740°

Doom Eternal "Mortally Challenged" Joke is Offensively Boring

The edgy humour in the recent Doom Eternal gameplay demo at QuakeCon 2018 may seem like harmless fun to some, but reading into the implications reveal some worrying possibilities.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
TheOptimist2106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

1. It is not boring.

2. It definitely isn't offensive. (If this is offensive to you, I wonder what people like Anthony Jeselnik would do to your fragile heart)

But hey, I don't live in a first world country, so what would I know anyways.

It's not surprising to see how they delve into polictics. If anything it is a mockery of prevalent trends and I love that.

Now taking offense on something in a game that's obviously a joke, that's offensive, not just to me, but to a medium where people should be able to express themselves freely.

Chaosdreams2106d ago

When tired, always just go with "I'm offended that you're offended." It's usually a good way to end a pointless discussion that clutches to ones emotional stature.

Aeery2106d ago

I dont know weather to laugh or cry ...
SJWs are a very bad plague.
They really are narrow minded and this is a real problem.

MadLad2106d ago

It's hard to pull that one off when most people that know you are aware you are devoid of emotions in general. The struggle is real.

zackeroniii2106d ago

on behalf of us all, you, JaffaMeister, are just a bich.

RosweeSon2105d ago

Shiiii someone’s reading faaaar too much into something very minor. Get a grip Jaffa.

TheCommentator2106d ago

Agreed! Check out these quotes:

"Until around the 1970s, people with physical disabilities were called “cripples.” That’s not common vernacular anymore, and when it is used nowadays then it’s often as a derogatory slur."

Cripple: A person with a severe limitation of a specified kind.
Disabled: Having a physical or mental condition that limits movements, senses, or activities.

"White people used to call Native Americans 'Indians'...”

Indian: A member of any of the indigenous peoples of North, Central, and South America, especially those of North America.
Native American: A member of any of the indigenous peoples of North, Central, and South America.

"Transgender people used to be called “transsexuals..."

Transsexual: A person who emotionally and psychologically feels that they belong to the opposite sex.
Transgender: A person whose sense of personal identity and gender does not correspond with their birth sex.

"British colonials used to call anyone from Asia 'Oriental'."

Oriental: A person of East Asian descent.
Asian: A native of Asia or a person of Asian descent.

"All of these words were phased out of parlance, on account of the fact that they were harmful or insensitive to the people they were being used to refer to because those people voiced discontent and fought to be treated with greater empathy."

Um, really? These words aren't insensitive to anybody that isn't TOO SENSITIVE to begin with. It's literally what the words mean, and in no case did I find anything in searching these definitions that mentions them being derogatory or insensitive... perhaps I should have looked in the Snowflakes' Dictionary of Harmless Yet Offensive Terminology instead???

Tomato, Tomahto...

T2X2106d ago

Terms are offensive if people allow them to be perpetuated. As they say, sticks and stones. We are fortunate to live in a country where the worst thing some of us may encounter is someone else's slang terminology for something, be it race or sexuality.
Just know that some people put their lives on the line and have died so that we may only be offended and not rounded up and imprisoned because of what we say. People need to just stop being shitheads. In other words, if you can't argue intelligently, just be quiet.

subtenko2106d ago

If its said to be offensive, its like they are the ones making it offensive when the other person is using it how its defined! The same situation can happen with any saying or word or even a made up thing like "Freaking Blueberry!" and in the other persons mind it could be some slur, but you dont know what they are thinking so you cant say that.

I wish people would just drop it all because its all just very stupid

Noskypeno2106d ago

@subtentko, thats what they did in 2016 when i think some censorship was going on all over, so people made new insults like googles skypes and skittles. Thats where my username came from. It died out but the point still remains that when one term is banned people will find another.

FinalFantasyFanatic2106d ago

Imagine if things were in the crappy, and we had a world war, famine, lack of safe drinking water, shelter, ect... It's crazy how incredible soft and sensitive people have become, it'd be eye opening to see how these people would handle the world as it was 100 years or more ago.

RememberThe3572105d ago (Edited 2105d ago )

I'm a pround supporter of human rights and kindness in general, but this shit is getting to be too much. Every adjective we use to describe something rare or different from the norm is being turned into some sort of insult that we then can't use anymore. I'm dyslexic and if people start making dyslexic a curse word I'm f*ckin done.

