them for what isn't their fault. It's a fine line between being against censorship, and supporting what the dev wants, and if people just cast blame where it isn't warranted, it makes actual instances of things that need to be criticized less meaningful.

If one wants to cast judgement on the dev over the issue, that's fine, but attribute the outcomes to the proper people.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1945d ago
1945d ago
rainslacker1945d ago

Given that its not censored due to Sony's policy, I'm not sure what you feel was clever about your sarcastic comment.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1945d ago
XiNatsuDragnel1946d ago

But still that's BS. Extreme fanservice is this franchise mantra get rid of that uniqueness you create another Street fighter

Abriael1946d ago

There's plenty of fanservice in the game.

Source: I played it.

gamer78041945d ago

that doesn't mean that the fan service hasn't been reduced, it clearly has compared to DOA5. From less destruction, no physics options like DOA and OMG modes etc.

Abriael1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

@gamer7804: No. It "clearly" hasn't. The fanservice level is pretty much similar to vanilla 5. There's plenty jiggle and having no OMG option doesn't mean less fanservice, just less comedy, because comedy is all OMG was. Clothes damage has never been a major feature in DOA at launch.

pietro12121945d ago

Not really. Two different fighting games even with the toned down fan service (which I'm hoping really isn't the case)

isarai1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

The only thing toned down is on the surface first impressions like adverts, trailers, starting/default costumes. But if you played the beta, or watched the outfits trailer (where it show skimpy bikinis galore), or read the ESRB rating(where it mentions the infamous one pice "V" swimsuit) you'd realize it's going to be the same old DOA, it's just trying to give a more serious first impression cause the lead wants it to be taken more seriously in the competitive scene. Hell if you watch the Nyo Tengu trailer all her power moves and grabs flourish in what is basically female dominant sex poses, not even kidding

rainslacker1945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

While I agree that it's a staple of the series, you have to admit, despite the changes, they've done quite well keeping it sexy without being overly gratuitous. Just goes to show how sexy isn't always or completely about what you can see, but an attitude.

I dunno if it's BS though. The clothing damage was never a major part of the series. It was never something where clothes were so destroyed it showed signficantly more that I can recall.

1945d ago
SlagWolf1945d ago

Get the pc version. Modders will be sure you get all the fan service you want

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1945d ago
1945d ago
gamer78041945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

Sony's influence probably contributed but it was the devs management decision, its definitely toned down.

All this article states is the game is toned down on all systems equally and there is reduced costume destruction. Any hope for dlc for paradise island has also vanished.

Just vote with your wallets if you care, then they might backtrack on this after they see sales or preorders plummet.

Abriael1945d ago

It's funny to see someone who has not played the game for a minute being so sure that it is "definitely" toned down.

It isn't. It's just as fanservicey as 5 was at launch, if not more because the graphics are way more detailed.

gamer78041945d ago (Edited 1945d ago )

Sorry, please tell me if in the options for physics are there like the DOA and OMG modes? Also the costume destruction has been toned down as per the producer of this game.

Abriael1944d ago (Edited 1944d ago )

@gamer78043: I can't make it more easy to understand than what I already did. There is plenty of jiggle physics in the game. The OMG mode doesn't make it more fanservicey. It just makes it ridiculous.

The implementation of the jiggle physics in 6 looks awesome, as opposed to the water balloons with weird physics we had before that you seem to mistake for something sexy for reasons that will probably remain unknown.

Costume break has never been prominent in launch DOA5, so it's certainly not toned down from that.

Keep bashing games that offer plenty of fanservice in this fanatical way, and you'll simply end up alienating developers. Team Ninja is doing whatever they can to provide the fans with as much fanservice as they can squeeze in, but considering the reactions they get from some, I wouldn't be surprised if they gave up on a certain crowd.

gamer78041944d ago

Thank you, all you had to do is confirm exactly what I said, which you just did ,with more words than necessary.

