550°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Graphics Comparison: Xbox One vs. Xbox One X vs. PS4 vs. PS4 Pro

A detailed look at the visual fidelity of Red Dead Redemption 2 on both Xbox One and PlayStation 4.

sammarshall1022034d ago

I'm only on the base PS4 so I'm glad that version still looks amazing

mrmikew20182034d ago

They really did do a great job on all platforms.

sammarshall1022034d ago

They really did and it seems they've raised the bar on being a detailed open world

Ceaser98573612033d ago

I read R* was wanting to make this game for last gen even but probably back off due to hardware...

Hardiman2034d ago

It looks amazing on my 65 KS9000 running on the Pro! I tried it on my kids base PS4 running on their 55 E series 4K HDR tv and it looks great as well! Just a beautiful game!

thrust2034d ago

According to reports it looks much better aswell with a Xbox one X, they did a great job by the sounds of it push all consoles to limit!

gravedigger2034d ago

Textures quality are the same on both Pro and X, but Pro looks blurry because bad implement of checkerboard resolution.

2034d ago
2034d ago
thrust2034d ago

Yeah native 4k is amazing and also better performance is very nice, it’s good they pushed all consoles 👍

2034d ago
Donnie812034d ago

Actually you are right reports do say it looks much better on the 1x. This guy bellow is kidding himself of he thinks the difference is minor. The difference in native res alone is a huge difference. These people on n4g can tell the difference between 1080p and 900p but 1440p and 4k are the same. Take your L buddy...... Just take it

Gaming4Life19812034d ago

Downvotes because the xbox one x version looks better lol. Well it's TRUE but the game looks good on all consoles.

Hardiman2034d ago (Edited 2034d ago )

I see you missed the "amazing" part of my comment! Amazing is good enough for me and games like AC Origins, Odyssey and Red Dead 2 look amazing on the Pro so there's no need for me to spend $500. because again amazing is good enough for me!

It'd be different if it looked and ran like shit but it doesn't, it looks amazing and as long as I get amazing I'm good!

It also appears others feel the same because last night at pickup everyone I saw got the PS4 version or Pro bundles. No one is denying the X is a superior piece of hardware but for most that isn't enough to pull the trigger on $500. even if we could afford it when we can get amazing with what we have.

CyberRekkr2033d ago

Lies, Doesn't look much better! You just an Xbox Fanboy. I have all the systems in my house & I have compared the Pro and X & there's not a big difference.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2033d ago
rainslacker2034d ago

I know we plan on doing comparisons at work today. But for technical curiosity reasons.

It's a nice advantage of my job that they get all these games in to see how things work.:)

crazyCoconuts2034d ago

What kinda company do you work for, out of curiosity?

rainslacker2034d ago

We make engine tools for developers and engine makers. Mostly graphics renderers/shaders and portability tools. We have professional reasons to look at the game, and see how well they did, although I won't go into our reasons for that. Just one of the perks of the job.:)

alb18992034d ago

The X versión is the one I'm gonna buy. Native 4K and better frame rate 😍

BrettAwesome2033d ago

Great tv! I had one of those! Unfortunately it died, so now I'm on a 65 SONY X900E

Hardiman2033d ago

How's the Sony? I'm gonna be shopping late this year or early next year.

BrettAwesome2033d ago

It's a great value for money tv. Very accurate color reproduction. Full array local dimming too. If you end up with a Sony TV, just be sure to get a 900 series or better. The 800s aren't quite as impressive

2033d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2033d ago
sprinterboy2034d ago

I do scratch my head when they do these analysis videos and kinda laugh when they do the zoom 50/100X comparisons. I agree the X is the better version but you shouldn't have to do a zoom in to see it.
I think DF do go alittle too deep sometimes. I'm 2hrs in so far and it looks great on my launch ps4

Brave_Losers_Unite2034d ago

Zooming in shows better detail of differences. I dont get why you wouldnt want to see that

BLUEKNIFE2034d ago

Can you spot the difference between 2 butterflies?, Probably not and that's the point, zooming in at that level doesn't make any sense.