They're just words!

2105d ago
TheCommentator2105d ago (Edited 2105d ago )

@ Danny

Try reading buddy. The definitions, as mentioned in my OP, don't say anything about being derogatory. Matter of fact they're identical to one another. A small group of people can't just all of the sudden say that a word is insensitive when there's nothing wrong with the terminology being used, and every "socially acceptable" word I'd chosen was synonymous with the "offensive ones".
"Nigger", otoh, was a term given to an African slave by their white "owners" and is not synonymous with black or African American terminology. Look...

Nigger: A contemptuous term for a black or dark-skinned person.
African American: Relating to black Americans.

Notice the definition of nigger includes the word contemptuous yet none of the ones in my OP show anything similar? You're barking up the wrong tree on this one, but I respect the hardships you've dealt with in your country. In the long run, what I'm saying is that if these words are truly offensive to the entire culture and not just some people complaining too loudly, then the definitions would include additional context to elaborate that they are culturally insensitive.

I'm not going to go on, but you need to understand the difference between actual words and derogatory slang! FYI, I have Asperger's and have dealt with ridicule all my life so you need to back off a bit.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2105d ago
Soc52106d ago

Yup, I’m offended, as well. At the use of the term offensively boring. Boring people have been treated poorly for so long. It is offensive to correlate being boring as a negative. Why can’t being boring be good. Like man that nap was so boring!

Boring people unite!
It’s time to get offended once more.

Kavorklestein2106d ago

I was born this kind of boring, and there's nothing I can do about it! I will always be this kind of boring, create laws about my preferred boring ass ways of life, and make all my boring friends have to cater to me and my boredom!

I'm not gonna stop until all boring people can be bored in peace! (Which honestly sounds Boring)

trooper_2105d ago

This SJW crap is so stupid.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2105d ago
LightofDarkness2106d ago

Anyone who uses terms like SJW (on either side) needs to be sterilised.

Hand it over, kiddo. You won't be needing it. We'll use it to make a more life like imitation for the lonely or more sexually adventurous. There's dignity in being an organ donor. But not in comments like yours.

Eonjay2106d ago

Absolutely agree. Kids these days don't understand that the real plague is being offended at being offended. And not having the testicular fortitude to take an opinion. Like damn so what if someone finds something offensive. Calling someone SJW isn't a counter argument. It is a weak scapegoat tactic that saves you from engaging in a conversation. No one ever said you have to agree to anyone's opinion.

Srhalo2106d ago

SJW has just become a word for people who lack the intelligence to explain what they don't like.

GUYwhoPLAYSvideoGAME2106d ago

Social Justice Warriors are a plague.

Surt2106d ago

Found the bleeding heart.

SyntheticMan2106d ago

@Eonjay
How exactly is being offended at others being offended a plague? Do these people call you a cis white racist misogynistic male nazi? Do they try to censor any art that triggers them due to their insane, cult-like ideology?

That's why we get pissed off when people write articles like this. Anything an SJW does is agenda-driven trash. There is no discussion to be had with these people, they are incredibly closed-minded (ironically) and will just try to shut you down by calling you one of the many insults above. Most people don't waste their time anymore, you'll probably just get blocked/banned from their "safe spaces".

2106d ago
Omnisonne2106d ago

What, you can't call people out for crying over nothing? If so you're crying yourself..? That makes little sense.
People aren't necessarily offended at someone else being offended, but rather tired or frustrated of the pettiness of it all, of the (quite frankly) children that are up in arms about a couple of lighthearted satire jokes.
Combined with the possibility of iD soft possibly removing said jokes should those children stamp their feet loud enough, I think people are right to call out these >SJWs< for their petty crap.

Omegasyde2106d ago

So you tried to make SanFanFreako look like a douche, but it backfired on you.....

Pot meet kettle

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ 318;‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

annoyedgamer2106d ago

Will you be conducting this sterilization in gulags or concentration camps?

TheCommentator2106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

@ Eonjay

I'm offended that you're offended by SanFranFreako being offended by SJW's being offended by inoffensive words... when does it end... when everyone's offended by everything? Being tolerant, not offended, is the way the world should work or eventually all of our liberties will be gone and everything will be offensive.

