430°

EA Responds to Star Wars Battlefront II's Unlock System Backlash

Many Early Access Star Wars Battlefront II players have encountered various unlocks that could take upwards of forty hours of play time to afford. EA chimes in.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
XiNatsuDragnel2373d ago

EA I wished you weren't the worst gaming company in the world right now.

Lonnie182371d ago

I sure do wish we would have got a property Mass Effect or Dead Space this generation...EA is just the worst!

Gazondaily2371d ago

The game will still sell bucket loads...

PapaBop2371d ago

It's Star Wars, that's pretty much a given but will it meet sales expectations?

Gazondaily2371d ago

Not sure. The complaints are gaining a lot of traction with core gamers. It might affect sales

EatCrow2371d ago

Me too. They could do so much more as a game company if they didnt suck this much. I want the company to die if at all possible..but thats evidently too much to hope for.

adonisisfree2371d ago

What more do you expect from this company? They are nothing but shit. Most of thier franchises are crap, including a football game that hasn't changed in years.

mafiahajeri2371d ago (Edited 2371d ago )

I can definetly agree with that FIFA is such a tired franchise, it needs a complete overhaul

I bought every FIFA since 2009 and im done, moved to PES.

To bad people buy it every year and spend crazy amounts of money on FUT, so basically itll never change.

The same goes for COD.

2371d ago
Lon3wolf2371d ago

@cupofjoe

Yet most of the time the ball is thrown or carried :)

TankCrossing2371d ago (Edited 2371d ago )

The ball is mostly thrown or carried, and conspiciously not actually ball-shaped. Don't let Rugby soften up the definition! Lol

ball noun (ROUND OBJECT)​
A1 [ C ] any object in the shape of a sphere, especially one used as a toy by children or in various sports such as tennis and football:
a beach/golf/tennis ball
Just try to concentrate on hitting the ball.
The kitten curled itself into a ball (= the shape of a ball).

opinionated2371d ago

Good thing I have 2000 dollars laying around. I’m not doing that time, no way in hell.

BrianOBlivion2371d ago

If you give EA $2000 for a single game, I'm gonna cast a spell to put "the curse of poverty" on you.

bloop2371d ago

No need to put the curse of poverty on him if he keeps buying into games like BF II.

Artemidorus2371d ago

But do you have 0000s for the upcoming games??

opinionated2371d ago

Yes but I’m not going passed 2000, that’s just crazy.

Artemidorus2371d ago

Then unfortunately the next EA game means you cannot afford to play to win.

FloydianAndroid2371d ago

EA makes activision seem like a paragon of virtue.

Chaosdreams2371d ago

Activisions new slogan: "Hey, at least we aren't EA."

Prince_TFK2371d ago

Ubisoft and Warner Bros are laughing at EA all the way to the bank.

Relientk772371d ago

10/10 slogan will support their games

datriax2371d ago

Hahahahaha......... EA. I can't even see a headline involving them anymore without genuinely bursting out in laughter. lol Get f**ked EA.

Show all comments (40)
70°

The Best Multiplayer Xbox Game Pass Games to Play With Friends

Xbox Game Pass has some great single-player experiences, but nowadays, it's all about getting together with friends and family. Thankfully, there's a surprisingly extensive library of multiplayer titles on Game Pass to bring everyone together.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
50°

Star Wars Battlefront 3: Is There Still Hope For A New Game?

Is Star Wars Battlefront 3 coming? Well, the correct answer is yes, no and maybe. It’s been six years since the second instalment, and fans are still waiting for confirmation of another sequel.

Read Full Story >>
fortressofsolitude.co.za
anast151d ago

Game companies are not mature enough to handle this concept without turning it into a casino.

shadowknight203151d ago

The remakes of battlefront should have been more simular to the originals. CoD/battlefield reskinned as Star Wars was not the anwser.

260°

Is Gaming Really Worse Than It Used To Be?

From Xfire: "Stop if you've heard this one before - with all the unplayable buggy launches, rampant monetization, season passes, chunks of games being locked behind DLC paywalls, day one updates, always-online single player games, early access, lootboxes, massive patches, etc, games were so much better back in the eighties, or the nineties, or the oughties (pick whichever applies to your age bracket) right?"

marioJP871083d ago

Most definitely. Without a doubt.
The prices. DLC prices. Short stories. Less split screen gaming. Lesser amount of games are made these days because of the advancement of technology.
Everything is about graphics and resolution.

