210°

Final Fantasy XIV Switch and Xbox One Discussions are "Positive", Says Producer

FFXIV Producer Yoshi-P has stated that ongoing discussions with Nintendo and Microsoft are "positive" about bringing Final Fantasy XIV to Switch and PS4.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
Ashlen2347d ago

They have been saying this about an xbox version since 2014. Given the poor sales of Japanese games including FFXV which only sold 15% of it's units on Xbox I don't see this as likely. A Switch version on the other hand seems like a great idea. FFXIV on a portable system would be great.

wonderfulmonkeyman2347d ago

If they can fit it on and get it running as smoothly as Skyrim, at the least, then I'd say that would be a great idea.

But if they can't do that, then I'd prefer Squeenix "switch" their focus over to making new games for the Switch, as well as getting that remake of Secret of Mana, and the Mana Collection, localized on Switch.

_-EDMIX-_2345d ago

Agreed. I felt FFXIV on Switch would make a lot of sense given that it exist on PS3 and Square is ok with having their own online UI (the very thing that MS was basically mad about)

JunMei2344d ago

PS3 support ended with the launch of Stormblood the latest expansion. That said, I don't think it'd be that difficult to run on Switch. It's got plenty of ram for what the system does.

Eidolon2345d ago (Edited 2345d ago )

Westerners love the MMORPGs, though. 15% doesn't seem too low. Didn't it release on PS4/PC and PS3 as well? Xbox One user base is smaller and way less units in Japan, but it's larger now and FFXIV is an established MMORPG.

Summons752345d ago (Edited 2345d ago )

FF14...on Switch? YES PLEASE!!!!!!

I mean I own it on PS4 and I love it but taking it on the go (provided I have an internet connection obviously) my healing skills will know no bounds!

2345d ago
Kaiou2345d ago (Edited 2345d ago )

God please no Switch port .unlike WOW, FFXIV graphics bearly improved since release because of the lowest common denominator the PS3 , they finally got rid of it and we now have large cities without loading screens, we don't need any new limiters .

datriax2345d ago

You already dumped the outdated PS3 that was holding back enhancements to the game. Now you want to bring it to Switch and be right back in the same boat? Why............?

GameBoyColor2345d ago

Let's not forget ps3 only had 256mb of ram and the architecture was difficult to work with. Not only is the switch much more powerful and has way more ram, it is also easier to develop for.

_-EDMIX-_2345d ago

This.

I get the PS3 isn't as strong as the PS4, but Switch is stronger then the PS3. So I'd say Square's team is on to something and maybe they see something that could really work on Switch. I think it easily can work in terms of function, but I don't know how well it will perform. I mean.....its an MMO, doesn't look kiddie at all, I just don't know how such a thing will really sell on a Nintendo system, but if they see a opening, I'll wait and see.

Trust me, they would like to not lose money more then I'd like to not see them lose money lol

bluefox7552345d ago

That's a good point, hadn't considered that.

DarkKaine2344d ago

1) Switch came out not too long ago while PS4 was already out when this game originally launched. The fact that you hardly see the Switch on store shelves shows there is a lot of potential for this system.
2) The Switch is extremely easy to develop for, as stated by a lot of developers and shown by the release of games like Skyrim, Doom, etc. From what I've seen, it seems to take developers about a week if not days to have something up and running.
3) The game is built with x64-x68 systems in mind. Porting it to a device that rocks ARM is actually not that difficult.

Porting it to the complicated Cell processor is simply not a viable option when the next system is already on the shelves. You'd have to rewrite a lot of code to specifically take advantage of all the SPU's and even then it might have not been worth it.

Also the Switch and PS3 cannot be compared, neither of them are more powerful than eachother. PS3 holds the advantage with the powerhouse CPU (hell, it even beats the PS4's CPU in some cases), while Switch has the advantage of having a modern and fully supported architecture that is easier to work with and supports more features. If your game is heavy on physics calculations and uses a lot of threads I think it's safe to say PS3 wins hands down, when the CPU isn't stressed that much Switch wins. In short; it depends on the game.

djplonker2345d ago

As much as I would love this on switch I would be cautious since they only recently dropped support for the ps3 version and a handheld switch is only a little more powerful than a ps3 so It could be holding the game back for pc / ps4 assuming it is crossplay.

