250°

Crytek Shanghai Reportedly Closed Following Failure to Pay Rent and Salaries

Crytek’s financial woes hardly surprise us anymore but it continues to pop up in the news every now and then for questionable management practices. The studio’s latest victims are its Shanghai-based employees, who’ve reportedly been unpaid since September 2016.

Read Full Story >>
playstationlifestyle.net
2602d ago
windblowsagain2602d ago

Unpaid, that just isn't on.

Crytek failed to understand so many things.

A shooter needs more then some fancy graphics and physics. The MP has to be the most solid of all now. They squandered it with Crysis. Although SP it was decent in many places.

Ryse was good, but was never going to be a massive seller. Those types of games never are. 1.4million sold. A second Ryse would be a waste of time.

For the engine they have. An action RPG would have been the right way to go.

Hopefully they can salvage something from it.

EatCrow2602d ago

Ryse still is one of the better games this gen since launch.
I like roman gladiator settings tho.

I believe MS tried to buy Ryse IP afterwards. Hopefully they do before Crytek goes completely under.

indyman77772601d ago

Hopefully they do so AFTER it goes completely under. Because THEN is when they will get the best price. But you may STILL be right because if they pay more for it they will be under pressure to do something with it and to justify spending a lot.

I hope all the FULLS that came on here and DEFENDED Crytek and their slezy executive who called his employees impatient because QUOTE: "it has ONLY been six months since they got paid". How many people can go two weeks without getting paid? There is always sellouts because they liked the game.

krypt19832602d ago

Ryse was a great game the story was solid gameplay and combat was solid, i look at ryse how i did the first arkham batman game, combat was stale because the set of moves was limited but it was a great framework for a franchise. Ryse 2 could of been amazing is they addressed then issues it could have been microsofts god of war. The crysis franchise was amazing the only multiplayer that sucked was 3 and it really didn't even suck you just don't split your multiplayer base when the audience for the game isn't that hugh. I honestly don't know where crytek went wrong they use to be a great company maybe they expanded too much too fast?

Godmars2902602d ago

Pity then that when Crytek came onto the scene graphics were the only thing that mattered.

2602d ago
dkp232601d ago

Sjould of sold ryse ip to ms.

LexHazard792601d ago

You crazy.. Ryse 2 needs to happen por favor.

mark_parch2601d ago

I recently downloaded ryse as it was free with gwg. the game is amazing, super fun gameplay, great story, amazing graphics and a surprisingly good multiplayer. I really really hope there's a sequel. the critics scores really hurt the game. if they had released a demo at launch I think it would have done much better. I think it's criminal how some critics scored it lower than 7.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2601d ago
conanlifts2602d ago

Someone really needs to buy crytek. It would make sense for ms to do it, but i do not think they will.

Puertorock772602d ago

Why would buying a company that earns little money in games sales makes sense in buying?

Eldyraen2602d ago

Because if crytek had better management and financial decision makers, they wouldn't be in the same position they are now (assumption on my part, but seems likely).

Plus it could give MS multiple new Dev teams at the same time. What they did with them
though is questionable as MS doesn't have the best track record with some of their pick ups/partners (Lionhead/Scalebound being some of the more recent high profile ones).

_-EDMIX-_2602d ago

@Puertor- To flip the IP or to use the studio to create an FPS of an IP they own, ie Nintendo could use them for their own IPs, Metroid or even a new IP.

Think Smash Brothers, means Team Fortress 2, FPS game that has a bunch of Nintendo characters and classes, DK as a Heavy, Samus as assault class, Kid Icarus as Recon and Sniping, Peach as health etc

Don't think of a team as simply an IP, think of a team as a core group of developers that can create a game, doesn't need to be a game that "earns little money" as you are talking about a IP that failed, NOT about a team in general. Yes, their games as of late have sold poorly, well their team direction as been bad, doesn't mean the team is bad or that the team can't produce quality.

We've seen many teams in gaming go from "meh" to OMG very quickly.

Who knows what a great publisher can do with Crytek.

TheUndertaker852602d ago

Because the company is capable of producing games and has gaming products on the market proving their employees did something even with Crytek giving them this treatment. Further those same employees may be able to produce better results with a different engine and company.

Puertorock772602d ago

@_-EDMIX-_

And who's that great publisher? Microsoft? If that was the case what happened with Platinum Games with Scalebound. It doesn't make sense for any company to buy Crytek when the core developers that make up the studio don't develop games that are sell. I can see maybe buying a few talent here and there to build a new studio but to buy them as a whole is a waste.

They're known for graphics but as you can see it didn't help them in the long run. Crytek don't really make appealing games to the masses. Buying them would be a money pit.

