210°
9.5

Game Informer: LittleBigPlanet Review

LittleBigPlanet is a gaming epiphany – one of the rare titles that opens new horizons on the landscape and changes the way you think about interactive entertainment. It blurs the lines that have traditionally separated single-player, multiplayer, creation, and community in a brilliant and refreshing twist on the familiar 2D platformer. Using this classic genre as a vehicle, Media Molecule has developed a charming adventure that mines the past to give gamers a glimpse of the future.

Read Full Story >>
gameinformer.com
TheColbertinator5684d ago

Game Informer right on schedule

thebudgetgamer5684d ago

those are my personal picks when it comes to game reviews

callahan095684d ago

I really, truly, honestly don't understand why some of these reviewers aren't giving the game a perfect 10. I've seen far inferior games that did much less in terms of innovation and have far less replay value/lasting appeal get 10's from Game Informer. What is their reasoning for skimming off the .5? Because if I've ever played a 10 / 10, it's LittleBigPlanet. The game is charming and fun, has immense variety, and most importantly, it is INFINITE. Nuff said.

sonarus5684d ago

Xplay and game informer give high reviews too much. Pretty much every game is a 5...out of 5 on x play

Harri44445684d ago

better that gears and fable. I guess that the 360s hardware is outdated.

TheMART5684d ago

If one only plays LBP only, he misses out on Gears of War 2 (and/or Fable 2), as they are two totally different and both great games.

If one plays Gears of War (and/or Fable 2) only, he misses out on LBP, both great games.

You are blind if you can't see that.

harpua5684d ago

If you own a PS3 and want to play Gears do what i do. Buy the 360 console at a place with a 30 day return policy and the game. Play the game which is easily finished within 30 days and then return the console. Other option is just rent the game instead of buying.

gears is a great game and totally worth playing, but you don't need to permanently own a 360 to do so.

Joejoefhosho5684d ago

And Gears always have the worst MP...

Do what I do if you want to play both:

Wait for the "better" PC version like always

cmrbe5684d ago (Edited 5684d ago )

the GOTY contest will be very interesting now.

IGN,Gamespot and GI all gave GTA4 and MGS4 10's . Not so the case with LBP and Fallout 3.

Is it possible that R2 or Gears 2 could muscle their way through?.

very interesting indeed.

MGS4 ftw

mt5684d ago

but the average score for littlebigplanet is higher than GTA and MG4

I_LOVE_MYSELF5684d ago

...and gave a average platformer with meh controls a higher score than it deserved... this game is a rent at best

gambare5684d ago

nope, Hype is before the reviews and users opinions, this is the response to the hype. Hype is the exaggeration of a product, but this is not hype anymore.

http://www.answers.com/topi...

I_LOVE_MYSELF5684d ago (Edited 5684d ago )

exactly... they responded to the hype by giving into it...
Gametime - 1
you - 0

I win... you lose...

(you lose because the high scores are only cos the game was hyped so much and people were scared to rate it low because fanboys would go thermal and spam the world with pointless threads... face it LBP is an average platformer... nowhere near the greatness of Super Mario Galaxy for example)

gambare5684d ago (Edited 5684d ago )

erm... how exactly did I lose? I just was just telling you about hype.

(erm... no, in that case Haze would had higher scores if we use your logic)

ultimolu5684d ago

Cute, but no.
Welcome to ignore list. I cannot tolerate comments like that.

Kyur4ThePain5684d ago

How on god's green earth would you know anything about LBP?

Figboy5684d ago

and how many worlds and planets can YOU create in Super Mario Galaxy?

truth is, Super Mario Galaxy and Little Big Planet are so far removed from one another in terms of gameplay and design ethic, that there is no point in comparing them.

now, Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction, and Super Mario Galaxy are far more comparable.

personally, i think Ratchet walks all over Super Mario Galaxy, and that's saying a lot, as SMG is a FANTASTIC game, but i think Ratchet trumps it in all areas, from Story, to Level Design, to Variety (uh oh, i hope Gamespot didn't read this), to Graphics and overall Gameplay. but that's just me.

see, the difference between me and you, is that i understand that my opinion is subjective, just like yours, but i don't choose to point out how "wrong" someone else's opinion is in relation to mine. i'll point out that i think you are confusing platformers to compare (LBP and SMG, for example), but your opinion of the quality of either is purely your own, and neither right or wrong.

in either case, you are treading dangerously close to being put on my ignore list, but i'll give you some time to grow up. i mean, after all, with such a close-minded, imperialist attitude ("i'm right, YOU'RE wrong!"), you've got to be no more than 10. am i close?