Would be impressive if they got some of the areas in stormblood to run on the switch though.

Ashlen2345d ago

Well, I believe the PS3 was dropped due to memory limitations. It only had 1 GB where as the Switch has 4.

Asuka2345d ago (Edited 2345d ago )

Not even 1GB for ps3. It was 256MB of system, and 256MB for applications (games, media apps, etc.) Where as switch has 1GB dedicated to system and 3GB for games... its not even comparable so idk why people are complaining. Switch far more competent than the ps3

bluefox7552345d ago

Sure, but it's still a far cry from PS4, and would be a new lowest common denominator. People who play the game don't want it limited any more than it already is.

Show all comments (26)
130°

Peripheral Maker Leaks Nintendo Switch 2 Info; States Backwards Compatibility for Games & More

Chinese gaming peripheral maker Mobapad has outed Nintendo Switch 2 info "through our partnership with Nintendo's supply chain."

Profchaos2h ago

Interesting I like what I've read so far.

Full backwards compatibility with games carts and digital, comparability with pro controller and joy cons (they can't be docked though)

So basically my investments in switch one games and hardware seems to be respected

130°

PlayStation x PUMA Collection Releases April 2024

PlayStation x PUMA orders open April 18, 2024, Priced between $100 - $120!

Read Full Story >>
sneakerbardetroit.com
Barlos1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Well, they're ugly aren't they?

phoenixwing14h ago

Isn't any better or worse than any other shoe. Most of them are made in sweat shops no matter what logo they have

Ironmike1d ago

Playstation should have went with nike

JackBNimble14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

I'd be embarrassed wearing any clothing with a console sponsored brand unless is was 12 years old.

Tody_ZA19h ago

It ain't real until LeBron tells us what this shoe means to his career.

DefenderOfDoom216h ago

Puma the unofficial sneakers for the NYC Breakers from the movie Beat Street (1984)

Abnor_Mal6h ago

Those were the suede ones like the burgundy ones with the fat shoe laces. If you were really nice you had the checker board laces done up. A pair of Lee or Guess jeans a BVD nylon T-shirt. Rocking some Gazelles and Kangol cap preferable the beaver fur.

290°

Microsoft’s Surface and Xbox hardware revenues take a big hit in Q3

Microsoft just posted the third quarter of its 2024 fiscal financial results. The software maker made $61.9 billion in revenue and a net income of $21.9 billion during Q3. Revenue is up 17 percent, and net income has increased by 20 percent.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
darthv723d ago

Xbox content + services up 62% while hardware down 31%... seems about right with the way they tout you don't need the hardware to play. People can play on their phones or smart tv or other means. I don't hardly play on my consoles directly since getting devices like the logitech g-cloud and ps portal. Which is to also say I have been playing more digital than physical because of these devices.

solideagle3d ago

you should apply in MS PR team buddy, I think you will do a great job in my humble opinion :)

Sonic18812d ago

I thought darthv72 and Obscure_Observer already work for Microsoft 🤔

dveio2d ago

MS: "Xbox services and content without AB up 1%, with AB up 62%. Hardware down 31%. In total a loss of 350 mill."

darthv72: "Seems about right."

MS: "Excuse m ..."

darthv72: "I don't hardly play on my consoles directly."

MS:

Lightning772d ago

What he said was facts. How he plays games is no concern of you. Don't get too mad about it.

Cacabunga2d ago

I can tell people like you are an absolute minority..

