380°

AMD Ryzen may be disappointing to Gamers

AMD may never be able to catch up with Intel. With the reviews of the Ryzen processors being absolutely disappointing.

Bigpappy2643d ago

The game engines and windows can be patched. During the bench marks for DX12 AMD was crushing NVidia. Now NVidia has updated there drivers and flipped those bench marks. I don't know that this will happen for Ryzen, but it could.

freshslicepizza2643d ago

the bios on the motherboards need updating and they cannot accept the higher frequency of the ram just yet. kaby lake has the higher clock rates which means the 7700k is still the card to beat for gaming but ryzen offers better value for overall performance if you care more than just gaming.

Cobra9512642d ago

The CPU to beat, you mean. I agree.

addictgamer2642d ago (Edited 2642d ago )

The Ryzen processors are showing some great results for productivity and video editing suites but, unfortunately, even the 1800x is being outperformed by intel's i5 7600k in the majority of gaming benchmarks and the i5 is half the price and is running without an overclock. If you are a gamer, I would still stick with Intel.

bmf73642642d ago

...We are talking about Central Processing Units, CPU's. Not Graphic Processing Units. The issue with Ryzen is motherboard BIOS bugs SUCH as RAM frequency limits and the 4.2 Ghz 'overclock limit' along with stability issues and the 1080p throttling that reviewers have been hammering AMD with questions about, and AMD defending the issue by saying that people with R7's arent going to be using it for 1080p gaming.

The issue is people have yet to see what Ryzen really is for gaming. The R7 lineup is meant for multitasking and content creation, which it clearly beats Intel's i7 lineup like how AMD has been showing it being capable of. The R5 and R3 is what's going to really stomp on Intel's monopolized market if AMD and motherboard manufacturers can sort out their BIOS issues by the time the R5 lineup releases.

Criti-Choco2641d ago

@bmf7364 The issues that concern gamers isnt RAM frequencies or overclocking, its the actual single core performance that AMD always tends to skimp out on.

I dont know why the reviewer call this a disappointing CPU because its actually a promising endeavor and good pricing for some decent 8 core cpus. AMD is and always will be the budget PC build option, but regardless how people see intel as a company, they make their CPUs extremely solid. I was hoping for a reason to buy into AMD this gen but I guess I will stay intel for another few generations.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2641d ago
MRMagoo1232642d ago

dx12 has been a huge disappointment, I haven't seen one game run better with dx12 compared to 11 yet , I even think totalbiscuit has seen the same thing. Matter of fact is most games using dx12 and 11 run far worse with dx12.

C4rnos2642d ago

DOOM is a prime example of why Vulkan is ridiculously good, DX12 seems to stumble and has a lot of issues with many games, surely Ryzen would do best with Vulkan instead of DX12? If i'm right in thinking DX12 (OpenGL) and Vulkan are competing API's, if Vulkan uses DX12 then it has been shown a success with DOOM surely?.

Cobra9512642d ago (Edited 2642d ago )

It was doing fine in Rise of the Tomb Raider, then it started crashing. Reverting to DX11 fixed it. Yeah, MS & partners absolutely need to iron that out.

@C4rnos: Wait up. I do believe Vulkan is on the OpenGL side of things, not DX. I have no experience with it, so I can't say for sure off the cuff here. I may read up on that.

I think you're mixed up. OpenGL and DX are the perennial competing APIs. Vulkan I think is the heir apparent to OGL. I will read more on this. It bugs me not to know the best answer here.

Edit 2: "The Vulkan API was initially referred to as the 'next generation OpenGL initiative,' or 'OpenGL next' by Khronos, but use of those names was discontinued once the Vulkan name was announced. Vulkan is derived from and built upon components of AMD's Mantle API, which was donated by AMD to Khronos with the intent of giving Khronos a foundation on which to begin developing a low-level API that they could standardize across the industry, much like OpenGL."

Yeah. Vulkan is separate from DX, and meant as a sort of next-level OGL, though it's really its own API path, not a replacement for OGL. So there you have it.

JunMei2642d ago

The problem with Directx 12 is just that games haven't actually been built for the ground up for Directx 12. Even Quantum Break was based on Directx 11.

bmf73642642d ago

The issue is that AMD is the primary go-to for DX12 optimization since Nvidia Gameworks hasn't updated with DX12 tools until this year's GDC. That's an issue because Nvidia holds over 70% of the GPU market with the GTX 970(already being seen as abandon-ware by the public because of the RAM partition controversy) being the most popular at 6% of Steam users according to Steam Hardware statistics and Pascal's 10-series GPU's took the whole market GPU by storm.