Razzer2034d ago

His point is that you don't notice any of this stuff DF points out while in game.

rainslacker2034d ago

All that really matters is what you see while playing, and sometimes, videos on the net don't really express just how much of a problem it is, and I would also posit that many people wouldn't really notice many differences if you didn't have the guy going, "Hey....look here, look here....it's not as good!!!". Particularly true since most people will only play on one console.....maybe two if they get a remaster next gen.

uth112034d ago

my eye can't see it when I'm
playing the game, so I really don't care what it looks like zoomed in.

that's for fanboys trying to justify their purchase

mcstorm2034d ago

Tbh this will always happen people get off that the game o there console looks far better when you zoom in 50%.

At the end of the day we will know the ps4 has more power than the Xbox one and games should look better on this console and the x has more power then the pro so should look better on this console.

I've never got a game on a console because xyz said it looked better on it I get it on the console I want and that's it.

RDR is not for me but gta is not to but this game looks like it's going to be massive and a joy to play so enjoy it eveyone on which ever console you own.

rainslacker2033d ago

@mc

When I was younger, and had both a Sega and Nintendo console(across a couple gens)....which was rare for a kid back in the day, I would consider which one looked better. Depending on which gen we're talking about, and the style of the art, I generally felt one console did better than the other. So, back then, I can say it was important to me. But back then, we didn't have a lot of this nitpicking, and games generally ran fine, or like crap. Nowadays, I'm not really fussed either way. I prefer Sony consoles, and I'm not ashamed of it. I play there because as of now, its the best console I have, and if I had an X1X, I may play my multi-plats there, although I'm not anywhere near as invested in the ecosystem there. Otherwise, most games still don't bother utilizing the mid-gens properly, so I see no reason to get another mid-gen, when I haven't even been overly impressed with the one I already brought.

sprinterboy2033d ago

I play the game, I don't go up close to every tree, leaf, zoom in on the horse testicle details lol.
My mate used to do that back in the half life days and I'd be like you gonna play the game or what.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2033d ago
2034d ago Replies(1)
Razzer2034d ago

I think it is hilarious that we have to have labels to tell us what console each video segment is from.

rainslacker2034d ago (Edited 2034d ago )

I thought it would be more hilarious if one of these sites maybe one day mixed up the labels, then came out a couple days later and said "oops....sorry about that".

Only because I can imagine the sudden changes in people's opinions when it happens.

gangsta_red2033d ago

Yeah, it's been like that since the beginning of of this gen. That's why we would always people patiently waiting for DF articles even when gameplay was already available to compare.

@rain

Didn't something like that already happen with CoD where they accidentally put the higher res label on the a low res version running the game and nobody noticed?

Also it happened with the new Killzone where it came out later that the MP was running at a lower res and no one knew or could tell until it was reported.

rainslacker2033d ago

I can't remember. But if it was COD, it was probably because I don't really follow that series much, and comparing the different releases of those games seems pointless since Activision doesn't exactly push the envelope of graphics, and don't spend much time optimizing either way.

KZ was a different scenario. But yeah, I think people didn't know, but they also didn't have it hammered in their heads at the time what checkerboarding was, or how it could affect graphics. I believe I even mentioned as much during my many comments about how people often can't tell the difference, and it becomes even less noticeable the higher the resolution becomes for what's being compared.

alb18992034d ago

The thing is that almost everyone watch DF on screens that are too small or don't support 4k and HDR so that's why you don't need the difference until DF make that zoom

Razzer2034d ago

ok.....so "almost everyone" is lying then. Guess that goes for those who are praising the superior Xbox One X version as well then. But even if you are on a 70" TV and standing close to the screen, most are not going to know what difference to detect. You still have to have DF stop the video and draw a circle around the area that is different.