TheUndertaker852601d ago

What you're comparing though just doesn't work. Under Crytek Cryengine is king but frankly Cryengine doesn't cut it. It's why they use it the way they do.
https://www.cryengine.com

The team seems to be competent with what they're using. Imagine what they could possibly do with a different, better engine. Crytek as a company can be swallowed.

indyman77772601d ago

Good question. I have a reason. Crytek has a GRAPHICS reputation. Microsoft is trying to make a comeback with a new machine that is good in......GRAPHICS. They have MARKETING that money can't buy built into their name that says cutting edge graphics.

I have a second reaons. Imagine HALO in Crytek graphics on Scorpio, or even Forza or a new IP many people have been calling for new IP's from Microsoft.

I have a third reason.
Look at Sony they have a division that helps many other internal divisions with graphics on games and it helps a LOT. Microsoft can do the same with Crytek.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2601d ago
_-EDMIX-_2602d ago

https://www.rockpapershotgu...

Maybe Sega, I mean they already bought one of their studios.

2602d ago
conanlifts2601d ago (Edited 2601d ago )

That's possible. MS need more ips and a way to expand the number of games produced, which is why i mentioned them. But i do not think it likely that hey will buy them out. Sega are the most likely if it happens.

_-EDMIX-_2601d ago

@sd11- Agreed. MS can use them for a AAA FPS, they can use them for Halo and let 343 do something else new, they can use them for Ryse etc. That team would be a smart buy, I don't know how much of the Crytek folk in Shanghai did on those IPs though, just a thought.

Sega could buy them based on already buying up one of their teams, who knows. Hope someone helps the out as I can see MS, Sega or even Nintendo needing a great FPS developer for future projects

SaveFerris2602d ago

I hope the employees manage to find new jobs, but can they sue for the unpaid salaries?

EatCrow2602d ago

This seems to be common in the industry...Bit of a shame.

2602d ago
Show all comments (47)
100°

Every PlayStation Studios game available now on Windows PC

Windows Central writes: "Many PlayStation Studios games that are ported to PC get dedicated PS5 DualSense support, which allows users to experience haptic feedback and adaptive trigger support without actually having to own a PS5.

According to Hermen Hulst, head of PlayStation Studios, it's still the company's intent to launch the bigger single-player games on PS5 first, before later bringing the games to PC. This might not be the case for multiplayer games however, which are considered okay to launch simultaneously on console and PC."

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
ocelot072d ago

My guess is after god of war. Probably last of us 2 that's a almost 4 year old game now and by the time it's released on pc it will be more than 4 years old or close to 5.

Elda2d ago

Every old Playstation game that is now on PC.

shinoff21832d ago

Right. I definitely see what a headlined from a website named windows central was trying to do though. It's cute little wordplay to help out the green box

Flewid6381d 22h ago

Are PlayStation games no longer good or worth playing once they are old?

Elda1d 22h ago

I'm guessing my comment went over your head.

XiNatsuDragnel2d ago

Good at least they can sell hardware

220°

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie

Former Activision studio Toys for Bob partners with Xbox to publish its first game as an indie. This is something of a homecoming, as Microsoft owns Activision.

Read Full Story >>
engadget.com
Obscure_Observer3d ago

Very very early in development. Still, fantastic news!

Let´s GO!!!

Lightning773d ago

I guess.

How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )

At least it wouldn't be MS of all ppl destroying them.

MS really should let go Tango go like they did TFB here.

darthv722d ago (Edited 2d ago )

one was under Bethesda (Tango) the other under Activision (TFB). Clearly each one handled the separations of their subordinates differently.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"How come they didnt either let them go or sell Tango and others to another publisher? Not saying Ubisoft, EA would be any better. (Capcome would of treated them right )"

Perhaps because Zenimax and ABK handles such matters differently based on their own internal policies as "independent" publishers.

Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future. Which could also be the reason why they ensured an exclusive partnership with TFB and its new game, before anyone else.

Sad and disgusting. But it is what it is.

Lightning772d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"Whoever, chances are it´s simply because MS didn´t wanted Tango or Austin to be acquired by competitors and develop new bangers for them, giving MS a bad rep in a possible future."

MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB.

It's inexcusable, they have options on how to handle studios they don't want anymore with killing jobs. Not just MS but the rest of the industry also.

Sad and disgusting sure how many will get shut down next year or this year even?

I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another.

Obscure_Observer2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

"MS has a bad rep now because those studios are no more. I rather them sell the studio continue to make multiplatform releases, while MS continues to focus on whatever they're doing. If they didn't want Tango around they should separated from them or sell them to, like they did TFB."

Imo, MS separated from TFB because they didn´t had a game associated with Xbox yet, unlike Tango.

"I don't trust MS decisions and motivations at this point. You have to admit they make one dumb move after another."

Fair enough. It was indeed an epic dumb move from them to close Tango.

