370°

L.A. Noire Switch details: Touchscreen control, Gyro aim, 1080p docked, 720p handheld

Rockstar Games Japan will publish L.A. Noire on 7 December for Nintendo Switch in Japan priced at ¥5,389 containing all five DLC packs, touch operation when removed from the dock, gyro operation in Joy-Con mode, 1080p in TV mode and 720p in portable mode. Trailer coming soon.

Read Full Story >>
japanesenintendo.com
EddieNX 2435d ago

Arguably the best version imo due to the portability. I'd rather buy it on my Switch than my XB1S for sure. I'm sure it will look nice on the X and Pro as well.

Genuine-User2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

That's not a reasonable point. Portability is not even a consideration for millions of gamers around the world. How will you argue in favour of your position and persuade a traditional console gamer?

michellelynn09762435d ago

Yeah it is. You can play it anywhere and anytime you want, and for millions of gamers around the world. It is a reasonable point. Also, it has motion controls and it uses camera angles to make it better. So wrong on that being the only useful feature. What new feature does the PS4 or X-Box One version have? Graphics do not count.

Genuine-User2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

Read the original post.

“Arguably the best version because of portability”

What the fudge kind of bizarre reasoning is that? Was Borderlands better on the Vita because it was playable on a portable device? No, not in the slightest.

Is Doom better on the Switch because it’s playable in a portable form factor? Don’t give me a laugh.

And what a dirty cop out, why don’t graphics count all of a sudden?
————

This isn’t a slight against the Switch, I enjoy mine a lot. But let’s be reasonable, in multiplatform games the only thing going for it is its portability, it’s inferior in almost every other aspect.

Nebaku2435d ago

"Portability is not even a consideration for millions of gamers"

I believe the millions who bought the Gameboy, DS, and 3ds, would disagree with you.

constantine_man2435d ago

"That's not a reasonable point. Portability is not even a consideration for millions of gamers around the world. How will you argue in favour of your position and persuade a traditional console gamer?"

Then why has the Switch sold millions around the world? Why is mobile gaming bigger globally than home console gaming? If portability isn't a selling point to you then that's a YOU problem.

deafdani2435d ago

Wow, so much irony in your statement.

So, what you're saying is that portaibility isn't a reasonable point because there are people that don't care for it?

What about those people who DO care about portability?

I'm one of them.

If you don't care about portability, fair enough. In that case, the Xbox One or the PS4 versions will be the best for you, for sure. But you don't speak for everyone else.

Istolla2435d ago

He doesn't have to convince you of anything. Furthermore, how could you possibly know The position of millions of gamers?

81BX2435d ago

@Genuine user
It seems your idea of reasoning is to get them to agree with you.

Neonridr2435d ago

portability is not a reasonable selling point? But shinier graphics is?

wow.. keep dragging those chains along.

gangsta_red2435d ago

@Genuine
"Read the original post.

“Arguably the best version because of portability” "

You should really learn to quote the whole statement if you're going to get this upset.

"Arguably the best version imo due to the portability."

imo...In My Opinion..

The guy is leaving his opinion on why he thinks this is the best version and for some unknown reason now he has to persuade millions of gamers around the world who are traditional console gamers.

Exactly why does he have to this?

Do you have any consideration for the millions of gamers around the world who do enjoy portability...I mean even you own a Switch.

_-EDMIX-_2435d ago

I agree portability is subjective in terms of how many people might view that as a positive.

Some like Portables some do not like such a trade-off.

Uken122435d ago

@Genuine-User

I read both post. The original post and your response.

You misquoted him. "Arguably the best version IMO due to the portability."
Clearly stating he that for him he wants it for being able to play the game on the go. So that is a reason.

Do I think that makes it the best version. No. But again I have no interest in the game period.
But I could see why some may value portability more than others.
Also graphics have always mattered. What are you talking about? There are loads of garbage games that look pretty. Graphics don't make a great game, they add to it.

Rebel_Scum2434d ago (Edited 2434d ago )

Try having a kid. Handheld is the most convenient form of gaming for a parent and therefore would qualify as the best version for them.

Genuine-User2434d ago (Edited 2434d ago )

@81BX
Sure, but you’d be wrong in your assessment.