The real issue is that every small group of offended people think they can tell everyone else what's acceptable because the complain loudly enough.

NecrumOddBoy2106d ago

Social Justice Activist = "This building doesn't have a handicap ramp, so let's petition the county to build one."

Social Justice Warrior = "Let's punish the people who own the building for discrimination against the upward-walkerly different.

bluefox7552106d ago

Why? That's exactly what they are, they're moral police. People who would absolutely use the power of the law to censor things they don't like. We need a word to point these people out, as they're dangerous to society. I'll keep using it, and continue to reproduce :)

madpuppy2106d ago

This is a bizarre comment, SJW's call themselves "SJW's" and don't think it's a slight.

FinalFantasyFanatic2106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

What else are you going to call them though? SJW is a blanket term for a wide variety of issues that a minority of people take issue with, no one is going to sit down and write down every possible term or offensive when they get stupidly petty.

I've sympathetic to people when life causes them hardship, but I have no sympathy for people who offended so easily by things like the phrases in this game and I think it's wrong to sympathize with them. I'm sure there are people that think my view is wrong, but tough bickies.

Eonjay2105d ago (Edited 2105d ago )

Until you guys realize that you are the ones being triggered by someone else's opinion, you will never understand how you are being used or how stupid a blanket term like social justice is. The guy has an opinion. Even if you don't agree, he still gets to express it. Be man enough to deal. You don't want to stop free expression. We fight nail and tooth to protect the artistic express of developers even if we don't agree with their underlying vision. Wake up. Until you can live in a world with dissenting opinions, you will never be anything more than a tool and you yourselves will lose rights.

Its not about saying you are right or wrong, its about the framework in which you choose to have discourse and your right to do so. It is your damn right to be disagreeable. Why don't you get this?

@Commentator

"The real issue is that every small group of offended people think they can tell everyone else what's acceptable because the complain loudly enough"

ITS BECAUSE THEY CAN. Don't you get it? You have the right as you are doing now, to tell me how I should react to someone's statements. And you HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO SO. Its like talking to brick walls. Deal with differing opinions. No one said you had to accept/agree or change yourself to satisfy them. But they and you and I don't lose our right to express ourselves. The moment we try to do that, we all lose.

SoulMikeY2105d ago

Eonjay, it’s not being offended at being offended. If someone murders another person, they are referred to as a murderer. They’re not called that because someone’s offended, they are called that because that is what they are.

Calling it like it is, is not being offended.

Also, why is there this falsified deep internal fear that using terminology will lead to bad treatment? Using the term “retarded” doesn’t mean I’ve ever used it to describe a mentally handicapped person. Saying “faggot” has never been against a homosexual, or ever thought it’s tied to seeing them as any less of a regular ass human. Articles like this make people want to be... humans. “You wanna say some shit? I’m gonna say some shit. Don’t be a bitch.”

2105d ago
Gh05t2105d ago

@Srhalo

"has just become a word for people who lack the intelligence to explain what they don't like."

The same could be said for "right-wing"

ajax172105d ago

wow, your comment is cringy as fuck

GrubsterBeater2105d ago

You and the other bleeding heart, close-minded social justice warriors need to read a little book called 'The Gulag Archipelago' by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. You SJW's, in your Nazi Brown Shirt-esque tactics of shutting down people's free speech, are quickly directing our country towards an Orwellian, propaganda filled world where those who speak out or use "offensive terms" will be sent to gulags and/or concentration camps to be "sterilized" as you put it, in order to "rehabilitate" those who don't share your crazy SJW, cult-like ideology.

You SJW's are all just a bunch of delusional, crazed, demagogues who, ironically, shut down opinions or thoughts contrary to yours.

Welcome to Seperated, Bigoted(against Whites), Social Justice Communism Nation (with no borders) States of America. Formerly known as the United States of America.

Fuck your feelings. I love this country and I won't let you crazy cult members destroy it and slowly erode our constitution.

You people are insane.

TheCommentator2105d ago

@ Eonjay

The irony in your post is hilarious!

+ Show (18) more repliesLast reply 2105d ago
RollingSquare2106d ago

''Like damn so what if someone finds something offensive.''

