The Xbox One X is the most powerful home console ever made, with some impressive advances in the RAM and GPU over the base system.
The Outerhaven interviews Francisco González of Grundislav Games about his passion for Point and Click games.
Hidetaka Miyazaki, a renowned director & president of FromSoftware has hinted how he might be soon making another Armored Core game.
Could potentially be any one of these:
King's Field V / Otogi 3 / Lost Kingdoms 3 / Shadow Tower 3 / Echo Night 4 / Metal Wolf Chaos 2 / Kuon 2 / Armored Core VII
LETS GO !
Pilestedt writes: "Very good question. First thing we got to do is ensure we get more devs time playing the game. It's hard to make the right decisions if the eyes aren't on the road.
Secondly, I want to ensure we actively look at the sentiment and create a holistic view of WHY feedback is given. And my working theory is that TTK is too high."
They need to give us weapons that are fun to use. Right now you will have over 30 enemy patrols that randomly appear around you in a near never ending horde. Most of the weapons we are getting are either semi automatic guns that can take out 1 light armored mob if you hit the weak point or low damage automatic rifles with high recoil.
To make the game more fun, we need some fun futuristic weapons. I would love to see a gun that can fire elemental rounds except for incendiary and a proper thermite grenade.
I'm confused about the article ..
Is the point you are trying to make that the Xbox One's CPU is weaker than PCs in general, and thus giving developers issues?
Or that the original Xbox One's CPU is weaker than the Xbox One X, and due to the fact that games need to be compatible on both, the Xbox One's CPU is giving developers issues compared to the possibilities they would have if they'd only needed to work with the Xbox One X CPU?
Bottom line, your article headline should say that the Xbox One's CPU is the biggest shortcoming, not the Xbox One X, since the Xbox One is the lowest denominator in this equation and as such, the weakest link.
So true like pro
Cpu is still faster than the pro...
The 8 core Jaguar CPU was probably the right choice at the time (2013) for the base Xbox One and PS4. But using the same CPU with a bit of an overclock for the Pro and X is frustrating. It lets both systems down massively. Some people fail to see the short comings of the CPU side. Last time I left a comment about the CPU one or 2 people kept banging on how it's not rubbish and how DX12 is baked into the CPU (for the Xbox). I honestly don't care what is baked into the CPU a crap CPU is a crap CPU end of.
Just imagine if both Sony and Microsoft went with the a Ryzen based APU for the Pro and X. 30FPS would be a thing of the past. Hell even if they thrown in a 4 year old intel i5 inside it would of been much better than the crap they have inside now.
I understand why they did it. It's just frustrating. A better CPU in both and both would of been much better than the average PC gamer's rig.