@Istolla, Nebaku, constantine-man, deafdani, Neonridr, gangsta_red and Uken12

It seems to me that all of you have left your brains outside of this thread.

Don’t fret, I’ll simplify the argument 🙂

EddieNX said:
“Arguably the best version imo due to the portability.”

I said:
That's not a reasonable point. How are you going to argue your opinion to a traditional console gamer. I didn’t receive a reply.

I said:
Portability does not automatically make your gaming experience any better or worse. I didn’t receive a reply.

I said:
Why don’t graphics matter all of a sudden? I didn’t receive a reply.

The replies that I did get were so out of mark, I don’t even know why they were aimed at me.

I never once said that portability is not a reasonable selling point or that it isn’t popular around the world. But saying that one version is ‘arguably’ the best because it can also be played in portable mode is what my argument is based around.

Kribwalker2434d ago

@genuine
way to misquote yourself. at no point did you bring up his opinion

“That's not a reasonable point. Portability is not even a consideration for millions of gamers around the world. How will you argue in favour of your position and persuade a traditional console gamer?”

there’s some games like this that are single player based that is get on my switch just for portability. in my opinion it’s a great thing.

“And what a dirty cop out, why don’t graphics count all of a sudden? ”

i don’t know. if you go into any xbox onex article it would appear as if they didn’t to a large group.

gangsta_red2434d ago (Edited 2434d ago )

@Genuine

The best part is you think this is an "argument". You are trying so desperately hard to get him to explain his opinion on why he thinks this is the best version and for what reason? Especially when you haven't done anything yourself to convince him otherwise.

The best part is you never acknowledge it's an opinion in any of your replies but then start leaving your own comments as fact.

For example:
"Was Borderlands better on the Vita because it was playable on a portable device? No, not in the slightest."

So according to you Borderlands on Vita wasn't better is a fact unlike Eddie who said IMO.

The best part and why your *argument* falls apart is because of this quote from you...

"But let’s be reasonable, in multiplatform games the only thing going for it is its portability,"

And that's pretty much his POINT of his opinion on why he thinks this is the best version, because of it's portability. You pretty much confirmed his opinion yourself (which is hilarious) and I suspect this is why most of us here are scratching our heads reading your meltdowns and wondering what exactly is your point in all this?

"it’s inferior in almost every other aspect."

Inferior how? Was the original in 1080p, did the original have gyro operation? Did the original already come with all 5 DLC included?

"But saying that one version is ‘arguably’ the best because it can also be played in portable mode is what my argument is based around."

And again...IT"S HIS OPINION...something that you seem to not understand or grasp or maybe it's both. Especially when you make no compelling selling points yourself on why it isn't.

Genuine-User2434d ago

Some of you are obsessively invested in your assumptions about what I said and meant. I can’t be asked anymore; believe whatever you want.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 2434d ago
Sm00thNinja2435d ago

Graphics do not count lmao!!!?

Genuine-User2434d ago (Edited 2434d ago )

@81BX
Sure, but you’d be wrong in your assessment.

@Istolla, Nebaku, constantine-man, deafdani, Neonridr, gangsta_red and Uken12

It seems to me that all of you have left your brains outside of this thread.
Don’t fret, I’ll simplify the argument 🙂

EddieNX said:
“Arguably the best version imo due to the portability.”

I said:
That's not a reasonable point. How are you going to argue your opinion to a traditional console gamer? I didn’t receive a reply.

I said:
Portability does not automatically make your gaming experience any better or worse. I didn’t receive a reply.

I said:
Why don’t graphics matter all of a sudden? I didn’t receive a reply.

The replies that I did get were so out of mark, I don’t even know why they were aimed at me.

I never once said that portability is not a reasonable selling point or that it isn’t popular around the world. But saying that one version is ‘arguably’ the best because it can also be played in portable mode is what my argument is based around.

Knushwood Butt2435d ago

Doesn't justify the asking price.

michellelynn09762435d ago

I can see that, but I think it depends on who you ask. For some people, it does justify, but for some, it does not.

wonderfulmonkeyman2435d ago

So all of that for about $50.
I'll keep an eye out on it.