I would agree with you, were it not for the fact that the SJWs certainly care, and they do their best to make others care. They do their best to censor anythign they find offensive, and even when they don't, they try to sway public opinion, often with lies, half-truths, misinformation, or other forms of propaganda. They literally think being offended is a form of violence that has been done to them. In their mind, it gives them every right to try to destroy you. It's basically what's happening with the extreme leftist Antifa. Or that Hollywood actor who once said that because he disagrees with people, he can 'punch some people in the face'.

These people are dividing the US and all you fools do is sit there and go ''so what if somebody finds something offensive?''. It's not ''somebody'', it's entire media outlets and people being propagandized into aggressive mobs. And they're going to come for 'toxically masculine' video games too, eventually. But thanks for your intelligent input. And btw, nobody is required to engage in conversation, if people just want to call somebody an SJW (when they are) then that's fine.

It's ironic that you would say people don't ''have the testicular fortitude to take an opinion'', because you're getting pissed over the opinion that ''SJWs are a plague''.

Omegasyde2106d ago

Good points.

Its like SJWs are the evolved version of “hipsters”.

Edgy people whom are in the minority trying to make everyone sway towards thier thinking despite the rationale.

Oschino19072106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

Ever see a leftist try to use the term "snowflake"? They can't even mock people without making up their own definitions to suit their agenda.

@Omega https://youtu.be/15iLHlJPp_... https://www.realclearpoliti...

thejigisup2106d ago

Why are we forgetting about SIWs? Social Injustice Warriors have seemingly all been pushed to their limits about people being offended by people who voice their offense that both some SJWs and SIWs have taken offense at others being offended by another's offensive words or actions. Quite frankly that offends me.

IanTH2106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

And you're offended that "SJWs" are offended, and the world goes round and round.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2106d ago
AK912106d ago (Edited 2106d ago )

The replies to your comments from said SJWs actually proves your point, they really are a plague.

senorfartcushion2105d ago

Social Justice Warrior used to be a lovely term. People started using it to describe old superheroes in Action Comics before they became what they were.

Now it's just *that* term used by a wide selection of idiots as they continue their ongoing war on niceness across the internet; we have sexed up selfish, middle-class idiots fighting against everything anybody says and deeming it "problematic" and we have sexless virgin incels giving the media an excuse to cheer for the selfish middle classers.

Scatpants2105d ago

War on niceness? Is that seriously why you think people don't like SJWs?

Gh05t2105d ago

I have a hard time taking anyone who uses the term incels un-ironically, seriously.

senorfartcushion2105d ago

Gho5t

I thought of writing the C word but I'd be banned.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2105d ago
Jinger2106d ago

Ahhh welcome to the current climate of comedy where you can't make jokes poking fun at current issues without a bunch of triggered nancy's getting their panties in a bunch.

Omegasyde2106d ago

I am offended of your use of the word “Nancy”.

Nancy was my great great great great grandmother whom was a Survior of the Saxon war.

;)

subtenko2106d ago

Nancy is a bad word in non English language, please dont say that....

senorfartcushion2105d ago

Grandma Nancy truly was the social justice warrior.

Araragifeels 2106d ago

How can the word "Demon" is an offensive term? Jesus, Mortally Challenge aka SJW people get offensive just for any little and specially when you go near their imaginery bubble.

KwietStorm_BLM2106d ago

I'm offended by your lack of proofreading.

Araragifeels 2106d ago

I could care less about proofreading. I will focus on that once I get back to class.

TheOptimist2106d ago

I love the comment and reaction here.

Uglyday2106d ago

Demon and Jesus in one post! Careful or you might incapacitate the author of this article.

G3ng4r2106d ago

Boohoo my feelings. Your freedom of speech ends where my feelings begin you know this. Pronouns etc.

Gh05t2105d ago

Please tell that to the author of this article because that is where it should start.

FinalFantasyFanatic2106d ago

I can understand if it was against your religious belief, but if that was the case you wouldn't be looking at a game like Doom in the first place.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2105d ago
ReesesPuffs2106d ago

I thought it was hilarious. If you're getting offended by a throwaway joke in a video game or you're shocked you're being offended by a Doom game you need to take a step back and reevaluate your life decisions.

Show all comments (160)
390°

IGN Entertainment acquires Eurogamer, GI, VG247, Rock Paper Shotgun and more

IGN Entertainment has acquired the Gamer Network family of digital brands for an undisclosed sum. As a result of the acquisition, some redundancies have been made across the UK-based organisation.