Abriael1944d ago

gamer7804: Nope. I didn't in any shape or form confirm anything you said. You're just purposely misinterpreting it to justify your own fantasy rage.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1944d ago
ShadowWolf7121945d ago

No, this article quite literally does not state that anywhere. That's pure conspiracy theory BS.

Show all comments (34)
60°

XCOM's Jake Solomon Q&A - Building a Narrative-Driven Life Sim Game at Midsummer Studios

XCOM and Marvel's Midnight Suns director Jake Solomon has founded a new studio to make a life sim game. Here's a new interview with him.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
40°

The Big Inworld AI Q&A - 'Everyone in Gaming Sees the Potential of Generative AI'

Wccftech interviewed Nathan Yu from Inworld AI to discuss the dynamic NPC tech's applications to games as well as potential issues like costs.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
160°

Xbox President Sarah Bond's Bloomberg Interview Is Corporate Fakery At Its Best

Saad from eXputer: "After Arkane Austin & Tango were shutdown, Xbox President Sarah Bond spoke with Bloomberg in what I believe to be utter corporate fakery."

gold_drake3d ago

im not really surprised by that, shes always been more a "let me talk about something else than what u want to know" kinda gal

Cacabunga2d ago

If what they are doing is that good, what’s the point of hiding the true story?

anast3d ago

She's a caricature of the shareholders.

PRIMORDUS2d ago

"Shareholders" I call them cancer, they are already rich to begin with but need more and more. It's like a disease, with no cure.

__y2jb2d ago

If you have a pension then you are likely to be a shareholder in these big tech companies yourself. To demonize them as 'heartless rich people' shows you have no idea what you're talking about.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

@Y2

Of course, it isn't about that. You are attempting to set up a self-righteous strawman to stir up some kind of ignorant mob mentality.

And by the way, most everyone is a touch heartless or we wouldn't be able to consume the products we do knowing very well how they are made. People have to be this way because of self-preservation and convenience.

__y2jb2d ago

@anast please explain to me how what i said is self righteous or a strawman. I simply pointed out that categorizing all shareholders as cancer is ridiculous.

Leeroyw2d ago

I own shares in game companies. I'm not anything near a major share holder. I just want them to make good games and be successful because of that. I think it's the senior management that's the problem. They are the ones that should be making it clear to the shareholders what creates growth and ensures a future of their business. Not this weasle words garbage that she did on the interview. It was horrific. I don't know a shareholder that would be happy with any of them for this.

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Same and I'm not rich by any stretch like most people's I'm just trying to keep my head above water these days most company's shareholders are made up of everyday people it's amazing how companies think we want something but the reality is we don't.

Disney are probably the worse at the moment it's shareholders voted on ending a lot of the crap and outing the current execs the execs turned around and said no we disagree with the shareholder vote

PRIMORDUS2d ago

I meant at the rich fucks who have millions in the bank already. They are making so much per year, that if they don't make what they are expecting they go into a panic, when in reality it will not even hurt them at all. Those are greedy assholes.

anast2d ago

"you have a pension then you are likely to be a shareholder"

Pensioners don't make any decisions about anything. Obviously that is not what this is about.

CrimsonWing693d ago

Yea, it was and it’s insulting that they think we’re dumb enough to fall for this. Look, the truth was you took a gamble on these studios and while they released some games to critical praise and great reception they just aren’t bringing in a ROI. Be transparent, you’re not a politician.

Just tell everyone you spend money on projects big and small and when money isn’t being made you go over the potential of revenue a studio can bring in vs those that can’t and make the hard decision to chop them.

She says this whole thing about “success” doesn’t fit one meaning for each studio. Well yea, a small budget production isn’t going to expect to sell the same as a large budget production.

One thing I wish they did though was let Tango be an independent studio.

TheGamingHounds2d ago

disheartening to see no regard for the human cost of business anymore
the bad decisions and judgements of these CEOs severely impact the frontliners
these fake responses are just salt on wounds

RoadRacer2d ago

imagine havin the audacity to say "we need more games like hifi rush" right after closing the studio that made it lol
followin up with this show of "deflecting every question" was in poor taste

Show all comments (28)