Concertoine2435d ago

All of that for a game from 2011

R00bot2435d ago

Updated with better graphics, new features, on a new console which allows it to be played anywhere. Sounds like a great deal if you've never played it before.

The 10th Rider2435d ago

TBH I wouldn't be too bothered if the Switch got a bunch of old third party ports. (Granted if that's ALL it got I'd have a problem with it.) On regular consoles I don't particularly mind it, but old ports are not at all attractive to me because many of those games are on Steam and can be picked up for dirt cheap and played at higher settings already. With the Switch it's the first time many of those games would be playable on a handheld device. It'd honestly be kind of cool if it (digitally) got some of the PS2/GC/Xbox and PS3/Xbox360 games that are on Steam. I'd hardly pick all of them up, but there's certainly some that I'd love to play.

sk8ofmnd2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

Exactly, how does nintendo or the devs expect a game from 2011 with a new game sticker price, to be a success and thrive on the switch. Yeah im sure some people will buy this but most already have or will be so turned off by the price they would skip it all together. I personally would wait a few months... If this, doom, or wolfenstein dont sell well they will all see slashed prices... Unlike ninty 1st partys.

This game should be 29.99 at most... Just give it a few months

The 10th Rider2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

@sk8ofmnd,

Yeah, I'd greatly prefer that any PS3/360 era games or earlier got released on the eShop or something for $20 with little to no improvements. The appeal of the games coming over has little to do with the added features and everything to do with the game being available on a handheld. The features are nice, but not $50 USD nice. Hopefully the price drops quickly.

I feel like a lot of devs don't expect their re released games to sell particularly well at those high prices, but they just price it high because die-hard fans will pay it and then others will pick it up when the price goes down to what it should be. It's basically a way to wring more money out of people that are either huge fans or don't know any better before dropping the price for general audiences.

Neonridr2435d ago

@sk8ofmnd - this game is also releasing on the XB1 and PS4 as well though.. so it's not like it's just Rockstar taking advantage of the Nintendo crowd. The Switch version will look and play identical to the base PS4 and XB1 versions with some added fluff to at least help set it apart.

wonderfulmonkeyman2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

So don't buy it, then.
I mean, you NEVER buy ANY ports of old games on ANY console, no matter what improvements the ports get for new consoles, right?
This couldn't POSSIBLY be you just coming in here to downplay the Switch version, right?
RIGHT?!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2435d ago
_-EDMIX-_2435d ago

I think it should be far cheaper than $50 we're talking about a game that released in 2011.

This is the same crap that Capcom was trying to pull off with Street Fighter 2 smh.

Uken122435d ago

um no. SF 2 has had like 50 rereleases. For a premium price every time. Nothing like Capcom dude.

Rockstar is doing this because the game never sold well to begin with. They are hoping to make some extra cash off of a failed game. And they decided that why not try it with the Switch also.

I think $40 would be a fair price. Not $50 though.

Concertoine2434d ago

Lol you know me monkeyman. Im not just here to bash the switch.

I do buy re-releases - just not for 50 dollars.

Neonridr2435d ago

Nice to see it's a feature comparable version and aside from handheld mode obviously being rendered at only 720p, it's still the same game with all the same content from the others. I hope this sells well enough so Rockstar look at porting some other titles over (or consider new titles).

meganick2435d ago

There's a good chance that's coming. There are probably a lot of people who would buy GTAV on Switch for portability.

2435d ago Replies(2)
michellelynn09762435d ago

That is good. Proving the Switch can run full-HD games. I am getting it and you can bet your bottom dollar GTA 5 will come to the Switch.

MrFisher212435d ago

Sucks it even has to prove this in 2017

Nebaku2435d ago

Sucks that a 300 dollar tablet has to prove it can play some of the most demanding game experiences in full, or near HD? Mkay.

Erik73572435d ago

No it doesn't, it has to prove it to the retards who thinks its underpowered?

bluefox7552435d ago

You realize this game was released over 6 years ago, right?

michellelynn09762435d ago

So? Oh really, back in 2011? I did not know that, of course I did. Just hating to be hating, get over it. The Switch is a really powerful portable-home console. I love it and I play my games on it.