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
darthv7216h ago

Well this can only mean one thing... more job layoffs even in the publication industry.

Jin_Sakai15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

“Layoffs occuring“

Yep. IGN now has a monopoly in the gaming media.

“As a result of the acquisition, some redundancies have been made across the UK-based organisation.”

“Gamer Network's publications are GamesIndustry.biz, Eurogamer (including six local language editions), Rock Paper Shotgun, VG247 and Dicebreaker. The business also holds shares in Outside Xbox, Digital Foundry and Hookshot (which operates Nintendolife, PushSquare, PureXbox and Time Extension).”

“IGN Entertainment is the division of Ziff Davis that includes IGN, MapGenie, HowLongToBeat, and Humble Bundle. It has acquired the websites from PAX and New York Comic-Con organiser ReedPop, which initially bought the Gamer Network business in 2018.“

Jingsing14h ago

When say IGN you mean Microsoft's chief propagandist.

VenomUK6h ago

Surprising news, also a little sad as the magazine era is over and the website era is slowly coming to an end. But it must be said that many of the bastards who work at these places have operated as a mafia to control opinion on not only what can be said about games, but who can be allowed to talk about them, and what can be allowed to feature in them or not. As said above, redundancies are coming, Eurogamer pays the highest salaries for a team of staff who for some their output is minimal. Eurogamer also campaigned against Hogwarts Legacy and refused to review it -, the site took a hit. PAX has probably thought to cut its losses. Some job layoffs? I know of some of these people and they took pride in excluding - I will shed no tears.

S2Killinit5h ago

This is good news for Microsoft. IGN is like their advertisement arm.

-Foxtrot13h ago

All this means is a collective hive mind when reporting the news

They’ll discuss with each other how to handle topics and what kind of headlines to go with so they can fire round after round of whatever point they want to make

And the sad thing is over the many years even to the old GameGate days they love making gamers look bad as a collective. Anything for a hit piece.

victorMaje13h ago

Narrative control. I don’t like this at all.
Independent reviewers will be more important than ever.

JEECE10h ago

"They’ll discuss with each other how to handle topics and what kind of headlines to go with so they can fire round after round of whatever point they want to make."

You say this like it will be a new thing that they didn't already do.

OtterX12h ago

Yea, I had actually just seen today on Linkedin that a GamesIndustry.biz guy was talking about being laid off. I didn't read all of his post, but I bet it's because of this. That's a shame to hear. :\

Petebloodyonion14h ago

Probably Microsoft's fault!
They surely gave IGN the idea.
What's next IGN Pass?

But joke aside let's hope that this makes the news better compared to some of IGN branches

Jingsing14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Microsoft and IGN work quite closely so it isn't a stretch to say this is a move to control the gaming press to get everyone singing from the Microsoft hymn sheet. Not a good look at all. It is transparent stuff like this which is backfiring in Microsoft's face. First they want control of all the games now the media.

crazyCoconuts13h ago

While there's obviously a desire to preserve add revenue and early access to review copies, I doubt there's the level of conspiracy here that you imply. I mean there's no direct link between MS and IGN right?

Petebloodyonion13h ago

You're probably right!!!!
Here's MS evil plan
1) Make sure that Hellblade 2 receives inflated reviews.
2) Fire all the ppl across UK who gave Starfield the justified 6/10 reviews
3) Make sure that Game industry.biz stops giving Sony's president a tribute to spew their lies and have them talk to Sarah Bonds and Todd Howard only.
4) Control the majority of players for the GOTY award so MS wins from now on.

PPL needs to know about this!

Jingsing13h ago

@crazyCoconuts The world has moved on from "direct links" as companies were easily caught doing that. These days corporations can merely operate as a cartel through shared mutual interest which is not strictly kosher either but is also more difficult to prove. It's the fundamental flaw with big corporations in the US economy today and no one in power is addressing it.

Lightning7711h ago

Is there proof to anything you're saying?

I've never heard of anything like this or is this N4G once again make believing stuff outta thin air again?

crazyCoconuts10h ago

@jing if you have proof then I stand corrected.
Otherwise it seems like more conspiratorial thinking to explain what could otherwise be explained by natural forces of market economies.
Don't get me wrong, I believe there is bias all over and unsavory influences. I just don't think it's all centrally planned by evil villains in a smoke-filled room

S2Killinit5h ago(Edited 5h ago)

I don't think anyone has proof but my personal experience corroborates what he is saying about IGN being in MS’s corner for whatever reason.