1083d ago Replies(4)
FlakyGoose1083d ago

The prices: With subscriptions and sales I feel like games are cheaper than ever.

DLC: I agree 100% DLC and MTX sucks.

split screen: Well... yes but now we have online multiplayer you can game with people on the other side of the world.

Lesser amount of games: This is unequivocally false. More games are made than ever before by far.

Everything is about graphics and resolution: I agree there is too much emphasis on that, but at the same time you can find thousands of pixel art games as well. Modern recreations of retro style games have never been more popular.

CYALTR1083d ago (Edited 1083d ago )

"split screen: Well... yes but now we have online multiplayer you can game with people on the other side of the world."

Yeah, but that really isn't the same thing. Couch co-op encouraged actual human interaction, that is missing on multiplayer. I guess I don't really understand why both aren't able to be included on some games. I miss the old days of being able to sit down next to an actual person and play a game. I can still do it, as long as I have two different systems in the house I guess.

I'm old!! LOL

All that said, I think gaming today is a much more robust landscape. There is a game for just about anyone. As a male, who has seen games progress from Pong to what we have today, I suppose I could hate on the fact that not every game is designed for me. Back in the day, games were for boys, adolescents boys generally, and that's what everything was directed. Being an adolescent boy at the time, I thought that was pretty great! Now there are so many games out there that there is something for everyone, and I think that that is a good thing.

Tacoboto1083d ago (Edited 1083d ago )

The MSRP are stable and consistent compared to the SNES and N64 days ( https://retrovolve.com/n64-... $80 for Star Fox 64 and $60 for Ocarina of Time. That was over 20 years of inflation ago.

"Short stories" - *lists Sony's PS4 output as counterpoint*

"Everything is about graphics and resolution" and yet almost every single new-gen title has a 60fps mode except for Watch Dogs (for a few more days) and The Medium, and most adopt resolution scaling to keep stable framerate.

Lesser games are made, and yet everyone seems to have a massive backlog when the topic comes up.

I think some people like to yearn for the old days because they weren't actually alive during these old days. I'll give you the point about DLC prices (though, in the 360/PS3 era, if you didn't spend the money, you were fractured from the online userbase. Now maps are generally free but cosmetics are worse. Which one is worse for you? I'd say being forced to pay to keep playing with your buds)

Iltapalanyymi1083d ago

Yes, i still play a lot of old games for the first time and they are miles better than some new stuff is.

gold_drake1083d ago

same, some ps2 games even.

i remember a time when i just bought a game on a whim but now .. ill think twice about it.

Rimeskeem1083d ago

I feel like the market is changing a lot these days. Before it was about getting as much into the game as you could without blowing the console/computer up. Now that we have all this power and capability games take longer to make and there are way more steps. Prices go up because games get more expensive, the same thing with movies. But the experiences can be truly astonishing. No one who played Pong would have thought within 50 years they could play something like God of War. Of course, greed causes practices that are not liked by communities of gamers. Some companies have veered into such practices but some companies are maintaining a balance between profit and creativity.

There are pro's and con's but I don't think you can objectively say that gaming is better or worse than before.

MadLad1083d ago (Edited 1083d ago )

Better and worse.

Most AAA releases are trying to figure out how best to nickel and dime you in the background. Even developing the entire game around that practice.

On the other hand, digital storefronts are now a big thing, allowing more smaller budget releases to be had, being they don't have to foot the cost of handling physical releases.

There's definitely more content to be had then ever.

Essentially the AAA space has become cancer in a lot of ways. I'm not talking every release, or even every company, but with all of the season passes, the dlc that boosts player progression in competitive titles, and now the retail price hikes being pushed on people .... it's obvious these companies are getting more greedy, year after year.

Fist4achin1083d ago

Yes and no. Yes in that it's annoying to have all this DLC/microtransactions in games and forced multiplayer that's hot for about a minute before something new and shiny comes out.

No in that, there are a lot of good games coming out and I have a comfortable backlog that should keep me entertained for quite some time. I never have an issue of what to play next.

I think it's a great time to be a gamer and if you don't have anything to play, you're not looking hard enough.

Show all comments (33)