Kuest5684d ago (Edited 5684d ago )

Well, I for one don't like LBP either... but if I ever obtain the chance to play it, my pride will find itself most thoroughly trampled.

I want to see what the big fuss is about (considering I don't particularly like level editing, or building for that matter). I must admit there's something about this game that (sadly) peeks my curiosity.

ZOUNDS!

Damn you, cute cuddly fiend!! My wealth pours out of me like grandma's Christmas carrels.

Figboy5684d ago

i think that's the part that most people get confused about:

YOU DON"T HAVE TO BUILD IN LITTLE BIG PLANET IF IT'S NOT YOUR THING

it's been stated over and over and over again that the game has 50 levels included in the box, spread out over 8 worlds (or is it 9, i can't remember).

if you don't want to build, but you enjoy platform games, you will get a kick out of the 50 spectacularly design levels and mini-games in the title.

and then, when you're all done with those, you can play the levels that your fellow gamers have spent countless hours creating.

i was in the beta, so i've already played a surprising amount of fantastic levels, as well as the expected amount of poor levels.

from the beta alone, i sunk at least 20 hours into LBP.

since i picked up the retail version 3 weeks ago, i've spent, hell, i don't even KNOW how many hours just toiling around, trying to unlock everything, and playing with my fiance and roommates. just last week, i decided to try my hand at my OWN level, and i had a blast creating it. about 5-10 hours later, my level was complete, and i uploaded it the servers.

i didn't need to create a level to get any enjoyment out of LBP, but i'll tell you, it certainly felt good to have my roommates play through it and test it for me, offering suggestions on how to improve it make it clearer to the player what their goals were, and i'm looking forward to hearing the positive and negative feedback people have for me, so when i ever decide to make my second level, it can be better than the first.

now that the server issues have been fixed, this is possible.

if you enjoy platform titles, then you owe it to yourself to play this games Story mode. even if you don't ever touch the create tools yourself, you will be satisfied with what the game is doing. charm oozes from every pore of this game, from beginning to end, story to tutorials to create and online mode. it truly is a genre defining, generation defining experience. and it does everything it set out to do. which is a damn near Herculean task, and it does it with aplomb.

SL1M DADDY5684d ago

Telling from your post, you have not played the game. Yeah, I think it is safe to say that anybody that hates on LBP is either tossing out flame bait or just speaks with no true hands on with the game.

I came home yesterday from being out and my wife had started playing it. Just to let you know, the only other game she has done that with was Eden and before that she had never played video games. She is addicted to LBP and that is saying a ton!

Kuest5684d ago

Must you disrupt my ignorant slumber? Can I not just complacently wallow in nescience?

Please, no more. LBP is amazing... there I said it.

Just please, don't make me buy it. I beg of you. I can't hold. on. much. lon...

*bubbles start to spill out from my gut*

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5684d ago
RememberThe3575684d ago

My most trusted name in news(reviews).

Show all comments (25)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel12d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow12d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo18211d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie11d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

10d ago
Hereandthere10d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
Notellin11d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

10d ago
Hereandthere10d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow10d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere10d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow10d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX11d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney10d ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno11d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno11d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

10d ago
fsfsxii11d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno10d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)
320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein64d ago (Edited 64d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville63d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi63d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein63d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos63d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein63d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

Number1TailzFan63d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long63d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger8864d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake64d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos64d ago (Edited 64d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts64d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername64d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai63d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
70°

Top 20 Best PlayStation 3 Games (20-11)

Alex DS. from Link Cable Gaming writes: "Is the PlayStation 3 retro? This is a surprisingly hard question to answer as the system definitely has the age to be considered retro, having launched in 2006, over 15 years ago now. But with it being home to so many massive games, many of which still hold up today and in fact were released for the PlayStation 4 when that console was released, make the PS3 a retro console that doesn’t feel retro."

Read Full Story >>
linkcablegaming.com
shinoff2183750d ago

No ps3 is not retro. I dont even consider ps2 era retro. All imo.

shinoff2183750d ago

Typically, the term retro is given to items which are at least 20 years old (but not yet 40 years old).

Quick google search

badz149750d ago

No the PS3 is not yet a retro console. But if you're gonna put 1 game from a series in this list, then LBP2 should be there instead of the original, Motorstorm PR is also an overall better game than the 1st game and to put Tools of Destruction over A Crack in Time is a blasphemy when ACiT is the best game in the series.