Granted, Last time I visited IGN regularly was years ago, I literally stopped once I realized the huge bias they showed in favor of xbox. Their pages for the two consoles were fundamentally different. When they would invite xbox president he was treated completely different than when Shuhei Yoshida was invited. The xbox pres was treated as one of their own. There was just too many examples, it wasn’t even much of a secret.

Jingsing2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

@Lighting77 The proof is in the pudding, "Partnerships for Events: Microsoft and IGN partner for specific events or showcases." "Sponsored Segments: Microsoft has sponsored segments within IGN's showcases." "Industry Relationships: Microsoft and IGN, as major players in the gaming industry, simply have good working relationships. This leads to collaborations on shows & joint announcements without any ownership involved." They just had an event together recently. The crux of it is money is being exchanged for favors, when that happens editorial independence goes out the window.

There was controversy about Microsoft having involvement with Polygon in the past and it proved to be real and effected their editorial bias. "Investment in Web3 Startup: Microsoft's venture capital arm, M12, participated in a $20 million funding round for Space and Time, a Web3 data warehousing platform, alongside Polygon (amongst other investors) "

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
shinoff21839h ago(Edited 9h ago)

I mean news did come out the same day hellblade did.

Jk

Petebloodyonion4h ago

The embargo was to make sure IGN had time to finalize the deal and make sure Eurogamer gave this game a 5 stars instead of a 3.

Man, how devious and low can Microsoft go just to promote Gamepass
I heard that it costs a ton of money to MS and they will raise the price of Gamepass by a lot of money just to compensate
true story

Christopher14h ago

Oh boy! If we've learned one thing about recent news, corporate shrinkage of an industry via buyouts from those at top only leads to good things for employees and consumers!

Aloymetal14h ago

100%!!
IGN and Eurogamer...A match made in heaven!!

thesoftware73012h ago

Aloy!
Yes, good credible websites, I agree, it is a good match.

IGN is one of the most trusted gaming sites, weather you like it or not, but I know because they don't fit the N4G goofiness bubble, they can't be good.

shinoff21839h ago

I left ign years ago. Used to be on the ign forums all the time. I left there and found here. Not sure if you remember but this place used to be pretty bad for Sony fans. 360 was king for a few years. Anyone I don't quite remember but ign changed. Whatever the fk it was it seemed for the worse.

VenomUK6h ago

You’re right Christopher, just look at how N4G has improved since the buyout. .

Lexreborn214h ago

Ummmm not sure that’s a good thing that all these review sites are under the same umbrella. There’s no guarantee that they will maintain a non-bias opinion not paid for by the highest bidder.

MrNinosan13h ago

They haven't been non-bias since GamePass was crowned "best service in gaming".

Amplitude11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

You can go much farther back than that. Never forget the Kane and Lynch 2 review drama

Edit: wait that was GameSpot. Still though - don't trust these websites for anything. Find YouTubers like who's opinions you agree with and watch them instead. GaminylGames, Minimme, Digital Foundry, GMan, whatever. All better than these ad-filled "reviews" from people who are forced to play games and score with an arbitrary number

MrNinosan10h ago

@Amplitude
Digital Foundry has lost my trust ever since they got that MS money, but other than that, I'm with you.

If I'm on the fence of a game, I wait till the reviewers that share my taste has given their opinion.

Charal14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

Ouch, that does not sounds good for Eurogamer.
With so much of the industry media that will more or less follow the same editorial line, it will be harder and harder to distinguish PR from actual journalism in a couple of years.

Thinking about it, may it explain their review score for Hellblade 2?

Christopher14h ago

***harder and harder to distinguish PR from actual journalism in a couple of years. ***

The age of gaming advertorials.

Petebloodyonion13h ago

You're right all of this is just to promote Hellblade 2 and inflate the score.
Also the why cuts are indeed coming to Eurogamer and other UK branches because they only gave Starfield an average score.