However, DX12 is a new API and devs are still learning to optimize for it. Games like Rise of the Tomb Raider and Ashes of the Singularity show that with good optimization, DX12 is worth its hype. DX12 benefits from multicore processing as the API tries to level out the workload between cores, and properly-optimized graphics architectures(like AMD's GCN) helps to exaggerate performance.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2642d ago
Bolts2642d ago

DX 12 gaming doesn't really exist. Even in 2017 virtually all of the games coming out this year are DX 11 with DX 12 "support".

Princess_Pilfer2642d ago

No, they haven't. AMD still performs better in numerous DX12 games. It's specifically the hairworks games that AMD struggles with, because like all Nvidia stuff it's intentionally built to **** up AMD hardare, which you can easily see by turning Hariworks off and suddenly the cards have very similar performance.

Bigpappy2642d ago

Okay that's for that info. I thought the 1080's were the new DX12 performance leaders, but I will be sure to review to benchmarks.

Princess_Pilfer2638d ago

1080s are performance leaders in every in everything, because they're 1080s. You have to compare comporable cards. 1060s, on the other hand, perform very similarly to 480s. To my knowledge the DX12 games where 480s don't perform the same or slightly better are games like Tomb Raider, with hairworks, and they perform very similarly if you turn it off.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2638d ago
Ashlen2642d ago (Edited 2642d ago )

I think a lot of the testing so far is rather misleading. Ryzen is an incredibly powerful CPU and in tests that are designed to take advantage of high core and threads you see it doing very well. Mostly outperforming Intel and definitely outperforming Intel in operations per dollar.

But when it comes to gaming the software itself is based around a four core system and isn't taking advantage of Ryzens extra cores and threads. I was watching someone benchmark games and game after game the Ryzen was only using 25-35% of the cores/threads power. When gaming software catches up and takes advantage of higher core/thread counts Ryzen will shine.

This happened at the start of multi core computing where single core processors that were able to run at higher frequencies at first outperformed dual core processors. That was until the gaming companies really started pushing threading. And well the rest is history. Now you can't even buy a single core processor. Ryzen is ahead of the curve and a great value option.

For me getting 10% higher FPS doesn't outweigh the multitasking ability of Ryzen. If you stream games (or do video editing to upload to YouTube) I can guarantee Ryzen will be able to stream (capture) and play better than a 4 core 7700k. Or for me, I often play a game on one monitor and watch a movie or a stream on another monitor Ryzen is much better for that.

2642d ago
Vasto2642d ago

I watched Linus Tech Tips review and they looked really good.

Cobra9512642d ago (Edited 2642d ago )

Same here. The killer is how the Ryzen tiers compare well to Intel CPUs costing up to double. That has to have Intel scrambling for better performance per dollar--and that's a very good thing, for us.

Cueil2642d ago

this is a processor that will be good for them... they can literally save thousands on builds for streaming and other video works.

peewee110162642d ago

A Lot of people dont understand that. Drivers... Bios and other updates need to come out for these CPUs. I seen lot of people shit talking these but yet they still pack a punch even if not fully up to par. But cost 1/2 of what Intel is selling. people would be saying this 1 or 2 years later when Zen is a monster and at its peak

Destiny10802642d ago

the consoles will keep amd alive for as long as it takes for them to beat intel

Show all comments (39)
280°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow17h ago(Edited 17h ago)

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff218315h ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan13h ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga12h ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--14h ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC14h ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--11h ago(Edited 11h ago)

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

porkChop10h ago

It's for the whole generation, so it would likely be including PC. They also make much more profit on digital sales vs retail, and digital is far more prominent these days. The generation also started at the height of COVID when everyone was home, spending far more money on gaming/hobbies. It makes a lot of sense for this gen to be more profitable.

Abnor_Mal16h ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman15h ago(Edited 15h ago)

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto14h ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda14h ago(Edited 14h ago)

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman14h ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

repsahj15h ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

sagapo15h ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (42)
80°

Zotac To Reveal Their Portable Gaming PC At COMPUTEX 2024

This sounds like a very interesting mobile gaming PC. ZOTAC returns to COMPUTEX 2024 to showcase its biggest push yet into brand-new product categories from Handheld Gaming.

smashman9820h ago

My last 2 gpus have both been zotac. No issues. I'm interested.

Garethvk18h ago

It will be interesting to see what they have to offer

310°

PlayStation VR2 Official PC Adapter by Sony Is Being Certified

An official PlayStation VR2 adapter for PC made by Sony is being certified. It won't be long before the VR headset is officially compatible.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
Profchaos1d 7h ago

one step closer to unlocking the headsets full power.