Still, all to be forgotten, like always have. This is not the first time a big publisher shuts down a beloved and/or successful studio out of nowhere and certainly won´t be the last. Do you remember Lionhead? Do you remember Evolution Studios? Yeah... both were beloved studios and yet, those companies kill those studios in q blink of an eye and got away with it.

anast2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

The studio boss made some money from this transaction. Once the game releases, the studio will get chopped up.

-Foxtrot3d ago

Manages to buy their freedom especially after all the shit Microsoft has been doing with its studios lately

...

Goes right back to them as partners.

Okaaaaaay...

darthv722d ago

Id venture a guess that TFB working directly with MS was a better outcome than working through Activision to get to MS.

VersusDMC2d ago

From the article...

"Toys for Bob spun out as an indie back in February after Microsoft instituted sweeping layoffs that impacted 86 employees, which was more than half of the staff"

I doubt those 86 employees enjoyed the Microsoft experience over Activisions.

Inverno2d ago

MS shuts down studios because of lack of resources and then helps these guys by giving em resources. Also MS is what forced them to buy their freedom in the first place? What kind of logic 😂

Chevalier2d ago

The best thing is that the company that is worth $3 trillion and owns the company instead of Xbox lacks resources. How the hell does a company worth $3 trillion making a measly $70 billion purchase they 'can't' support. Lol

BlindMango2d ago

The reason they would need to "partner with Microsoft" is simply to make a game that's part of a franchise that Microsoft owns. Meaning they're probably going to make a new Spyro game - they're still an independent studio, but are making a game in a franchise that Microsoft owns. It's kind of like Remedy partnering with Rockstar to be able to make the Max Payne remakes.

shinoff21832d ago

It was probably the deal to get released from Ms

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Xbox’s gaming division seems to still function as 3 semi-autonomous sub-divisions, Xbox Studios, Bethesda and ABK. The three main sub-divisions can seemingly shut down or build studios and set up partnerships independently. This would explain why Bethesda can recently shutdown studios, while ABK spins off one studio, while building a new one. Plus, Toys for Bob could be spun off by ABK, only to immediately re-partner with Microsoft.

Chevalier2d ago

That's absolutely 💯 BS. Any sane 'autonomous' company would NOT put their games on Gamepass day 1 like COD will lose probably billions.

Also they're all under Xbox game studios so any autonomy is an illusion.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago

No, I'm sure MS can and does step in when they want something done specifically but I'm also sure they let them also work independently

shinoff21832d ago

I highly highly doubt this. Ms controls all. The guys aren't gonna be allowed to just shut something down like that without approval. No way

Elda2d ago

Either a kiddie game or something uninteresting.

Obscure_Observer2d ago

Don´t worry. You won´t be playing it anyway since their next game will possible be a next gen Xbox console game.

Elda2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Don't worry about my comments.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago

Right probably something like astrobot

romulus232d ago

Nah he said "uninteresting", lots of people are interested in Astro Bot.

Elda2d ago

Never Astro Bot. Astro Bot looks better than any exclusive released on XB this entire generation & believe there hasn't been much.

Asplundh2d ago

Crash 4 was good, so I'm hopeful.

PhillyDonJawn2d ago

Hey you said that about SOT and looks like many ppl on PS is playing it. You also found bugsnax interesting ffs your opinion hold no weight lol.

Elda2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Bugsnax is BS, tried it & quickly deleted it. It's a game that fits right on Gamepass. PS5 owners that are probably playing the boring SOT you could count on one hand. LMAO!!...don't try to come for me.

PhillyDonJawn1d 22h ago

So you admit bugsnax interested you enough to try? 😂 someone gotta call you out on the foolishness.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 22h ago
Show all comments (35)
130°

What Happens to Your Steam Account When You Die?

The Outerhaven writes: While Steam has come out recently, stating that Steam accounts can't be transferred, we need to think about it since we all will eventually kick the bucket. But if Valve is denying transferring accounts, what can be done? Plenty, actually.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
thorstein4d ago

It goes to my kids because I gave them the passwords.

To Steam: Missio has a song that conveys my feelings about you stealing my purchase after I die. It's called "Middle Fingers"

shinoff21833d ago

Pretty much. My son knows my info.

Abear213d ago

Yeah worrying about digital ownership when you’re on the other side of the grass seems a little strange, but also on brand for these millennial journalists to worry about.

qalpha2d ago

I'm sure Keith will be happy to hear he's a millennial journalist.

Goodguy013d ago

I suppose if I have kids, I'd just give em my account details by retirement age. If I die young then...idk lol.

CrimsonWing693d ago

Yea, I mean just give someone the password to your account. Is that difficult to do or something? Like, I’m legit asking because I don’t know.

anast3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

It's not difficult but It's against the policy. If they find out, they will lock the account permanently.

CrimsonWing693d ago

Ah ok, I had a feeling there was something like that. It seems kind of weird that you can’t just hand your account over to a family member or friend and let them take over the account.

Show all comments (16)