HonestGamer52034d ago

My understanding was that they zoom in bcuz if you are watching it on a small screen that's the only way to see the difference (phone/monitor). But on a tv screen you can see the differences without zoom.

rainslacker2033d ago (Edited 2033d ago )

zooming in changes the native pixels, so that makes no sense. If you change one pixel to four pixels, or more in some cases, you're immediately introducing variances to the picture. That variance can exaggerate what is being shown. A murky texture becomes more murky as the "murk" is stretched across a great area. Aliasing become more pixelated because instead of a few pixels showing crawl, you now have double or triple the pixels showing crawl in not just one direction, but two. Shadows which are defined well enough in a non-zoomed image, suddenly become undefined because you add in excessive edge dithering. So on and so forth.

On a screen, a pixel is a pixel. There is no truer unit of display. Doesn't matter the resolution. So, if they wanted to show it properly, they'd show a cropped part of the image, unaltered in resolution, which would fit on a person's screen, without the image being stretched or compressed in any way. If the difference isn't readily apparent without zooming in, then the difference is probably minimal, and likely would go unnoticed except maybe in side by side comparisons, which are extremely rare in the home...so a person is likely to feel the same about either version if they were to play it.

The zooming in thing sounds more like an excuse to show off things which really aren't readily apparent.

KickSpinFilter2034d ago

Ya it’s kinda funny since most play at at least 8ft from their screen. 4K vs checkerboard rendering is of diminishing returns. Sure if your playing from 2 feet away ya XB1X is much better. But we can see from sales of consoles resolution really doesn’t matter all that much to folks

conanlifts2033d ago (Edited 2033d ago )

I will play it on the X, but while it is the better looking version ultimately the experience and enjoyment would be the same whether I played it my X or standard PS4.

Hardiman2033d ago

Yeah the fact they have to zoom in so much to show the "difference" has always come kinda silly to me. If it was a major difference I could see all the fuss. As it is I'm playing on the Pro and I haven't experienced any slow down and it looks magnificent! I also played it on my kids base PS4 and it looked awesome as well so really in the end it's all good!

Rhythmattic2033d ago (Edited 2033d ago )

Its a technical analysis so this approach is expected and appreciated.
In the end, whats important is if you enjoy the game, no matter the platform.

MikeNike3102033d ago

I appreciate their attention to detail but your right, the extra curricular zoomage doesn't necessarily translate to what the average consumer will experience. It actually still looks good from normal viewing angles no matter the console.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 2033d ago
XabiDaChosenOne2034d ago

Not seeing the considerable difference DTF referred too.

Brave_Losers_Unite2034d ago

Thats because IGN shouldnt be doing comparison videos

mad-dog2034d ago

I have a PS4 Pro and the game doesn't look as good as it can look on it. There is something wrong with the checkerboard rendering in this game. It's a real shame. Let's hope that a patch can fix this a bit.
Now you can dislike this post but that doesn't mean it's not true. I think this site should remove the likes and dislikes. It's toxic and just brings out the worst in a lot of people.

gobluesamg2034d ago

I gave you a DISAGREE. I hope you can get through this trying time.

mad-dog2034d ago

Oh i'll manage. But neither your disagree or your post has anything constructive that i can work with. So while i know you disagree with something in my post, i have no idea what it is.

michaelknight352034d ago

I agree with you on that n4g should remove likes and dislikes because people on here will dislike a person comment because they know can

rainslacker2033d ago (Edited 2033d ago )

I felt on the Pro they looked a bit faded compared to the X1X. I don't know if this is an effect of the checkerboarding, or just a byproduct of the lighting effects. I didn't really dive too deep into this this morning when we were checking out the different versions at work.

Overall, I wouldn't really have a problem with either version, as they both look fantastic.

As far as the likes/dislikes, I sometimes wonder why people disagree with innocuous comments, or statements of fact...even when they're not console war related, but I try not to let it get to me. If people want to disagree that's fine. If they can't bother to discuss it, then their opinion doesn't really matter to much to me.