If service is up means their fans and fanboys accepted this model and subscribed to it. The near future you will see a big decline because the service is saturated.

darthv722d ago

to you it may seem like the minority... but your bubble is shrinking because more and more are following suit. convenience is a hell of a drug and its also why physical sales only amount to 30% of overall game sales. times are changing, you either get with them or you get left behind.

neutralgamer19922d ago

Darth

30% physical sales: yet Phil and xbox division are in a rush go give up on that 30%. they don't have any right to give up any piece of the pie since the control such a little of the pie to begin with

also, the market is clearly speaking that the model Xbox is pushing isn't working right now the keyword being right now. you are right about freedom to play anywhere so i hope they put their games on steam

shinoff21832d ago

But that's been ms for years. When things aren't going their way they try to change the way things are said. For instance console sales are down, they stop telling how many sold instead telling us how many hours spent in halo or headshots. So it makes sense console sales down just say people are playing on more devices then previous. What they won't say is how many xbox players jumped ship to ps5.

Cacabunga2d ago

Hardware sales are so bad that Sony and Nintendo are blowing the sales off the water with their hardware.

If Xbox are losers, others aren’t..
Xbox already tried everything with Xbox live then subscriptions went down so much that they had to find something else. Their fans subscribed then reached saturation rather quickly.

Hardware and exclusive games is where it’s at! Keep gamers excited, announce decent software and people will support you

itsmebryan2d ago

@shin
Well keep it simple Sony 's operating income is down 26% and Microsoft's is up 32%. No MS spin there, just facts. 😉
Cheers

S2Killinit2d ago

MS is after diminishing consoles as a medium. They want to destroy this market because they couldnt win. MS’s vision is to dissolve console gaming.

romulus232d ago

Odd that a company that touts you dont need the hardware to play is already touting another console in the works.

darthv722d ago

They are not reliant on the HW but still want to maintain a presence (no matter how small) is a good thing. It shows commitment to the craft. It reminds me of SNK and how they made games for their own hardware (Neo Geo) while also making them for others because they knew there was a market to do so. They knew they would sell more to others but also sell to their own niche fan base.

TheEroica2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Perfectly reasonable post down voted by insecure corporation friendly folk.... But not gamers. Real gamer want accessibility and ease of acquisition for all.... Company shills are the only ones still telling us that hardware locking people from games is good for us.

Chevalier2d ago

@Darth

You should stop parroting metrics like an idiot without context.

"Xbox content and services revenue grew 62% in Q3 from a year earlier, “driven by 61 points of net impact” from the purchase of the third-party video game giant, Microsoft said."

61 of the 62% was from their merger so net increase is ONLY 1%

https://www.mesaonline.org/...

itsmebryan1d 20h ago

@chevalier

It looks like made a great purchase. Much better then Sony buying Bungie. 😉
Cheers

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1d 20h ago
purple1013d ago

Xbox hardware revenue tanks to lowest point of Xbox Series generation

Profchaos3d ago

I'm not surprised surface is struggling they aren't relevant anymore

DOMination-2d ago

In the last two years they've started exiting the consumer market altogether. All of the newest Surface products are business models only. They can't seem to work out what they want to do with it.

XBManiac3d ago

Too expensive hardware when others offer the same or more for less? Good work, Green Team.

SimpleDad3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

"Despite some early successes for Xbox games on rival platforms, Xbox hardware is down by a massive 31 percent this quarter."
"Without Activision Blizzard, Microsoft’s overall gaming revenue would have actually declined this quarter."
"Xbox content and services would have only been up a single percent without Activision Blizzard..."
"It looks like next quarter is going to be a similar story for gaming at Microsoft, too."

That is crazy... so A/B/K is carrying the whole Xbox gaming.
Oh and Microsoft will be fine. Windows, Office and Cloud are growing with each pc purchase.

purple1013d ago

Activision: "we gonna need a bigger rucksack/backpack please"

Microsoft: "why's that"

Activision: "to carry yo' weak ass'

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Top brass have also wanted to start seeing returns on the 100 billion they have put into various Xbox related moves so seeing more multiplatform games is highly likely especially from abk

It's basically saying that PlayStation is the reason Xbox is afloat right now thinks to Ps5 versions of COD

Kornholic2d ago

So basically PS and PC gamers' money is keeping Xbox on life support.

MrDead2d ago

The only growth MS will get out of the console industry is if it supports it's rivals platforms. Xbox is a pointless machine now. I can see them on a big push for live next, and they won't give up on trying to buy Steam.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Show all comments (46)