I'm extremely underwhelmed with how Sony has treated it's psvr2 customers seriously Nintendo treated it's Wii U owners of which the sales were probably equal in the headsets 2bd year v the consoles far better.

This is the least they could do

ravens521d 5h ago

I agree. I'm a day 1 consumer too. 😢 For my day 1 Vita. I do not like when Sony does that crap.

DarXyde12h ago

I still don't have PSVR2, but this was always my concern. I almost pulled the trigger for RE4, but I waited it out to see what changed. As it happens, not much.

I love my Vita. Great piece of hardware. It didn't shine the way we know it could have, but it'll still got amazing titles.

PC support is very much a step in the right direction. Even if some PC only titles can make use of the headset, it does increase PSVR adoption: it's a great piece of hardware and it's also the best in its price bracket, so I see a way forward for uptake. Who knows? Maybe that'll allow VR devs to feel more comfortable releasing on PS5.

1d 5h ago Replies(2)
BlackOni1d 3h ago

Agreed, but to your point, those dollars went a lot further back then than they do now. This should have been a consideration from the beginning.

Imagine buying a monitor or tv that could only work with one device. That's basically what this equates to, so they left a LOT of money on the table by not making it PC compatible from the getgo. But to Sony's credit, even they were unaware of how popular their games would be once released on PC.

poppatron13h ago

No credit to Sony on this one I’m afraid, first party and generally Sony support for psvr2 really hasn’t been great

BlackOni4h ago

@poppatron yes, I wasn't implying the PSVR2 games became popular or well supported, only that Sony was considering the PC market an afterthought. I imagine more people will want to buy this when it works with PC. I know I will, as I play on both.

Babadook71d ago

I doubt there will be foveated rendering implemented on PC. PSVR2 is already a better experience than PCVR. PS5 Pro will unlock the full power.

Profchaos6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Probably not but not all psvr2 games use fov many are just straight ports from quest systems which barely take advantage the headsets capabilities.

Still I'd rather have more options and games to play on this than a tiny LIbrary

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4h ago
Sonic18811d 7h ago

It was just a matter of time

Neonridr1d 6h ago

so now Sony is going to sell me an adapter I have to buy so I can use the headset on my PC? Gee, how generous of you :P

While it's great that I will be able to use this headset instead of my Index or Q3 for PC only VR titles, it's still a sad realization that Sony is sorta waiving the white flag here. Here's hoping they at least make some of their PSVR2 exclusive content available on PC as well now.

ocelot071d 5h ago

I don't see it as waving the white flag. PSVR the first one even though modders did get it working on pc it was a awful experience.

PSVR2 one of the best VR headsets available. Requires just one usb c cable. Even though I truly believe exclusives are what sell consoles. When it comes to VR it's very nich among gamers. I'm ecstatic that soon I can imo use the best VR headset on both ps5 and pc. No need for a pc vr headset. I have said it since PSVR2 was announced that I hope they make it pc compatible. With it being a very expensive headset and pc vr being more popular it just makes sense for Sony to do this.

1d 5h ago
Neonridr1d 4h ago

as opposed to a Quest 3 that requires no cables, or a single cable if you want to pair it with your PC right? ;)

While the tech is better in the PSVR2 for the most part (I own an Index, Q3 and PSVR2), I'm still let down by certain things. Headset rumble is a novelty. Eye tracking has only been used well on a couple of titles.

to each their own I guess, but to me this doesn't give me confidence that Sony is fully investing in their own hardware, more like they are stepping back to allow others to fill in the gaps.

ocelot071d ago

@Neonridr not owned a quest 3. Did own a quest 1 and 2 both where fairly good. Have used a quest 3 for a limited time and thought it was fine. But comfort wise not as nice as psvr2.

Tried using quest 2 via wireless streaming to my pc and it was so bad I much rather using a single cable and have a solid connection than streaming the game from pc to headset.

1d 5h ago Replies(2)
ocelot071d 5h ago

It's most likely just going to be a usb c to usb 3 adapter. Even for modern era a lot of new cases and motherboards don't have a usb c ports.

The budget but still fairly fairly high end pc I recently helped my friend build. He went with a b550 motherboard. Didn't have a usb c port or a on board socket to connect a pc case with a front panel usb c. Had to get a cheap pcie usb c.

1nsomniac1d 2h ago (Edited 1d 2h ago )

They developed the headset/attached usb c cable so that it wasn’t possible to run through any port other than a designated ps5 port. The adapter allows all the data to be passed correctly to a none designated ps5 port.

ocelot071d 2h ago

Oh right that's annoying.

1d 5h ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (60)