Jingsing13h ago

Shed the non US assets that are not favorable to Xbox keep the US assets that are. Microsoft are going to deliver crap and they are going to tell you their crap is good and you are going to buy it. That seems to be the strategy. At this point I just want them out of gaming as they are operating like cancer.

VenomUK6h ago

YouTubers ursurped the games media years ago.

victorMaje13h ago

Exactly right. No more journalists. Just 1 take regurgitated & paraphrased down the chain. Smh.

Show all comments (67)
100°

2K Games’ big Summer Game Fest announcement needs to be Mafia 4

2K Games will take the stage at Summer Game Fest, and it is about time we got some good news about the state of Mafia 4's development.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
purple1012d ago

Didn’t a leak about a max Payne remake surface a while ago?

banger882d ago

I hope it's Mafia 4. And I really hope it's set during the 70s or 80s, and not a prequel of the first game as was rumoured.

PrecursorOrb1d 18h ago

Hoping for a Vegas mafia over here

TheColbertinator1d 17h ago

Mafia 4 would be cool if set in a 70s to 80s era

Show all comments (10)
60°

Call Of Duty On Game Pass Is A Big Risk Big Reward Gamble

Discover the impact of Microsoft's decision to include Call Of Duty in Game Pass. Explore the pros and cons and speculate about future changes.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Elda2d ago

Most folks that have a Gamepass subscription will not spend the $70, they will use Gamepass instead to play COD. MS will most likely make their money from some solely PC players & some solely PS5 owners. Even some PC players may opt to use Gamepass instead of spending $70. I would think MS would want to make every dime they could from retail sales. As long as they put new releases of COD day one on Gamepass, MS will lose out on some sales of COD.

porkChop2d ago

COD makes truck loads of money on microtransactions. That's likely the play. Get more people in the door through Game Pass and sell more microtransactions. Have a steady stream of events to keep people interested so they keep their sub, and then just the sub alone would double the revenue from that player each year.

Elda2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Buying the game at $70 a pop including the deluxe versions is much better than people subs for a dollar to $15 a month. Die hard fans that usually buy the game also buy into the transactions. Again putting any new COD day one on Gamepass is definitely a sure loss of making some retail money for every copy of COD. With the last iteration of COD being bad most likely people are going to sub to Gamepass to play COD basically saving themselves $70, that is a loss of retail sales.

Kakashi Hatake2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Most that don't have Gamepass will just buy the game and he done with it. People that do will just result in a retail sale being lost. Some will buy the subscription for the month then be done. This is lose lose. Casuals aren't going to pay almost 300 dollars a year for COD.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

The reality is that Microsoft already knows the answer as stated by them in their documents. PlayStation gamers have built up an ecosystem of games and they aren't migrating over and dropping what they have to buy an Xbox to play one game in a service you have to pay monthly for. Cheaper to just buy the game. And, I'd bet many casual COD players don't know or care about the acquisition.

Which is why Jim Ryan pushed to make sure that that one game continues to be sold as usual on Sony's platform to keep the status quo. Every other IP owned by Activision are worthless. And Activision has shown they don't care about other IP like Tony Hawk by cancelling them.

Sales WILL be lost on Xbox. That's for certain. Microsoft can only hope that Xbox gamers continue to buy up those micro transactions to make up for those lost sales. Only positive for Microsoft is that they get to dip into PlayStation game sales that we all know from history and NPD, that Sony's console sells more games. But increase subs from Sony fans for game pass? Not happening in any way that matters.

Sony, on the other hand, can have their cake and eat it too. They get COD and they can continue dropping more content for their fastest selling GaaS game which is Hell Divers 2. As the game passes 12 million sales and doesn't beat you over the head with micro transactions, Sony has a win win situation and can support the game getting more content to keep players engaged.

As a side note, COD is probably going to turn into some version of Sea of Fortnite Duty. Games as a service sitting in game pass being milked dry with micro transactions and constant updates making you feel you're playing an unfinished game that keeps going and going with no soul.

Tedakin2d ago

I'm not sure why everyone is acting like COD is a surprise. That was always the plan. They said in court during the FTC case they were doing this. They have said repeatedly and recently all first party games are going to Gamepass.

badboyz091d 23h ago

gamepass like PS Plus are rental services. Games like COD you buy not rent. So in my case unless I plan on keeping gamepass for 2yrs minimum than the benefit of adding cod is pointless.