EverydayGuy2033d ago

Why not just make 20 word lock on the like and dislike, so you would have to make a comment?

King_Noctis2033d ago

Most sites don’t even have dislike button. They remove that and keep only the like button. I wish this site would do the same.

MikeNike3102033d ago

I kind of like the dislike button. It lets you know what kind of audience your dealing with. It shouldn't be something that affects you at all but act as more of a barometer.

mad-dog2033d ago

A barometer for insecurity?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2033d ago
Show all comments (106)
370°

PlayStation Plus Game Catalog for May: RDR2, Deceive Inc., Crime Boss: Rockay City and more

All titles release May 21.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
-Ghost6d ago

PlayStation Plus Extra and Premium | Game Catalog

- Red Dead Redemption 2 | PS4
- Deceive Inc. | PS5
- The Sims 4 City Living | PS4
- Crime Boss: Rockay City | PS5
- The Settlers: New Allies | PS4
- Stranded: Alien Dawn | PS4, PS5
- Cat Quest | PS4
- Cat Quest II | PS4
- The LEGO Movie 2 Videogame | PS4
- Watch Dogs* | PS4

PlayStation Premium | Classics

- 2Xtreme | PS4, PS5
- G-Police | PS4, PS5
- Worms Pinball | PS4, PS5

shinoff21836d ago

They gotta do better on the premium side for sure. Where are any of those jrpgs from the ps1 Era. Come on Sony.

jznrpg6d ago

Most of the Sony JRPGS have been released. Square has a ton that could be ported over but they would need Squares involvement.

VenomUK6d ago

Crime Boss! I know it hasn't reviewed well but I love the eighties action movie vibe of the trailer but didn't want to risk any money on it so this is a great way for me to play it.

Exvalos5d ago

I don't know why Sony is not getting some of the legendary ps1 games from square like parasite eve, xenogears, brave fencer musashi

outsider16246d ago

Looking at this list, i gotta ask what is even the point of premium?

raWfodog6d ago

I'm good with just my PS+ Essential

GamerRN5d ago

I have premium, and I'm also wondering why I have it

Xeofate5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I think there are a ton of good games on Premium, and don't sleep on the movie collection if you like 90's and 2000's movies, the selection is stacked with classics and gets updated pretty regularly.

Abnor_Mal6d ago

G-Police is a game I have fond memories of and will definitely download to replay. I remember controlling your helicopter was a bit difficult and would make my hand cramp having to press all the shoulder buttons to go up and down and I think yaw left and right.

The next game they should add to Classics is Colony Wars, and I wouldn’t mind replaying Nightmare Creatures. I’d also like to replay Black, PSI Ope: The Mindgate Conspiracy.

Redgrave5d ago

Nightmare Creatures, Deathtrap Dungeon, Urban Chaos

TheColbertinator5d ago

Colony Wars, G-Police, Black and PsiOps were all amazing games. Such creative games from a golden age.

DefenderOfDoom25d ago

I would love to play Black again on a higher difficult setting . Black was so fun to play!

MrBaskerville5d ago

G-Police is nice. But might be among the hardest games I've ever played.

Bathyj5d ago

G Police.
I almost want to upgrade for that.

But let's face it, there's no way the game has held up.

MrBaskerville5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

You can just buy it, you don't need premium.

And it's still good, but there's a couple of early missions that are extremely tough. But they don't really make games like this anymore.

DarXyde5d ago

2Xtreme was the first game I ever bought for PS Plus (I still have the PS1 version somewhere).