Erik73572435d ago

And its getting released on ps4/xbox one as well with switch being the only portable handheld to play and run it?

bluefox7552435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

Lol, no reason to get so defensive. I don't hate any piece of hardware, that would be irrational and silly. It's just a game, lol. I'm just saying, if you think it's impressive to port a 6 year old game today, then set those standards higher!

michellelynn09762435d ago

Yeah, because you act like I did not know. It does not matter, the game is running at 1080, which is good, but I can live with 720. Also, the graphics have been upgraded, for all machines.

_-EDMIX-_2435d ago

These people's Jaws must have touched the ground when they saw Metal Gear Solid 1 Final Fantasy 9 Resident Evil 2 and a whole bunch of PlayStation 1 games playable on the PSP 😂😂😂

Sm00thNinja2435d ago

All you have is a Switch though Michelle so you have to admit you're a bit biased

michellelynn09762435d ago

No, because I am not stupid, the Switch does not have the power of the PS4 or X-Box One. That being said, some on here act like the Switch is the Wii U, and it is 3x more powerful than that machine. The Switch has the games I like, but don't think I do not like the other two, well the X-Box One is eh to me. I do not see many games I want to play on it. The PS 4 has a few like Blood Borne and Horizon Zero Dawn. You can own a machine and still admit flaws, but the power is not one of them. Storage is. I do wish the Switch had a bigger internal storage. Sigh

michellelynn09762435d ago

I do not like GTA, even if it was to come to the Switch, I would not get it. I would be happy for the people who want it, but even if it was a near perfect port, I am just not into GTA. Never have been, now I did like LA Noire, that is why I am gonna get it for the Switch. I like Skyrim, and Doom. Just putting it on the Switch is not gonna make me buy it.

Sm00thNinja2435d ago (Edited 2435d ago )

I feel ya but there's pros and cons to getting it on other consoles. I'll probably pick it up on Xbox just because I had the 1st one on Xbox.

Imo I don't want to play certain games on the Go. Certain games require my full immersive attention. Amazing visuals are part of the experience. A great setup, surround sound, 4k tv. Nothing beats it. I love taking certain games on the Go. Zelda, Mario Kart, etc. But I'm not taking Destiny 2 on the drive to work.

TallonIV2434d ago

I can def see GTA coming to Switch in the near future, whether it's GTAV or a collection of the older games I'm not sure.

UKRsoldja2434d ago (Edited 2434d ago )

I don't know where you got you info from, but the Switch is NOT 3x the power of the WiiU. It's roughly 30% more powerful. 450 gigaflops (docked) vs around 350 (WiiU). The Xbox One (1.3 teraflops) is roughly 3.2 times the power of the WiiU and 2.8 times the power of the Switch.

Just an fyi, the Switch is also around 170 gigaflops in portable mode, or roughly 8 times less than the X1.

Akarogg 2434d ago

You're forgetting that the Switch have twice the amount of RAM

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2434d ago
Show all comments (70)
150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies2d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX2d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody2d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

Cacabunga2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_2d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga2d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie1d 4h ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly2d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga2d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit2d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_2d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21832d ago (Edited 2d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies2d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (30)
60°

CRKD and Limited Run Games Team Up for Special Edition Tomb Raider Controllers

CRKD, and Limited Run Games announced a special Tomb Raider edition of CRKD's popular NEO S, and Nitro Deck+ controller. - IS

Read Full Story >>
infinitestart.com
80°

The MSI Claw Gaming Handheld Sees Another Game Performance Boost Through New BIOS and MSI Center M

MSI is proud to announce that its gaming handheld, Claw, has achieved a significant performance increase of up to 30% through a new BIOS and MSI Center M update. Furthermore, the new BIOS and MSI Center M enable Claw to smoothly play all of the top 100 po

purple1013d ago (Edited 3d ago )

is this the one with the switch2 chip inside.?

this is Intels first try at the format

probs not though, as it's $799. so not good for switch actually

Huey_My_D_Long3d ago

Well thats nice considering Ive heard it consistently performs worse when it really shouldn't.

Now if only Lenovo would do the same for the legion go