Game is awful, but it's stupid fun. Like Thrasher: Skate and Destroy.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5d ago
TheProfessional6d ago ShowReplies(7)
hiroyukisanada6d ago

Man.... Premium has been a massive letdown but this is the only month they don't have a single thing for me. Oh well. I've gotten my money's worth so far and still need to finish up Rebirth and Rise of the Ronin then I'll hop back in to Relink and Helldivers after that.

hiroyukisanada5d ago

I should clarify that I was referring to the Classics catalog, in particular. Only 1 PS1 game I've loved is the Legend of Dragoon and the Tekken/Soul Caliburs on PSP

Petebloodyonion5d ago

RDR2 is a win for Sony and Crime boss is a good fit to help promote a struggling game
but we're far from what was removed this month (including Horizon Zero Dawn)
https://www.pushsquare.com/...

crazyCoconuts5d ago

Yeah I was hoping burning shores would have been added now that it's a year old vs. the base game being removed.
I wouldn't be surprised if both MS and PS continue to either walk back the quality of games in the sub services or increase the price, since it's now clearer to them how cannibalistic these services are

isarai5d ago

The game deserves to struggle, it's garbage

Petebloodyonion5d ago

Indeed it's bad but it does offer incredible Hollywood star power so for free it might draw a crowd while giving a boost to this game.
Just remember Fallout 76 was the biggest turd and yet there are now tons of ppl playing it.

shinoff21835d ago

When I seen video on this game I thought Holy sht this is gonna be awesome. Then the footage continued and I seen what type of game it was going for. Was so disappointed. Would've loved a gta style game not from Rockstar,like we had back in the day some studios trying. I'm all about being different but a little gta clone idea been cool with.

Yui_Suzumiya5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

To be fair, I'd play Crime Boss before GTA any day. I mean I have no interest in either but just for the celebs I'd pick Crime Boss, lol

JL29305d ago

How is a 6 year old game a win for anything? Anyone who cares has already played it.

Petebloodyonion5d ago

Simply because ppl do play it!
As much as I don't like it GTA V always managed a boost of ppl when it was offered on Game Pass or PS+.
NOW RDR 2 was never offered on a subscription service.
Again the point isn't about will hardcore gamers play the game because we already played it. it's about having a huge star power game never offered on service that will make casual ppl subscribe to it.

MrBaskerville5d ago

You are aware that new people are born every day? All the 5 year olds probably didn't play it when it released.

But I guess you played every game ever released, which is quite impressive.

JL29304d ago Show
seanpitt235d ago

A 6 years old game is a win? Yes it's a masterpiece but I am sure most of hardcore gamers have already played it! I doubt it would be shifting ps plus extra subs if there was a native ps5 version or 60fps option then maybe

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4d ago
Show all comments (57)
120°

6 Games That Genuinely Deserve A Current-Gen Upgrade

Games such as Mad Max, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Batman: Arkham Knight desperately deserve a modern-day revisit.

thorstein34d ago

Mad Max is underrated. Such a fun game.

Cacabunga33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

RDR2 still looks astounding on PS4 Pro. i cannot imagine how it could look with a next gen upgrade.

JonTheGod33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Probably not very different.

No idea why this article is highlighting recent beautiful graphically-advanced games and saying they need current gen makeovers. They already look better than most new releases; just compare Arkham Knight and Suicide Squad!

exputers32d ago

I see what you did there.

Yi-Long33d ago

It's obviously never gonna happen since Sony killed the game and studio, but Driveclub. Even in its current state, 10 years after release, it still puts many competitors to shame ...

Demetrius32d ago

I'm not into racing games but yeah I even looked at gameplay of that sometimes

redrum065d ago

It's a shame they cancelled the game. Definitely the best racing game I've ever played on Playstation. Just got GT7, but it feels so slow and less arcade-y, which is to be expected of a sim racer of course, that I just enjoy it less.
Driveclub also graphically looked insanely good for its time. I wonder what a Driveclub 2 would look like for the PS5.

Demetrius32d ago

Mad max ikr! Far cry primal, it amuses me how ubisoft just left ac unity hanging, sadly most of the good staff left from rocksteady while being forced to make that abomination smh